Complaint in Intervention?

Useful Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

Recent Rulings on Complaint in Intervention

26-50 of 1551 results

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N,A, VS JL FURNISHINGS LLC, ET AL.

On August 22, 2019, Labor Commissioner filed a complaint in intervention to allegedly protect the statutory rights of approximately 360 former employees of JLF. Labor Commissioner filed a complaint in intervention against JLF and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. alleging causes of action for: (1) enforcement of wage claim preference under California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1204; and (2) enforcement of wage lien under California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1205.

  • Hearing

    Jul 23, 2020

MARK SASSER VS. JACK STEVEN GRAY

As the proposed complaint in intervention seeks only to assert affirmative defenses, the Court grants leave to amend the proposed pleading in intervention to clarify its nature as an answer. The pleading in intervention shall be filed upon presentment to the clerk and payment of the requisite filing fee. This case has been assigned to Department 47 for hearing. In the event that either party requests a hearing the matter will be heard at 9:30 a.m. in Department 47.

  • Hearing

    Jul 22, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

PRIETO V. PACIFIC PRIDE, LLC

Motion by FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention TENTATIVE RULING The unopposed motion is granted. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY is to file and serve its proposed complaint in intervention forthwith, on both Plaintiff, and on Defendant, the latter in the manner required for service of summons, per C.C.P. §387(e)(2)(A). THE PARTIES MAY JOIN THIS COURT CALENDAR REMOTELY UTILIZING THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82099418111?

  • Hearing

    Jul 22, 2020

WASHINGTON V. TSERING, ET AL.

(1) Motion by CSAA for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention; (2) Motion by CSAA to Vacate Default Judgment of Defendant TSERING TENTATIVE RULING Parties are to appear via Zoom.

  • Hearing

    Jul 22, 2020

GRACE CARELLI VS. MERCEDES BOHBOT

The proposed complaint-in-intervention and this motion are improperly brought in the name of the Trust alone. (See Motion, Ex. A.) The trustee of the Trust is not named. Therefore, the motion is denied without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 21, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

HAROLD WEBSTER VS JAVAN JAMES EBERHARD

Moving party is ordered to file its Complaint-in-Intervention forthwith. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 21, 2020

KATIE SANCHEZ VS BRIAN GREGORY, ET AL.

Intervenor shall file its complaint-in-intervention within ten (10) days. Intervenor shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: July 17, 2020 ___________________________ Stephen I. Goorvitch Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

EMILIANO DIAZ PINEDA, ET AL. VS C & E TRASNPORTATION, LLC, ET AL.

Complaint-In-Intervention to be filed forthwith. The court shall permit a nonparty to intervene if required by law or the intervenor shows an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede that person’s ability to protect the interest. Code Civ. Proc., § 387(d)(1)(B). Intervenor insures and provides a defense for Defendants, C&E Transportation, LLC and Bao Nguyen.

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

BERNADINE RAMIREZ VS 7-ELEVEN INC ET AL

Hawley Insurance Company filed a complaint-in-intervention for its FTB forfeited corporate insured, IPT, LLC dba FM Facility Maintenance. Dismissal of the complaint-in-intervention with prejudice was entered on April 10, 2018. On February 11, 2020, Plaintiff filed the instant motion to compel deposition.

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY VS CARLOS VIORATO

On January 31, 2020, Non-party Twin City Fire Insurance Company (“Twin City”) filed the instant Application for Leave to File a Complaint in Intervention (the “Motion”). On March 3, 2020, the Court continued the hearing due to a deficiency in the proof of service and ordered Twin City to file a corrected proof of service. (3/3/20 Minute Order.) On April 6, 2020, Twin City re-filed the Motion with a new proof of service. To date, no opposition has been filed.

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

WASHINGTON V. TSERING, ET AL.

Motion by CSAA for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention TENTATIVE RULING This motion is continued to July 22, 2020, at 8:45 a.m., to coincide with the hearing on CSAA’s motion to set aside default of Defendant DAWA TSERING. Insofar as CSAA is seeking to intervene to defend its insurance policy insuring TSERING against Plaintiff’s claims of liability against TSERING, CSAA is to file and serve, at least 5 days prior to the July 22 hearing, a proposed “answer in intervention”.

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

THE MOTIVA GROUP INC VS GLOBAL IMPACT GROUP INC

The petition shall include a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention or answer in intervention and set forth the grounds upon which intervention rests." Venture Resources has not submitted this required pleading (e.g., a complaint seeking a declaration of rights). The Motion is denied on this basis and the Court does not consider Plaintiff's other arguments in opposition. _____ 3.

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

THE MOTIVA GROUP INC VS GLOBAL IMPACT GROUP INC

The petition shall include a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention or answer in intervention and set forth the grounds upon which intervention rests." Venture Resources has not submitted this required pleading (e.g., a complaint seeking a declaration of rights). The Motion is denied on this basis and the Court does not consider Plaintiff's other arguments in opposition. _____ 3.

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

ISAAC ESCOBAR V. QUINN LIFT, INC., ET AL.

On June 15, 2020, NYM filed its complaint in intervention against Quinn. The demurrer was rescheduled to this hearing date by notice on May 26, 2020. No opposition or other response has been received to this demurrer. Analysis: “ ‘The rules by which the sufficiency of a complaint is tested against a general demurrer are well settled.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

ESTHER HERNANDEZ VS SAFEWAY INC ET AL

Motion for an Order to Allow Zurich American Insurance Company to Intervene and File its Complaint-In-Intervention, in its Capacity as Insurer of Cross-Defendant Paramount Building Solutions, LLC, a Suspended Entity in Response to the Cross-Complaint of the Vons Companies is GRANTED. Complaint-In-Intervention to be filed forthwith.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

LUIS SIERRA VS FIBER CARE BATHS INC.

Motion for Leave to File Complaint-in-Intervention by American Zurich Insurance Company is GRANTED. Intervenor paid benefits to Plaintiff as an employee of the insured and thus may join as a party in the employee’s suit under Labor Code section 3852. Complaint-In-Intervention to be filed forthwith. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

WHITE V. FAUGENET

Motion by AMERICAN HOME INSURANCE COMPANY for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention TENTATIVE RULING The unopposed motion for leave to file a complaint in intervention is granted. The proposed complaint in intervention shall be filed and served on all parties, including the newly-appearing Defendant, within 10 days.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

SEBASTIAN LATU VS. BROWN CONSTRUCTION, INC.

("Brown") opposes the motion on grounds it has a complete defense to the claims asserted in the proposed complaint-in-intervention and that it would be futile to permit the filing of a pleading that is subject to demurrer and/or summary judgment. However, the merit of claims asserted in a proposed pleading-in-intervention is not among the factors the Court considers in determining whether to grant a motion to intervene. (Code Civ. Proc. § 387).

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

YAN LI VS APRIL LI

Co. filed its complaint in intervention. On February 25, 2019, Plaintiffs dismissed Cheng, without prejudice. On May 23, 2019, Plaintiffs filed an Amendment to Complaint, wherein Zhigang Yang (“Yang”) was substituted in lieu of Doe 1. A Trial Setting Conference is set for July 8, 2020. 1. Motion to Amend Complaint Legal Standard “The court may, in furtherance of justice, and on any terms as may be proper, allow a party to amend any pleading…” (Code Civ. Proc., § 473, subd.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

LUIS SIERRA VS FIBER CARE BATHS INC.

Motion for Leave to File Complaint-in-Intervention by American Zurich Insurance Company is GRANTED. Intervenor paid benefits to Plaintiff as an employee of the insured and thus may join as a party in the employee’s suit under Labor Code section 3852.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ESTHER HERNANDEZ VS SAFEWAY INC ET AL

Motion for an Order to Allow Zurich American Insurance Company to Intervene and File its Complaint-In-Intervention, in its Capacity as Insurer of Cross-Defendant Paramount Building Solutions, LLC, a Suspended Entity in Response to the Cross-Complaint of the Vons Companies is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Jul 08, 2020

CANDELARIA DE JESUS SANCHEZ, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL. VS GAGIK KHACHATRYAN, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

The petition shall include a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention or answer in intervention and set forth the grounds upon which intervention rests. (Code Civ. Proc., § 387, subd. (c).)

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

LEMUS V JUAREZ

That said, State Farm’s proposed pleading is improper and should be an “Answer in Intervention,” not a “Complaint in Intervention,” since it seeks to resist Plaintiffs’ claims. State Farm’s motion for leave to intervene is GRANTED. State Farm is ordered to submit an amended proposed pleading that is properly captioned within 10 days of the hearing on this motion. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 01, 2020

ARMANDO MARTINEZ VS CITADEL OUTLETS ET AL

On December 14, 2018, Plaintiff-in-Intervention Starr Indemnity & Liability Company filed a complaint-in-intervention against Defendant/Cross-Defendant Citadel Outlets and Craig Reality Group, Inc. alleging negligence, negligence per se, and premises liability. On March 19, 2019, Defendant/Cross-Complainant Craig Realty Group Citadel LLC and Cross-Complainant Eureka Realty Partners, Inc. d.b.a.

  • Hearing

    Jun 30, 2020

JUAN ANTHONY TORRES VS DRAGO CHARLIE VINSKI

Old Republic Insurance Company seeks leave to file a complaint-in-intervention to recover the workers’ compensation benefits paid to Plaintiff. A nonparty shall petition the court for leave to intervene by noticed motion or by ex parte application. The petition shall include a copy of the proposed complaint in intervention or answer in intervention and set forth the grounds upon which intervention rests. (Code Civ. Proc., § 387, subd. (c).)

  • Hearing

    Jun 29, 2020

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 63     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.