Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Useful Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Recent Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

101-125 of 10000 results

CHADWICK C. RAHMAN VS JOEL MAYORGA

Counsel is ordered to give notice. Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at [email protected] indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

PAHOLA YBARRA VS JESSICA GARCIA

Motion to Set Aside Dismissal At this time, Plaintiff moves to set aside the dismissal. Plaintiff’s attorney declares the failure to appear at the trial was because he failed to calendar the hearing date. The motion is denied for three reasons.

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

MORON VS. AVILA'S EL RANCHITO, INC.

Demurrer to Amended Complaint 2. Motion to Strike both filed by AER Surfer, Inc., Veronica Lopez, El Pachuco, LLC, Salvador Avila, Avila'S El Ranchito Grill, Inc. on 2/6/20 and 2/7/20 Continued to 11/09/2020

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

MARIBEL VELAZQUEZ VS FOOD FOR LESS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., ET AL.

The court asks the parties to meet and confer prior to the hearing if possible and to advise the court whether or not both parties waive the conflict and to advise the court. The court asks the parties to simply indicate whether or not both parties waive the conflict and to not disclose which party or whether one or both objected if both do not waive. If the conflict is waived the court will set a continued hearing. If not, the court will arrange a prompt transfer of the file.

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY VS. ALAI

(“Alai”) moves for the court to reconsider its February 24, 2020, order denying Alai’s anti-SLAPP motion. However, Alai has not presented any new or different facts, circumstances, or law that would require a different result. (See CCP § 1008(a).) Therefore, the ruling on the anti-SLAPP stands. Prevailing party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

WILLIAMS VS. MCPHETRIGE

Motion to Quash Discovery Subpoena filed by Bradley T. Williams Motion is Moot; No sanctions ordered.

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

LALA GRIGORYAN, ET AL. VS WILLI O. COELER, ET AL.

., Defendant(s). 19STCV42541 ORDER TRANSFERRING PERSONAL INJURY (PI) CASE TO INDEPENDENT CALENDAR (IC) COURT INITIAL NOTE: This is not a tentative ruling. It is being posted with the tentative rulings to give Counsel notice not to appear. This is a final order and the case is being transferred. DEPARTMENT 31 OF THE PERSONAL INJURY (PI) COURT HAS DETERMINED THAT THE ABOVE ENTITLED ACTION IS: Complicated based upon either the number of pretrial hearings or the complexity of the issues presented.

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

ESMERALDA YVONNE ELIAS VS MARIA LOPEZ

If the fees and costs are not paid within thirty days, the action is subject to dismissal. CCP § 399(a); see Stasz v. Eisenberg (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 1032, 1037. Defendant is ordered to give notice. Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at [email protected] indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org.

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

ROSAMOND MOSCOZO VS STIHL INC., ET AL.

(NOTE: All hearings currently set in Department 29 of the Spring Street Courthouse are taken off calendar subject to being reset and notified by the receiving court Re: New hearing dates.) Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Sep 28, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

PISMO BEACH SELF-STORAGE, L.P. V. CITY OF PISMO BEACH, ET AL.

A fee shall not include the costs attributable to existing deficiencies in public facilities, but may include the costs attributable to the increased demand for public facilities reasonably related to the development project in order to (1) refurbish existing facilities to maintain the existing level of service or (2) achieve an adopted level of service that is consistent with the general plan. (Gov. Code, § 66001(g).)

  • Hearing

    Sep 26, 2020

STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND VS. RICARDO LARA IN HIS CAPACITY AS INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

and 3) whether failure to properly file the algorithm affected the validity of SCIF’s rating tier modifier.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

ANAYELI MENDOZA ET AL VS JILLIAN NOELLE HECKMAN

Nature of Proceedings: (6) Motions to Compel Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

BEACH FRONT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC ET AL VS PLY GEM PACIFIC WINDOWS CORPORATION ET AL

The motion to compel is therefore moot except as to the issue of sanctions. “The court may award sanctions under the Discovery Act in favor of a party who files a motion to compel discovery, even though no opposition to the motion was filed, or opposition to the motion was withdrawn, or the requested discovery was provided to the moving party after the motion was filed.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1348(a).)

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

GRANT BEALL ET AL VS RONALD L. WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES

Nature of Proceedings: Case Management Conference; Motion to Compel Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

JESS GRIEGO VS MARIBEL PRATT ET AL

A party may move to compel a further response to a request for production if “(1) A statement of compliance with the demand is incomplete. (2) A representation of inability to comply is inadequate, incomplete, or evasive. [or] (3) An objection in the response is without merit or too general.” CCP § 2030.310(a). 1. RFP #34: Defendants seek all the insurance cards plaintiff has held in the last 10 years. This seeks essentially the same information as SI #10 above.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

JESS GRIEGO VS MARIBEL PRATT ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: (3) Motions to Compel Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

JP WILSON FAMILY LLC ET AL VS ROBERT SHUMAKE ET AL

Applicable Statutes: “A judgment entered pursuant to this chapter may be vacated on any ground which would be a defense to an action in this state on the sister state judgment, including the ground that the amount of interest accrued on the sister state judgment and included in the judgment entered pursuant to this chapter is incorrect.” CCP § 1710.40(a). 2.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

GRANT BEALL ET AL VS RONALD L. WOLFE AND ASSOCIATES

Nature of Proceedings: Case Management Conference; Motion to Compel Tentative Ruling: The hearing on the motion brought by defendant Ronald L. Wolfe and Associates to compel plaintiff to provide further responses to demands for production (Set 2) and for sanctions, is continued to October 23, 2020, when it will be heard along with plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint, which is scheduled for that date. The Court will direct Mr.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

FARIBA SALEHANI VS EMANUEL PONCE

Nature of Proceedings: Case Management Conference; Motion to Withdraw as Attorney Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

JP WILSON FAMILY LLC ET AL VS ROBERT SHUMAKE ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Motion to Vacate Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

IN THE MATTER OF JOHN H. CANDIANIDES

The Court intends to grant the ex parte relief. __________________ The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible. A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF WALEED YOUSEF BUKHARI

Proposed order to be lodged prior to hearing per Local Rule 10.00.D.1. __________________ The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible. A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF APRIL LYNN BENTON

A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols. Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF ALAN MOK

Proposed Order to be lodged prior to hearing per Local Rule 10.00.D.1. Why is counsel submitting handwritten documents? __________________ The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible. A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF RYAN RINGO

Subject to the declaration, the Court intends to grant the petition. All 7 powers. Zoom appearance is authorized. _______________ The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Appearances in Department J6 should be made by CourtCall (audio or video) whenever possible. A very limited number of people will be allowed in Department J6 at one time to comply with safety protocols.

  • Hearing

    Sep 25, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.