Complaint in Intervention?

Useful Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

1501-1525 of 1607 results

JOSE VEGA ET AL VS THOMAS MIKESELL

Old Republic shall file its Complaint-in-Intervention within five days. Old Republic is ordered to give notice of this ruling. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 20, 2018 _____________________________ Dennis J.

  • Hearing

    Mar 20, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

EXTREME FIRE PROTECTION INC VS JIM BELL ET AL

There are several cross-complaints filed by Armstrong, the architect, the civil engineer and subcontractors as well as a complaint in intervention. On January 17, 2012, the court ordered a global discovery stay in this case pending further review because of a criminal investigation of Armstrong that was instigated by Bell. The court lifted the stay as of May 10, 2012.

  • Hearing

    Oct 18, 2012

  • Judge

    Denise deBellefeuille

  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

COOPER V. DIAZ-HUBBEN

For some, BMO included a terse, confusing one sentence explanation (“The ACCOUNT is not referenced in BMO’s COMPLAINT, and USRECH’s Complaint in intervention seeks an adjudication of the parties’ rights under the DACA as currently written”); and then for a few, a “notwithstanding see attached documents” type of response. No responses with objections clarified if the objections were asserted to the entire request, or just part of it.

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2019

EXTREME FIRE PROTECTION INC VS JIM BELL ET AL

There are seven cross-complaints filed by the architect, the civil engineer and subcontractors as well as a complaint in intervention. MSC is set for February 17 and trial for March 15, 2012. Armstrong seeks summary adjudication of the duty of subcontractors to defend it with respect to Bell’s claims in their second amended cross-complaint that arise out of or are connected with the subcontractors’ operations performed under their subcontracts.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2011

  • Judge

    Denise deBellefeuille

  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

NORTH COAST RIVERS ALLIANCE VS. DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

NDWA’s Petition and Complaint in Intervention shall be filed forthwith. If this tentative ruling becomes the final ruling of the Court, counsel for Respondent shall prepare a formal order; submit it to counsel for the parties for approval as to form; and thereafter submit it to the Court for signature and entry of judgment in accordance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312.

  • Hearing

    Nov 01, 2019

DIANE BOROUDIAN VS WESTFIELD GROUP ET AL

The file shows that on September 2, 2016, the court permitted Pacific Indemnity Company, the workers’ compensation insurer for plaintiff’s employer, to file a Complaint in Intervention.

  • Hearing

    Mar 17, 2017

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

GREENLEAF MUTUAL BENEFITS ASSOCIATION V. OH, ET AL.

Greenleaf did not perfect its claim by filing a complaint in intervention, despite such action being warranted,4 did not respond to any of Oh’s requests for the names of potential additional claimants, despite being advised that the Court desired them, did not appear at further CMCs, and did not move for relief. Waiver is the voluntary relinquishment of a known right with knowledge of the facts. (McDermott v. Superior Court, supra, 6 Cal.3d at 698, fn. 3.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2018

JORGE VELASCO ET AL VS OMAR TORRES

(citation omitted).The court finds that Everest has met its burden under CCP §387.The motion for leave to intervene is therefore GRANTED.Everest shall file its Complaint in Intervention within five days.Everest is ordered to give notice of this ruling.IT IS SO ORDERED.DATED: March 21, 2018_____________________________Dennis J. LandinJudge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Mar 21, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

JUAN TAFOYA ET AL VS BAKER PERKINS INC

Illinois Midwest Insurance Agency has filed a complaint in intervention to recover workers’ compensation benefits paid to plaintiffs. MSC is set for December 13, 2013. A pre-trial conference is set for January 3 and trial for January 6, 2014. NuSil Corp’s Demurrer NuSil Corp demurs to both causes of action on the ground that they are barred by the exclusivity provisions of Labor Code § 3602. When adding NuSil Corp as former Doe #4, plaintiffs’ counsel (Mr.

  • Hearing

    Nov 26, 2013

CHARLES H ROBERTS III. ETAL VS. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

in intervention.

  • Hearing

    Aug 19, 2010

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

SUKHWINDER BHULLAR VS. ANIL YADAV

Furthermore, part of Bhullar's $106,000 in fees was ostensibly incurred opposing Gujral's (ultimately successful) complaint-in-intervention. In the absence of billing records, the degree of such remains uncertain. Requiring Gujral to pay half of the fees Bhullar incurred to oppose Gujral's claim, and potentially losing the entire benefit of his participation in the trial, is inconsistent with fairness and proportionality.

  • Hearing

    Sep 10, 2015

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

  • Judge

    James L. Long

  • County

    Sacramento County, CA

MARY TIRITILLI VS LAURIE M WOLL DO ET AL

(citation omitted).The court therefore finds that City of Long Beach has met its burden under CCP § 387.The motion is GRANTED.City of Long Beach shall file its Complaint-in-Intervention within five days.City of Long Beach is ordered to give notice of this ruling.IT IS SO ORDERED.DATED: February 26, 2018_____________________________Dennis J.

  • Hearing

    Feb 26, 2018

LAUREN THUNEY VS CHA HOLLYWOOD MEDICAL CENTER LP ET AL

(citation omitted).The court therefore finds that Insurance Company has met its burden under CCP § 387.The motion is GRANTED.Insurance Company shall file its Complaint-in-Intervention within five days.Insurance Company is ordered to give notice of this ruling.IT IS SO ORDERED.DATED: March 29, 2018_____________________________Dennis J. LandinJudge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Mar 29, 2018

ARMANDO VALLES VS MOHAMED A MOHAMEDCASS

On August 25, 2017, National Casualty Co. on behalf of suspended corporation Noho Airport Transportation filed a complaint in intervention. On February 27, 2018, Jimenez filed an application for determination of good faith settlement.

  • Hearing

    Jun 05, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

THOMAS DELAMORA VS PARIHAR LOGISTICS INC ET AL

Old Republic shall file its Complaint-in-Intervention within five days. Old Republic is ordered to give notice of this ruling. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 20, 2018 _____________________________ Dennis J.

  • Hearing

    Mar 20, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

THOMAS DELAMORA VS PARIHAR LOGISTICS INC ET AL

Old Republic shall file its Complaint-in-Intervention within five days. Old Republic is ordered to give notice of this ruling. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 20, 2018 _____________________________ Dennis J.

  • Hearing

    Mar 20, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

TYRONE BANKS VS CENTINELA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER

On June 28, 2017, City of Los Angeles filed a complaint in intervention for subrogation of workers’ compensation benefits. LEGAL STANDARD There is a special two-step procedure for securing disclosure of peace officer personnel records. Warrick v. Superior Court (City of Los Angeles Police Dept.) (2005) 35 Cal. 4th 1011, 1019.

  • Hearing

    May 30, 2018

FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY VS JOUNELLE STEPHANY MURILLAS

It is also undisputed that, as a result of the 2013 Case, Carlos Murillas recorded a lis pendens against the Property [SSUMF 35; Defendant's response]; after In Home Connections received notice of the lis pendens on the Property, claims were tendered to Plaintiff [SSUMF 36]; on June 30, 2014, Plaintiff filed a complaint-in-intervention alleging causes of action for quiet title, declaratory relief and slander of title against Carlos Murillas [SSUMF 37; Defendant's response]; following mediation in the 2013 Case

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2019

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

CANNDESCENT JV LLC, ET AL. V. FIORE MANAGEMENT LLC, ET AL.

In its complaint-in-intervention, HCB contends that McPherson created Canndescent with funds that could have been used to pay the U.S. District Court judgment. HCB seeks an injunction preventing and prohibiting the transfer of any settlement funds to McPherson without further order of the court. McPherson has since deposited the sum of $2,036,293.60 into the registry of the District Court in Mississippi as principal and interest on the HCB judgment. McPherson contends that the U.S.

  • Hearing

    Aug 26, 2019

30-2015-00822942-CU-BC-CJC

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication as to Intervenor Motion #2 is moot as the Complaint-in-Intervention was dismissed 11/03/2017.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2017

MARK WOODSON VS PEDDINGHAUS CORPORATION ET AL

(Although not relevant to the instant motions, but for completeness sake only, the Court also notes that a complaint-in-intervention was filed on November 29, 2017; that a cross-complaint was filed April 12, 2018; and that a separate cross-complaint was filed January 29, 2019. These other matters are also still active.) Herrick Motion for Summary Judgment Only the first cause of action, for negligence, is asserted against Herrick.

  • Hearing

    Feb 15, 2019

SYLVIA T SAUCEDO ET AL VS CLIFF VIEW TERRACE INC ET AL

Travelers Insurance Co. filed a complaint in intervention against Hyster alleging that it paid workers’ compensation benefits to the plaintiff because of Hyster’s negligence. Hyster asked Travelers to admit that the plaintiff’s employer was negligent and that its percentage responsibility was at least 20% – 50%. Traveler denied all requests, even though its own expert admitted at trial that the employer was negligent.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2009

30-2015-00822942-CU-BC-CJC

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication as to Intervenor Motion #2 is moot as the Complaint-in-Intervention was dismissed 11/03/2017.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2017

YAN LI VS APRIL LI

Co. filed its complaint in intervention. On February 25, 2019, Plaintiffs dismissed Cheng, without prejudice. On May 23, 2019, Plaintiffs filed an Amendment to Complaint, wherein Zhigang Yang (“Yang”) was substituted in lieu of Doe 1. A Trial Setting Conference is set for July 8, 2020. 1. Motion to Amend Complaint Legal Standard “The court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading…” (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

SIERRA CLUB VS. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO [E-FILE]

Following full briefing, the court granted the motion (ROA 276, 285), and the complaint in intervention was filed. ROA 277. Presently, the County has filed a motion to discharge the May 4, 2015 Supplemental Writ of mandate. ROA 271-274. Sierra Club and Golden Door have filed separate opposition. ROA 282-284, 286. The County filed reply. ROA 287-290. The court has reviewed the papers. The case is also set for a continued CMC. ROA 239-241, 255, 278. 2. Applicable Standards. A.

  • Hearing

    Jul 18, 2018

  « first    1 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.