Complaint in Intervention?

Useful Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

1-25 of 1539 results

GONZALEZ V. BAINS

Motion: Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint-in-Intervention of Zenith Insurance Company Tentative Ruling: To deny plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the complaint-in-intervention filed by Zenith Insurance Company. (Code Civ. Proc. §§ 583.210; 583.220; 583.250.) Explanation: Plaintiff moves for dismissal of the complaint-in-intervention under Code of Civil Procedure section 583.210 and 583.250.

  • Hearing

    Jun 22, 2016

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

APARTMENT RENTAL ASSISTANCE II, INC. V. 80 OAK HILLS, LP, ET AL.

Because the “Complaint in Intervention” has not yet been filed other than as an exhibit, the clerk shall (1) remove the original “Complaint in Intervention” from the instant petition, (2) make a copy of the “Complaint in Intervention” and reattach the copy as exhibit A to the instant petition, and (3) file the original with a filing date of July 20, 2018, after striking through the term “[PROPOSED]” in the title.

  • Hearing

    Aug 31, 2018

MATTHEW KELLY VS. BARNEY NG

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File Answer In Intervention And Complaint In Intervention / Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Granting Leave To File Answer In Intervention And Complaint In Intervention Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for October 26, 2017, line 6. OTHER SUSAN UECKER's Motion For Order Granting Leave To File Answer In Intervention And Complaint In Intervention GRANTED. Moving party to file and serve Answer in Intervention and Complaint in Intervention forthwith.= (501/REQ)

  • Hearing

    Oct 26, 2017

MARIA DEL CARMEN NARANJO HERNANDEZ VS BARBARA VOORHIES

The proposed plaintiff in intervention, SBMTD, has filed the current motion for leave to file its complaint in intervention. The proposed complaint-in-intervention has been provided to the Court.

  • Hearing

    Jan 03, 2018

SHINTAKU, JANICE, ET AL VS. PULTE HOME CORPORATION, ET AL

Moving party shall file its complaint-in intervention on or before February 8, 2019. Motion to Intervene on Behalf of Elegant Surfaces The motion for leave to intervene by Contractors Insurance Company of North America on behalf of Elegant Surfaces is granted. Moving party shall file its complaint-in intervention on or before February 8, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2019

  • Type

    Complex

  • Sub Type

    Writ

  • Judge

    MICHAEL A. JACQUES

  • County

    Placer County, CA

PHENGSAVATH VS THE VONS COMPANIES INC

Proposed Intervenor Helmsman Management Services, LLC's unopposed Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention is granted. Helmsman's proposed Complaint in Intervention was inadvertently filed by the clerk prior to the court ruling on the motion. The complaint in intervention is stricken. (ROA 53.) Helmsman shall file the complaint in intervention within five days.

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ABDIEL RAFAEL GALINDO VS. RICHARD JONES ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION Matter on Calendar for Friday, July 19, 2013, Line 18, DEFENDANTS IN INTERVENTION RICHARD JONES and SANDRA JONES' MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION. Granted. The Complaint in Intervention filed on March 4, 2013 is stricken as it predates the Court's order issued on May 17, 2013, granting Intervenor leave to file a Complaint in Intervention. The Complaint in Intervention filed on May 17, 2013 is the operative pleading.

  • Hearing

    Jul 19, 2013

APARTMENT RENTAL ASSISTANCE II, INC. V. 80 OAK HILLS, LP, ET AL.

(“Complaint in Intervention” at 3:8, 32:13.) Plaintiffs concede as to this part of the motion. (Opposition at 7:14-17.) The motion is denied as to all other targeted allegations. (Motion at 2:14-4:16.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 18, 2019

LUIS MIGUEL BELTRAN- HERNANDEZ V. SWARANJIT KAUR, ET AL.

XL Catlin dismissed the entire complaint-in-intervention with prejudice on January 14, 2019, following a settlement agreement with each of those defendants and an individual named Gurtej Singh. (See Opp., Ex. A.) Because XL Catlin already released its claim as to these defendants, it can no longer seek to bring a complaint-in-intervention against the same defendants. (Matthews Decl., ¶ 8.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2019

JESSE COMBS ET AL. VS BROSAMER & WALL, INC. ET AL.

s November 22, 2019 Motion to Strike Complaint-In-Intervention, Plaintiff-In-Intervention's Opposition to Motion to Strike Portions of Complaint-In-Intervention filed December 10, 2019 and Plaintiff-In-Intervention's Reply filed January 8, 2020. The Court agrees with defendant's analysis and following the authorities set forth therein finds the Complaint-In-Intervention does not set forth facts sufficient to support a claim for punitive damages.

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George J. Abdallah

  • County

    San Joaquin County, CA

KYLE ZIRKLE VS RIGOBERTO M GARCIA ET AL

Motion by Defendants, Rigoberto Garcia, and Intervenor, Williamsburg National Insurance Company to Bifurcate Plaintiff’s Complaint and Intervenor’s Complaint-in-Intervention, filed on 9/27/18, is DENIED, without prejudice to Intervenor, Williamsburg National Insurance Company, (“Williamsburg”) seeks a separate trial of its Complaint-in-Intervention to avoid prejudice and to promote the interests of convenience, economy, and expedition. Cal. Code Civil Procedure § 1048(b).

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2018

CUSTER VS. PIXLEY

Therefore, the proposed complaint in intervention is incomplete. Intervenor is to give notice.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2018

PSC 1401152

Once Pinscorp files its complaint in intervention, Pinscorp can seek court permission to add causes of action against Mark Adams upon proper motion for such relief. The Court orders that Pinscorp has 20 days in which to file its complaint in intervention.

  • Hearing

    Aug 29, 2016

HAZELHURST VS GROHMAN

If the fees are timely paid, Intervener PESTSURE is permitted leave to file the Complaint-in-Intervention which the Court notes that Pestsure has already filed with the Court. ROA # 24. Pestsure is directed to promptly effect service of the Complaint-in-Intervention on Defendant AUDREY GROHMAN. However, if the fees are not timely paid, this Motion is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS TRAVIS S SHANNON ET AL

(“SPS”) for order granting leave to file complaint in intervention. BONY and SPS shall file the original complaint in intervention on or before June 23, 2016, and shall serve it on defendants Travis S. Shannon and Tracy Shannon. The complaint in intervention shall be deemed served on plaintiff/real party in interest City of Santa Barbara as of June 17, 2016.

  • Hearing

    Jun 17, 2016

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

SABA VS. SAN JACINTO Z, LLC

TENTATIVE RULING: Cross-Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention Silvia Alvarado Grantham is already a party to this action because she has been named as a Cross-Defendant in the Cross-Complaint filed by Defendant San Jacinto Z LLC (SJZ) on 5/21/18. She now seeks leave of court to file a Complaint in Intervention. There would seem to be no prejudice to any of the other parties because she is already a party to this action. (CCP 387 (d)(1).)

  • Hearing

    Aug 15, 2018

RAMIREZ V. VALLEY PACKLINE SOLUTIONS, INC.

Also, allowing Liberty to file its complaint in intervention will not enlarge the issues of the case, since the complaint in intervention will be based on the same facts and issues as the underlying complaint. Moreover, allowing Liberty to intervene will not tread on the rights of the other parties, since there is no reason to expect that allowing the complaint in intervention to be filed will delay the trial or require significant additional discovery or motion practice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 11, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

REPUBLIC INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA VS. JUAN MORALES ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Leave To Intervene And To File Complaint-In-Intervention; Declaration Of Counsel In Support Thereof; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; [Proposed] Order Re: Complaint-In-Intervention Set for hearing on Monday, March 19, 2018, Line 8, [PROPOSED] INTERVENORS FRANK CAVAZ, JULIE CAVAZ's Motion For Leave To Intervene And To File Complaint-In-Intervention. Proposed Intervenors Frank and Julie Cavaz's motion to intervene and file complaint-in-intervention is granted.

  • Hearing

    Mar 19, 2018

CUSTER VS. PIXLEY

Therefore, the proposed complaint in intervention is incomplete. Intervenor is to give notice.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2018

LARRY SPERLING VS EASTWEST CARPET PLUS, INC.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to file a complaint in intervention is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Sep 03, 2019

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

CORTEZ V. PORTERVILLE CITRUS, INC. AND RELATED COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION

Motion: Motion by Star Insurance Company to file Complaint in Intervention Tentative Ruling: To Grant the Motion by Star Insurance Company to file Complaint in Intervention. Movant shall submit an original Complaint in Intervention for filing by the clerk. Movant Star Insurance Company asserts it is the worker’s compensation insurance carrier for Plaintiff’s employer and has paid worker’s compensation benefits to Plaintiff.

  • Hearing

    May 30, 2018

WHITE V. FAUGENET

Motion by AMERICAN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention TENTATIVE RULING The unopposed motion for leave to file a complaint in intervention is granted. The proposed complaint in intervention shall be filed and served on all parties, including the newly-appearing Defendant, within 10 days.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

GILKEY VS PRO-MART INDUSTRIES, INC.

The Court has now received a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention with a proof of service to the other parties. (See ROA # 60; CCP § 387(c).) There is no timely written opposition to the motion. The Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention is Granted. The proposed complaint in intervention filed BerkleyNet on 2/26/2019, shall deemed the operative Complaint in Intervention going forward (ROA#60) BerkleyNet is too proceed diligently with service.

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2019

HONDA VS. GUTIERREZ

Petitioner Sentry Casualty Company’s motion for leave to file a complaint in intervention is granted. Petitioner shall e-file the complaint in intervention within three (3) days. The complaint in intervention is deemed served upon all parties who have appeared herein. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Apr 19, 2018

WILSON VS. DICHIAN

HEARING ON MOTION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION / FILED BY NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY * TENTATIVE RULING: * National Union’s unopposed motion for leave to file a complaint in intervention is granted. The complaint in intervention shall be filed within one week. * TENTATIVE RULING: * This case was dismissed.

  • Hearing

    Apr 12, 2019

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 62     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.