What is an Augmentation of Expert Witness List?

Useful Rulings on Augmentation of Expert Witness List

Recent Rulings on Augmentation of Expert Witness List

TRAN VS. PALOMAR HEALTH

Plaintiffs' motion to strike Defendants' supplemental expert designation is granted without prejudice for Defendants to bring a motion to augment their expert witness list pursuant to CCP § 2034.620. At the time the General Order was issued on 5/12/20, all expert designation dates had expired and all expert exchanges had been made. The Court did not reopen the dates when trial was re-set, other than the limited order as to Plaintiffs' expert designation on 6/3/20.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

SANTOS FLANIKEN VS TIMOTHY R COMMERFORD ET AL

On June 19, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to augment his expert witness list pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 2034.610. On June 23, 2020, the Court scheduled Plaintiff’s motion for leave to augment his expert witness list to be heard on October 30, 2020. A trial setting conference is scheduled for November 3, 2020. PARTY’S REQUESTS Plaintiff asks the Court for leave to change Babak Samimi, M.D. from a non-retained expert to a retained expert.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

TANIA ESTRADA VS MICHAEL PRIEBE

On September 1, 2020, Defendant filed a motion for leave to augment his expert witness list pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 2034.610. Trial is set for April 30, 2021. PARTY’S REQUESTS Defendant asks the Court for leave to add three physicians who treated Plaintiff for workers’ compensation related injuries.

  • Hearing

HTTP://WWW.SCSCOURT.ORG (FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY)

Defilippis, counsel for Jeremy Wright, filed this motion on behalf of apparently all plaintiffs for reconsideration of this Court’s order denying the motion to augment the expert witness list. Defendants oppose the motion. III. Analysis. Presiding over a civil law and motion department involves plenty of work to decide cases rightly or wrongly the first time. One of the rights of a court is not have the administration of justice indeed good and burdened by repeated motions on which it has already ruled.

  • Hearing

STEPHEN ALAN GREEN VS AXIALL CORPORATION, ET AL

“The court shall grant leave to augment or amend an expert witness list or declaration only if all of the following conditions are satisfied: (a) The court has taken into account the extent to which the opposing party has relied on the list of expert witnesses. (b) The court has determined that any party opposing the motion will not be prejudiced in maintaining that party's action or defense on the merits.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    H. Jay Ford

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

EMILIANO CHACON VS WALNUT PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ET AL

On May 13, 2020, Defendant filed a motion for leave to augment its expert witness list pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 2034.610. On May 14, 2020, the Court scheduled the hearing on Defendant’s motion for September 24, 2020. Trial is set for February 16, 2021. PARTY’S REQUESTS Defendant asks the Court for leave to substitute Dr. Caroline Crump with Dr. David A. Krauss as Defendant’s expert on human factors.

  • Hearing

ELIJAH HAMMETT VS WHITTIER SCHOOL

In such a case, the party must make a motion to augment or amend its expert witness designation. CCP § 2034.610(a); Richaud v. Jennings (1993) 16 Cal. App. 4th 81, 90–92. If additional testimony is needed on subjects raised in an opposing party's expert witness exchange, the party has the right to serve a supplemental expert witness list within 20 days.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

MEENA ZAREH M D VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL

TRIAL DATE: July 13, 2021 PROOF OF SERVICE: OK PROCEEDING: Plaintiff’s Motion to Augment Expert Witness List OPPOSITION: August 4, 2020 REPLY: August 10, 2020 TENTATIVE: Plaintiff’s motion to augment expert witness list is GRANTED. Plaintiff must file a supplemental designation of a retained expert witness within 10 days of this date.

  • Hearing

GALLEGOS VS DUENAS

s motion for leave to augment expert witness list is granted. The Court allows these defendants to augment their expert witness designation to include a medical billing expert. The defendants shall serve their augmented expert witness designation by August 21, 2020. Upon request by plaintiff's counsel, defendants shall promptly produce the newly designated expert witness for deposition.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

NIUKKA HERNANDEZ VS BEVERLY HOT SPRINGS INC ET AL

Defendant seeks to augment its expert witness list with an “aquatic” expert. Both motions are denied. Legal Standard A.

  • Hearing

ARSEN GEVORGYAN VS ELENA JANET AREVALO PANIAGUA

.: BC692630 Hearing Date: July 21, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to augment Expert witness list and To Reopen discovery Background Plaintiff Arsen Gevorgyan (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant Elena Janey Arevalo Paniagua (“Defendant”) following a motor vehicle collision. Now, Defendant moves to augment her expert witness designation, and to reopen discovery. Plaintiff opposes the motion, which is granted in part and denied in part.

  • Hearing

USBALDO MUNOZ VS SEAN NICHOLAS FOSTER

The court finds that Defendant has established good cause to augment the defense expert witness list. Defendant’s initial expert bases her opinion on the survey of the properties, and as such, the need now arises to augment the list to allow expert surveyors to testify. In opposition, Plaintiffs contend Defendant was not diligent because they had retained Amador on 12/21/17. However, the need for Amador’s testimony did not arise until Smith indicated that her opinion will be based on a survey.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  • Judge

    Lori Ann Fournier or Olivia Rosales

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

WALLACE V. ORANGE COUNTY GLOBAL MEDICAL CENTER

Defendant seeks to augment its expert witness list by replacing Dr. Russell Craig Klein (Dr. R. Klein) with Dr. William P. Klein (Dr. W. Klein.) Plaintiffs (James M. Wallace, Sr., as Guardian Ad Litem for the benefit of James M. Wallace, Jr. an incapacitated adult and Laura Wallace) Opposition to Defendant Orange County Global Medical Center’s Motion for Leave to Augment Defendant’s Designation of Expert Witnesses (Opposition), filed on 6-10-20 under ROA No. 400, asserts, “Given that Dr.

  • Hearing

GERMAN PEREZ VS. JERRY STEVENS

Discussion A party "who has engaged in a timely exchange of expert witness information" may move for an order permitting that party to "[a]ugment that party's expert witness list and declaration by adding the name and address of any expert witness whom that party has subsequently retained." (Code Civ. Proc., § 2034.610, subd. (a).)

  • Hearing

KARRY FORD-HELSETH VS COAST NEUROSURGICAL ASSOCIATES ET AL

In determining whether to grant a party leave to augment an expert witness list, the Court takes into account certain factors: the extent to which the opposing parties relied on the list of expert witnesses and after determining that the opposing parties will not be prejudiced in maintaining that party’s action or defense on the merits. Cal Code Civ Procedure §2034.620. Plaintiff has not demonstrated that she acted in reliance on Defendants’ initial designation in a manner that has resulted in prejudice.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

ARSEN GEVORGYAN VS ELENA JANET AREVALO PANIAGUA

.: BC692630 Hearing Date: March 13, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to augment Expert witness list Plaintiff Arsen Gevorgyan (“Plaintiff”) filed this action following a motor vehicle collision with Defendant Elena Janey Arevalo Paniagua (“Defendant”). Defendant moves to augment her expert witness designation. Defendant also seeks an order authorizing the new expert witnesses to examine Plaintiff. Plaintiff opposes the motion.

  • Hearing

REPUBLIC VS GONZALEZ

HEARING ON MOTION TO AUGMENT OR AMEND EXPERT WITNESS LIST FILED BY NEW AMERICA GROUP, INC. * TENTATIVE RULING: * Appear.

  • Hearing

TALPOS VS. FULLERTON JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Nevertheless, CCP §2034.620 states: “The court shall grant leave to augment or amend an expert witness list or declaration only if all of the following conditions are satisfied.” (emphasis added).

  • Hearing

TALPOS VS. FULLERTON JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Nevertheless, CCP §2034.620 states: “The court shall grant leave to augment or amend an expert witness list or declaration only if all of the following conditions are satisfied.” (emphasis added).

  • Hearing

GLADYS E DUQUE VS DAVID S ROSENBERG MD

On February 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed this motion to augment her expert designation with a new expert retained after she learned of this conflict. On motion of any party who has engaged in a timely exchange of expert witness information, the court may grant leave to augment that party’s expert witness list and declaration by adding the name and address of any expert witness whom that party has subsequently retained. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2034.610, subd. (a).)

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

HERRICK V. PETE CICH MGMT LLC

Plaintiff Danielle Herrick's motion to augment her expert witness list is granted. The Court is persuaded that: (a) all of the conditions listed in CCP §§ 2034.610 and 2034.620 are satisfied, and (b) that this is an appropriate case for the Court to allow plaintiff to augment her expert witness designation. Thus, the Court allows plaintiff to augment her expert witness designation to include Jeff Bruno. Plaintiff shall produce Jeff Bruno for deposition upon request by defendant.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ARSEN GEVORGYAN VS ELENA JANET AREVALO PANIAGUA

.: BC692630 Hearing Date: February 25, 2020 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion to augment Expert witness list Plaintiff Arsen Gevorgyan (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant Elena Janey Arevalo Paniagua (“Defendant”) following a motor vehicle collision. Defendant moves to augment her expert witness designation, which Plaintiff opposes. Defendant makes a series of representations in the memorandum of points and authorities in support of the motion.

  • Hearing

ROBERT VARTZAR ET AL VS NEW STAR REALTY INC

.: BC721623 Hearing Date: February 25, 2020 [TENTATIVE] RULING RE: Defendants new star realty and jenny s. nam’s motion to augment defendants’ expert witness list Defendants New Star Realty and Jenny S. Nam’s Motion to Augment the Expert Witness List is GRANTED. Factual Background This is a negligence action.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

WALLACE V. ORANGE COUNTY GLOBAL MEDICAL CENTER

Defendant promptly sought leave to augment as shown by the filing of this Motion on 2-7-20, two days after Defendant learned that Nurse Stuck was unwilling to testify. Based on the above, the court finds that Defendant has satisfied the conditions supporting leave to augment its expert witness list by adding Nurse Dennin.

  • Hearing

DORINDA MAE BROWN VS EAN HOLDINGS LLC ET AL

[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: MOTION TO AUGMENT EXPERT WITNESS LIST On July 20, 2017, plaintiff Dorina Mae Brown filed this action against EAN Holdings LLC, Zuber Murad, and Annet McCrosky for injuries and damages arising from a July 21, 2015 car accident. Plaintiff was stopped in traffic when Murad, who was driving a rental car from Enterprise Car Rental Company (sued as EAN Holdings), crashed into a vehicle in front of him, which was then pushed into Plaintiff’s car. Plaintiff moves to add Dr.

  • Hearing

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 11     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.