What is enforcement of settlement agreement?

Useful Rulings on Enforcement of Settlement Agreement

Recent Rulings on Enforcement of Settlement Agreement

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Court recognizes that in the future some Plaintiffs might be able to show imminent threat of irreparable harm, depending on the City’s conduct with respect to their STR permit renewals, Code enforcement, and other changed circumstances. For this reason, the application for preliminary injunction is denied without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Stay of Enforcement of Court’s Judgment The Court is inclined to stay enforcement of its judgment pending appeal. The Court is persuaded that the status quo should be maintained pending appeal so that any different relief granted by the Court of Appeal is not rendered illusory, and to avoid interfering with those parts of the Permit which may have been successfully implemented by some cities affected by the Permit.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

RE: 1ST & FNL ACCT & RPT OF ADMNTR & PET’N FOR SETTLEMENT & FNL DIST

FILED ON 08/19/20 BY JAMES A WALTERS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Declaration addressing creditor claim filed by Far Hills MHP on 8-2-19 for $5,000.00. PrC § 10900; CRC § 7.403. 2. Proposed Order JAMES A WALTERS DANIEL T. QUANE, ESQ. RALPH EDWIN WALTERS PROBATE EXAMINER NO...

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

GRDSHP OF SCOTT

Parties entered into a mediated settlement agreement on 1/31/2020. PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Lutricia Randolph, maternal aunt, still needs to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2.

  • Hearing

    Dec 09, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MAX GLEASON VS JOHN DUNGAN ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Motion: Determine; Motion Good Faith Settlement Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

ALLSTATE SETTLEMENT CORPORATION VS J. E.

Tentative Ruling Petitioner Allstate Settlement Corporation’s Petition for Approval of Transfer of Structured Settlement Payment Rights is GRANTED. Background J.E. (“Transferor”) has agreed to sell, and Allstate Settlement Corporation (“Transferee”) has agreed to purchase, Transferor’s rights of structured settlement payments arising in connection with a personal injury claim.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

MARTINEZ VS. SSC NEWPORT BEACH OPERATING CO. LP

Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement is granted, except that the court awards an enhancement to plaintiff Evelia Martinez in the amount of only $5,000. An enhancement award of no more than $5,000 is sufficient and proper for a class and settlement of this size.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

RODRIGUEZ VS. VENUS GROUP, INC.

Plaintiff Joanna Rodriguez’s Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement and Defendant Venus Group, Inc.’s Joinder in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Approval of PAGA Settlement are granted.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

JUAN PALMA ET AL VS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC ET AL

On December 5, 2018, a Notice of Settlement was filed as between Plaintiffs and KFH, SCPMG, KFHPI and Shah. On January 16, 2019, the “Order Re: Application for Determination of Good Faith Settlement” as between Plaintiffs and KFH, SCPMG, KFHPI and Shah was filed. On June 27, 2019, a second Notice of Settlement was filed as between Plaintiffs and Aviation.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

REVELS VS. BOTTLING GROUP, LLC

The court concludes that a reasonable attorney fee in this case is 30% of the gross settlement amount. Counsel’s lodestar fees are only $306,876, the case settled only about a year after it was filed, and class members are receiving an average payment of under $118. A 30% fee still results in a generous multiplier of about 1.47.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

TOROVERDE, INC. VS. ELEMENT 7, INC.

The motion is off calendar based on the Notice of Settlement filed on November 4, 2020. An OSC re Dismissal on Settled Case is set for February 26, 2021 at 1:30 p.m.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

MICHAEL LAWRENCE KLINE VS MICHAEL DIBACCO

. § 362(a), the filing of a bankruptcy petition operates as a stay in actions against the debtor, enforcement of judgment against a debtor, any acts to obtain possession of property, any act to create/perfect/enforce a lien against property of the estate or against the property of the debtor, to collect assets against the debtor, to setoff any debt owing to the debtor, or commencing or continuing a proceeding before the United States Tax Court.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

MOHAWK WESTERN PLASTICS, INC.A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS REVEL ENERGY, LLC., A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.

The burden then shifts to the opposing party to prove by a preponderance of the evidence a defense to enforcement (e.g., fraud, unconscionability, etc.) (Id.) “In these summary proceedings, the trial court sits as a trier of fact, weighing all the affidavits, declarations, and other documentary evidence, as well as oral testimony received at the court’s discretion, to reach a final determination.” (Engalla, supra, 15 Cal.4th at 972.)

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

GATICA VS. BISTANGO-IRVINE

The tentative ruling is to continue the hearing on plaintiff’s Motion to Approve PAGA Settlement to January 29, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. Counsel must file supplemental papers addressing the court’s concerns (not fully revised papers that would have to be re-read) at least 16 days before the next hearing date. Counsel must submit an amendment to the settlement agreement rather than any amended settlement agreement.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

MATTER OF ROY W DANLEY AND ELNORA H DANLEY FAMILY TRUST

Nature of Proceedings: 14th Accounting & Report, Settlement of Exemption Trust; Approval of Fees Absent objection, the Thirteenth Accounting will be approved.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF JULIE DAWN HORNETT

Exhibit B is the Seller's Final Settlement Statement. Please explain all of the items listed under "Additional Charges". The 2015 Red Honda Civic was listed in the property on hand at the beginning of the account period (Exhibit A, page3). Petitioner states it was sold for its carry value and that this is reflected on Schedule F of Exhibit A. Exhibit A does not include a Schedule F. Petitioner includes $18,791.57 and $103.45from CalPERS Long Term Care Program in receipts.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

IN RE CAROL FROELICH BEECHWOOD REVOCABLE TRUST

While Petitioner alleges that there was a settlement, no settlement agreement was presented to or approved by the Court. The record only show's the underlying petition was voluntarily dismissed. Moreover, Petitioner has made no showing that the trustee "recovered" anything under the settlement agreement. Proposed Order to be lodged prior to hearing per Local Rule 10.00.D.1. __________________ As COVID-19 cases continue to rise, we need to be even more vigilant.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

MATTER OF ROY W DANLEY AND ELNORA H DANLEY FAMILY TRUST

Nature of Proceedings: 14th Accounting & Report, Settlement of Exemption Trust; Approval of Fees

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

RE: PET’N FOR RETURN OF TRUST ASSETS, ELDER ABUSE, SURCHARGE

Petition for Approval of Settlement Agreement is set for hearing 12-21-2020. MELLO FAMILY TRUST AS AMENDED MICHAEL MELLO MATTHEW B TALBOT ROBERT MELLO MATTHEW B TALBOT SHIRLEY MAGANA RICHARD HOBIN FILED ON 09/24/19 BY ROBERT M MELLO, MICHAEL A MELLO -- See also Line # 23 -- Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order Notes: 1. Response filed by Shirley Magana 11-19-19. 2. Petition for Approval of Settlement Agreement is set for hearing 12-21-2020.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR PROBATE OF ORIGINAL WILL, LETTERS TEST, IAEA

File a verified declaration providing the name and date of death of decedent’s predeceased spouse DOROTHY M CALHOUN JOAN MARILYN KIMBROUGH FILED ON 08/17/20 BY ANITA AMIRREZVANI PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved Proposed Order Submitted No Appearance Required ANITA AMIRREZVANI LISA WEIMAN HANKS DAVID WALTER ERICKSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances Notice of Conditional Settlement filed 11/2/

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST AMENDED PET’N FOR REMOVAL OF CUSTODIAN, ACCTNG, SURCHG,

Petition for Approval of Settlement Agreement is set for hearing 12-21-2020. MELLO FAMILY TRUST AS AMENDED MICHAEL MELLO MATTHEW B TALBOT ROBERT MELLO MATTHEW B TALBOT SHIRLEY MAGANA RICHARD HOBIN FILED ON 09/24/19 BY ROBERT M MELLO, MICHAEL A MELLO PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE -- See also Line # 23 -- Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed Order Notes: 1. Response filed by Shirley Magana 11-19-19. 2.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS POLLO MEAL, INC.

“In wage and hour collective actions, fellow employees would not be expected to want to conceal their contact information from plaintiffs asserting employment law violations, the state policies in favor of effective enforcement of these laws weigh on the side of disclosure, and any residual privacy concerns can be protected by issuing so-called Belaire-West notices affording notice and an opportunity to opt out from disclosure. [Citations.]” (Id. at 553.)

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

(“CGS”); and Hooman Nissani (“Nissani”) (“Moving Defendants”) RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Lilia Garcia-Brower, in her official capacity as California State Labor Commissioner, Division of Labor Enforcement, Department of Industrial Relations, State of California The Court has considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

OLIVER MBOLO VS DRAGI ILIC, ET AL.

According to Plaintiff, a settlement was reached between the parties as a result of a mandatory settlement conference. Now, Plaintiff, representing himself, seeks rescission of the settlement agreement, arguing that he was forced into entering an amended settlement agreement as a result of duress, fraud, and undue influence. Discussion Plaintiff concedes that he willingly signed an initial settlement agreement.

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

RICHARD PECH VS THOMAS E. MORGAN, III, ET AL.

Considering that you have been ‘ready for trial since June 6th’ (waiting for a long-cause courtroom), why has no information been provided to Capital or Morgan in response to the outstanding requests as part of ‘ongoing August work’ which should ONLY involve settlement work - as you have been advised many weeks ago). This suggestion of continuing litigation fees makes no sense to me.” (Pech Decl., Ex. C.)

  • Hearing

    Dec 03, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.