Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Useful Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Recent Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

126-150 of 10000 results

IN THE MATTER OF PETER HALOWACK

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF EDIDSABEL GOMEZ

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL B PLATT

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF GABRIEL DWEYN CASILLAS

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF FREDRIC V LANE

Proposed Order to be lodged prior to hearing per Local Rule 10.00.D.1. __________________ The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible. A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF PETER HALOWACK

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

MATTER OF DIANA MEEKS

Proposed Order to be lodged prior to hearing per Local Rule 10.00.D.1. The Clerk shall give notice. __________________ The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible. A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

MATTER OF HUMAN POTENTIAL FOUNDATION

The court has authority to require all objectors to file a written objection pursuant CRC, Rule 7.801, or else deem the failure to do so a waiver. Due to staffing limitations, processing times may be delayed. To assist in processing, attorneys and parties should include the next court date in the “Filing Description” field provided by the electronic service provider.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

ESTATE OF JACK P. BLAKEMORE

Code, § 1064(a)(2)) (e.g. if no cash, information regarding the source of funds that will be used to pay the fees, since fees must be paid out of the estate (Prob. Code, § 10831(d)) - A statement of all compensation paid from the assets subject to the account to the fiduciary or to the attorneys for the fiduciary other than pursuant to a prior court order. (Prob.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

MATTER OF HUMAN POTENTIAL FOUNDATION

The court has authority to require all objectors to file a written objection pursuant CRC, Rule 7.801, or else deem the failure to do so a waiver.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

PETITION OF HAE CHO

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petitioner Candice Mayo must appear at the hearing with photo identification CANDICE ATHENA MAYO FILED ON 09/03/19 BY GEORGE MARTINEZ PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status, including mediation Note: Verified Opposition filed by Michael Martinez on 10/11/2019. GEORGE MARTINEZ MICHAEL MARTINEZ JOHN MADERIOUS NORA G MARTINEZ

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: AMENDED PET'N TO DETERMINE SUCCESSION TO REAL PROPERTY

FILED ON 11/08/19 BY WILLIAM M McCOMBE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE This petition is now apparently moot PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE -Moving paper is in Vol. 1- Note: Petitioner was appointed Administrator of the estate by order dated 3/13/2020 RANDALL JAY NOTT VALERIE PEABODY WILLARD NOTT RYAN H. APPERSON

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: THE DENNIS PAPPAS LIVING TRUST

RE: PET’N FOR ORDER CONFIRMING TRUST ASSETS FILED ON 04/28/20 BY FRANCELLA BILES PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Francella Biles, petitioner, still needs to do the following: 1. Appear at the hearing 2. Proof of mailing Notice of Hearing that complies with PrC § 851(c), including a description of the property, description of the relief sought and statement advising that a response may be filed. 3.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: MTN TO COMPEL ATTENDANCE AT DEPOSITION

FILED ON 04/06/20 BY ANTHONY TRUCKS, RANDALL HART SR , RANDALL HART JR , BRADLEY COSTA, AMBER WORTHEN, ASHLEY WORTHEN, VANESSA MACON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances FILED ON 03/05/20 BY MICHAELE L McGEE PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF ROSS ALLEN NORGAARD

Proof of mailing Notice of Petition to Administer Estate with new hearing to all persons entitled to receive notice or waivers of notice. PrC § 1202 2. Verified declaration to set forth the anticipated liabilities of the decedent so court can determine minimum bond amount. Although heirs waive bond, petitioner is a non- resident of California. LR 7.154 DIANE MARIE TILLOSTSON JENNIFER GRABOWSKI JOSHUA D BROMLEY

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION, NO WILL, IAEA

FILED ON 01/13/20 BY VALERIE PEABODY PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE This petition is apparently superseded by Line 16.A above PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Bond in the amount of $200,000 DONALD E BARKLEY JERRY MARTIN BROWN MARTIN T. GONSALVES

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N TO COMPEL ACCT; BREACH TRUST; RTN TRST PROP

Verified declaration by petitioner to add deceased spouse with date of death to petition Item # 8. LR 7.151(d) 3. Proof of mailing Notice of Petition to Administer Estate with new hearing date. PrC § 1202 4. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify date of will and codicil to be admitted for Probate. A copy of the 7-12-05 Will is attached to petition; however, petition requests admission of 6-12-89 will and 6-2-98 codicil, which are revoked in 7-12-05 Will. 5.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL FOR HOWARD LEE RUSSELL

Submit Order Determining Succession to Real Property form DE-335 Note: Decedent was survived by a daughter, Cherry Drenner, who appears to have priority as decedent’s intestate heir pursuant to PrC §6402(a) JAMES VINCENT McCOMBE JR WILLIAM M McCOMBE

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST AMENDED FIRST AND FNL ACCT & RPT, FOR FEES, FINAL DIST

FILED ON 01/14/20 BY MICHAEL MARTINEZ PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances to report status, including mediation 2. Proof of mailing petition and notice to personal representative for Estate of Timothy Martinez 3.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR ORDER ESTABLISHING SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST SETTING BOND;

Verified declaration by petitioner to include heirs of Robert Stringberg as persons entitled to receive notice or verified declaration by petitioner showing diligent efforts made to identify, locate and serve them. CRC 7.52 2. Bond presented for filing before Order will be signed. MICHAEL R GARDNER SCOTT E POLING RALPH AND DOROTHY STRINDBERG F FILED ON 05/05/20 BY MATTHEW ROTHSCHILD PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR PROBATE OF COPY OF WILL, LETTERS TEST, IAEA

Verified declaration by petitioner to address unmarked box 5.a (7) or 5.a (8) as to whether decedent was survived by issue of a predeceased child 3. Specific information as to what efforts were made to locate missing heirs Randy Bell and Ricky Bell CRC § 7.52 4. Lodge Original Will (w/legal process). PrC § 8200 5. Bond in the amount of $295,000.00 If original will cannot be located, need: 1. Evidence to overcome presumption of revocation by the fact that the originals cannot be located. PrC § 6124 2.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to entry of judgment in the amount of $3,949.37, plus costs of $60.00. (Id. at ¶6.) Conclusion Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s Motion to Enter Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation is GRANTED. JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED FOR PLAINTIFF IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,949.37 PRINCIPAL AND $60.00 COSTS. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

FRANCISCA TORRES VS MIGUEL CARILLO, JR., ET AL.

Cross-Complainants do not oppose the motion, so there is no basis asserted to hold Correa liable to Cross-Complainants under an indemnity or contribution theory for the accident. Therefore, Correa’s motion for summary judgment to the cross-complaint is granted. Cross-Defendant Correa is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

GARRET ADELMAN, ET AL. VS JEROME ADELMAN, ET AL.

Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

OTILIA MEZA VS MICHELLE FRANCO, ET AL.

Defendant attempted to meet and confer further with Plaintiff and requested verifications for the three sets of discovery. To date, Plaintiff has not served verified responses. Defendant therefore seeks an order compelling Plaintiff to respond, without objections, to the outstanding discovery and to pay sanctions. An unverified response is tantamount to no response at all. (Melendrez v. Superior Court (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 1343, 1348.) Defendant’s motions to compel are granted.

  • Hearing

    Sep 22, 2020

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.