What is a Condensed Narrative/Settled Statement on Appeal?

Useful Rulings on Condensed Narrative/Settled Statement on Appeal

Recent Rulings on Condensed Narrative/Settled Statement on Appeal

151-175 of 251 results

BALBOA CAPITAL CORPORATION VS. ERIC LADENHEIM MD, INC.

Defendants’ and Cross-Complainant’s Motion to Use a Settled Statement as Part of the Record on Appeal is moot and off calendar by virtue of the court’s signing and filing of the Stipulated Condensed Narrative Statement for Settled Statement on Appeal.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2017

MICHAEL ZIMMERMAN ET AL VS FIERSTADT & MAN LLP ET AL

Second, Defendants contend that Plaintiffs suffered actual injury when the court in the Underlying Action issued its Tentative Decision on May 20, 2015 against Plaintiffs or by July 28, 2015 at the latest when Plaintiffs filed their objections to the court’s Proposed Statement of Decision. (DSS ¶ 35.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 25, 2017

PEOPLE OF CALIF VS. BP WEST CO

ARB’s Objections to Proposed Statement of Decision: 1) The number of violations. ARB argues that the three shipments unloaded over more than one day consisted of a total of 16 compartments. Thus, there should be 32 additional violations, rather than three. This is a new argument that was not made during the Phase 2 trial. It relies on the Phase One testimony of Captain Steven Alexander. He testified that it was “common” to unload more than one tank at a time to keep a ship on an even keel.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2017

NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES OF UPLAND AND POMONA VS HLA M MAUNG,MD

On 10/18/16, the court adopted its proposed Statement of Decision filed 9/30/16 as its Statement of Decision. On 6/7/17, cross-defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings as to the cross-complaint was granted. On 6/8/17, the “Order Granting Cross-Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings to the Cross-Complaint” was filed. On 6/15/17, cross-defendants filed their “Notice of Ruling.” On 8/9/17, the judgment was entered. On 8/15/17, Maung’s objections to the proposed judgment were filed.

  • Hearing

    Oct 05, 2017

MANUEL VEGA JR. VS FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ, JR., ET AL

Proposed Statement of Decision:

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2017

ROBERT E OWENS JR VS OREILLY AUTOMOTIVE STORES INC ET AL

On May 1, 2017, this court issued a Proposed Statement of Decision. On June 19, 2017, this court issued its Final Statement of Decision. In part, the decision noted that with respect to the alleged seating violations, “Pedroza dismissed the fifth cause of action with prejudice.” PRE-FILING HISTORY On January 4, 2017, Pedroza served a Notice of Videotaped Deposition of Defendant CSK Auto, Inc.’s Person(s) Most Qualified to Testify Re: Seating Topics. (Lee Decl. ¶ 8.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 26, 2017

TEMIKA S DIXON VS RANDALL G HUNZIKER

Defendant now moves to use settled statement in lieu of transcript. Plaintiff filed an opposition. As a transcript for the day in question is not available, it is appropriate to use a settled statement for that date. As to the other dates of trial, transcripts are available, so a settled statement for those dates is not appropriate. There is no prejudice to the plaintiff in allowing defendant to use a settled statement for the date of 4/4/17 only.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ANGELA WALLACE VS US BANK N A

.: BC621961 Motion: Motion to Use a Settled Statement Moving Party: Plaintiff Angela Wallace Opposing Party: Unopposed Tentative Ruling: The Motion is denied.

  • Hearing

    Aug 28, 2017

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

LAW OFFICES OF MARLO VAN OORSC VS. DANESHRAD, JOSEPH

Judge Minning issued a proposed statement of decision on March 15, 2017. On March 30, 2017, Daneshrad filed objections to the statement of decision. Judge Minning issued a final statement of decision on April 13, 2017. It devoted a single paragraph to summarily dismissing Daneshrad’s objections and otherwise matched the proposed statement of decision. On July 3, 2017, the Hon. Elaine Lu (Judge Minning having retired) entered a final judgment in the case pursuant to the statement of decision.

  • Hearing

    Aug 23, 2017

  • Judge

    Elaine Lu or Georgina Torres Rizk

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

MICHELLE LEE VS. BJS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Defendants have submitted a proposed order granting the motion, a memorandum of costs, and a proposed Statement of Decision and Judgment (the latter pursuant to the May 25, 2017 Court order). The Court denies this motion without prejudice for failure to provide sufficient information regarding the nature and value of legal services rendered. II. Analysis A. Entitlement to reasonable attorney fees and costs under Civ. Code § 1717 Civ.

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2017

  • Judge

    Steven D. Blades or Brian S. Currey

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ZINA DOLZHENKO ET AL VS LA WEEKLY L P ET AL

MOTION TO USE SETTLED STATEMENT FOR APPEAL FILED ON 08/22/16 MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Zina Dolzhenko in pro per. RESPONDING PARTY(S): No opposition filed. STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS AND/OR PROCEEDINGS: Plaintiff Zina Dolzhenko[1] alleges that Defendants made defamatory statements about Plaintiff which were published in the LA Weekly, L.P. Plaintiff claims that Defendants’ motivation is that she obtained judgments against them.

  • Hearing

    Jun 27, 2017

NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES OF UPLAND AND POMONA VS HLA M MAUNG,MD

On 9/30/16, the court’s proposed Statement of Decision (“SOD”) was filed. (RJN, Exhibit “A”).

  • Hearing

    Jun 07, 2017

LILLI SHOEN VS JULIET ZACARIAS

The Court, having read the parties’ respective trial briefs, heard oral testimony, received and reviewed documentary evidence, taken a site visit to the real property which is the subject of dispute herein, heard argument of counsel, and considered the matter as well as the objections to the proposed statement of decision, hereby issues its Decision of the Court Regarding Bifurcated Trial—Part Two.

  • Hearing

    May 25, 2017

AGUILA VS HUNTER

Plaintiffs' unopposed motion for an order for a settled statement on appeal in lieu of reporter's transcript is granted. California Rules of Court, rule 8.137. The court finds Plaintiffs establish that "[t]he designated oral proceedings were not reported or cannot be transcribed." CRC 8.137(a)(2)(B). Plaintiffs submit a "Proposed Settled Statement in Lieu of Reporter's Transcript" and Defendant Duncan L. Hunter, Sr. submits proposed amendments.

  • Hearing

    Apr 27, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

ZINA DOLZHENKO ET AL VS LA WEEKLY L P ET AL

(a) Motion to use settled statement (1) An appellant intending to proceed under this rule must serve and file in superior court with its notice designating the record on appeal under rule 8.121 a motion to use a settled statement instead of a reporter's transcript or both reporter's and clerk's transcripts.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2017

JOE KLEIN ET AL VS ALBERT MALKA ET AL

A settled statement will provide an adequate record for an appellate court to investigate whether reversible error occurred. (People v. Hawthorne (1992) 4 Cal.4th 43, 66.) Safyari seeks to use a settled statement regarding eight hearings, none of which were reported. (Motion to Use Settled Statement at pp. 1–2.)

  • Hearing

    Apr 19, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES OF UPLAND AND POMONA VS HLA M MAUNG,MD

On 10/18/16, the court adopted its proposed Statement of Decision filed 9/30/16 as its Statement of Decision. The Final Status Conference on the remaining issues is set for 8/9/17. A jury trial is set for 8/22/17. Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Nephrology Associates of Upland and Pomona now moves for judgment on the pleadings as to Defendant/Cross-Complainant Hla Myant Maung Hwang, M.D.'

  • Hearing

    Apr 17, 2017

4G WIRELESS, INC. VS. GHOREISHI

Also, the court reduced several claimed attorney hours to reasonable attorney hours including: reduction from 31.5 to 20 reasonable attorney hours for preparation of the Joint Witness List, the Joint Exhibit List, trial subpoenas, and comprehensive trial brief, and the 69.0 claimed attorney hours to 40.0 reasonable attorney hours to negotiate, draft and prepare the Agreed Statement of Facts, the Amended and Corrected Joint Statement of Agreed Facts, and plaintiff’s Initial Settled Statement Brief.

  • Hearing

    Apr 01, 2017

EVELYN BRIONES VS CASA LEADERS INC

Plaintiff moves for an order for a settled statement on appeal in lieu of reporter’s transcript. TENTATIVE RULING: Plaintiff Evelyn Briones’ motion for an order for a settled statement on appeal in lieu of reporter’s transcript is GRANTED. Plaintiff is to submit a settled statement for the Court’s signature.

  • Hearing

    Mar 30, 2017

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

LILLIAN CARTER ET AL VS UNIVERSAL STUDIOS INC ET AL

On January 24, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to use a settled statement with respect to the April 19, 2016 hearing, and ordered the parties to meet and confer in a good faith attempt to reach agreement on the content of the settled statement. (See January 24, 2017 Minute Order.) The parties have now informed the Court that they have stipulated to the content of the settled statement.

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2017

  • Judge

    Brian S. Currey or John A. Slawson

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ORANGE COVE FULL GOSPEL TEMPLE V. LEEPER

To overrule the objections to the proposed statement of decision, and declare that the tentative decision signed by the Court on December 15, 2017 is deemed the final statement of decision as of March 9, 2017. To order that plaintiffs prepare a judgment which mirrors the proposed judgment previously provided and submit same forthwith. To order that the judgment entered December 15, 2016 be vacated as entered by clerical error. Explanation: 1.

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2017

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

BARRETT, JOHN VS HODGE, HAIRM

Moreover, in substance, the proposed statement of the case does not differ materially from the underlying petition, except for additional details it provides regarding Petitioner’s allegations that the arbitrator was not selected in a procedurally proper manner. As noted, because this proposed statement lacks a declaration, the information contained therein are merely unsupported allegations.

  • Hearing

    Mar 07, 2017

  • Judge

    Elaine Lu or Yolanda Orozco

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

HARVEY, INC. V. HORSESHOE BAR INVESTORS 2, LLC

Hearing on proposed statement of decision and objections. (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1590(k).)

  • Hearing

    Mar 01, 2017

MARQUES V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

Plaintiffs also claim that defendants were required to respond to their qualified written request for a settled statement before foreclosing (see FAC ¶ 49), presumably because plaintiffs’ tender put them out of arrears. These allegations might form the basis for any number of tort claims already pled herein.

  • Hearing

    Feb 24, 2017

MINERVA M BARTE ET AL VS JILLIAN JENEE STROMSOE ET AL

The court ordered any proposed settled statement by the Plaintiff and the Carpenter Firm be distributed and submitted for this hearing. None has been submitted. Is Plaintiff and the Carpenter Firm abandoning the request?

  • Hearing

    Feb 21, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 11     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.