Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Useful Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

Recent Rulings on Civil Bench Warrant - Failure to Comply

226-250 of 10000 results

RALPH MORALEZ VS PHILIPPE THE ORIGINAL

In response, Plaintiff seeks to amend the complaint to add Rose Marie Morales in her individual capacity. The motion for summary adjudication is set for hearing on August 11, 2020, a date the Court is dark for motions. The trial date is January 12, 2021, which was set before COVID-19. The motion to amend is set for hearing on January 27, 2021. Accordingly, the Court orders as follows: 1. Defendant’s motion for summary adjudication shall be continued to September 18, 2020, at 1:30 p.m.

  • Hearing

    Aug 11, 2020

BENJAMIN C. SCHIEBEL V. DAVID C. SOMMERVILLE

And Plaintiff is silent as to his failure to respond to Defendant’s meet and confer efforts over a six-month period. In reply, Defendant notes that Plaintiff has yet to serve verifications with the amended responses. “Where a verification is required, an unverified response is ineffective; it is the equivalent of no response at all.” (Weil & Brown, Cal. Prac. Guide: Civ. Proc. Before Trial (The Rutter Group 2020) Ch. 8F-5, § 8:1113, citing Appleton v. Sup. Ct. (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 636.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 11, 2020

ROBIN JEREMIAH VS WESTERN HEALTH COMMUNITY CLINICS

AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1: This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE SOUTH DISTRICT, JUDGE KIM presiding in DEPT. S27 of the LONG BEACH Courthouse, for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the cause for trial to that Independent Calendar Court. The Order is signed and filed this date, and incorporated herein by reference.

  • Hearing

    Aug 11, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

SUNSET HILLS CAR WASH INC VS GENERAL BARRICADE LLC

All signs must comply with all Applicable Requirements.” (Ryan Evid., Exh. 2, p. GR000037.) Further, installation of fencing (on which the signs were affixed in this case) requires Lessor written consent pursuant to the Lease Agreement. (Ryan Evid., Exh. 2, p. GR000027, ¶ 7.3.) Ryan’s argument turns primarily on the first and second prongs: that Ryan did not speak a falsity or have knowledge of a falsity.

  • Hearing

    Aug 11, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

RICHARD KINSELLA VS JOSE JESUS FLORES, ET AL.

The ruling is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to file a motion for leave to amend if, during the course of the litigation, Plaintiff learns of facts that would support imposition of punitive damages against Gainer. Moving Defendant is ordered to give notice. Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at [email protected] indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org.

  • Hearing

    Aug 11, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

MCCOY ELECTRIC CORPORATION V. ANNETTE RUBIN, ET AL.

The numerous discovery motions on calendar are referred to the assigned discovery referee. The Motion for Leave to File Cross-Complaint is moot.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

JENNIFER HERRINGTON V. THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, ET AL.

North County thus appears to be the appropriate venue for this action within Santa Barbara County. The matter will be transferred to North County for further proceedings unless plaintiff shows good cause for this matter to remain in South County.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

ALEXANDRO FILIPPINI, ET AL. V. TESLA, INC.

The court expects that plaintiffs’ first amended complaint as it will be filed, whether or not it is identical to the PFAC, will address all of the issues raised in this demurrer to the extent appropriate. (2) Motion to Strike All of the allegations and prayers that are the subject of Tesla’s motion to strike are within and relate to causes of action for which the court sustains Tesla’s demurrer with leave to amend. The motion to strike is therefore moot.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

ALEXANDRO FILIPPINI, ET AL. V. TESLA, INC.

Nature of Proceedings: Case Management Conference; Demurrer to Complaint; Motion Strike Portions of Complaint Tentative

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

ALEXANDRO FILIPPINI, ET AL. V. SANTA BARBARA COTTAGE HOSPITAL, ET AL.

The court has concerns about plaintiff's ability to respond, and will discuss with counsel an appropriate date for hearing.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

JOHN PAUL VOITA VS. MARK C SHERWOOD

The operative CIJ in the divorce case was an attempt by John's father, George Voita, to void the transfer of most of his Suncoast stock to family members other than John Voita. Although the present case covered some of the same ground, the central issue here is whether John Voita is the rightful owner of shares of stock which his mother Carol obtained in the earlier divorce proceeding after having allegedly promised to give them to John.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

JENNIFER HERRINGTON V. THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Case Management Conference; Demurrer to First Amended Complaint Tentative

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

CONSERVATORSHIP OF DELVA ROBERTS SOUZA

Code, § 2610) 2) Notice of How to File Objection to I & A (Form GC-042) Proof of Service must be filed showing a Notice of How to File Objection to Inventory and Appraisal was sent to all persons entitled to notice.(Prob. Code, § 2610) If the conservatee submits these documents, no hearing will be necessary and the Court can find compliance with the Conservatorship Compliance Order of December 2, 2019 is complete.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

MATTER OF LEONARD A AND MAVI GONZALES TRUST

The report also reveals time to respond to the demurrer was granted by the demurring party. If counsel appears and informs the Court settlement negotiations are still ongoing, it is recommended the Court take the Demurrer off calendar for August 10 and continue this matter to August 31, 2020, to allow sufficient time to finish the final details of the settlement.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

ESTATE OF CLARK THOMAS WILSON

If the documents curing these deficiencies are not processed by noon on August 7, 2020, it is recommended that the matter be continued to August 24, 2020, at 8:30 a.m. unless the party appears and requests a different date, or submits a request for a different continuance date prior to the hearing. (Local Rule 1721(c)(2)(A-B).) If the matter is continued, documents must be submitted at least 10 days prior to the new hearing date to be considered.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

MATTER OF JESSE AND MARY MASSE TRUST

Nature of Proceedings: Petition to Confirm Real Property a Trust Asset Appearances required.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

MATTER OF JESSE AND MARY MASSE TRUST

Nature of Proceedings: Petition to Confirm Real Property a Trust Asset The following must be submitted: 1) Supplement. A supplement is required to explain why Bart Emmett Massie was not given notice, and why a person named Jesse Massie was given notice when the petition alleges that person is deceased. 2) Proper Proof of Service. Proof of Service using Form DE-115 must be filed IF service to Bart E. Massie is required.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

GUARDIANSHIP OF YANSY YAQUELIN MEJIA LAINEZ

Nature of Proceedings: Petition to Appoint Guardian of the Person w/ SIJF Appearances required.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

ESTATE OF DEMENT F. WEAVER

Parties must come prepared to try issues raised in objection filed June 23, 2020, or narrow issues for hearing on August 18, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

TAFT VS. VENTURA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER

If you wish to obtain a copy of any orders issued by the court at the hearing, please contact the Records Dept. one week after the hearing at: (805) 289-8668. Absent waiver of notice and in the event an order is not signed at the hearing, the prevailing party shall prepare a proposed order and comply with CRC 3.1312 subdivisions (a), (b), (d) and (e). The signed order shall be served on all parties and a proof of service filed with the court.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

LISA HERNANDEZ SOLIS VS. CAMERON KIEFER

The demurrer is limited to the four corners of the complaint and any additional facts which are properly the subject of judicial notice. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 430.30, subd.(a).) If there is a reasonable possibility that a pleading deficiency can be cured, it is an abuse of discretion for the Court to deny leave to amend. (Blank v. Kirwan, supra, 39 Cal.3d at p. 318, 216 Cal.Rptr. 718, 703 P.2d 58.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

TAFT VS. VENTURA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER

If you wish to obtain a copy of any orders issued by the court at the hearing, please contact the Records Dept. one week after the hearing at: (805) 289-8668. Absent waiver of notice and in the event an order is not signed at the hearing, the prevailing party shall prepare a proposed order and comply with CRC 3.1312 subdivisions (a), (b), (d) and (e). The signed order shall be served on all parties and a proof of service filed with the court.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

TRICOAST BUILDERS VS FREDERICK

The record is clear that the parties to the settlement agreement - with the exception of Mr. Connette and TriCoast - executed the agreement. Plaintiffs' counsel, Ms. Tarassoly, declares that she made multiple efforts to contact Mr. Connette and TriCoast to get them to sign the agreement but they were not responsive. Mr. Connette's excuses for delay in his declaration are not persuasive. He does not deny having received, after the MSC, drafts of the written settlement agreement.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

JOSEPH CALIBOSO VS. THE RAYMOND CORPORATION

The counsel pro hac vice must familiarize himself or herself and comply with the standards of professional conduct required of members of the State Bar of California and will be subject to the disciplinary jurisdiction of the State Bar with respect to any of his or her acts occurring in the course of such appearance.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

ROBERT MEADOWS VS. ANACAPA HOMES LLC

Symantec's statement that its software is "industry leading" could lead a reasonable consumer to believe that Symantec software would adhere to industry best practices."]. (5) The Court finds that the Complaint's agency and successor allegations as to Anacapa, Skyline, and Champion are sufficient to assert CLRA liability as to all three. For the above reasons, the Court OVERRULES Champion's general demurrer to the Fourth Cause of Action.

  • Hearing

    Aug 10, 2020

  « first    1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.