Complaint in Intervention?

Useful Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

Recent Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

151-175 of 1550 results

JESSE SNYDER VS. A TEICHERT & SONS INC

s motion for leave to file a complaint-in-intervention is GRANTED. Intervener's complaint-in-intervention shall be filed upon presentation to the clerk and payment of the filing fee. The Court finds good cause for intervention as StarStone National Ins. Co. provides worker's compensation insurance to Plaintiff Jesse Snyder's employer and seeks to recoup payments made to Plaintiff. This case has been assigned to Department 47 for hearing.

  • Hearing

    Oct 10, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

JESSE SNYDER VS. A TEICHERT & SONS INC

s motion for leave to file a complaint-in-intervention is GRANTED. Intervener's complaint-in-intervention shall be filed upon presentation to the clerk and payment of the filing fee. The Court finds good cause for intervention as StarStone National Ins. Co. provides worker's compensation insurance to Plaintiff Jesse Snyder's employer and seeks to recoup payments made to Plaintiff. This case has been assigned to Department 47 for hearing.

  • Hearing

    Oct 10, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

LAZBEN INVESTMENT CO VS LAWRENCE M DEUTSCH

Lawrence is to file an answer to the complaint in intervention within 20 days.

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2019

PHENGSAVATH VS THE VONS COMPANIES INC

Proposed Intervenor Helmsman Management Services, LLC's unopposed Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention is granted. Helmsman's proposed Complaint in Intervention was inadvertently filed by the clerk prior to the court ruling on the motion. The complaint in intervention is stricken. (ROA 53.) Helmsman shall file the complaint in intervention within five days.

  • Hearing

    Oct 03, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

YELENA LITVINOVA VS. BLVD MOVING INC

Starr Indemnity and Liability Company is directed to serve the Complaint in Intervention . If Answers, Defaults and/or Dismissals for all Defendants/Cross-Defendants are not on file at the time of Order to Show Cause Re: Non-Compliance, this case will be set for Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

DANIEL CHAVEZ VS MISSION SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION, ET AL.

The petition shall include a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention or answer in intervention and set forth the grounds upon which intervention rests. (Code Civ. Proc., § 387, subd. (c).)

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2019

ROBERTO CASTRO ET AL VS ADAN TINOJERA ET LA

Intervenor shall file the complaint-in-intervention within ten (10) days. Intervenor shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: October 2, 2019 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

JESSIE TUCKER, GARY TUCKER V. FAIRMONT PRIVATE SCHOOL OF FRESNO, INC.

It shall file and serve its Complaint-In-Intervention by October 11, 2019. Footnote 1: “Employer” includes the insurer. (Labor Code § 3850.)

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2019

MONA GHOBRIAL VS LAJAUNA D. BROWN

State Farm is ordered to file a separate copy of its complaint-in-intervention and its cross-complaint within ten days. State Farm is ordered to give notice. Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at [email protected] indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2019

THE MEMBERS OF EASTERN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH V. LEE

Where an intervenor’s proposed pleading supports plaintiff’s claims or demands anything adverse to both a plaintiff and a defendant, the pleading is a “Complaint in Intervention.” Where an intervenor’s proposed pleading supports defendant’s claims, it is an “Answer in Intervention.” Here, however, EPC does not seek to file either a Complaint in Intervention or an Answer in Intervention.

  • Hearing

    Sep 30, 2019

SYLVIA ELENA LEVEY ET AL VS MADE BY TAYLOR LAYNE, LLC ET AL

The [proposed] complaint-in-intervention lodged with the court on July 26, 2019, is ordered filed. The complaint-in-intervention is deemed served on the parties effective as of September 27, 2019. Intervenor Mid-Century Insurance Company is ordered to give notice of this ruling.

  • Hearing

    Sep 27, 2019

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

ELIAS KHARAZI, MR. VS ALLIANCE TEXTILES, INC.

On August 21, 2019, Plaintiff-in-Intervention Insurance Company of the West filed a motion for leave to file a complaint-in-intervention pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 387. Trial is set for November 30, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Sep 26, 2019

FADI CHELICO, ET AL. VS ROMEO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL.

On April 24, 2019, Plaintiff-in-Intervention City of Los Angeles filed a complaint-in-intervention for subrogation of workers’ compensation benefits paid to Plaintiff Fadi Chelico, a City of Los Angeles police officer, alleging negligence against Defendants Romeo Systems, Inc., Douglas Donovan, and Nicole Rael.

  • Hearing

    Sep 26, 2019

JAVIER CAZAREZ VS BASIC HAULER INC ET AL

The petition shall include a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention or answer in intervention and set forth the grounds upon which intervention rests. (Code Civ. Proc., § 387, subd. (c).)

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2019

CITY OF OXNARD VS. GATEWAY PLAZA APARTMENTS

At the continued hearing, the court will inquire as to the status of the proof of service/default re Coaster Company of America's Cross-Complaint to the Complaint in Intervention filed on 7/29/19. Notice to be provided by Coaster Company of America.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2019

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  • Judge

    Genalin Riley

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. HOFFMAN

., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-10 ("BONYM") for summary judgement in its favor with respect to its Complaint in Intervention, is OFF CALENDAR at the request of BONYM.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2019

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. HOFFMAN

., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-10 ("BONYM") for summary judgement in its favor with respect to its Complaint in Intervention, is OFF CALENDAR at the request of BONYM.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2019

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. HOFFMAN

., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-10 ("BONYM") for summary judgement in its favor with respect to its Complaint in Intervention, is OFF CALENDAR at the request of BONYM.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2019

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. HOFFMAN

., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-10 ("BONYM") for summary judgement in its favor with respect to its Complaint in Intervention, is OFF CALENDAR at the request of BONYM.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2019

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

JOHN HOFFMAN ET AL VS ABRAHAM BARISHMAN

., Inc. filed a complaint-in-intervention against Defendant Abraham Barishman asserting negligence per se, negligence, and product liability for the injuries of Plaintiff-in-Intervention Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.’s employee, Plaintiff John Hoffman, that give rise to the initial complaint in this action.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA VS HARPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC

Bean then sought and was permitted to intervene, ultimately filing his Complaint-in Intervention on October 20, 2017. Regents’ complaint was then dismissed on December 5, 2017, and Bean has pursued the action seeking additional damages for the injuries he sustained. The Complaint-in-Intervention alleges that Regents contracted with Harper and Tierra to perform construction services near the pool at the Santa Catalina Residence Hall.

  • Hearing

    Sep 20, 2019

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

MICHAEL JACOBSEN VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

Southern California Edison Company, et al. (18 STCV09319) TENTATIVE RULING: American Zurich Insurance Company’s UNOPPOSED Motion for an Order Granting Leave to File a Complaint-in-Intervention to Assert a Workers’ Compensation Lien is GRANTED. Intervenor is ordered to efile with the court by 4 p.m. this date a separate executed copy of its attached Complaint in Intervention, and to fully comply with CCP § 387(e).

  • Hearing

    Sep 20, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

LEE V. HOGG

Also, allowing New York Marine to file its complaint in intervention will not enlarge the issues of the case, since the complaint in intervention will be based on the same facts and issues as the underlying complaint. Moreover, allowing New York Marine to intervene will not tread on the rights of the other parties, since there is no reason to expect that allowing the complaint in intervention to be filed will delay the trial or require significant additional discovery or motion practice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 17, 2019

WANG VS. BRANAGH DEVELOPMENT

Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 387(c) and (e)(1), the “Complaintin Intervention shall be amended to state that it is an “Answer” in intervention.

  • Hearing

    Sep 12, 2019

PEGGY REESE, ET AL. VS TOTAL WOMAN GYM AND DAY SPA, A CORPORATION

Intervenor shall file its complaint-in-intervention within ten (10) days. Intervenor shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: September 12, 2019 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Sep 12, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 62     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.