What is an Augmentation of Expert Witness List?

Useful Rulings on Augmentation of Expert Witness List

Recent Rulings on Augmentation of Expert Witness List

KARRY FORD-HELSETH VS COAST NEUROSURGICAL ASSOCIATES ET AL

In determining whether to grant a party leave to augment an expert witness list, the Court takes into account certain factors: the extent to which the opposing parties relied on the list of expert witnesses and after determining that the opposing parties will not be prejudiced in maintaining that party’s action or defense on the merits. Cal Code Civ Procedure §2034.620. Plaintiff has not demonstrated that she acted in reliance on Defendants’ initial designation in a manner that has resulted in prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

ARSEN GEVORGYAN VS ELENA JANET AREVALO PANIAGUA

.: BC692630 Hearing Date: March 13, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to augment Expert witness list Plaintiff Arsen Gevorgyan (“Plaintiff”) filed this action following a motor vehicle collision with Defendant Elena Janey Arevalo Paniagua (“Defendant”). Defendant moves to augment her expert witness designation. Defendant also seeks an order authorizing the new expert witnesses to examine Plaintiff. Plaintiff opposes the motion.

  • Hearing

    Mar 13, 2020

REPUBLIC VS GONZALEZ

HEARING ON MOTION TO AUGMENT OR AMEND EXPERT WITNESS LIST FILED BY NEW AMERICA GROUP, INC. * TENTATIVE RULING: * Appear.

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2020

TALPOS VS. FULLERTON JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Nevertheless, CCP §2034.620 states: “The court shall grant leave to augment or amend an expert witness list or declaration only if all of the following conditions are satisfied.” (emphasis added).

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2020

TALPOS VS. FULLERTON JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Nevertheless, CCP §2034.620 states: “The court shall grant leave to augment or amend an expert witness list or declaration only if all of the following conditions are satisfied.” (emphasis added).

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2020

GLADYS E DUQUE VS DAVID S ROSENBERG MD

On February 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed this motion to augment her expert designation with a new expert retained after she learned of this conflict. On motion of any party who has engaged in a timely exchange of expert witness information, the court may grant leave to augment that party’s expert witness list and declaration by adding the name and address of any expert witness whom that party has subsequently retained. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2034.610, subd. (a).)

  • Hearing

    Mar 11, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

HERRICK V. PETE CICH MGMT LLC

Plaintiff Danielle Herrick's motion to augment her expert witness list is granted. The Court is persuaded that: (a) all of the conditions listed in CCP §§ 2034.610 and 2034.620 are satisfied, and (b) that this is an appropriate case for the Court to allow plaintiff to augment her expert witness designation. Thus, the Court allows plaintiff to augment her expert witness designation to include Jeff Bruno. Plaintiff shall produce Jeff Bruno for deposition upon request by defendant.

  • Hearing

    Mar 05, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ARSEN GEVORGYAN VS ELENA JANET AREVALO PANIAGUA

.: BC692630 Hearing Date: February 25, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to augment Expert witness list Plaintiff Arsen Gevorgyan (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant Elena Janey Arevalo Paniagua (“Defendant”) following a motor vehicle collision. Defendant moves to augment her expert witness designation, which Plaintiff opposes. Defendant makes a series of representations in the memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion.

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2020

ROBERT VARTZAR ET AL VS NEW STAR REALTY INC

.: BC721623 Hearing Date: February 25, 2020 [TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Defendants new star realty and jenny s. nam’s motion to augment defendants’ expert witness list Defendants New Star Realty and Jenny S. Nam’s Motion to Augment the Expert Witness List is GRANTED. Factual Background This is a negligence action.

  • Hearing

    Feb 25, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

WALLACE V. ORANGE COUNTY GLOBAL MEDICAL CENTER

Defendant promptly sought leave to augment as shown by the filing of this Motion on 2-7-20, two days after Defendant learned that Nurse Stuck was unwilling to testify. Based on the above, the court finds that Defendant has satisfied the conditions supporting leave to augment its expert witness list by adding Nurse Dennin.

  • Hearing

    Feb 18, 2020

DORINDA MAE BROWN VS EAN HOLDINGS LLC ET AL

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO AUGMENT EXPERT WITNESS LIST On July 20, 2017, plaintiff Dorina Mae Brown filed this action against EAN Holdings LLC, Zuber Murad, and Annet McCrosky for injuries and damages arising from a July 21, 2015 car accident. Plaintiff was stopped in traffic when Murad, who was driving a rental car from Enterprise Car Rental Company (sued as EAN Holdings), crashed into a vehicle in front of him, which was then pushed into Plaintiff’s car. Plaintiff moves to add Dr.

  • Hearing

    Feb 10, 2020

VIRGINIA SOLORIO CASTILLO VS SHUN FAT SUPERMARKET INC

Second, even if the supplemental designation had been untimely, the Court would grant leave to augment the party’s expert witness list pursuant to section 2034.610. Under that section, “on motion of any party who has engaged in a timely exchange of expert witness information, the court may grant leave to . . .

  • Hearing

    Jan 31, 2020

VIRGINIA SOLORIO CASTILLO VS SHUN FAT SUPERMARKET INC

Second, even if the supplemental designation had been untimely, the Court would grant leave to augment the party’s expert witness list pursuant to section 2034.610. Under that section, “on motion of any party who has engaged in a timely exchange of expert witness information, the court may grant leave to . . .

  • Hearing

    Jan 31, 2020

VIRGINIA SOLORIO CASTILLO VS SHUN FAT SUPERMARKET INC

Second, even if the supplemental designation had been untimely, the Court would grant leave to augment the party’s expert witness list pursuant to section 2034.610. Under that section, “on motion of any party who has engaged in a timely exchange of expert witness information, the court may grant leave to . . .

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2020

VIRGINIA SOLORIO CASTILLO VS SHUN FAT SUPERMARKET INC

Second, even if the supplemental designation had been untimely, the Court would grant leave to augment the party’s expert witness list pursuant to section 2034.610. Under that section, “on motion of any party who has engaged in a timely exchange of expert witness information, the court may grant leave to . . .

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2020

ALONSO OCON ET AL VS CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ET AL

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Augment Plaintiffs’ Cal Code Civil Procedure § 2034 Expert Witness List is GRANTED. 1) Plaintiffs can move to augment their expert witness list by adding the name and address of any expert witness subsequently retained if Plaintiffs engaged in a timely exchange of expert witness information. Code Civ. Proc., § 2034.610 There is no issue with the timeliness of each parties’ designation of experts. Plaintiffs served their designation on 9/3/19. Opposition, Ex. 1.

  • Hearing

    Jan 17, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

MAYO VS NIDEFFER

Plaintiff's Motion to Augment Expert Witness List is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Jan 16, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

JOSE TAPIA VS INTERSTATE NON-FERROUS CORPORATION

The court shall grant leave to augment an expert witness list only if all of the conditions in Code of Civil Procedure section 2034.620 are satisfied. Here, in effect, Plaintiff is asking to reopen the time to designate a supplemental expert, rather than to augment his original expert witness list.

  • Hearing

    Dec 30, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

IMPRESO VS VAN HOUT

CCP §2034.620 is the statute that governs augmenting experts: "The court shall grant leave to augment or amend an expert witness list or declaration only if all of the following conditions are satisfied: "(a) The court has taken into account the extent to which the opposing party has relied on the list of expert witnesses. "(b) The court has determined that any party opposing the motion will not be prejudiced in maintaining that party's action or defense on the merits.

  • Hearing

    Dec 19, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

IMPRESO VS VAN HOUT

CCP §2034.620 is the statute that governs augmenting experts: "The court shall grant leave to augment or amend an expert witness list or declaration only if all of the following conditions are satisfied: "(a) The court has taken into account the extent to which the opposing party has relied on the list of expert witnesses. "(b) The court has determined that any party opposing the motion will not be prejudiced in maintaining that party's action or defense on the merits.

  • Hearing

    Dec 19, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

. §2034.610 provides, as follows: (a) On motion of any party who has engaged in a timely exchange of expert witness information, the court may grant leave to do either or both of the following: (1) Augment that party’s expert witness list and declaration by adding the name and address of any expert witness whom that party has subsequently retained.

  • Hearing

    Dec 17, 2019

DELVIN MANUEL VS EMILY ALICIA GROSPE ET AL

Cal Code Civ Proc § 2024.030. 2) Plaintiff can move to augment his expert witness list by adding the name and address of any expert witness subsequently retained or amend the expert witness declaration with respect to that expert’s general substance of testimony. Code Civ. Proc., § 2034.610 Defendants argue that § 2034.610 applies to permit amendment or augmentation of retained experts only.

  • Hearing

    Dec 11, 2019

DE RIVERA V. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.

., Inc. and Hardin Honda) Motion for Leave to Augment Their Expert Witness List, filed on 8-15-19 and scheduled for hearing on 12-10-19, is off calendar.

  • Hearing

    Dec 10, 2019

SNIPE VS KELLY

., CCP § 2034.620(d) [allowing for costs after a party seeks to augment or amend an expert witness list].) In this case, Defendant informed Plaintiff’s counsel that the expert would be on November 27, 2019 because he was out of town. The Court finds this notice substantially complies with section 2034.280. As such, the Court orders that Defendant’s supplemental expert be ordered for deposition on November 27, 2019, or at a time convenient to both counsel prior to the start of trial.

  • Hearing

    Nov 21, 2019

KIRITKUMAR MANGALDAS VS THE END ZONE SPORTS BAR & RESTAURANT

.: BC634189 Hearing Date: August 28, 2019 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to augment Plaintiffs’ Expert witness list Background Plaintiff Kathy Pauline Morris (“Plaintiff”) moves to augment her expert witness designation. Defendants Hakob Babajanyan and TLA Limousine, Inc. (“Defendants”) oppose the motion. The motion is granted.

  • Hearing

    Nov 15, 2019

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 11     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.