Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Useful Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Recent Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

201-225 of 10000 results

CHAN VS. TRANQUILITY, INC.

HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY RESPONSES FILED BY TRANQUILITY, INC. * TENTATIVE RULING: in light of the Court’s ruling on the companion demurrer, Defendant’s motion to compel is moot, See Line 4 below.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF ANNIE BERNSTINE

Proof of mailing to Veterans Administration. PrC § 1461 Notice filed 8/21/2020 was sent to the California Department of Veterans Affairs, not the Veterans Administration LARRY NATHANSON PAUL D EPSTEIN SHIRLEY NATHANSON TERRY NATHANSON TRACY S REGLI Need appearances to report status of filing accounting DEBBY LYNNE BASKIN KONSTANTINE A DEMIRIS HERBERT BERNARD BASKIN MATTHEW B TALBOT

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CHAN VS. TRANQUILITY, INC.

HEARING ON MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF 2nd Amended COMPLAINT FILED BY TRANQUILITY, INC. * TENTATIVE RULING: * In light of the Court’s ruling on the companion demurrer, Defendant’s Motion to Strike is moot. See Line 4 below.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

DUTCH ENTERPRISES VS. ABDUL-AZIM

That contract did provide that Abdul-Azim agreed to transfer her right to receive insurance proceeds to Plaintiff. That agreement did not purport to bind Amica in any way. Defendant Amica Mutual Insurance Company (hereafter “Amica”) has filed a motion for summary judgment. It claims that it had no contractual or any other obligation to Plaintiff that would have obligated it (Amica) to pay insurance proceeds due and owing to its insured Abdul-Azim (hereafter Abdul-Azim) directly to Plaintiff.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS. MILLER

Because the only issue that appears to have been raised by the Defendant in his motion to vacate is limited to credits/offsets against the amounts otherwise set forth in the Default Judgment, the court encourages the parties to meet and confer before October 13 to try to resolve what appears to be this one remaining issue.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

NORMA IFRAZ VS. GILMER PACAHUAL

., supra, 10 Cal.App.5th at 970 [reversing summary judgment for employer, where facts could give rise to different inferences as to whether the employee was on a business errand or was commuting, finding the issue was a decision for the jury].) Evidentiary Objections Plaintiffs' "Objections" to evidence do not comply with California Rule of Court 3.1354(b). Though described as objections to the evidence, Plaintiffs are objecting to the text of four of the undisputed material facts in Defendant's SUMF.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF ROBERT SWEATT

File Capacity Declaration (Judicial Council Form GC-335) to show whether proposed conservatee lacks capacity to give informed medical consent. PrC § 1890 7. File a verified declaration to include Attachment 14 to Confidential Conservator Screening Form GC-314 filed 8. File verified declaration by petitioner to clarify whether you have attended the orientation class for unlicensed conservators pursuant to LR 7.416 9.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS OF HERBERT BERNARD BASKIN

RE: PET’N FOR ORDER APPROVING C'TOR & ATTY FEES FILED ON 06/11/20 BY DEBBY LYNNE BASKIN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify amount of fees requested by conservator. Petition at page 4, Line 21 requests $170,924.62. Prayer on page 7, Line 21 requests $142,437.18 2.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

WELLS FARGO VS. TAIWAN WALKER

On March 12, 2020 the defendant failed to appear for a scheduled CMC and his answer (a General Denial that contained no factual allegations or asserted defenses) was ordered stricken. On June 17, 2020 the Plaintiff filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. No opposition has been filed. The court has reviewed the motion and the complaint and now grants the Plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff is directed to prepare and submit a final judgment on or before Friday, November 13, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

DYNASTY VS. CISILINO

HEARING ON MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL FILED BY TIMOTHY CISILINO, NICOLE CISILINO * TENTATIVE RULING: * The parties have notified the court that this case has been settled.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MIDLAND VS. FLATH

Parties to appear for trial. Failure to appear may result in imposition of sanctions.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF DONOVAN SCHWARZROCK

RE: OBJECTION TO SETTLEMENT, PET’N FOR SURCHARGE FILED ON 07/17/20 BY KELLIE A HAYES PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proposed order DONOVAN SCHWARZROCK KELLIE A HAYES SCOTT E POLING KONSTANTINE A DEMIRIS KONSTANTINE A DEMIRIS LAURIE SCHWARZROCK MATTHEW TALBOT MATTHEW B TALBOT PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Apparently superseded by Line 5.B DONALD P O'CONNELL NATHAN D. PASTOR MAY H HILL

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF BRANDI BEAUDOIN

RE: OSC RE: NAME CHANGE FILED BY BRANDI BEAUDOIN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petitioner, Brandi Beaudoin, still needs to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2. File a Proof of Publication of Order to Show Cause For Change of Name BRANDI DESHAN BEAUDOIN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petitioner, Katherine Wiatt, still needs to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: J. HART

Hart, an unmarried person with no children, has petitioned this court pursuant to Insurance code section 10134 to approve petitioner’s transfer to Wentworth Originations LLC his right to collect payments from an annuity issued by American general Life Insurance Company. The annuity payments constitute part of the payments to be made under a “structured settlement.”

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N TO FIX RESIDENCE OUTSIDE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FILED ON 08/07/20 BY MATTHEW ALLEN PICKARD, DIANA LYNN PICKARD PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petitioners, maternal grandparents, still need to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2. Provide proof of mailing to Christine Pickard 3. Proposed order Note: Pursuant to court’s order dated 8/1/2018, Petitioners previously moved the ward to Nevada and were ordered to transfer the guardianship to Nevada within four months of the move.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

BARCLAYS BANK VS. RODGERS

HEARING ON MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT & DEFAULT JUDGMENT FILED BY BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE * TENTATIVE RULING: * Plaintiff requests that the default judgment entered in its favor on January 9, 2020 be vacated because it was obtained after the defendant in the case had filed for bankruptcy. Plaintiff also requests that after the Default Judgment is vacated that the court dismiss the case without prejudice. There being no opposition, the motion is granted.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF MAY H. HILL

Verified declaration by petitioner to confirm that all expenses for legal advertising, bond premiums and costs of administration have been paid PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Apparently superseded by Line 5.B

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CHAN VS. TRANQUILITY, INC.

Plaintiff does not articulate any legal theory as to why defendant was obligated to make duplicative reports to the authorities, nor does plaintiff articulate any legal theory as to how defendant’s failure to make duplicative reports caused plaintiff’s injuries or exacerbated her injuries.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

WEEKLY VS. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE

Plaintiff has failed to allege facts sufficient to state a claim for violation of Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200. (5) Cancellation of Written Instruments Civil Code section 3412 provides a “written instrument, in respect to which there is a reasonable apprehension that if left outstanding it may cause serious injury to a person against whom it is void or voidable, may, upon his application, be so adjudged, and ordered to be delivered up or canceled.”

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

LVNV FUNDING VS KLOAK

Parties to appear for trial. Failure to appear may result in imposition of sanctions.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

GRISWOLD VS. BORG

Parties to appear for trial. Failure to appear may result in imposition of sanctions.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

GOLDEN GATE MEAT COMPANY VS. GREGORY LAMBERT

The parties are required to be present for that CMC.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CITY OF COSTA MESA V. NATIONAL THERAPEUTIC SERVICES, INC.

Second, the lack of a hearing date on the face of the Sanctions Motion that was served on RAW on 4/10/2020 does not mean that the papers failed to comply with the safe harbor provisions of the statute. The notice of motion served on 4/10/2020 shows “TBD” on the caption page for the date, time and department and, within the text of the notice, it states the motion will be heard in Department 32 on a day “to be determined by the court.”

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

CHUNG & ASSOCIATES LLC ET AL VS XAVIER RUFFIN ET AL

to ¶ 18); (16 – referring to ¶ 19); (17 – referring to ¶ 20); (18 – referring to ¶ 22); (19 – referring to ¶ 23); (21 – referring to ¶ 25); (22 – referring to ¶ 26); (23 – referring to ¶ 27); (24 – referring to ¶ 28); (25 – referring to ¶ 29); (26 – referring to ¶ 30); (27 – referring to ¶ 31); (31 – referring to ¶ 35); (33 – referring to ¶ 38); and (35 – referring to ¶ 40)

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

CERTAIN UNDERWRITTERS AT LLOYDS' SUBSCRIBING TO COVER NOTE B0509MARCR1900001, ET AL. VS APEX LOGISTICS INTERNATIONAL, INC., A CORPORATION, ET AL.

Securitas is to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 21, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.