Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Useful Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Recent Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

151-175 of 10000 results

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Discovery sanctions are not to be imposed for punishment, but instead are used to encourage fair disclosure of discovery to prevent unfairness resulting for the lack of information. (See Midwife v. Bernal (1988) 203 Cal.App.3d 57, 64 [superseded on other grounds as stated in Kohan v. Cohan (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 967, 971].) Here, Defendant submits evidence showing Plaintiff has failed to comply with the discovery requests, and Plaintiff failed to comply with the previously imposed monetary sanctions.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

JANE K.C. VS LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL

Plaintiff has agreed to settle her claims against defendant for $750,000. If approved, $1,509.75 will be paid to the California Victim Compensation Board, $3,740.25 will go towards litigation costs, and $262,500 in attorney fees will be paid to plaintiff’s counsel.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

HAPPY KIDS FOOD, INC. VS. HAPPY KIDS NUTRITION, INC.

Continued to 11/19/2020.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

ANDREA PASILLAS, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOEL PASILLAS VS CITY OF GLENDALE, A PUBLIC ENTITY, ET AL.

On July 2, 2020, Plaintiff’s counsel, AlderLaw, PC and OshaganLaw, filed a motion to be relieved as counsel pursuant to California Rules of Court rule 3.1362. Also on July 2, 2020, the Court scheduled hearing date on the motion to be relieved as counsel to August 13, 2020. Trial is scheduled for December 30, 2020. PARTY’S REQUEST Plaintiff’s counsel, AlderLaw, PC and OshaganLaw (“Counsel”), asks the Court to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

MARTIN DIAZ VS CHARTWELL STAFFING SERVICES INC, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, ET AL.

Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.2 states, in relevant part: “On petition of a party to an arbitration agreement alleging the existence of a written agreement to arbitrate a controversy and that a party thereto refuses to arbitrate such controversy, the court shall order the petitioner and the respondent to arbitrate the controversy if it determines that an agreement to arbitrate the controversy exists….”

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

GRYTSENKO VS. DOKY, INC.

Grytsenko's wages in order to force her to comply with fabricating or falsifying statements to investors…the Court finds that it is Plaintiff that bears the burden of proving her claims and other than Count One, the evidence shows that she has fallen short. Accordingly, as to Count One, the Court finds that Plaintiff has successfully proven her claim. As to Counts Two and Three, the Court finds that Plaintiff has not met her burden of proving those claims.”

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

SALON REBELLE, LLC VS. LOVE

The Court sets an OSC for September 10, 2020 at 1:30 pm as to why the Salon Rebelle, Inc. and Salon Rebelle, LLC should not be dismissed as plaintiffs. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

RANDALL HARTSOCK, ET AL. VS DAVID DAOUD

According to Plaintiffs, all payments were made to Daoud at his insistence to a bank account in California. Plaintiffs raised concerns about unpaid taxes but was reassured there was nothing to be concerned about. Daoud represented to Plaintiffs that he had good title and paying him would result in ownership of the properties, which according to plaintiffs, were false statements.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

  • Judge

    Paul A. Bacigalupo or Virginia Keeny

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JUI-CHIEN LIN VS ROBERT CHIU

money judgment. (4) The amount being or to be received in satisfaction of the right to payment that may be assigned.”

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

BORGES V. MEDPRO PROTECTIVE

Motion for Leave to Amend The motion of the plaintiff for leave to file a second amended complaint is on the court’s own motion and for good cause CONTINUED to September 24, 2020, at 1:30 pm. In the court’s file in this case is a motion for consolidation brought by the defendant. (ROA 49.) The motion was filed in Jeffrey Golden, Chapter 7 Trustee, etc. v. Medpro Group, Inc. 18-1035776 and seeks to consolidate this case with the Golden case now pending in front of Judge Sherman in Department CX-105.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

YUMIKO RAFAEL ET AL VS JULIE RICHMOND

To date, despite an attempt to meet and confer, Plaintiffs have not served responses. Defendant therefore seeks an order compelling Plaintiffs to respond, without objections, to the outstanding interrogatories and RPDs. Defendant’s motions to compel are granted. Plaintiff Yumiko is ordered to serve verified responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and RPDs, without objections, within ten days.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

JOTASHA WASHINGTON VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Government Code, Section 12940(a); (6) failure to accommodate in violation of California Government Code, Section 12940(m); and (7) failure to engage in an interactive process in violation of California Government Code, Section 12940(n).

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

EMILY ROBLES, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, MARIA ARREDONDO VS EMANATE HEALTH, ET AL.

Inc. dba Foothill Presbyterian Hospital’s Motion to Compel Independent Medical Examination to Include Genetic Testing is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

OLIVIA GARCIA DE MONTES ET AL VS ORANGE COUNTY GLOBAL MED CT

Pregerson also opines that these deviations from the appropriate standard of care was “a direct and substantial cause of material physical injury and death to [Decedent].” (Id., ¶ 8.) In other words, Defendant’s failure to take these actions led to the failure to diagnose the kidney injury which caused Decedent’s death. Defendant takes the position that Decedent’s death was likely related to of injuries he sustained in a fall after his first visit to Defendant’s emergency department.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ENTERTAINMENT REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS MAGNOLIA REAL ESTATE CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

On June 30, 2020, the Court continued the instant matter to July 21, 2020. Plaintiff was directed to give notice. On July 17, 2020, the Court continued the instant matter to August 13, 2020. Counsel for Defendant was telephonically notified and directed to give notice. RELIEF REQUESTED: Defendant formally objects to the form of judgment and requests the Court reduce the interest rate on the damage award to 10% with interest accruing from the date of the verdict, February 13, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

GLOVER V. SVC-WEST, LLC

The demurrer of the defendants to the first amended complaint is OVERRULED. The defendants shall file and serve their answer within 10 days. The plaintiff’s request for judicial notice is DENIED. The objections of the defendants to the plaintiff’s request for judicial notice are SUSTAINED. The plaintiff shall give notice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

RONALD KIM ET AL VS PALM TREE INVESTMENTS INC ET AL

Moreover, Plaintiff failed to submit a declaration in support of his motion to tax costs. Thus, Plaintiff has not met his burden to tax any costs pursuant to Ginn as his motion is procedurally deficient. Issue No.2: Apportionment of Costs Although not necessary to address due to the procedural deficiencies of Plaintiff’s motion, the Court will address Plaintiff’s argument that costs should be apportioned between himself and Park. “The right to recover costs under California law is governed by statute.”

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

HAROLD DAILY, ET AL. VS INTERCOMMUNITY CARE CENTERS, INC. , ET AL.

Plaintiffs allege Decedent spent three months in Defendant’s care prior to his death, which was caused by Defendant’s neglect, including failure to care for a pressure ulcer. Motions to Compel Further Responses At issue today are Defendant’s motions to compel further responses to special interrogatories and requests for production of documents.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

MARIAM MITOYAN VS STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

she is entitled to under their contract.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

DANIEL ACEDO V. CDCR, ET AL.

Bank for depositing the check without a proper indorsement, Plaintiff has failed to provide authority or allege facts showing that he has standing to act or bring suit on behalf of the Estate. U.S. Bank’s demurrer shall be sustained. Plaintiff to come prepared to discuss whether there is any way he can amend the complaint to state a cause of action against U.S. Bank; otherwise the demurrer will be sustained without leave to amend as to U.S. Bank.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

THOMAS SAHS VS NEUTRON HOLDINGS, INC

.: 18STCV02817 Hearing Date: August 13, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: plaintiff’s motion to set aside dismissal Plaintiff Thomas Sahs (“Plaintiff”) moves to set aside the Court’s order of January 22, 2020, in which the Court dismissed this action for failure to appear at the order to show cause regarding arbitration and dismissal.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

MICHAEL KLIMUSHA VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES

AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE CENTRAL DISTRICT, JUDGE BYRDSONG presiding in DEPT. 28 of the STANLEY MOSK Courthouse, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the cause for trial to that Independent Calendar Court. The Order is signed and filed this date, and incorporated herein by reference.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

CLAUDIA VENEGAS VS SAN PEDRO FISH AND OYSTER CORPORATION

Unless Defendant Lifetime Products, Inc provides the court proof of service of a notice of continuance of the instant application to August 13, 2020, the hearing on the application is CONTINUED to September 10, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. Kelly H. MacFarlane is ordered to give notice of this ruling and to file proof of service of the notice. The parties are directed to the header of this tentative ruling for further instructions.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

BEACHCITI CONSTRUCTION INC VS RICH ESTATE PROPERTIES INC ET

BCI and Berengian are to re-notice and re-file their demurrer and motion to strike as to the FAXC for a date in September of 2020. Defendants shall have the opportunity to oppose such demurrer and motion to strike. BCI and Berengian may file a reply brief to such opposition. Moving parties are ordered to give notice of this ruling.

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

SEVIM CAMERON VS TURKISH AIRLINES, INC., ET AL.

This ADR Policy is understood to apply to all disputes relating to my employment, the terms and conditions of my employment, including but not limited to my compensation, wages, claims alleging failure to compensate for all hours worked, failure to pay overtime, failure to pay minimum wage, failure to reimburse expenses, failure to pay wages upon termination, failure to provide accurate, itemized wage statements, failure to provide meal and/or rest breaks, entitlement to waiting time penalties and/or other claims

  • Hearing

    Aug 13, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.