Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Useful Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Recent Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

51-75 of 10000 results

NGUYEN VS. TURBO

Motion to Strike Portions of the Complaint Moving Party: Defendant Bernard Turbow (esa Bernard Turbo) Responding Party: None Ruling: Defendant Bernard Turbow, M.D.’s Motion to Strike Portions of the Plaintiff Vinh Huu Nguyen’s Complaint is GRANTED with leave to amend. (Code Civ. Proc., § 436.) The Complaint fails to plead facts supporting the claim for punitive damages or attorney’s fees. To plead a claim to recover punitive damages, a plaintiff must allege facts showing malice, oppression, or fraud. (Civ.

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

WOODALL VS. WOODALL

Motion to Seal and Redact OFF CALENDAR NOTICE OF MOTION WITHDRAWL FILED 7/15/20

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

STARR VS. STARR

Motion to Appoint Guardian Ad Litem OFF CALENDAR PER MOVING PARTY

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

GUTIERREZ VS. FARMER BOYS FOOD, INC.

Plaintiffs to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

BANK OF AMERICA VS. KU

Motion to Vacate

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

TORRES VS. BROWN

Motion for Leave to File Cross Complaint

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

DAI VS. DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

It is unnecessary for the court to take judicial notice of Exhibits 2 and 3, as they are materials filed in this case. “[A]ll that is necessary is to call the court’s attention to such papers.” (Weil & Brown, Cal. Prac. Guide: Civil Proc. Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2020) ¶ 9.53.1a.) Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

UPGRADE SECURITIZATION TRUST I VS CHRISTOPHER LOPEZ

The Loan was subsequently assigned to Plaintiff. Lopez has defaulted on the Loan by failing to make all required payments due thereunder. On October 25, 2019, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting a cause of action against Lopez and Does 1-5 for: Breach of Written Contract On January 16, 2020, Lopez’s default was entered. A Case Management Conference is set for March 23, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

SACK VS. PINNER CONSTRUCTION CO.

Demurrer to Amended Complaint 2. Motion to Strike Portions of the Complaint

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ET AL. VS CHERRY DESIGNS INC., A CORPORATION

(“Defendant”) has failed to pay premiums due under an insurance policy (i.e., No. 76 WEG PK 2367) issued to Defendant by Plaintiffs. On May 3, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Defendant and Does 1-10 for: Breach of Contract Book Account Account Stated Services Rendered On February 13, 2020, Defendant’s default was entered. A Case Management Conference is set for September 16, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Aug 16, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

COURTNEY CROSBY VS SPITZER HELICOPTER LLC ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Motion to Quash Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

TAYLER HANNES VS PARKS MANAGEMENT COMPANY

Nature of Proceedings: Case Management Conference; Motion to Compel Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

ASTRID G NELSON MEGEL ET AL VS THE STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Motion to Compel; Motion for Leave to File FAC; Motion for Trial Preference; Case Management Conference Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

CHELSEA HERZOG VS NUSIL TECHNOLOGY LLC ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: (3) Motions to Compel Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

GDNSHIP OF CARLOS LOBO

RE: SPECIAL IMMIGRANT JUVENILE FINDINGS FILED ON 02/14/20 BY XIOMARA BEATRIZ LOPEZ LOBO PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2. Proof of mailing to all parties entitled to notice Note: Spanish interpreter requested

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

GDNSHIP OF JOSE LOBO

RE: PET’N FOR APPTMNT OF GRDN OF PERSON FILED ON 02/14/20 BY XIOMARA BEATRIZ LOPEZ LOBO PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Appearances 2.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS. OF MASSOUD FAQUIRYAN

Letters of Temporary Guardianship issued to petitioner expire 10-29-20. 2. Court will dispense with further formal service on mother Melissa Salinas, pursuant to Decl. filed 2-13-2020, 2-21-2020 and 7-22-2020. Court will dispense with further formal service on unknown maternal and paternal grandparents, pursuant to Decl. attached to UCCJEA Form GC-120 filed 7-22-2020.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CONS OF JAMES D. BROWN

Nina Dong is ordered to appear, pursuant to 6-29-2020 minute order Note: Letters of Temporary Conservatorship of Person/Estate issued to Public Guardian 3- 29-19. C.C. COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES DEPT COUNTY COUNSEL NENITA BERMUDEZ KONSTATINE A DEMIRIS

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ALICE JUNE DAVIDSON VS ANDREA LIN, ET AL.

The Court finds that Lin has not established her failure to plead her cross-claims against Plaintiff through oversight, inadvertence, mistake, neglect, or other cause. At most, she argues that it only took her 6 months after the action was filed in April 2019 to replace her counsel and represent herself in pro per in October 2019. She does not explain what caused the delay in filing this motion (which has been continued on several occasions) from October 2019 to its eventual filing on February 28, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ANDREA DEBOSE ET AL VS ROBERT WELLER

First, as to Plaintiffs’ request for sanctions because of Defendant’s failure to meet and confer prior to filing the instant motions, while the court strongly encourages parties to attempt to meet and confer to resolve disputes without judicial intervention, Defendant was not required to meet and confer prior to filing the instant motions. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1345(b)(1).)

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

BAIRD VS. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.

Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of the ruling to defendant unless it waives notice, to serve both defendant and the LWDA with any new papers filed for future hearings, and to file a proof of service showing compliance.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

VIVIAN BANH VS LAW OFFICES OF LARRY H. PARKER

“It is mandatory that the court impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010) on the party or attorney, or both, whose failure to serve a timely response to requests for admission necessitated this motion.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280(c).) B. Discussion 1. Requests for Admission On January 17, 2019, Defendant served Plaintiff with its requests for admission. (Motion, p. 3:4-7.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

CANDIDA COTTO VS HOLLYWOOD PIANO COMPANY

Demurrer On March 9, 2020, Plaintiff filed a demurrer to Defendant’s answer and affirmative defenses. On July 24, 2020, Defendant filed an opposition to the demurrer. DISCUSSION Plaintiff demurs to the answer and the 1st to 22nd affirmative defenses asserted by Defendant in its answer. A. Time to Answer Plaintiff argues that Defendant belatedly filed an answer. Pursuant to CCP §412.20, a defendant has 30 days after the summons is served on it to file a response to the complaint.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

RON CUELLAR VS WESTGATE COMMUNITY BIBLE CHURCH

Those who own, possess, or control property generally have a duty to exercise ordinary care in managing the property in order to avoid exposing others to an unreasonable risk of harm. (Annocki v. Peterson Enterprises, LLC (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 32, 37.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

MARAT CHORNY VS SPECIAL CAKES BY RUBEN, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

Ohio argues that it unsuccessfully attempted to contact its client Ruben Sinanyan d.b.a Special Cakes by Ruben, Inc. to coordinate a defense, and thus seeks leave to intervene to protect its interests. (Decl. Izurieta, ¶¶ 9, 10.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.