Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Useful Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Recent Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

cancel future bookings to comply with the new ordinances; and (4) the need to submit costly and burdensome hardship applications to extend the amortization schedule beyond 18 months.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

With respect to the first question, the Court concludes that Section 13.2(f) does not preclude SARVS from attempting to obtain compensation for any alleged loss of goodwill. Notably, nowhere in that section is there any reference to goodwill or any statement to the effect that any potential item of compensation not explicitly referenced therein is considered waived.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

“The failure to comply with this requirement of a separate statement may in the court's discretion constitute a sufficient ground for denying the motion.” (Id.) 2. Evolution Evolution manages the operations of the hotel pursuant to a management agreement with T-12 and is a party plaintiff to the First Cause of Action for Breach of Contract, and the Second Cause of Action for Negligence. Evolution is not a party to the express and implied warranty claims.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

CAS004001, as amended on June 16, 2015 by State Board Order WQ 2015-0075, which is remanded to you for reconsideration in light of the Decision of this Court dated April 18, 2019. Nothing herein shall limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in you. YOU ARE FURTHER COMMANDED to file with this Court a return to this writ on or before (90 plus 30 days as per Respondents’ request) stating what you have done to comply.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

The hearings on the applications are continued to 7/19/19 to allow the applicants to provide supplemental information regarding the foregoing factors. The supplemental information should be submitted by 7/12/19. No appearance is required at the hearing set for 6/21/19.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

MALIN VS AMBRY GENETICS CORPORATION

Continued to 7-19-2019

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for October 16, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The following defects are noted: Plaintiff has failed to dismiss Does 1-10. Plaintiff has failed to provide a summary of the case. Plaintiff has not provided a calculation re interest.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

BELINDA AGUILAR, ET AL. VS TG PROPERTIES LLC

(NOTE: All hearings currently set in Department 29 of the Spring Street Courthouse are taken off calendar subject to being reset and notified by the receiving court Re: New hearing dates.) Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Oct 13, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for July 2, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. The following defects are noted: This instant case pertains to 16010 Phoenix Drive, City of Industry, CA, 91745 only. Plaintiff’s authorized agent, Michael Tang (“Tang”), attests that the monthly rental amount was $43,153.00, which was subsequently increased to $44,447.59 effective May 1, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

JOSE AGUILERA VS 5 STAR DELIVERY INC

Plaintiff has not provided the court with an explanation regarding why this was done or provided the court with any information regarding Zaragoza’s ability to read and/or speak English. The first loan agreement to Zaragoza is undated. Plaintiff is requested to attach and authenticate the checks attached to the complaint to any future declaration, with any handwritten notes in Spanish translated.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

WEST COVINA CAR STOP, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS ROUND TABLE REMARKETING D.R.S., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

After the checks had been sent to Round Table, Plaintiff learned that the vehicle price was to be paid directly to the selling dealer, and that only the broker fee was to be paid directly to Round Table. Round Table cashed the checks and refuse to return the monies to Plaintiff.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

VAGAN AZARYAN VS EXXON MOBILE

(NOTE: All hearings currently set in Department 29 of the Spring Street Courthouse are taken off calendar subject to being reset and notified by the receiving court Re: New hearing dates.) Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

LOUIS & IRENE MONROY, TRUSTEES OF THE LOUIS & IRENE FAMILY TRUST OF 2447 NO. CHICO AVENUE, SO. EL MONTE, CA 91733, ET AL. VS HING KA HWANG, ET AL.

Plaintiffs claim damages of $89,535.22 for past due and future rents, late fees and repair of damages to the subject premises. On January 31, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a complaint, asserting a cause of action against Hwang, Zhan and Does 1-10 for: Breach of Commercial Lease On May 12, 2020, Hwang’s and Zhan’s defaults were entered. A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for September 3, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Sep 03, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

DANIEL GINZBURG, ET AL. VS 15025 SATICOY STREET, INC., ET AL.

(NOTE: All hearings currently set in Department 29 of the Spring Street Courthouse are taken off calendar subject to being reset and notified by the receiving court Re: New hearing dates.) Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Aug 31, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

RICHARD MACIAS VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

(NOTE: All hearings currently set in Department 29 of the Spring Street Courthouse are taken off calendar subject to being reset and notified by the receiving court Re: New hearing dates.) Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all Parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Aug 27, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ESTATE OF YOLANDA REBECA SILVA

If there is any objection as to this amount, the objecting party is to file a declaration setting forth its position why a different and/or lower bond amount would be appropriate in this case pursuant to Probate Code, section 8482. The Court’s tentative decision is to grant the petition for Letters of Administration if the bond issue and filing fee issues set forth above are resolved.

  • Hearing

    Aug 24, 2020

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

HAYK MELKUMYAN VS. ELMER A. DIAZ, ET AL

The burden transfers to Defendant to show a triable issue of fact exists. Defendant failed to file an opposition and thus did not meet his burden. The motion is persuasive. MOVING PARTY TO SUBMIT ORDER FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND PROPOSED JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED, ____________________ TO GIVE NOTICE.

  • Hearing

    Aug 21, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

TARZANA VILLAGE COMPANY, LLC. A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS JOSEPH COLUMBIA, ET AL.

ALTERNATIVELY CONTINUE TO ALLOW FOR RESUBMISSION OF DECLARATIONS IN PROPER FORMAT

  • Hearing

    Aug 20, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

CONS. OF NANCY SHEPSON

RE: PET’N FOR APPT OF TEMP CONSERVATOR FILED ON 07/28/20 BY CHRISTY JAMES, JANET DIDONE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proof of Service on all persons entitled to receive notice 3. Proposed Order CHRISTY JAMES DAVID MONSOUR JANET DIDONE DAVID MONSOUR NANCY SHEPSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proof of Service on all persons entitled to receive notice 3.

  • Hearing

    Aug 19, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF JACONREY M WILLIS

Audrey Shields to report status of completing the accounting. The Court will consider sanctions of up to $1,500.00, pursuant to CCP § 177.5 for failure to complete accounting, as ordered 6-8-2020. ANNIE MAE NASH MAGANY ABBASS ANNIE MAE NASH, SPECIAL NEEDS DARNELL ROLLINS AUDREY D. SHIELDS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearance by Atty. Audrey Shields, pursuant to 7-6-2020 minute order 2.

  • Hearing

    Aug 19, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR APPT OF C'TOR, PERSON AND ESTATE

Proof of mailing to all persons entitled to receive notice or verified declaration by petitioner showing diligent efforts made to locate and serve them. CRC 7.52 JULIO ERNESTO HENRIQUEZ KATE E ROBERTS KEVIN ALFREDO HENRIQUEZ ARROYO PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Proof of Personal Service on minor or his consent and waiver 2. Verified declaration by petitioner to include current address of mother 3.

  • Hearing

    Aug 19, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PROBATE COURT TRIAL RE: PET'N FOR ORDERS APPROVING & SETTLNG 1ST

ACCT FILED ON 06/04/18 PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Unable to review. Moving paper is unavailable. Need appearances CHRISTY JAMES GORDON C YOUNG DURWIN SHEPSON JANET DIDONE GORDON C YOUNG NANCY SHEPSON THE DURWIN AND NANCY SHEPSON F

  • Hearing

    Aug 19, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N AND DECLARATION ISO OF ORDER APPRVING COM

MEISCH PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Unable to review. File is unavailable at this time. Need: Verified declaration by petitioner to include conservatee as a person entitled to receive notice, including her current address so court can confirm mailing LYNN A MEISCH JENNIFER E McGUIRE RICHARD A. MEISCH JONATHAN T. THOMPSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE File w/ 8-14 calendar Need: 1.

  • Hearing

    Aug 19, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF MAURICE COKER

BRAY STEVEN COKER TRACY S REGLI PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status GLORIA COOPER JOSEPH BLUM MEREDITH R BUSHNELL LINDA CYROG GIACOMI MEREDITH R BUSHNELL

  • Hearing

    Aug 19, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

18131 VENTURA BLVD, LLC, ET AL VS. 5223 LINDLEY, LLC

Without evidence to support Plaintiffs’ contention as to the remaining 29 witnesses, the argument, at least as to the remaining 29 witnesses, is unpersuasive. Even with the four witnesses being served at their deposition, the arguments do not take into consideration that trial was continued and the witnesses were reserved. Plaintiffs’ argue that the witnesses also agreed to be on-call.

  • Hearing

    Aug 19, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.