Complaint in Intervention?

Useful Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

Recent Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

1501-1525 of 1607 results

RICHARD MEDEL ETC VS LA CUMBRE SENIOR LIVING CONCEPTS

However, Columbia has never filed a complaint in intervention. Moreover, if and when it ultimately intervenes in the case, as a separate party to the litigation, Columbia cannot simply join La Cumbre’s motion for summary judgment and adopt its separate statement. Instead, it would have to file its own summary judgment motion. See, Frazee v.

  • Hearing

    Feb 06, 2012

LONNIE HOLMES VS. LUXOR CAB ET AL

Intervenor Mercury Casualty Company'S Motion For Order Granting Leave To File Complaint In Intervention Set for hearing on Tuesday, January 17, 2012, Line 28, Intervenor Mercury Casualty Company'S Motion For Order Granting Leave To File Complaint In Intervention, Hearing IS required. =302/HK

  • Hearing

    Jan 17, 2012

DEBORAH MARINO VS. GLOBAL BUILDING SERVICES INC

Target Corporation subsequently filed a complaint in intervention. Target has now filed a motion for leave to amend its complaint. The motion will be vacated. Motions to amend the complaint and all other law and motion matters are to be heard in the civil law and motion department of the court. (See Sacramento Superior Court Local Rule 3.00(a)). Target Corporation may re-notice its motion in the appropriate law and motion department.

  • Hearing

    Jan 10, 2012

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

RENE J. ZUNIGA ET AL VS. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY ET AL

Ntc Of Mtn And Mtn To File A Complaint In Intervention Set for hearing on Friday, December 9, 2011, Line 6. INTERVENOR EDGARDO GONZALEZ RIVERA Motion To File A Complaint In Intervention. Denied. Moving party failed to provide courtesy copies of motion as required by San Francisco Local Rule 2.6B.

  • Hearing

    Dec 09, 2011

ROBIN BLADES, A MINOR, BY WES BOYD, HER GUARDIAN ET AL VS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Intervene And For Leave To File Complaint In Intervention [Ccp 387] And Notice Of Motion To Join As Necessary Parties Set for hearing on Wednesday, November 30, 2011, Line 14, INTERVENOR DELTA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., DALTON TRUCKING, INC., SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC., ENGINEERING & UTILITY CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA DUMP TRUCK OWNERS ASSOCIATION Notice Of Motion And Motion To Intervene And For Leave To File Complaint In Intervention [Ccp 387

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2011

LONNIE HOLMES VS. LUXOR CAB ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Granting Leave To File Complaint In Intervention; Set for hearing on Wednesday, November 30, 2011, Line 7, INTERVENOR MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Granting Leave To File Complaint In Intervention. Granted. Opposing party failed to provide courtesy copies of the opposition papers as required by San Francisco Local Rule 2.6B.

  • Hearing

    Nov 30, 2011

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY VS. GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION ET AL

Ntc Of Mtn And Mtn For Leave To Intervene And File A Complaint In Intervention Matter on calendar for Wednesday, November 23, 2011, Line 15, INTERVENOR MONICA BLAKE's Notice Of Motion And Motion For Leave To Intervene And File A Complaint In Intervention. Granted. No opposition filed.

  • Hearing

    Nov 23, 2011

EXTREME FIRE PROTECTION INC VS JIM BELL ET AL

There are seven cross-complaints filed by the architect, the civil engineer and subcontractors as well as a complaint in intervention. MSC is set for February 17 and trial for March 15, 2012. Armstrong seeks summary adjudication of the duty of subcontractors to defend it with respect to Bell’s claims in their second amended cross-complaint that arise out of or are connected with the subcontractors’ operations performed under their subcontracts.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2011

  • Judge

    Denise deBellefeuille

  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

BS HAND & SONS INC VS. VRATSINAS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

s porposed complaint in intervention (Exh 1) may be filed and shall be deemed served as of today. Counsel is requested to provide a separate copy of the complaint in intervention, for filing.

  • Hearing

    Oct 27, 2011

VILLA DEI FIORI OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA VS. VILLA DEI FIORI CONDOMINIUMS L.P., A CALIFORNIA ET AL

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO (Amended) File A Complaint-In-Intervention Set for hearing on Thursday, September 29, 2011, line 4, INTERVENOR LINCOLN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO (Amended) File A Complaint-In-Intervention. GRANT, NO OPPOSITION FILED. =(302/CWW)

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2011

VILLA DEI FIORI OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA VS. VILLA DEI FIORI CONDOMINIUMS L.P., A CALIFORNIA ET AL

Ntc Of Motionm To File Complaint In Intervention Set for hearing on Thursday, September 29, 2011, line 4, INTERVENOR LINCOLN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY'S Motion To File Complaint In Intervention - DUPLICATE ENTRY. =(302/CWW)

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2011

EDITH WONG VS. SUET YIM DIANA LAU ET AL

s Motion for Summary Adjudication to the Complaint and Complaint in Intervention is denied. There is a triable issue of fact as to whether the consideration for the Promissory Note was ever paid. If the consideration was never paid, the Note would be void and the foreclosure improper. Further, even if the $300,000 was paid, Defendant Diana Lau?s claims that Plaintiff defaulted by not paying her property taxes, not by failing to pay back the $300,000.

  • Hearing

    Aug 24, 2011

NAVISTAR, INC. VS. CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, AN AGENCY OF THE

DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION Set for hearing on Wednesday, August 17, 2011, line 5. INTERVENOR CUMMINS INC, DAIMLER TRUCKS N. AMERICA, LLC, DETROIT DIESEL CORP., MACK TRUCKS, INC, VOLVO GROUP N. AMERICA, LLC DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION. Cummins Inc et al?s Demurrer to the 1st coa is overruled. The arguments raised require the Court to interpret the Settlement Agreement and its requirement.

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2011

TRAYNOR MARINA INVESTMENTS LLC VS. ROBERT A. COOK

Intervener TMI sets forth in its complaint in intervention that its liens arising from the Sacramento case have priority over any rights or interests Omni may have in Santa Cruz and that a receiver has already been appointed in Sacramento.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2011

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

FAUSTINO ANTONIO GARCIA VS. JC PENNEY CORPORATION INC

Utica may file the complaint in intervention attached to the motion forthwith.

  • Hearing

    Jul 28, 2011

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

FAUSTINO ANTONIO GARCIA VS. JC PENNEY CORPORATION INC

Utica may file the complaint in intervention attached to the motion forthwith.

  • Hearing

    Jul 28, 2011

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

DAWN RIFKIN VS. RIO LINDA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT

Hartford may file the proposed complaint in intervention attached to the motion forthwith.

  • Hearing

    Jul 27, 2011

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

NAVISTAR, INC. VS. CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, AN AGENCY OF THE

DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION Set for hearing on Thursday, July 14, 2011, line 8, INTERVENOR CUMMINS INC., DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, LLC, DETROIT DIESEL CORPORATION, MACK TRUCKS, INC., VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, LLC DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION. CONTINUED TO AUGUST 3, 2011 ON THE COURT'S OWN MOTION. =(302/LMG)

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2011

JAISEN BISHOP VS. DR. HORTON LOS ANGELES HOLDING, INC.

The court's tentative ruling is to: Grant the motion, and deem the proposed complaint in intervention filed in open court. (CCP § 387). CCP §387(a); intervention is proper where: 1) the putative intervener has direct and immediate interest in the action; 2) intervention will not enlarge the issues in the litigation; and 3) reasons for intervention outweigh any opposition by the current parties to the suit. (US Ecology v. CA (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 113, 139.)

  • Hearing

    Jun 03, 2011

NAVISTAR, INC. VS. CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, AN AGENCY OF THE

Ntc Of Mtn And Mtn For Leave To File A Complaint In Intervention Set for hearing on Wednesday, June 1, 2011, line 11. INTERVENOR ENGINE MAUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION'S Motion For Leave To File A Complaint In Intervention is granted. E.M.A. has established intervention as of right as well as permissive intervention. =(302/LMG)

  • Hearing

    Jun 01, 2011

JEROME SAID VS. BTV DEVELOPMENT, LP

New Case Management Statements shall be filed by all parties no later than 15 days prior to the hearing pursuant to Local Rule 11.055 This matter is continued to allow the Complaint in Intervention to proceed. Absent a request to appear and be heard for any matter on the Case Management Calendar, all tentative rulings shall become the final ruling of the court. The tentative ruling, or such other ruling as the court may render, will not become the final ruling of the court until the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Jun 01, 2011

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

CONCORDE EQUITY 11, LLC VS. Q-BLACK, ET AL

Mo For Leave To File Complaint In Intervention Set for hearing on Friday, May 27, 2011, line 2. INTERVENOR MATTHEW SCHWARZ, GEORGE GAMBLE, NANCY GAMBLE'S Motion For Leave To File Complaint In Intervention is granted. Intervenors have met their burden under CCP 387 (b). =(302/LMG)

  • Hearing

    May 27, 2011

NAVISTAR, INC. VS. CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, AN AGENCY OF THE

Ntc Of Motion For Leave To File Complaint In Intervention Set for hearing on Thursday, May 5, 2011, line 7, INTERVENOR CUMMINS INC., DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, LLC, DETROIT DIESEL CORPORATION, MACK TRUCKS, INC., VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA, LLC Motion For Leave To File Complaint In Intervention. Cummin, Inc., Daimler Trucks North America, LLC, Detroit Diesel Corp., Mack Trucks, Inc., and Volvo Group North America, LLC?s Motion to Intervene is granted Per CCP ?387(a) and (b).

  • Hearing

    May 05, 2011

JOHNNY ROBLES VS. COUNTY OF VENTURA

(Complaint-In-Intervention)- Dismiss without prejudice per represented settlement. No appearance necessary if there is no opposition.

  • Hearing

    Mar 18, 2011

  • Judge

    Jeanne Flaherty

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

AIRGAS-NOTHERN CALIFORNIA & NEVADA. INC. VS. KAMPS PROPANE

The court notes that defendant is entitled to test a complaint in intervention by way of demurrer. The court has developed a special Friday demurrer calendar and has set aside space for additional demurrers on Wednesdays. Accordingly, the backlog for setting demurrers has significantly lessened.

  • Hearing

    Mar 01, 2011

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  « first    1 ... 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.