Complaint in Intervention?

Useful Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

Recent Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

176-200 of 1551 results

KYLE BROWN VS BEACH HOUSE DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT

Insurance Company of the West is to file its proposed Complaint in Intervention is to be filed within fourteen (14) days. Intervention is proper where the intervenor shows an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede that person’s ability to protect the interest. Code Civil Procedure § 387(d)(1).

  • Hearing

    Sep 11, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

JOSE A. LOPEZ VS NELSON A. PORTILLO

.: VC067364 HEARING: 9/10/19 #11 TENTATIVE ORDER Cross-Defendant Lopez’s demurrer to Cross-Complaint-in-Intervention is taken OFF-CALENDAR. On 7/30/19, this court ordered Cross-Defendant to file a meet and confer declaration “no later than 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, 9/3/19.” As of 9/6/19, no declaration has been filed with the court. Accordingly, the matter is taken off-calendar.

  • Hearing

    Sep 10, 2019

AVIS COPELIN, REAL PARTY IN INTEREST, ET AL. VS REHABBERS FINANCIAL INC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

On June 6, 2019, this Court granted Lloyd White’s Ex Parte Application for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention, which was filed that same day. Plaintiffs filed the present Motion for Preliminary Injunction on July 19, 2019. On July 23, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a Supplemental Motion for Order to Show Cause re: Preliminary Injunction. On July 25, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a Second Supplemental Motion for Order to Show Cause re: Preliminary Injunction, prior to the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Sep 09, 2019

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

STEPHANIE MARISS HERNANDEZ VS C.R. ENGLAND, INC ET AL

Intervener is ordered to file a separate copy of the complaint-in-intervention within five days. Intervener is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 09, 2019

EULOGIO RODRIGUEZ VS NATIONAL CONCRETE WASHOUT

The Proposed Complaint-in-Intervention submitted with the motion is ordered filed forthwith. Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Complaint-in-Intervention is deemed served, and that Defendant’s answer to the Complaint-in-Intervention shall be filed within 30 days from the date of service of the court’s order.

  • Hearing

    Sep 09, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

MIKHA VS SMITH

(The court cannot deem the proposed complaint in intervention filed and served because the proposed pleading was submitted as an exhibit and not as a separate document.) If this tentative ruling is confirmed, the Minute Order will be the final order of the court, and the parties shall not submit any further order on this motion.

  • Hearing

    Sep 05, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

SHAWN J ROBINSON VS. EVOLUTION MOTORSPORTS INC A NEVEDA CORPORATION

The OSC for sanctions/dismissal re disposition of complaint in intervention, set on 9/3/19, is vacated. Dismissal of the complaint in intervention was filed on 7/19/19. The OSC for sanctions/dismissal re disposition of complaint remains on calendar on 9/3/19, at 8:15 am in Dept. 22B.

  • Hearing

    Sep 03, 2019

  • Judge

    Genalin Riley

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

LARRY SPERLING VS EASTWEST CARPET PLUS, INC.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to file a complaint in intervention is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Sep 03, 2019

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

PATRICK WILLIAM KINSELLA ET AL VS JOEL BAUTISTA GARCIA ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Hearing: Application for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention Tenative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Aug 30, 2019

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

PATRICK WILLIAM KINSELLA ET AL VS JOEL BAUTISTA GARCIA ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Hearing: Application for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention Tentative Ruling: The court denies Hallesche Krankenversicherung, A.G.’s application for leave to file complaint in intervention. Background: The action arises out of a motor vehicle collision that allegedly occurred in Santa Barbara County on January 4, 2018.

  • Hearing

    Aug 30, 2019

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

ARGABRIGHT VS. NRT WEST, INC.

The Gannons may, if they choose, file and serve a first amended complaint-in- intervention by September 13. If they elect not to do so, Coldwell Banker’s time to answer will run from that date.

  • Hearing

    Aug 30, 2019

JESSICA MARTINEZ VS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ-TOLOZA

Insurance Company of the West is to file its proposed Complaint in Intervention within ten (10) days. Intervention is proper where the intervenor shows an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede that person’s ability to protect the interest. Code Civ. Proc., § 387(d)(1).

  • Hearing

    Aug 30, 2019

ELIZABETH MONICA VS REVELATION WINDOW CLEANING, ET AL.

The petition shall include a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention or answer in intervention and set forth the grounds upon which intervention rests. (Code Civ. Proc., § 387, subd. (c).)

  • Hearing

    Aug 29, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

GEORG LINGENBRINK VS. STEPHEN C GAMES

Paragraph 15 of the complaint in intervention alleges in October 2007, "Jennings and Fryzer purchased the assets of Bahia LLC - specifically, the Bahia Property - and transferred them to a company that they owned." ROA # 48. Paragraph 16 alleges Jennings and Fryzer created Grande Bahia in 2008 and transferred ownership of the Bahia Property to Grande Bahia at that time.

  • Hearing

    Aug 29, 2019

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

GEORG LINGENBRINK VS. STEPHEN C GAMES

Paragraph 15 of the complaint in intervention alleges in October 2007, "Jennings and Fryzer purchased the assets of Bahia LLC - specifically, the Bahia Property - and transferred them to a company that they owned." ROA # 48. Paragraph 16 alleges Jennings and Fryzer created Grande Bahia in 2008 and transferred ownership of the Bahia Property to Grande Bahia at that time.

  • Hearing

    Aug 29, 2019

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

GEORG LINGENBRINK VS. STEPHEN C GAMES

Paragraph 15 of the complaint in intervention alleges in October 2007, "Jennings and Fryzer purchased the assets of Bahia LLC - specifically, the Bahia Property - and transferred them to a company that they owned." ROA # 48. Paragraph 16 alleges Jennings and Fryzer created Grande Bahia in 2008 and transferred ownership of the Bahia Property to Grande Bahia at that time.

  • Hearing

    Aug 29, 2019

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

GEORG LINGENBRINK VS. STEPHEN C GAMES

Paragraph 15 of the complaint in intervention alleges in October 2007, "Jennings and Fryzer purchased the assets of Bahia LLC - specifically, the Bahia Property - and transferred them to a company that they owned." ROA # 48. Paragraph 16 alleges Jennings and Fryzer created Grande Bahia in 2008 and transferred ownership of the Bahia Property to Grande Bahia at that time.

  • Hearing

    Aug 29, 2019

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

MARIANA NOEMI GARCIA VS. JOSE ANTONIO PORTILLO

For general information regarding Judge DeNoce and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.denoce.com _____________________________________________ Motion by Government Employees Insurance Company ("GEICO") for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention. The court's tentative ruling is as follows: GEICO's request for judicial notice is GRANTED. GEICO's motion to intervene is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Aug 27, 2019

MARIANA NOEMI GARCIA VS. JOSE ANTONIO PORTILLO

For general information regarding Judge DeNoce and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.denoce.com _____________________________________________ Motion by Government Employees Insurance Company ("GEICO") for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention. The court's tentative ruling is as follows: GEICO's request for judicial notice is GRANTED. GEICO's motion to intervene is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Aug 27, 2019

CANNDESCENT JV LLC, ET AL. V. FIORE MANAGEMENT LLC, ET AL.

In its complaint-in-intervention, HCB contends that McPherson created Canndescent with funds that could have been used to pay the U.S. District Court judgment. HCB seeks an injunction preventing and prohibiting the transfer of any settlement funds to McPherson without further order of the court. McPherson has since deposited the sum of $2,036,293.60 into the registry of the District Court in Mississippi as principal and interest on the HCB judgment. McPherson contends that the U.S.

  • Hearing

    Aug 26, 2019

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL

The Court deems Intervening Party’s complaint-in-intervention filed on May 31, 2018 as properly filed on that date. The Court also deems Intervening Party’s subsequently filed amendments to this complaint-in-intervention on September 10, 2018, October 4, 2018, and April 15, 2019 as properly filed on those dates.

  • Hearing

    Aug 23, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

HAWKINS V. TITAN SHEET METAL

The intervenor, Applied Risk Services, Inc. for California Insurance Company as real party in interest, is directed to file a copy of the Complaint in intervention as an independent and standalone record in the court file, within the next three days. Intervenor is to proceed diligently thereafter with service. The Court is scheduling a case management conference to address certain matters going forward. MP is directed to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 22, 2019

PAULA ZOSS OH LA LA NAIL BEAUTY LOUNGE ET AL

On July 25, 2019, USLI filed a Complaint in Intervention. On May 10, 2019, Defendants Raafat Iskander and Koharik Iskander (“Defendants”) filed this Motion for Leave to File a Cross-Complaint against Oh La La Nail and Roes 1 to 50. Plaintiff filed an opposition on August 9, 2019. Defendants filed a reply on August 15, 2019. II.

  • Hearing

    Aug 22, 2019

CITY OF OXNARD VS. GATEWAY PLAZA APARTMENTS

A Cross-Complaint to the Complaint in Intervention by Coaster Company of America was filed on 7/29/19, and the time for filing proof of service and/or default has not expired. Notice to be provided by Coaster Company of America.

  • Hearing

    Aug 21, 2019

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  • Judge

    Genalin Riley

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

APOLONIO GARCIA, AN INDIVIDUAL BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM RAFAEL GARCIA VS ANTONIO URIBE CARACHEO, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

Intervener is ordered to file a separate copy of the complaint-in-intervention within five days. Intervener is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 19, 2019

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 63     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.