Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Useful Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Recent Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

176-200 of 10000 results

GDNSHIP OF MIA GRACE FLORES

RE: PET'N FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN FILED ON 06/08/20 BY MARQUITA LA TEASE LEDET PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Marquita LaTease Ledet, maternal grandmother, still needs to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing The Court is still waiting for: A.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

UECKER VS. NG

HEARING ON MOTION FOR EARNINGS WITHHOLDING ORDER TO CHARGE SPOUSE FILED BY SUSAN L. UECKER * TENTATIVE RULING: * Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for an earnings withholding order as to the earnings of defendant Ng’s wife, Lexie Iku Endo Ng, is granted.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

BARKER VS. COHEN

HEARING ON DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT FILED BY LESLIE MIDDLETON, STEPHEN COHEN, D.D.S. * TENTATIVE RULING: * Defendants’ demurrer to the complaint is sustained without leave to amend. Defendants should prepare a judgment separate from the order after hearing. The demurrer is substantively unopposed. Plaintiff has filed an opposition that raises only frivolous technical nits about the form of the papers, but makes no attempt to address the substance of the demurrer.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

SOLORIO VS. KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC

Kaufman’s hours expended in this matter by 8 hours (no evidence presented as to the reasonableness of certain entries, excessive document review, etc.) In addition, Mr. Kaufman’s hourly rate is excessive for this geographical area. Court will allow reduced rate of $500 per hour for Mr. Kaufman. No multiplier will be applied as this case does not present novel or complex issues. Plaintiff is awarded blended fees for 93.1 hours of attorney and paralegal time, for a total of $41,986.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

PDTW, LLC VS. KRING & CHUNG

“If the items appearing in a cost bill appear to be proper charges, the burden is on the party seeking to tax costs to show that were not reasonable or necessary. On the other hand, if the items are properly objected to, they are put in issue and the burden of proof is on the party claiming them as costs.” (Ibid.) II. Merits of Costs Motion Defendants seek to recover $7,547.20 in costs. The first page of their memorandum of costs (ROA 284) lists amount in a single line item for “[f]iling and motion fees.”

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

CITY OF LA HABRA VS JOHNSON

The Proposed Order submitted on 3/12/20 is approved, except that City is to seek and obtain Court approval for any fees and costs claimed, prior to any payment to City. Moving party City is to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

IN RE THE MATTER OF GEORGE L. AND BETTY TORASSA TRUST

Is the Trustee the Conservator or the attorney in fact authorized to agree to appointment of a successor trustee per Probate Code §15660(c)?

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

As to Cross-Complainants Onni Contracting (California) Inc. and Onni Real Estate IX, LLC’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Cross-Complaint: As to Cross-Complainants Onni Contracting (California) Inc. and Onni Real Estate IX, LLC’s Motion for Leave to File First Amended Cross-Complaint the Court issues an Order to Show Cause for October 26, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. re why Onni Real and Onni Contracting cannot consolidate the pleadings and orders the Moving Parties to file supplementary briefings as to why the

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

ALFARO VS. ORANGE AUTOMOTIVE

The tentative ruling is to continue the Final Report Hearing to March 12, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiff has informed the court that defendant won’t fund the settlement due to its financial condition. The Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Final Judgment entered on December 13, 2019 constituted a Judgment, and the court retained jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement and Judgment.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

KYRA GROVES ET AL VS MAPLEBEAR INC

Plaintiffs’ first amended class action and collective action complaint alleges counts for: (1) failure to pay minimum wage & overtime in violation of the FLSA; (2) expense reimbursement; (3) willful misclassification; (4) minimum wage; (5) overtime; (6) pay statements; (7) failure to pay wages on termination; (8) failure to timely pay wages; (9) unfair business practices; (10) failure to pay wages for meal and rest breaks; (11) conversion; and (12) penalties pursuant to the California Labor Code Private Attorneys

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

SEED BEAUTY, LLC, ET AL. VS KKW BEAUTY, LLC, FORMERLY KKW BEAUTY, INC.

Due to Plaintiffs’ failure to identify specific portions of the Transcript requiring sealing of confidential information, Defendant argues Plaintiffs’ proposed sealing is neither narrowly tailored nor the least restrictive means. Defendant takes issue with Plaintiffs’ lack of specificity in describing the confidential information and how disclosure of such information will cause specific harm to Plaintiffs.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

VINCENT DEROSA, ET AL. VS K9 LOFT INC., ET AL.

Failure to comply with such orders subject the offending party to sanctions proportional to the violation. (See Siry Investment, L.P. v. Farkhondehpour (2020) 45 Cal.App.5th 1098, 1117 [“When faced with a party’s misuse of the discovery process, a trial court ‘should’ impose ‘[t]he penalty ... appropriate to the dereliction.’ . . .

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ALIREZA BADINFEKR VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES

.: BC704669 Hearing Date: September 18, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to compel production of documents NOTICE Judge Goorvitch was sworn-in as a Superior Court Judge on December 15, 2015. Prior to that time, Judge Goorvitch made the following campaign contributions to Michael N. Feuer: (1) $100 to Mr. Feuer’s 2008 campaign for the 42nd Assembly District on or about November 9, 2007; (2) $100 to Mr.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

ROMERO V. LGC NORTH AMERICA, INC., ET AL.

Consumer Cause, Inc. (2002) 29 Cal.4th 53, 67, the plaintiff-oil companies filed a declaratory relief suit against a Proposition 65 enforcer, seeking to declare that the notices of violation themselves were invalid due to failure to comply with Proposition 65 regulations. And, in CKE Restaurants, Inc. v. Moore (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 262, 267, a Carl’s Jr. franchisee received a notice of violation and subsequently filed a declaratory relief complaint directly.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

YAKIR Y COHEN VS NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.

Pursuant to tentative agreement of the parties, the term “POWERTRAIN DEFECT” “shall be understood to mean such defects which result in engine oil turning to sludge; engine overheating; failure of the water pump assembly; failure of the water pump gasket; and failure of the belt-fan.” (Cao Decl., and Exh. 1.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

  • Judge

    Paul A. Bacigalupo or Virginia Keeny

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

PETITION OF LEE

appropriate recommended disposition for funds and assets that were held by the practice; and (c) inform the court as to the status of the foregoing and as to what remains to be done to wind up the practice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

PATTY CORNWALL VS BARRY BEITLER, ET AL.

“A pleading which on its face is barred by the statute of limitations does not state a viable cause of action and is subject to judgment on the pleadings.” (Hunt v. County of Shasta (1990) 225 Cal.App.3d 432, 440.) Analysis Meet and Confer The parties have failed to comply with the meet and confer requirements of section 439(a)(4). Defendant attempted to meet and confer with Plaintiff. Defendant provides evidence that Plaintiff failed to meet and confer with Defendant. (See Akhondzadeh Decl. ¶ 3.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

DARSHAN THIND VS MUKHTIAR S KAMBOJ ET AL

On February 4, 2020, Plaintiff moved to compel further responses to discovery, including: (1) Motion to Compel Mukhtiar Kamboj’s Amended Responses to Requests for Admission, Set 1; (2) Motion to Compel Mukhtiar Kamboj’s Amended Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set 1; (3) Motion to Compel Mukhtiar Kamboj’s Amended Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set 1; (4) Motion to Compel Mukhtiar Kamboj’s Amended Responses to Requests for Production of Documents, Set 1; (5) Motion to Compel Amadeep Kamboj’s Amended

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

KOTHARI VS. WAVE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS GROUP

Defendant does not owe a Plaintiff a general duty of care to pay Plaintiff’s salary and other employment related money. Defendant’s demurrer to the seventh cause of action is sustained. Should Plaintiff wish to amend the Complaint to address the issues herein, Plaintiff shall file and serve the Amended Complaint within 15 days of service of the notice of ruling. Order to Show Cause Re Failure to Comply with Court order Dated 09/20/2019. Discharged.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

BEDIRIAN ENTERPRISES, INC. VS LEONID KAMENETSKY, ET AL.

Defendant Honda shall produce any customer complaints relating to rough idles and engine vibration in vehicles for the same year, make, and model of the subject vehicle that were sold in the California for the period of 2009 to the present. Defendant Honda shall produce all documents evidencing policies and procedures used to evaluate customer requests for repurchase pursuant to the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act for the period of 2016 to the present.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ORANGE COUNTY, INC.

CCP § 1005(c) In order to give Petitioner adequate time to receive, review, and respond to the opposition, the Court continues the hearing to 10/02/20. Petitioner is given leave to file a reply (or amended reply if it deems one necessary) no later than 09/25/20, with service pursuant to code. No other pleadings are permitted. No appearances necessary at the 9/18/20 hearing. The Court to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

CULLUM VS. MANHEIM INVESTMENTS, INC.

Specifically, the Amended Judgment must state how much money was paid to the nonparties, including any interest that accrued on the funds, and, if known, the purpose of the distribution to the nonparties and how they plan to expend the funds. Plaintiffs are ordered to give notice to defense counsel unless notice is waived.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

WHITTAKER VS. LAGO

The motion by Plaintiff William Whittaker to compel further responses from Defendant Alexandra Lago to Special Interrogatories (Set Two) is CONTINUED to 10/09/2020 at 10:00 a.m. in Department C24. Should Defendant wish to address the additional evidence submitted by Plaintiff on reply, Defendant shall file and serve a supplemental brief of no more than five pages on or before 10/02/2020. No additional evidence will be considered. Plaintiff to give notice. Motion No. 2.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

SANTOS CIFUENTES VS TANNIA VANESSA GALLEGOS, ET AL.

With respect to defendant’s demurrer, to plead a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith as to an insurance contract based on the failure to pay benefits due under the policy, plaintiff must allege the following: (1) plaintiff suffered a loss covered under an insurance policy with defendant, (2) defendant was notified of the loss, (3) defendant unreasonably failed to pay policy benefits, (4) plaintiff was harmed, and (5) defendant’s failure to pay policy benefits was a substantial factor in cause

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

INTERINSURANCE EXCHANGE OF THE AUTOMOBILE CLUB VS. HILL

Motion to Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories 2. Motion to Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories 3. Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories 4. Motion to Compel Production 5. Motion to Compel Deposition (Oral or Written) 6. Motion to Compel Deposition (Oral or Written) 7. Motion to Compel Response to Requests for Admissions This matter is continued. Clerk to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 18, 2020

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.