Complaint in Intervention?

Useful Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

Recent Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

1451-1475 of 1607 results

CHATEAU DE LOUIS,LLC A CALIFORNIA LIMITED ET AL VS. GENERAL WINDOW CORPORATION DBA INTERNATIONAL ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Sever Cross Complaint And Complaint In Intervention From First Amended Complaint Set for hearing on Monday, October 21, 2013, Line 1, INTERVENOR EVEREST INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY's Motion To Sever Cross Complaint And Complaint In Intervention From First Amended Complaint. Continued to November 5, 2013 to give Everest Indemnity Insurance Company the opportunity to comply with Local Rule 2.6B.

  • Hearing

    Oct 21, 2013

VALENTE REVELES JR VS FRANK MACIAS ET AL

Plaintiff and defendants later agreed to settle around County, contingent upon County’s filing a complaint in intervention. On February 13, 2013, County filed its complaint in intervention. At a second mandatory settlement conference on February 15, 2013, plaintiff and defendants finalized their settlement on the record.

  • Hearing

    Oct 11, 2013

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

MARTHA O'BRIEN VS. DOWMAN PRODUCTS, INC. ET AL

Notice Of Proposed Intervenors Motion For An Order Granting Leave To File A Complaint-In-Intervention Pursuant To Ccp Section 387 ON ASBESTOS LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR FOR THURSDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2013 IN DEPARTMENT 503 AT 9:30 A.M., LINE 4, Proposed Intervenors Hartford Fire Insurance Co., et al?s (on behalf of their insured defendant Rich-Tex, Inc.) motion for leave to file a complaint-in-intervention pursuant to C.C.P. section 387 is granted. No opposition filed.

  • Hearing

    Oct 10, 2013

IVA MCGREW ET AL VS. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED ET AL

Notice Of Proposed Intervenors Motion For An Order Granting Leave To File A Complaint-In-Intervention Pursuant To Ccp Section 387 ON ASBESTOS LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR FOR THURSDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2013 IN DEPARTMENT 503 AT 9:30 A.M., LINE 2, Proposed Intervenors Hartford Fire Insurance Co., et al?s (on behalf of their insured defendant Rich-Tex, Inc.) motion for leave to file a complaint-in-intervention pursuant to C.C.P. section 387 is granted. No opposition filed.

  • Hearing

    Oct 10, 2013

JAMES SCHWERDT ET AL VS. BORG-WARNER CORPORATION, BY ITS SUCCESSOR IN INTER ET AL

Notice Of Proposed Intervenors Motion For An Order Granting Leave To File A Complaint-In-Intervention Pursuant To Ccp Section 387 ON ASBESTOS LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR FOR THURSDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2013 IN DEPARTMENT 503 AT 9:30 A.M., LINE 3, Proposed Intervenors Hartford Fire Insurance Co., et al?s (on behalf of their insured defendant Rich-Tex, Inc.) motion for leave to file a complaint-in-intervention pursuant to C.C.P. section 387 is granted. No opposition filed.

  • Hearing

    Oct 10, 2013

DOMENIC J CANNIZZARO ET AL VS. FRED P RICHARD ET AL

Ntc Of Mtn And Mtn To Intervene And To File A Complaint In Intervention Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, September 17, 2013, line 1. -INTERVENOR ROBERT RICHARD II'S Motion To Intervene And To File A Complaint In Intervention. is GRANTED. Robert Richard II has an interest in the outcome of this ligation. Motion is timely in light of representations made by his former counsel Dominic Cannizzaro. Intervenor shall file and serve his motion in intervention forthwith. = (501/PJB)

  • Hearing

    Sep 17, 2013

DOMENIC J CANNIZZARO ET AL VS. FRED P RICHARD ET AL

Ntc Of Mtn And Mtn To Intervene And To File A Complaint In Intervention Matter on Calendar for Monday, September 9, 2013, Line 3, INTERVENOR ROBERT RICHARD II'S Notice Of Motion And Motion To Intervene And To File A Complaint In Intervention The motion is continued to September 17, 2013, to be heard in department 501 at 9:30 a.m. That department handles all real property dispute cases.

  • Hearing

    Sep 09, 2013

VALENTE REVELES JR VS FRANK MACIAS ET AL

Accordingly, plaintiff and defendants agreed to enter into a tentative settlement around County, contingent upon County’s filing a complaint in intervention. (Up to this point, County had filed a notice of lien in the case, but had not formally intervened.) The parties further agreed to continue the Mandatory Settlement Conference to February 15, 2013 to allow County to intervene in the case. On February 13, 2013, County filed its complaint in intervention.

  • Hearing

    Sep 06, 2013

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

JASON WILSON VS. JESUS QUINTERO

Moreover, allowing Sedgwick to file its proposed complaint-in-intervention would only slightly enlarge the issues in this lawsuit because the complaint-in-intervention only seeks to recover benefits paid on Plaintiff's behalf as a result of Defendants' alleged negligence.

  • Hearing

    Aug 21, 2013

ABDIEL RAFAEL GALINDO VS. RICHARD JONES ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION Matter on Calendar for Friday, July 19, 2013, Line 18, DEFENDANTS IN INTERVENTION RICHARD JONES and SANDRA JONES' MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION. Granted. The Complaint in Intervention filed on March 4, 2013 is stricken as it predates the Court's order issued on May 17, 2013, granting Intervenor leave to file a Complaint in Intervention. The Complaint in Intervention filed on May 17, 2013 is the operative pleading.

  • Hearing

    Jul 19, 2013

VALENTE REVELES JR VS FRANK MACIAS ET AL

On February 13, 2013, County filed its complaint in intervention. On February 15, 2013, all parties appeared at the continued MSC. The parties finalized their agreement as follows: The plaintiff has worked out his claims against the Goleta Valley Community Center only. So plaintiff and the defendant, and the agreement worked out between those two parties are that subject to Labor Code section 3852, and 3859(b); they’re settling their claims again (sic) each other.

  • Hearing

    Jul 12, 2013

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

ABDIEL RAFAEL GALINDO VS. RICHARD JONES ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION Set for hearing on Monday, June 17, 2013, Line 16, DEFENDANT IN INTERVENTION RICHARD JONES, SANDRA JONES MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION Continued to July 19, 2013 on the Court's own motion. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to [email protected] with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. =302/MJM

  • Hearing

    Jun 17, 2013

ABDIEL RAFAEL GALINDO VS. RICHARD JONES ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION Matter on calendar for Wednesday, May 22, 2013, Line 30, DEFENDANTs IN INTERVENTION RICHARD JONES & SANDRA JONES' MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION. Continued to June 17, 2013 to give the opposing party the opportunity to comply with Local Rule 2.6B.

  • Hearing

    May 22, 2013

VALENTE REVELES JR VS FRANK MACIAS ET AL

On February 13, 2013, County applied to the court ex parte for leave to file a complaint in intervention in order to recover its payments of workers’ compensation benefits. The application was granted and County’s complaint in intervention was then filed. On February 15, 2013, the parties attended a Readiness and Settlement Conference. A settlement was reached between Reveles and defendants.

  • Hearing

    May 10, 2013

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

JONES MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, A VS. OVERAA/MILLER CONSTRUCTION, ET AL

Notice Of Motion For Leave To File A Complaint In Intervention Set for hearing on Monday, May 6, 2013, Line 5, INTERVENOR RSUI GROUP, INC.'s Motion For Leave To File A Complaint In Intervention. Granted. No opposition filed. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to [email protected] with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

  • Hearing

    May 06, 2013

COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY VS. MANUEL PEDROSA CONTRERAS ET AL

Of Amendment To Complt In Intervention Set for hearing on Wednesday, May 1, 2013, Line 13, INTERVENOR DAVID CANIZALES Motion To File Amendment To Complaint In Intervention. Motion for leave to file amendment to Complaint in Intervention pursuant to CCP 474 is denied. Moving party did not show that it was genuinely ignorant of the potential liability and identity of Tropicana & Russell Inc., dba Marina Foods ("T&R") in light of the fact that Mr.

  • Hearing

    May 01, 2013

JUAN TAFOYA ET AL VS BAKER PERKINS INC

Nature of Proceedings: Motion Leave Motion to file a complaint-in-intervention by Illinois Midwest Insurance Agency on behalf of Star Insurance Company. Granted; intervenor must attend the Case Management Conference of 4/23/13 at 8:30 am; telephone appearances acceptable; complaint must be filed by May 1, 2013.

  • Hearing

    Apr 16, 2013

JONES MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, A VS. OVERAA/MILLER CONSTRUCTION, ET AL

Notice Of Motion For Leave To File A Complaint In Intervention Matter on calendar for Friday, April 12, 2013, Line 4, INTERVENOR ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY'S Motion For Leave To File A Complaint In Intervention. Granted. No opposition filed. Admiral's Complaint in Intervention shall be filed within 10 days after entry of this order. The Court will sign the proposed order submitted with the moving papers.

  • Hearing

    Apr 12, 2013

JONES MEMORIAL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, A VS. OVERAA/MILLER CONSTRUCTION, ET AL

For Leave To File A Complaint In Intervention; Matter on calendar for Friday, April 12, 2013, Line 4, INTERVENOR ARROWPOINT CAPITAL CORP'S Motion For Arrowpoint Capital Corp. For Leave To File A Complaint In Intervention. Granted. No opposition filed. The Court will sign the proposed order submitted with the moving papers.

  • Hearing

    Apr 12, 2013

BRIAN CARIDEO VS. STANLEY KELLEY ET AL

Defendants shall have 30 days from entry of the order lifting the stay to file a response to Francene Kenedy's Complaint in Intervention. The parties should contact Department 206 to set a new trial date and case management conference. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to [email protected] with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

  • Hearing

    Apr 11, 2013

DANIEL GARCIA VS IOVATE HEALTH SCIENCES USA INC

On March 7, 2012, he filed his complaint in intervention asserting the same six causes of action Garcia has asserted in this action. The motion for preliminary approval of class settlement is set for April 18, 2013. Motion for Stay: Branca now moves to stay this action pending the resolution of his federal action.

  • Hearing

    Apr 04, 2013

COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY VS. MANUEL PEDROSA CONTRERAS ET AL

Of Amendment To Complt In Intervention Matter on calendar for Tuesday, April 2, 2013, Line 14, INTERVENOR DAVID CANIZALES Amendment To Complaint In Intervention. Continued to May 1, 2013 on the Court's motion. Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to [email protected] with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. =(302/EHG)

  • Hearing

    Apr 02, 2013

DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT ETC VS AT&T MOBILITY ETC ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Motion: Intervene The unopposed motion of plaintiff-intervenor Raul Quintana-Castillo for leave to file a complaint in intervention and to intervene in this action is granted. Intervenor shall file the complaint in intervention in the form attached to the motion on or before March 14, 2013. The complaint in intervention is deemed served on the parties served with notice of this motion as of March 7, 2013.

  • Hearing

    Mar 07, 2013

  • Judge

    Denise deBellefeuille

  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

DANIEL GARCIA VS IOVATE HEALTH SCIENCES USA INC

Kevin Branca shall file and serve his complaint in intervention no later than March 7, 2013. On July 20, 2012, plaintiff Daniel Garcia filed this purported class action against defendant Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A., Inc. Iovate manufactures, markets and sells Hydroxycut – a weight loss product. Garcia alleges: The product does not have the weight loss capabilities that Iovate claims in advertising. Garcia would not have purchased the product but for the claims Iovate made.

  • Hearing

    Feb 21, 2013

  • Judge

    Denise deBellefeuille

  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

CHRISTOPHER THOMAS SCOTT VS. ROBERT ELMER BARQUERO ET AL

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO Allow Filing Of Complaint In Intervention Set for hearing on Thursday, February 7, 2013, Line 17, INTERVENOR FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO Allow Filing Of Complaint In Intervention The motion for leave to file a complaint in intervention pursuant to CCP ? 387 is granted. No opposition filed.

  • Hearing

    Feb 07, 2013

  « first    1 ... 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.