What is a Condensed Narrative/Settled Statement on Appeal?

Useful Rulings on Condensed Narrative/Settled Statement on Appeal

Recent Rulings on Condensed Narrative/Settled Statement on Appeal

126-150 of 250 results

ASSELIN-NORMAND VS. COLUMBIANA 619 INVESTMENTS, LLC

TENTATIVE RULING This was the time reserved for a motion to use settled statement by plaintiff Jonathan Asselin-Normand. No papers were filed and the motion is off calendar.

  • Hearing

    Mar 22, 2018

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

PAUL SOJAI, ET-AL VS DANICA SOLOMON, ET-AL

LEGAL STANDARD California Rules of Court, Rule 8.137 states, in relevant part: “(a) Description: A settled statement is a summary of the superior court proceedings approved by the superior court. An appellant may either elect under (b)(1) or move under (b)(2) to use a settled statement as the record of the oral proceedings in the superior court, instead of a reporter's transcript.

  • Hearing

    Mar 07, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

CHERYL LYNCH VS ALLIANCE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP INC ET AL

LEGAL STANDARD California Rules of Court, Rule 8.137 states, in relevant part: “(a) Description: A settled statement is a summary of the superior court proceedings approved by the superior court. An appellant may either elect under (b)(1) or move under (b)(2) to use a settled statement as the record of the oral proceedings in the superior court, instead of a reporter's transcript.

  • Hearing

    Mar 07, 2018

PHILLIP HOWELL VS UNIVERSAL CITY NISSAN INC

LEGAL STANDARD California Rules of Court, Rule 8.137 states, in relevant part: “(a) Description: A settled statement is a summary of the superior court proceedings approved by the superior court. An appellant may either elect under (b)(1) or move under (b)(2) to use a settled statement as the record of the oral proceedings in the superior court, instead of a reporter's transcript.

  • Hearing

    Mar 07, 2018

AHMED AWAD VS JAZMIN DIAZ

LEGAL STANDARD California Rules of Court, Rule 8.137 states, in relevant part: “(a) Description: A settled statement is a summary of the superior court proceedings approved by the superior court. An appellant may either elect under (b)(1) or move under (b)(2) to use a settled statement as the record of the oral proceedings in the superior court, instead of a reporter's transcript.

  • Hearing

    Mar 07, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

YOUNG-PETRILLO VS. JOHNSON

They must bring all motions in limine and opposing briefs thereon; lists of each side’s witnesses and exhibits; proposed statement of the case; and jury instructions. As to instructions, the Court recognizes that sometimes finalization of instructions must await the evidence.

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2018

NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES OF UPLAND AND POMONA VS HLA M MAUNG,MD

On 10/18/16, the court adopted its proposed Statement of Decision filed 9/30/16 as its Statement of Decision. On 6/7/17, cross-defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings as to the cross-complaint was granted. On 6/8/17, the “Order Granting Cross-Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings to the Cross-Complaint” was filed. On 6/15/17, cross-defendants filed their “Notice of Ruling.” On 8/9/17, the judgment was entered. On 8/15/17, Maung’s objections to the proposed judgment were filed.

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2018

ROBERT T JOHNSON VS. FIRE WATER SALOON

Johnson, III, for a settled statement in lieu of reporter's transcript is DENIED. This is the tentative ruling for an appearance hearing at 1:30 p.m. On Friday, February 23, 2018. If no party appears at the hearing, this tentative ruling will become the order of the court as of February 23, 2018.

  • Hearing

    Feb 22, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

DOWNEY-RACEN V. HEALTHY GOURMET, LLC

Objections to “ProposedStatement of Decision First, there is no Proposed Statement of Decision. The court served a Tentative Decision pursuant to CRC 3.1590 and included the optional language provided by CRC 3.1590(c)(4). Here, the court served its Tentative Decision electronically on 11/7/17. Thus, any request for a statement of decision had to be filed by 11/21/17. Neither side filed such a request. The plaintiffs filed their objection on 11/27/17.

  • Hearing

    Feb 15, 2018

DR. DAVOUD GHAREHBAGHI, ET AL., VS ALIREZA MAHDAVI, ET AL.,

Defendant should submit a proposed settled statement in conformity with the current version of CRC 8.137(d) within 30 days after service of notice of the order granting the request to use settled statement. Respondent will have 20 days after service of the proposed statement to serve proposed amendments. The Court will adhere to the procedure set forth in the current version of the CRC Rule 8.137.

  • Hearing

    Jan 31, 2018

MATTER OF IRMA BRINTON REVOCABLE TRUST

The Tentative Decision and Proposed Statement of Decision had directed Nicholas to obtain an appropriate statement from a doctor, and, in essence, he has done so. Thus, there is little to be gained by declining to allow the trial to be reopened for this purpose.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2018

  • Judge Ed Weil
  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

LONDON & CO LLP VS ROBERTA GOVRO ET AL

The Court, having considered the evidence and read the arguments of counsel, issues this tentative and proposed Statement of Decision. This tentative and proposed Statement of Decision will become the Statement of Decision unless, within 15 days hereafter, a party serves and files objections to the proposed Statement of Decision.

  • Hearing

    Jan 18, 2018

A&B MARKET PLUS INC VS. NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET ASSOCIATION INC

The Court approves the proposed Statement of Decision presented by the Plaintiffs and will be prepared to execute it following the hearing. All objections by the Defendants are overruled. The Court also approves the proposed Judgment. The parties should be prepared to discuss which version should be used and whether any further modifications are necessary following the determinations made at the hearing on January 12, 2018. All objections to the proposed Judgment are overruled.

  • Hearing

    Jan 17, 2018

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

A&B MARKET PLUS INC VS. NEIGHBORHOOD MARKET ASSOCIATION INC

The Court approves the proposed Statement of Decision presented by the Plaintiffs and will be prepared to execute it following the hearing. All objections by the Defendants are overruled. The Court also approves the proposed Judgment. The parties should be prepared to discuss which version should be used and whether any further modifications are necessary following the determinations made at the hearing on January 12, 2018. All objections to the proposed Judgment are overruled.

  • Hearing

    Jan 17, 2018

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

William Powers, Junior v. Denise Emerson 16CVP-0115

To obtain a settled statement under rule 8.137(a), the appellant was required to serve and file a motion.2 Plaintiffs filed this separate motion that same day (November 13, 2017) and set the matter for hearing.3 The Court (Hon. Roger Picquet) denied the request for a settled statement on December 7, 2017. The Order was served on the parties that same day. As the motion has already been ruled upon, the Court intends to take this matter off calendar.

  • Hearing

    Jan 16, 2018

  • Judge

    Hurst

  • County

    San Luis Obispo County, CA

William Powers, Junior v. Denise Emerson 16CVP-0115

To obtain a settled statement under rule 8.137(a), the appellant was required to serve and file a motion.2 Plaintiffs filed this separate motion that same day (November 13, 2017) and set the matter for hearing.3 The Court (Hon. Roger Picquet) denied the request for a settled statement on December 7, 2017. The Order was served on the parties that same day. As the motion has already been ruled upon, the Court intends to take this matter off calendar.

  • Hearing

    Jan 16, 2018

  • County

    San Luis Obispo County, CA

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. HOFFMAN

The Court's minute order dated November 21, 2017 (ROA # 76) states: "Appellant Judith Hoffman's request to proceed with a settled statement is granted by the Court. The Hearing on Settled Statement is scheduled for 12/07/2017 at 02:30PM before Judge Joel R. Wohlfeil." The parties are directed to meet and confer to agree upon, if reasonably possible, a settled statement.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2017

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. HOFFMAN

The Court's minute order dated November 21, 2017 (ROA # 76) states: "Appellant Judith Hoffman's request to proceed with a settled statement is granted by the Court. The Hearing on Settled Statement is scheduled for 12/07/2017 at 02:30PM before Judge Joel R. Wohlfeil." The parties are directed to meet and confer to agree upon, if reasonably possible, a settled statement.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2017

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. HOFFMAN

The Court's minute order dated November 21, 2017 (ROA # 76) states: "Appellant Judith Hoffman's request to proceed with a settled statement is granted by the Court. The Hearing on Settled Statement is scheduled for 12/07/2017 at 02:30PM before Judge Joel R. Wohlfeil." The parties are directed to meet and confer to agree upon, if reasonably possible, a settled statement.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2017

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY VS. KHAN CL-MC-CJC

Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Bilkis Khan has already timely filed a proposed statement of decision, and moving party Kabir’s Investment Corp. has already timely filed objections to same. The court will consider the proposed statement of decision and objections thereto without a hearing. (CRC 3.1590(k); Wegner, et al., Rutter Group, Civil Trials and Evidence, Chapter 16-E, Section 16:190).]

  • Hearing

    Dec 01, 2017

THIRD EYE CAPITAL CORPORATION VS HILL & BRAND PRODUCTIONS 7

The factual basis for the claims are set forth in Third Eye’s Proposed Statement of Decision at pages 20-57.

  • Hearing

    Nov 17, 2017

ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF L A ET AL VS DANA HOLLISTER

(See Joint Proposed Statement of Established And/Or Stipulated Facts And Conclusions of Law, filed on October 27, 2017). The Court was under the mistaken impression that the Plaintiffs and Bird Nest were “stipulating” to Facts No. 19 and 20 regarding the PSA, but now understands that there are only specific items that are stipulated, to as stated, such as Fact No. 18 for example.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2017

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF L A ET AL VS DANA HOLLISTER

(See Joint Proposed Statement of Established And/Or Stipulated Facts And Conclusions of Law, filed on October 27, 2017). The Court was under the mistaken impression that the Plaintiffs and Bird Nest were “stipulating” to Facts No. 19 and 20 regarding the PSA, but now understands that there are only specific items that are stipulated, to as stated, such as Fact No. 18 for example.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2017

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

RONALD C BRADFORD VS CHARLEY JOHNSTON

The parties elected to proceed without a court reporter or a settled statement of the record. In reaching its decision, the court has considered the entire record, including the testimony of witnesses and exhibits received into evidence, and made credibility decisions. The court has also reviewed the post-trial briefs of the parties. This action follows the May 10, 2013 Purchase Agreement for Business Assets (the “Agreement”) between Plaintiff Ronald C.

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

BALBOA CAPITAL CORPORATION VS. ERIC LADENHEIM MD, INC.

Defendants’ and Cross-Complainant’s Motion to Use a Settled Statement as Part of the Record on Appeal is moot and off calendar by virtue of the court’s signing and filing of the Stipulated Condensed Narrative Statement for Settled Statement on Appeal.

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2017

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.