Complaint in Intervention?

Useful Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

Recent Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

201-225 of 1539 results

CEBALLOS VS ANDIS COMPANY

State Farm Fire and Casualty Company's ("State Farm") unopposed motion to file complaint-in-intervention is granted. State Farm shall file and serve its complaint-in-intervention within 5 court days of this ruling. Plaintiff Carina Ceballos alleges she was injured while using a hair dryer manufactured by the defendant. State Farm says it paid workers' compensation benefits in connection with plaintiff's injuries. State Farm has a statutory right to seek reimbursement of those benefits.

  • Hearing

    Aug 01, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. HOFFMAN

This Motion also appears to be an improper procedural mechanism on which to adjudicate Intervenor's claim for lien priority, as alleged within the Complaint-In-Intervention.

  • Hearing

    Jul 30, 2019

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

JOSE A. LOPEZ VS NELSON A. PORTILLO

On June 20, 2019, the Court granted Dominguez’s ex parte request for leave to file the Cross-Complaint in Intervention. Lopez’s counsel gave “notice” that Lopez will be filing a demurrer; however, there was no “discussion as to the alleged defects of the Complaint in Intervention or how any purported defects might be corrected. Ms. Anderson also failed to provide any legal basis for Lopez to file a demurrer... Plaintiff’s counsel filed and served her demurrer on that very same day.

  • Hearing

    Jul 30, 2019

ESTEBAN MONTENEGRO VS FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION

Plaintiff then brought a motion to set aside the dismissal of the Cross-Complaint in intervention, which was heard on April 12, 2019, and granted. The copy of the FACC attached to the motion to set aside set forth three causes of action, for Violation of California Civil Code § 2624.17, Wrongful Foreclosure, and Slander of Title. The FACC efiled with the court and served on the parties added a fourth cause of action for quiet title and fifth cause of action for declaratory relief.

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2019

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Foreclosure

PABLO VEJAR, JR. VS CVS PHARMACY. INC. A RI CORP., ET AL.

Security National Insurance Company to file it Complaint-in-Intervention within ten (10) days. Security National Insurance Company is ordered to provide notice of this order and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: July 26, 2019 ___________________________ Hon. Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

AVIS COPELIN, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST, ET AL. VS REHABBERS FINANCIAL INC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

On June 6, 2019, this Court granted Lloyd White’s Ex Parte Application for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention, which was filed that same day. Plaintiffs filed the present Motion for Preliminary Injunction on July 19, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Jul 25, 2019

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

MARTHA FERNANDEZ VS CITY OF PASADENA ET AL

Intervener is ordered to file a separate copy of its complaint-in-intervention within five days. Intervener is ordered to give notice. Temporary Scheduling Change: 1. Parties who wish to be heard on this tentative must send an email to the court at [email protected] confirming possible changes in the date and time of the hearing; 2.

  • Hearing

    Jul 23, 2019

JOANNE DAVIS VS. ADVANCED PAIN DIAGNOSTIC & SOLUTIONS INC

Jane Doe alleges that she seeks to intervene in this action to file her complaint in intervention against Defendants Advanced Pain Diagnostics & Solutions, Inc. and Dr. Kayvan Haddadan because Defendant Derrick Mullin, R.N. sexually assaulted Jane Doe and she claims she was injured by the same negligent and wrongful conduct as alleged by the current plaintiffs, e.g., negligent hiring, supervision, training, and retention; violation of Civil Code sections 51, 51.9, and 52.

  • Hearing

    Jul 23, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

EDDIE TURNER VS U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ET AL

The petition shall include a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention or answer in intervention and set forth the grounds upon which intervention rests. (d) (1) The court shall, upon timely application, permit a nonparty to intervene in the action or proceeding if either of the following conditions is satisfied: (A) A provision of law confers an unconditional right to intervene.

  • Hearing

    Jul 23, 2019

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Foreclosure

SERRANO VS. FRANKLIN

A petition for leave to intervene may be made by noticed motion or ex parte application and must include a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention or answer in intervention and set forth the grounds upon which A nonparty must be allowed to intervene if (A) a provision of law confers an unconditional right to intervene or (B) the nonparty “claims an interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of the action and that person is so situated that the disposition of the action may impair

  • Hearing

    Jul 22, 2019

EDDIE TURNER VS U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ET AL

The petition shall include a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention or answer in intervention and set forth the grounds upon which intervention rests. (d) (1) The court shall, upon timely application, permit a nonparty to intervene in the action or proceeding if either of the following conditions is satisfied: (A) A provision of law confers an unconditional right to intervene.

  • Hearing

    Jul 22, 2019

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Foreclosure

DEPT. OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING VS. CFB, INC, ET AL

No request for dismissal of the Second Amended Complaint in Intervention filed by Heather Rothermund has been filed. The parties are ordered to appear to apprise the Court regarding the status of dismissal of Ms. Rothermund’s complaint in intervention. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

  • Hearing

    Jul 22, 2019

DEPT. OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING VS. CFB, INC, ET AL

No request for dismissal of the Second Amended Complaint in Intervention filed by Heather Rothermund has been filed. The parties are ordered to appear to apprise the Court regarding the status of dismissal of Ms. Rothermund’s complaint in intervention. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

  • Hearing

    Jul 22, 2019

BANET VS. MCDONNELL

HEARING ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUBROGATION COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION / FILED BY SENTRY CASUALTY COMPANY * TENTATIVE RULING: * Sentry Casualty, the plaintiff’s worker’s comp carrier, moves for leave to intervene to file a complaint in subrogation. The proof of service, however, shows that the motion was mailed to defendant personally, not to his counsel of record.

  • Hearing

    Jul 19, 2019

GUILLERMINA BAUTISTA CHAVEZ ET AL VS METROPOLITAN AUTOMOTIVE

Intervenor’s proposed complaint in intervention is deemed filed as of this date. Intervenor is ordered to provide notice of this order and file proof of service of such. DATED: July 19, 2019 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Jul 19, 2019

AGUILAR VS. CERVANTES

The Complaint in Intervention shall be filed and served within 10 days. Moving party is ordered to give notice. Case Management Conference is continued to August 26, 2019 at 9:00 a.m.

  • Hearing

    Jul 18, 2019

FRANCISCO BANUELOS VS HILTON WOODLAND HILLS

Intervenor has demonstrated a right to intervene and has attached a proposed complaint-in-intervention. The Motion for leave to intervene is GRANTED and Intervenor is ordered to file its complaint-in-intervention within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 18, 2019

EDWARDS SOLUTIONS, LLC V. 2 REAL, LLC

A proposed complaint in intervention for declaratory relief has been submitted. Although absent opposition it appears that Caliber Home Loans, Inc. has a material interest in this litigation and under the circumstances it would be appropriate to allow leave to intervene, the court notes that Caliber Home Loans, Inc. failed to file proof of service of notice of the hearing and the moving papers on the plaintiff and the other interested parties.

  • Hearing

    Jul 18, 2019

GRETCHEN D LICHTENBERGER VS. NICOLAS CARL VRATARIC

The action was dismissed in its entirety; Plaintiff had not filed a complaint in intervention. After the Vrataric case was dismissed, Moving Parties requested that Plaintiff withdraw the order of examination and subpoena. They were not withdrawn. Discussion 1.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2019

PAULA ZOSS OH LA LA NAIL BEAUTY LOUNGE ET AL

The petition shall include a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention or answer in intervention and set forth the grounds upon which intervention rests. (Code Civ. Proc., § 387, subd. (c).)

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2019

STEVEN WORKMAN VS JUSTINE MUSK

The proposed Complaint-in-Intervention is to be filed within ten (10) days. Intervention is proper where the intervenor shows an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede that person’s ability to protect the interest. Code Civ. Proc., § 387(d)(1).

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

LOUIS ACOSTA VS MAS REALTY LLC ET AL

The petition shall include a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention or answer in intervention and set forth the grounds upon which intervention rests. (Code Civ. Proc., § 387, subd. (c).)

  • Hearing

    Jul 12, 2019

MECHANICS BANK VS. ORION PACIFIC

Sunkist has not yet sought leave to file a complaint in intervention, and has not demonstrated that even if it had filed such a complaint, it would have the authority to represent “similarly situated qualified PACA trust creditors.” (See, Lohnes v. Astron Computer Products (2001) 94 Cal.App.4th 1150, 1153 [“[w]hether intervention is permissive or mandatory, a petition to seek leave is required; without permission from the court, a party lacks any standing to the action”].)

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2019

STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND V. CENTRAL CALIFORNIA ALMONDGROWERS ASSOCIATION

(Dept. 501) Motions: Romiro Aguilar’s Motion for Leave to File Complaint-In-Intervention Tentative Ruling: To grant. Romiro Aguilar must file his complaint-in-intervention within 5 days of service of the minute order. Explanation: Labor Code section 3853 provides a statutory right of intervention.

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

COMPASS BANK V. FAIRFIELD CJD, ET AL.

1 West Capital LLC's Motion to Intervene The unopposed motion to intervene filed by 1 West Capital LLC is granted. 1 West Capital LLC shall file the complaint in intervention and serve the complaint on all parties within 30 calendar days. IN RE: THE MATTER OF JERSEY ATHLETICS CORPORATION

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2019

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 62     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.