Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Useful Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

176-200 of 10000 results

BRIANNA BUFFINGTON VS. SHAWN CAMPBELL

No appearance is required under the following conditions: The Order to Show Cause Re: Contempt - Case Management Program is scheduled for 02/26/2009 at 08:30 AM in Department 39. Attorney E John Overton failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file an Attorney Compliance Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to comply with previous court orders.

  • Hearing

    Dec 02, 2008

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ALICIA VASQUEZ VS. PEDIATRIC URGENT CARE OF SACRAMENTO

No appearance is required under the following conditions: The Order to Show Cause Re: Contempt - Case Management Program is scheduled for 03/11/2010 at 08:30 AM in Department 39. Alicia Vasquez failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file an Attorney's Compliance Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.15. 2. Failure to comply with the 7/2/009 and 9/17/2009 court orders.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2009

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N A VS. ADELINE G MCKIM

Event Date: 07/23/2009 No appearance is required under the following conditions: The Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal - Case Management Program is scheduled for 10/08/2009 at 08:30 AM in Department 39. Attorney Janalie Henriques failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file an Attorney's Compliance Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.15. 2. Failure to comply with Case Management Program guidelines.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2009

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

DCFS USA INC VS. KENNY W FLINN

Event Date: 07/23/2009 No appearance is required under the following conditions: The Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal - Case Management Program is scheduled for 10/08/2009 at 08:30 AM in Department 39. Attorney Janalie Henriques failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file an Attorney's Compliance Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.15. 2. Failure to comply with Case Management Program guidelines.

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2009

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

PHILLIP VANG VS. FELICIA ROSHAWN HURTS

No appearance is required under the following conditions: The Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance - Case Management Program is scheduled for 04/15/2010 at 08:30 AM in Department 39. Attorney Jeffrey Bohn failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to comply with the 10/22/2009 court order.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2010

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, VS AVALON FOODS, INC., ET AL.

CCP §2023.030 permits the Court to impose terminating sanctions for discovery misuses, which are defined by CCP §2023.010 to include the failure to respond to an authorized method of discovery and the failure to comply with a Court discovery order. Under California law, a discovery order cannot go further than is necessary to accomplish the purpose of discovery. (Newland v. Superior Court (1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 608, 613.)

  • Hearing

    May 10, 2019

BAILEY V. WELLS FARGO

(Id. at 496) Here, it appears that Plaintiff is willfully choosing to disobey the order, as further evidenced by Plaintiff’s failure to oppose this motion. Plaintiff’s failure to respond to discovery, failure to oppose a motion to compel, failure to comply with the discovery order, and failure to oppose this motion constitute evidence that Plaintiff has abandoned the case or is willfully disobeying the Court’s order.

  • Hearing

    Sep 02, 2015

  • County

    San Luis Obispo County, CA

VICKI GEORGE VS GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

Defendant’s Motion for Terminating and/or Issue Sanctions Against Plaintiff for her Failure to Comply with Court Ordered Discovery, filed on 4/25/17, is GRANTED. Plaintiff failed to comply with a court order issued on 4/6/17 compelling Plaintiff to respond to discovery. Defendant gave notice of the court’s ruling on 4/6/17. Failure to comply with a court’s order, which is a misuse of the discovery process, is grounds for terminating sanctions, Code Civ. Proc., § 2023.010, § 2023.030.

  • Hearing

    May 31, 2017

ALICIA R LOWRIE VS. KAISER PERMANENTE HOSPITAL

Alicia R Lowrie failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file an Attorney's Compliance Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.15. 2. Failure to comply with the 9/24/2009 and 12/17/2009 court orders. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP) Pursuant to Local Rule 11.15 (CMP), an Attorney's Compliance Statement shall be filed not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Mar 11, 2010

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

SIMI SURGERY VS BURMEISTER

App. 4th 1093, 1106.[2]) Here, Plaintiff has established Defendant's failure to comply with the Court's December 1, 2015 discovery order. However, this is Defendant's first failure to comply with a discovery order, and therefore Plaintiff fails to establish a pattern of noncompliance.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2016

GIORGIO DENIRO VS. FIVE POINT CAPITAL INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is set for an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance. Attorney for plaintiff failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2012

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA COLLECTION SERVICE INC VS. JIMIK INCORPORATED

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is set for an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance. Attorney for plaintiff failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    Nov 08, 2011

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

GARY HALE VS. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS INC

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is set for an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance. Attorney for plaintiff failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a case management statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    Apr 29, 2011

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

DONNA CARDOZA VS. MICHAEL P. MAZZEO

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is set for an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance. Attorney for plaintiff failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    Oct 12, 2011

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

CHASE BANK USA NA VS. BOB A SCHWARTZ

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is set for an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance. Attorney for plaintiff failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a case management statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    May 06, 2011

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

BREANNA SCHRAM VS. JOSE LEON

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is set for an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance. Attorney for plaintiff failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    Aug 31, 2011

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

GEORGE S LOUIE VS. LIBERTY TAX SERVICE

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is set for an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance. Attorney for plaintiff failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    Nov 08, 2011

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

ANA MARIE ORTEGA VS. SUTTER GENERAL HOSPITAL ADMINISTRATORS

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is set for an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance. Plaintiff failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    May 02, 2012

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

CHASE BANK USA NA VS. MARIA LINDSEY-CONESA

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is set for an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance. Attorney for plaintiff failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    Jun 17, 2011

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

MARGARET J FRANCIS VS. LAWRENCE P SALVO

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is set for an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance. Attorney for plaintiff failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    Feb 22, 2012

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

JAMES CHANDLER VS. BRUNO METEYRY

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is set for an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance. Attorney for plaintiff failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    Apr 17, 2012

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

SERGEY KOVALEV VS. AEGIS WHOLESALE CORPORATION

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is set for an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance. Attorney for plaintiff failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a case management statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    Apr 20, 2011

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

RONALD WALKER VS. PARMINEER ATWALL

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is set for an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance. Attorney for plaintiff failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    Mar 01, 2012

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

CHUNG S KIM VS. LORI A MIGLIORI

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is set for an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance. Attorney for plaintiff failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    Oct 04, 2011

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

CHRISTOPHER ADAMS VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION

No appearance is required under the following conditions: This matter is set for an Order to Show Cause Re: Compliance. Attorney for plaintiff failed to comply with the following: 1. Failure to file a Case Management Statement in accordance with Local Rule 11.055. 2. Failure to have all answers/responsive pleadings or defaults on file in a timely manner. Failure to comply with CMP rules may result in sanctions (included, but not limited to, dismissal of the action) under Local Rule 11.12 (CMP).

  • Hearing

    Apr 10, 2012

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.