Complaint in Intervention?

Useful Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

Recent Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

76-100 of 1550 results

HOLLENCREST BAYVIEW PARTNERS L.P. VS FROST MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC

CCP § 387, which provides for intervention in “an action or proceeding”, requires that the motion to intervene “shall” include a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention or answer in intervention. Moving parties appear to argue that have satisfied the statutory elements to intervene by contending that the situation here is “unique” and that because § 387 permits intervention in any “proceeding”, the mandatory requirement of a pleading in intervention need not be met. (Reply at 5:8-13).

  • Hearing

    Feb 21, 2020

GEIGER VS SUNWOOD PACIFIC RIDGE LLC

Having reviewed and considered Colony Insurance Company's ("Colony") unopposed motion for leave to intervene and to file its complaint in intervention in the Geiger Action, and proof being made to the satisfaction of the Court and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Colony's motion. The Court will sign the proposed order.

  • Hearing

    Feb 13, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

GEIGER VS SUNWOOD PACIFIC RIDGE LLC

Having reviewed and considered Colony Insurance Company's ("Colony") unopposed motion for leave to intervene and to file its complaint in intervention in the Geiger Action, and proof being made to the satisfaction of the Court and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Colony's motion. The Court will sign the proposed order.

  • Hearing

    Feb 13, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

JEREMIAH CASAS VS THE HOPS LLC, ET AL.

The petition shall include a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention or answer in intervention and set forth the grounds upon which intervention rests.” Plaintiff Jeremiah Casas filed a complaint for assault and battery against The Hops LLC (dba the Junction Bar), Joseph August, and Does 1-20. Plaintiff alleges that on 4/3/17, Doe 1, who is employed by The Hops LLC as a security guard, allowed Does 2-7 to assault Plaintiff. Based on these facts, the complaint asserts causes of action for: 1.

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2020

SAVE THE VALLEY LLC VS CHUMASH CASINO AND RESORT ENTERPRISES ET AL

., Exhibit 2, pp 5-6] STV sought leave to file a complaint in intervention in The Roman Catholic Bishop of Monterrey v. Salomon Cota, et al., USDC C.D. Cal. Case 2:15-cv-08065-JFW-RAO (“STV II”). [Id. Exhibit 3] The court denied leave to file that complaint.

  • Hearing

    Feb 07, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

RIVERA, DONALD SCOTT VS. VELO PROMO LLC

SKILES, WESTON EUGENE – Intervenor’s Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention –GRANTED, and unopposed. The Court finds that the action falls within the provisions of Lab. Code §3853, such that intervention is mandatory under Code Civ. Proc. §387(d)(1)(A). Movant shall be permitted to file the Complaint in Intervention. The Court will sign the proposed order submitted by the moving party.

  • Hearing

    Feb 05, 2020

KEVIN SANDOVAL VS EXPRESS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., ET AL.

Intervenor shall file its complaint in intervention within ten (10) days. Intervenor shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: February 3, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Feb 03, 2020

SMITH VS PETERS

Although a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention is not attached to the motion, precluding the Court from conducting a complete evaluation, the Court deems the lack of opposition to the motion to be a concession as to the merits of the motion.

  • Hearing

    Jan 30, 2020

SMITH VS PETERS

Although a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention is not attached to the motion, precluding the Court from conducting a complete evaluation, the Court deems the lack of opposition to the motion to be a concession as to the merits of the motion.

  • Hearing

    Jan 30, 2020

JESUS ISMAEL GUTIERREZ VS PORTS AMERICA CRUISE, INC.

.: 19STCV42902 Hearing Date: January 28, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion for leave to file complaint in intervention Plaintiff Jesus I. Gutierrez (“Plaintiff”) filed the complaint in this case based on injuries she sustained in an underlying accident. Proposed Intervenor Redwood Fire & Casualty Insurance Company (“Intervenor”) seeks leave to intervene per Labor Code section 3852. Intervenor represents that it paid workers’ compensation benefits to Plaintiff as a result of the accident.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2020

ARMET VS. WOLVERINE FENCE COMPANY

Moving Party is to file its Complaint in Intervention within 10 days. Moving Party is to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2020

XERA HEALTH LLC VS SCHEELE

The complaint in intervention was thereafter filed. ROA 178. Scheele and Nova-Life filed a general denial as well as a cross-complaint in intervention against CSVBA and George McGregor. ROA 198, 199. This cross-complaint in intervention was later amended (ROA 223), and it is the focus of this ruling. Xera Health filed an answer as well as a cross-complaint in intervention against Scheele and Nova-Life. ROA 205, 206.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

RICHMOND POLICE VS. CITY OF RICHMOND

HEARING ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS FILED BY ALLWYN BROWN, CITY OF RICHMOND * TENTATIVE RULING: * The City of Richmond and its chief of police, Allwyn Brown, as respondents to the cross- complaint in intervention filed by the Media Intervenors, move for judgment on the pleadings against that cross-complaint. The motion rests on hypertechnical procedural grounds not going in any way to the substantive merits of the Media Intervenors’ claims. The motion is denied.

  • Hearing

    Jan 24, 2020

XERA HEALTH LLC VS SCHEELE

The complaint in intervention was thereafter filed. ROA 178. Scheele and Nova-Life filed a general denial as well as a cross-complaint in intervention against CSVBA and George McGregor. ROA 198, 199. This cross-complaint in intervention was later amended (ROA 223), and it is the focus of this ruling. Xera Health filed an answer as well as a cross-complaint in intervention against Scheele and Nova-Life. ROA 205, 206.

  • Hearing

    Jan 23, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

XERA HEALTH LLC VS SCHEELE

The complaint in intervention was thereafter filed. ROA 178. Scheele and Nova-Life filed a general denial as well as a cross-complaint in intervention against CSVBA and George McGregor. ROA 198, 199. This cross-complaint in intervention was later amended (ROA 223), and it is the focus of this ruling. Xera Health filed an answer as well as a cross-complaint in intervention against Scheele and Nova-Life. ROA 205, 206.

  • Hearing

    Jan 23, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

KELSO V. CITY OF FRESNO

Proposed Intervenor is ordered to file the proposed complaint-in-intervention within five (5) court days of this order and perfect service in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANDRE COLLINS VS JOSE LOPEZ ET AL

App. 3d 678, 682-83 (if it asserts a new cause of action, leave to file a complaint in intervention “must be filed within the pertinent limitations period.”) The statue of limitations for injuries caused by the neglect of another is two years from the date of accrual. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1. Here, the accident occurred on August 15, 2016. The statute of limitations on Ms. Brown’s claim thus expired on August 15, 2018. Ms.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2020

MATTER OF THE GEORGE MIGUEL CARRARI TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 28, 1979

Farmer, the Temporary Trustee of the Carrari Family Trust dated February 28, 2002, that was filed on 12/20/19 by his counsel James Buttery and Elizabeth Culley for an order directing the Clerk of the Court to enter default against Defendant Angelina Dettamanti for failing to respond to the Complaint-in-Intervention filed on May 2, 2019, by Farmer and served on Dettamanti at her service address of record in this case and in the related cases on June 6, 2019, is GRANTED (there is a proposed order submitted).

  • Hearing

    Jan 21, 2020

MARTIN SANCHEZ, ET AL. VS JULIO CESAR FERRER

Intervener is ordered to file a separate copy of the complaint-in-intervention within ten days. Intervener is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 17, 2020

ESTEBAN MONTENEGRO VS FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION

Plaintiff then brought a motion to set aside the dismissal of the Cross-Complaint in intervention, which was heard on April 12, 2019, and granted. The copy of the FACC attached to the motion to set aside set forth three causes of action, for Violation of California Civil Code § 2624.17, Wrongful Foreclosure, and Slander of Title. The FACC efiled with the court and served on the parties added a fourth cause of action for quiet title and fifth cause of action for declaratory relief.

  • Hearing

    Jan 17, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Foreclosure

JESSE COMBS ET AL. VS BROSAMER & WALL, INC. ET AL.

s November 22, 2019 Motion to Strike Complaint-In-Intervention, Plaintiff-In-Intervention's Opposition to Motion to Strike Portions of Complaint-In-Intervention filed December 10, 2019 and Plaintiff-In-Intervention's Reply filed January 8, 2020. The Court agrees with defendant's analysis and following the authorities set forth therein finds the Complaint-In-Intervention does not set forth facts sufficient to support a claim for punitive damages.

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George J. Abdallah

  • County

    San Joaquin County, CA

JONATHAN PEREZ, AN INDIVIDUAL VS XU PAN, ET AL.

The Court also finds Intervener filed a proposed complaint-in-intervention as an exhibit to the moving papers, such that there is no failure to provide a copy of the proposed complaint with the moving papers. The motion to intervene is granted. Intervener is ordered to file a separate copy of the complaint-in-intervention within ten days. Intervener is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2020

BRYAN HEESCH, ET AL. VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

RELIEF REQUESTED: Travelers moves for leave to file a complaint in intervention in the instant action as Subrogee of Shaw.

  • Hearing

    Jan 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

PEDRO ZUNIGA VS KEMP BROS CONSTRUCTION INC ET AL

Everett shall file its complaint-in-intervention within ten (10) days. Everett shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: January 10, 2020 ___________________________ Hon. Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Jan 10, 2020

DONALD GREENE VS KOMATSU FORKLIFT RETAIL OPERATIONS, INC., ET AL.

ICW shall file its complaint-in-intervention within ten (10) days. ICW shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: January 9, 2020 ___________________________ Hon. Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Jan 09, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 62     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.