What is a Motion for Contempt (CCP 1209)?

Useful Resources for Motion for an OSC Re: Contempt (CCP 1209)

Recent Rulings on Motion for an OSC Re: Contempt (CCP 1209)

126-150 of 3972 results

IN THE MATTER OF EVA ANNIKA NOWLIN

Set for OSC re Contempt for failure to comply with court order of 7/16/20. Proposed Order to be lodged prior to hearing per Local Rule 10.00.D.1. __________________ The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible. A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF EVA ANNIKA NOWLIN

Set for OSC re Contempt for failure to comply with court order of 7/16/20. Proposed Order to be lodged prior to hearing per Local Rule 10.00.D.1. __________________ The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible. A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols.

  • Hearing

    Oct 28, 2020

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF JOHN ANTHONY KOZUB

Bavaro; Set OSc re Contempt for Failure to Cure Defects. Mandatory appearance by Conservators Catherine Jonas and Korina Kozub Bavaro and Attorney Joseph McHugh. The Clerk shall give notice. __________________ The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible.

  • Hearing

    Oct 27, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

DOE VS. CARL’S JR.-MISSION VIEJO

OSC re: Contempt: Plaintiff’s Motion is labeled a Motion for Order to Show Cause re: Contempt. Since both sides have treated the Motion as a Motion to Compel Attendance under Code Civ. Proc., § 2025.450, the court will construe it in that manner. An OSC re: Contempt would require a different procedure, which would not yield different results. “A contempt proceeding is commenced by the filing of an affidavit and a request for an order to show cause. (§ 1211, subds. (a), (b).) . . .

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

UNITED GRAND CORPORATION VS MALIBU HILLBILLIES LLC ET AL

Sanai refused to pay and in March 2018, the court held a trial and found Sanai guilty of contempt. On June 14, 2018, the court ordered Sanai to pay Staub the sum of $29,531.2. On July 6, 2019, the court ordered Sanai to pay Mr. Staub the sum of $27,562.50. Sanai has not paid the issued sanctions and has an outstanding bench warrant. On September 23, 2020, Mr.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2020

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS

Superior Court (1975) 15 Cal.3d 230, 235 ["Although ... various statutes provide for the appearance of the district attorney in specific civil cases, none covers the circumstances o f t h e present case" to "intervene in "a contempt proceeding stemming from private civil litigation"]; People v.

  • Hearing

    Oct 23, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

(d) The order shall be personally served upon the judgment debtor and shall contain a notice to the judgment debtor that failure to comply with the order may subject the judgment debtor to being held in contempt of court. (CCP § 708.520, bold emphasis and underlining added.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 23, 2020

HTTP://WWW.SCSCOURT.ORG (FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY)

(d) A violation of this section may be punished as a contempt and with sanctions as allowed by Section 128.7. In addition, an order made contrary to this section may be revoked by the judge or commissioner who made it, or vacated by a judge of the court in which the action or proceeding is pending.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

ANN S MENJIVAR VS CHRISTOPHER

HEARING ON OSC RE: CONTEMPT CIVIL RESTRAINING ORDER * TENTATIVE RULING: * Appear in person. ADD-ON

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

OTERO VS. ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC.

They include monetary sanctions, contempt sanctions, issue sanctions ordering that designated facts be taken as established or precluding the offending party from supporting or opposing designated claims or defenses, evidence sanctions prohibiting the offending party from introducing designated matters into evidence, and terminating sanctions that include striking part or all of the pleadings, dismissing part or all of the action, or granting a default judgment against the offending party.” (Juarez v.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

ALLY BANK, A CORPORATION VS JUAN MOYSES RODRIGUEZ

The order must notify the defendant that failure to comply may subject him or her to contempt of court. CCP §512.070. The turnover remedy is not issued in lieu of a writ, but in conjunction with it to provide the plaintiff with a less expensive means of obtaining possession. See Edwards v Superior Court, (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 173, 178. 3.

  • Hearing

    Oct 22, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

MATAMOROS VS ARELLANO, ET AL.

HEARING ON OSC RE: ORDER COMPELLING IMMEDIATE OBEDIENCE W/PRELIM INJ PLTF * TENTATIVE RULING: * The OSC against defendant Arellano for contempt of court is dismissed. Plaintiff contends that defendant violated the preliminary injunction by paving over portions of his property which are near and/or directly above the disputed underground waterline easement.

  • Hearing

    Oct 21, 2020

MARTIN VS SAINI

SPECIAL SET HEARING ON: OSC RE CONTEMPT SET BY PLAINTIFFS * TENTATIVE RULING: * The OSC re contempt is denied without prejudice to plaintiffs refiling to strictly comply with the quasi-criminal procedures of a contempt. The court is not certain plaintiffs appreciate all the requirements. Contempts are quasi-criminal matters and all procedural rules must be strictly complied with. The contempt begins with a supporting declaration that that outlines the specifics of the contempt. CCP 2015.5.

  • Hearing

    Oct 21, 2020

CARL J. GOEDINGHAUS V. JED D. HAZELTINE, ET AL.

Contempt of Court (No. 28) Indirect contempt proceedings are initiated by the filing of an affidavit setting forth the facts constituting the contempt. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1211(a).) If the court is satisfied with the sufficiency of the affidavit, the court will issue an order to show cause re contempt which, along with the affidavit, must be personally served. (Cedars-Sinai Imaging Medical Group v. Superior Court (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1281, 1286.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 21, 2020

WILLIAM SZYMACZAK V. NATURAL HEALING CENTER, LLC

“Overbroad, vague or generally phrased injunctions are avoided because contempt will not lie. (Evans v. Evans (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 1157, 1169 [enjoining “defamatory” comments].)” (Weil & Brown, supra, Ch. 9(II)-A, ¶ 9.525.2; see also ReadyLink Healthcare v. Cotton (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 1006, 1023 [injunctions as to acts not subject to objective verification are looked on with suspicion].) Here, Plaintiffs’ requests for alternative relief are unclear to the Court.

  • Hearing

    Oct 21, 2020

BUTCH TRUST VS MERRILL LYNCH FENNER & SMITH

III. 3rd cause of action for contempt—SUSTAIN WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND Contempt is not a cause of action but a separate, quasi-criminal proceeding initiated by filing an affidavit of contempt per CCP §1211(a) in the main action or proceeding. See CCP §1211(a); People v. Gonazalez (1996) 12 Cal.4th 804, 816-817. “Although prosecuted under the title of the main action or proceeding, contempt is nevertheless a separate proceeding.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  • Judge

    H. Jay Ford

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

FLAGSHIP CREDIT ACCEPTANCE, LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS THERESA SCOTT

The order must notify the defendant that failure to comply may subject him or her to contempt of court. CCP §512.070. The turnover remedy is not issued in lieu of a writ, but in conjunction with it to provide the plaintiff with a less expensive means of obtaining possession. See Edwards v Superior Court, (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 173, 178. 3.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

BUTCH TRUST VS MERRILL LYNCH FENNER & SMITH

III. 3rd cause of action for contempt—SUSTAIN WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND Contempt is not a cause of action but a separate, quasi-criminal proceeding initiated by filing an affidavit of contempt per CCP §1211(a) in the main action or proceeding. See CCP §1211(a); People v. Gonazalez (1996) 12 Cal.4th 804, 816-817. “Although prosecuted under the title of the main action or proceeding, contempt is nevertheless a separate proceeding.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  • Judge

    H. Jay Ford

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

MYUNG SIK KIM VS BYUNG HA CHANG, ET AL.

.: 20NWCP00021 HEARING: 10/20/20 #8 TENTATIVE ORDER Petitioner Kim’s motion for order to show cause re contempt is DENIED. Opposing Party to give NOTICE. Petitioner Kim’s motion for order to show cause re contempt is procedurally defective. On 7/14/20, Petitioner applied ex parte to shorten time on her motion for order to show cause. Judge Ito set Petitioner’s motion for hearing on 9/15/20. Petitioner failed to thereafter file and serve her motion.

  • Hearing

    Oct 20, 2020

  • Judge

    Lori Ann Fournier or Olivia Rosales

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

DARBY DENTAL VS. HOLLOWAY

Failure by the Judgment Debtor to execute the assignment as ordered by the court may constitute a contempt of court and subject the Judgment Debtor to penalties for contempt pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128(a); and 2.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ANTHONY SMITH VS CF UNITED LLC ET AL.

sanction by an order treating the drafting party as in contempt of court.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2020

  • Judge Jayne Lee
  • County

    San Joaquin County, CA

DESCHENES VS BUREAU D ELECTRONIQUE APPLIQUEE BEA INC

The court may order compliance with a subpoena, and punish failure to comply via contempt. Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1987.1, 1991, 2020.240. B. An unresolved conflict of interest which is made known to the court yet not resolved can have a profound impact on a case. See generally Tsakos Shipping & Trading v. Juniper Garden Townhomes, 12 Cal.App.4th 74, 95-97 (1993) (judgment reversed due to unresolved conflict of interest in trial court). C.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

FAIRMONT RIDING VS. PESTANA

The phrase is a lusty and creative expression of contempt, too loose and figurative to be susceptible of being proved true or false ...”.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY VS DEVONSHIRE SILVER PLAZA L

“A violation of this section may be punished as a contempt and with sanctions as allowed by Section 128.7.” (Code Civ. Proc. § 1008(d).) “[T]he requirements of section 128.7 apply to sanctions under section 1008, subdivision (d).” (Moofly Productions, LLC v. Favila (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 993, 998.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

BISAGNO V. RESOLVE DEFAULT SERVICES

To deter parties from filing noncompliant renewed applications, the Legislature provided that “[a] violation of this section may be punished as a contempt and with sanctions as allowed by Section 128.7.” (§ 1008, subd. (d).) ¶ We have recognized only one exception to section 1008's “jurisdiction[al]” (id., subd. (e)) exclusivity. In Le Francois v.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 159     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.