Complaint in Intervention?

Useful Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

Recent Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

51-75 of 1551 results

CHIOTTI, ET AL. V. K HOVNANIAN HOMES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., ET AL.

The Complaint, filed on May 16, 2018, sets forth the 25 following causes of action: (1) Violation of Building Standards as Set Forth in California Civil 26 Code § 896; (2) Breach of Implied Warranty of Merchantability; (3) Breach of Contract; and 27 (4) Breach of Express Warranty. 1 Now before the court is the motion of Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company 2 (“Ironshore”) to intervene and file a complaint-in-intervention on behalf of its insured Legacy 3 Plumbing Company, Inc. (“Legacy”).

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

CYNTHIA ZABALA VS JAMES ALAN MOBLEY

Defendant also seeks summary judgment on the Complaint-in-Intervention. Defendant’s attempt to bring a combined summary judgment is procedurally improper. Defendant was required to bring two separate motions, with two reservations and two filing fees. Therefore, the Court declines to consider Defendant’s motion as it relates to the issues of the complaint-in-intervention.

  • Hearing

    Jun 25, 2020

RICHARD WALLACE VS WJE TRUCKING INC ET AL

“‘[T]he law is clearly established that, when the employer’s action is timely filed, the employee may intervene and press his complaint in intervention to recover damages for personal injuries, even though the employee does not appear and make such a claim until more than one year after his injury.’” (Id. at 207 [quoting Harrison v. Englebrick (1967) 254 Cal.App.2d 871, 875].) An employer includes the employer’s insurer. (Lab. Code, § 3850, subd. (b).)

  • Hearing

    Jun 24, 2020

GENERAL STREET MEDIA, LLC VS SUNSET HILLS CAR WASH, INC.

Sunset GP has satisfied the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 387, subdivision (c), including attaching a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention. The Motion for Leave to Intervene is GRANTED. MOTION TO EXPUNGE LIS PENDENS “A lis pendens is a recorded document giving constructive notice that an action has been filed affecting title to or right to possession of the real property described in the notice.’ [Citation.]

  • Hearing

    Jun 22, 2020

MAGED HAKEEM VS. UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LP

Similarly, Representative Plaintiffs admit that Moving Parties carefully crafted the proposed complaint-in-intervention to avoid enlarging the issues. While Representative Plaintiffs contend this is a ruse and Moving Parties are seeking to recover for unrelated claims, Moving Parties will be limited to recovery only for those claims actually asserted in this action.

  • Hearing

    Jun 17, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

SANCHEZ V. WEST AG SERVICES, INC., ET AL.

Moving party to file its complaint in intervention within 10 days of the clerk’s service of the minute order. Explanation: Code of Civil Procedure section 387, subdivision (b), provides that the court shall grant a timely application for intervention based on an unconditional right to intervene.

  • Hearing

    Jun 15, 2020

SAVE THE VALLEY LLC VS CHUMASH CASINO AND RESORT ENTERPRISES ET AL

., Exhibit 2, pp 5-6] STV sought leave to file a complaint in intervention in The Roman Catholic Bishop of Monterrey v. Salomon Cota, et al., USDC C.D. Cal. Case 2:15-cv-08065-JFW-RAO (“STV II”). [Id. Exhibit 3] The court denied leave to file that complaint.

  • Hearing

    Jun 12, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

ORTIZ VS. 54 CAROL LANE, LP

HEARING ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION FILED BY COMPWEST INSURANCE COMPANY * TENTATIVE RULING: * Granted. No opposition.

  • Hearing

    Jun 11, 2020

ECO PROPERTY GROUP LLC V. SNIDER INVESTMENTS LLC, ET AL.

Motion for leave to file cross-complaint in intervention Against this pleading backdrop, MEPI, as successor to SCCP, seeks leave to intervene in the action, through the filing of a cross-complaint in intervention (CCI) against individual defendants Brent Buhrman, Scott Edwin Newby, Eli Owens, Roger Macfarlane, and Gary William Walker, Jr.

  • Hearing

    Jun 09, 2020

ISAAC ESCOBAR VS QUINN LIFT INC ET AL

The complaint in intervention shall be filed and served on or before April 2, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Mar 18, 2020

MADELINE F FRANGEL VS. AARON SUMNER MCKINNEY

. § 387(c) and (f) but is erroneously entitled a complaint in intervention. The Court grants leave to file the proposed answer in intervention. Further, the Court grants leave to amend the title of the proposed pleading to correctly reflect its content. The pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee. This case has been assigned to Department 47 for hearing.

  • Hearing

    Mar 16, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

CLIVE WILKINSON VS SCANLON CONSTRUCTION INC

On November 13, 2019, JRIC filed and served a motion for leave to file a complaint-in-intervention as the insurer for Cross-Defendant Southern California Steel, Inc. (“SCS”), a suspended California corporation, to assert the denials and defenses set forth in JRIC’s concurrently filed proposed complaint-in-intervention.

  • Hearing

    Mar 16, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

JESUS ISMAEL GUTIERREZ VS PORTS AMERICA CRUISE, INC.

Intervenor shall file its complaint-in-intervention within ten (10) days. Intervenor shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: March 12, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2020

GALVAN VS. TREPPA

* TENTATIVE RULING: * First Group’s unopposed motion for leave to file a complaint in intervention pursuant to CCP 387 and Labor Code 3852 is granted. The court will sign the order provided.

  • Hearing

    Mar 11, 2020

LARAINE BAXTER VS EDER REYES MENDEZ ET AL

Intervener is ordered to file a separate copy of the complaint-in-intervention within ten days. Intervener is ordered to give notice. Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at [email protected] indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org.

  • Hearing

    Mar 10, 2020

MORALES VS. TORRES GENERAL INC.

Plaintiff-in-Intervention Next Level Administrator for United Wisconsin Insurance Company, as real party in interest, filed its complaint in intervention against Garden and the Owners alleging negligence, premises liability, and subrogation. Because Plaintiff’s claims fail, the Plaintiff-in-Intervention’s claims necessarily fail. Thus, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted. Moving parties to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2020

MORALES VS. TORRES GENERAL INC.

Plaintiff-in-Intervention Next Level Administrator for United Wisconsin Insurance Company, as real party in interest, filed its complaint in intervention against Garden and the Owners alleging negligence, premises liability, and subrogation. Because Plaintiff’s claims fail, the Plaintiff-in-Intervention’s claims necessarily fail. Thus, Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted. Moving parties to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Mar 09, 2020

PEARHEAD, INC. VS. LUH

Proposed Intervenor to file the complaint in intervention within 15 days of this ruling and shall serve the complaint in intervention in compliance with CCP § 387. Intervention is governed by Code of Civil Procedure section 387. Subdivision (a) of section 387 states in relevant part, “[u]pon timely application, any person, who has an interest in the matter in litigation, or in the success of either of the parties, or an interest against both, may intervene in the action or proceeding.”

  • Hearing

    Mar 05, 2020

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO INSURANCE V. SARAH STORER

Century submits a copy of its proposed “complaint in intervention”. (Benton Decl., Exh. A.) As set forth above, this action arises out of an accident that occurred on July 29, 2019 wherein Storer sideswiped a parked Jeep Wrangler owned by Beene and insured by State Farm. (Benton Decl., ¶ 2.) On October 22, 2019, State Farm filed this complaint for subrogation. At the time of the accident, Storer was insured by Century. (Benton Decl., ¶ 4.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 05, 2020

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY VS CARLOS VIORATO

Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1013a, subdivision (1), a proof of service by mail must set forth “the exact title of the document served and filed in the cause…” Here, the Proof of Service filed indicates that Twin City’s “Ex Parte Application for Leave to File a Complaint-in-Intervention” has been served. Thus, because this Motion is not brought on an ex-parte basis, the Proof of Service does not demonstrate the parties were served with the instant Motion.

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JONATHAN CLYMAN, ET AL. VS PULLMAN TRANSPORT, LLC

The petition shall include a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention or answer in intervention and set forth the grounds upon which intervention rests. (Code Civ. Proc., § 387, subd. (c).)

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2020

STAFFING NETWORK HOLDINGS, L.L.C. VS DWELL HOME, INC. ET AL.

Salvador sought leave to file a complaint in intervention, which leave was granted. Mr. Salvador filed his complaint-in-intervention on May 21, 2018 against Dwell Home, Inc. and Mr. LeBlanc, alleging injury to his right ankle by negligence in the operation of a forklift by Mr. LeBlanc at a Dwell warehouse in Lathrop on January 15, 2016. His injury has required multiple surgeries. Complaint in Intervention (“Complaint”), ¶ 9.

  • Hearing

    Mar 01, 2020

ROBERT BELANGER VS ROGER COTY

By way of this complaint-in-intervention, the City seeks to recoup these amounts from defendants. The City has a right to intervene in this action. Any employer who pays, or becomes obligated to pay compensation, or who pays, or becomes obligated to pay salary in lieu of compensation, or who pays or becomes obligated to pay an amount to the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Section 4706.5, may likewise make a claim or bring an action against the third person. Lab.Code § 3852.

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2020

DEDICATO TREATMENT CENTER, INC. VS MICHAEL D. ANDERSON

., LLC’s Demurrer to the 3rd Cause of Action of the Second Amended Cross-Complaint-in-Intervention is OVERRULED. The Motion to Strike Portions of the Second Amended Cross-Complaint-in-Intervention is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. ANALYSIS: Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Dedicato Treatment Center, Inc.

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2020

DOUGLAS EMMETT MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. VS FIBERTEL COMMUNICATIONS, ET AL.

Richard Webb’s Motion for Leave to File a Complaint-in-Intervention for Recovery of Damages Pursuant to Labor Code Section 3853, filed on 01/21/20, is GRANTED. Intervenor is ordered to file his complaint in intervention within 10 days of the date of this order. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 63     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.