What is Writ of Attachment

Useful Rulings on Application for Right to Attach Order & Writ of Attachment

Recent Rulings on Application for Right to Attach Order & Writ of Attachment

3M PARTS, INC. V. P&B INTERMODAL SERVICES, LLC

Application for Right to Attach Order and Order for Issuance of Writ of Attachment Plaintiff 3M Parts, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) seeks a right to attach order and a writ of attachment against Defendant P&B Intermodal Services, LLC (“Defendant”). The Court notes as an initial matter that this application was initially set to be heard on 4/13/2020, but on 5/18/2020 it was continued to 7/13/2020 because of the Court’s closure due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2020

KAPLAN V. CARINGELLA

However, the October 2, 2020 hearing on Defendant’s application for right to attach order/writ of attachment shall remain on calendar. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 1281.8, subd. (b).) An arbitration status conference is scheduled for January 15, 2021 at 9 am in Department C21. Plaintiff shall give notice of the ruling and of the January 15, 2021 arbitration status conference.

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2020

JOHNSON VS. JOINER

Joiner Trust, and (3) Plaintiff’s Application for Right to Attach Order and Order for Issuance of Writ of Attachment against William G. Joiner. Defendants to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2020

CHATSWORTH CAS, LLC VS OREN LANG

., 19STCV40772 Tentative decision on application for right to attach order: granted Plaintiff Chatsworth Cas, LLC (“Chatsworth”) seeks a right to attach order against Defendant Oren Lang (“Lang”) in the amount of $2,875,076.06. The court has read and considered the moving papers and opposition (no reply was filed), and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1. Complaint Plaintiff Chatsworth commenced this action against Lang on November 12, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Jul 07, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

DONZELLI VS. HOMETOWN SERVICES

HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER & WRIT OF ATTACHMENT FILED BY PLAINTIFF * TENTATIVE RULING: * Taken off calendar by moving party.

  • Hearing

    Jul 01, 2020

HITACHI CAPITAL AMERICA CORP VS OT TRUCKLINES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

OT Trucklines, et al. 19TRCV00834 Hitachi Capital America Corp.’s Application for Right to Attach Order and for Issuance of Writ of Attachment as to OT Trucklines Hitachi Capital America Corp.’s Application for Right to Attach Order and for Issuance of Writ of Attachment as to Tom Pongil Kim TENTATIVE RULING Hitachi Capital America Corp.’s Applications for Right to Attach Order and for Issuance of Writs of Attachment are granted.

  • Hearing

    Jun 26, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

BANK OF THE WEST V. EASYKLEAN, INC.

If the court determines that it has authority to issue a right to attach order and order for issuance of writ of attachment, the court makes the following tentative ruling: Plaintiff’s (Bank of the West) unopposed Application for Right to Attach Order and Order for Issuance of Writ of Attachment (Application), filed on 3-10-20 under ROA No. 16, is GRANTED. An attachment may issue only upon a claim for money based upon an express or implied contract. (Code Civ. Proc., § 483.010, subd. (a).)

  • Hearing

    Jun 23, 2020

SQI DIAGNOSTICS SYSTEMS, INC. V. PREDICTIVE HEALTH DIAGNOSTICS, INC.

Plaintiff SQI Diagnostics, Inc.’s application for right to attach order and writ of attachment against Defendant Predictive Health Diagnostics, Inc., is denied. “Attachment is a prejudgment remedy which requires a court to make a preliminary determination of the merits of a dispute.” (Lorber Industries v. Turbulence, Inc. (1985) 175 Cal.App.3d 532, 535.) The main purpose of attachment is to create a judicial lien on the debtor's attachable property.

  • Hearing

    Jun 19, 2020

MURRAY VS. CAMPOS

The property to be attached as to defendant Armor Contracting Company is all corporate property for which a method of levy is provided (CCP § 487.010 (a)) and as to defendant Christian Campos all property described in item 9.c. of plaintiffs’ Application for Right to Attach Order against Campos, except to the extent that the court grants Campos’ claims of exemption, as described below. (See CCP § 487.0101 (c), 487.020.)

  • Hearing

    Jun 03, 2020

NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC. V. WESTLAND FLORAL COMPANY CARPINTERIA, INC., ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Application Application for right to attach order for defendant Westland Floral Company Carpinteria, Inc. Application for right to attach order for defendant Gallup & Stribling Orchids, LLC ATTORNEYS: Steven R. Stoker of Pascuzzi, Pascuzzi & Stoker for plaintiff Steven M. Selna /Robert W.

  • Hearing

    Jun 02, 2020

NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC. V. WESTLAND FLORAL COMPANY CARPINTERIA, INC., ET AL.

Nature of Proceedings: Application Application for right to attach order for defendant Westland Floral Company Carpinteria, Inc. Application for right to attach order for defendant Gallup & Stribling Orchids, LLC ATTORNEYS: Steven R. Stoker of Pascuzzi, Pascuzzi & Stoker for plaintiff Steven M. Selna /Robert W.

  • Hearing

    Jun 02, 2020

PACIFIC MERCANTILE BANK VS USMAN VAKIL

Vakil (20PSCV00156) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Pacific Mercantile Bank’s APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER AND WRIT OF ATTACHMENT Responding Party: Defendant, Usman Vakil Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Pacific Mercantile Bank’s Application for Right to Attach Order and Writ of Attachment is GRANTED. The court will issue a writ for $763,613.45 and order an undertaking of $10,000.00.

  • Hearing

    Jun 02, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

MICHAEL J . KUHL, ET AL VS. COOPERATIVE COMMUNITY ENERGY CORPORATION, ET AL

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: NOTICE OF MOTION — APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER; TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER, ETC. [PLTF] BUSINESS ESOLUTIONS, INC. [PLTF] MICHAEL J. KUHL RULING Plaintiff Business eSolutions Inc. (BBS) has failed to prove the probable validity of its breach of contract claim against defendant Cooperative Community Energy Corp. (CCEC) and its motion for a Right to Attach Order is therefore DENIED, (Code Civ, Proc. §§ 483.010(a), 484.090(a).)

  • Hearing

    Mar 17, 2020

CRESCENT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED VS, ERIC HARR, ET AL

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: MOTION — APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER AND ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT OF ATTACHMENT [PLTF] CRESCENT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, A CORPORATION RULING Plaintiff’s application for a right to attach order and order for issuance of writ of attachment is DENIED. Plaintiff has not established the probable validity of its claim as Plaintiff has offered no admissible evidence to support its claim.

  • Hearing

    Mar 10, 2020

MELINDA BAKER, ET AL. VS DARRELL AVISS, ET AL.

., 19STCV36333 Tentative decision on application for right to attach order: denied Plaintiff Stampede Way, LLC (“Stampede”) applies for a right to attach order against Defendants Darrell Aviss (“Aviss”), InterSwiss Holdings Group, LLC (“InterSwiss”), and Swiss Management Group, Ltd. (“SMG”) (collectively, “Aviss Defendants”). The court has read and considered the moving papers,[1] opposition, and reply, and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1.

  • Hearing

    Mar 03, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

REBAS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION DBA TOYOTA-LIFT OF LOS ANGELES VS MATRIX INTERNATIONAL TEXTILE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

., 19STLC05953 Tentative decision on application for right to attach order: denied Plaintiff Rebas, Inc., dba Toyota-Lift of Los Angeles (“Toyota-Lift”) applies for a right to attach order against Defendant Matrix International Textile (“Matrix”). The court has read and considered the moving papers,[1] opposition,[2] and reply, and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1.

  • Hearing

    Mar 03, 2020

RUSFIGHTERS, LLC VS MINAKOV

The Application for Right to Attach Order etc. is therefore granted, subject to posting an undertaking in the amount of $10,000. (C.C.P. § 489.220(a).) Plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED under Ev. Code §452(d) as to the existence of and legal effects of the records, but not as to the truth of any disputed facts asserted therein. (Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 256, 264; Arce v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 471, 482.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2020

A&A CALIFORNIA BUILDERS VS. LAM

HEARING ON APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER FILED 01-14-2020 BY WEN D. LAM AND ANNA N. LAM * TENTATIVE RULING: * Cross-Complainants Wen and Anna Lams’ motion for a writ of attachment is denied.

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2020

CALIFORNIA BANK VS. NORTHERN PACIFIC

HEARING ON WRIT OF ATTACHMENT * TENTATIVE RULING: * Plaintiff California Bank of Commerce’s application for right to attach order and issuance of writ of attachment is granted.

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2020

SPECOPSXR, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS INHANCE DIGITAL CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION

., 19STCV44373 Tentative decision on application for right to attach order: denied Plaintiff SpecOpsXR, LLC fka Adventure Capital Holdings, LLC (“SpecOps”) applies for a right to attach order against Defendant Inhance Digital Corporation (“Inhance”). The court has read and considered the moving papers, opposition, and reply, and renders the following tentative decision. A. Statement of the Case 1.

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2020

PACIFIC WESTERN BANK VS HARRY LOGISTICS INC

(Application for Right to Attach Order (Application), ¶8.) Second, the amount of Plaintiff's claim is fixed and readily ascertainable and is more than $500.00. (Application, ¶8.) Third, the claim upon which the attachment is sought is not secured by real property. (Id., at ¶6(a).) Second, the Court must find that a plaintiff has established the probable validity of the claim upon which the attachment is based. (Code Civ. Proc., §484.090(a)(2).)

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

FINANCIAL PACIFIC LEASING, INC. VS. GONNEVILLE, INC.

Application for Right to Attach Order/Writ of Attachment 2. Application for Right to Attach Order/Writ of Attachment 3. Application/Request ***Motion off calendar***

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2020

PACIFIC WESTERN BANK VS HARRY LOGISTICS INC

(Application for Right to Attach Order (Application), ¶8.) Second, the amount of Plaintiff's claim is fixed and readily ascertainable and is more than $500.00. (Application, ¶8.) Third, the claim upon which the attachment is sought is not secured by real property. (Id., at ¶6(a).) Second, the Court must find that a plaintiff has established the probable validity of the claim upon which the attachment is based. (Code Civ. Proc., §484.090(a)(2).)

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

PACIFIC WESTERN BANK VS HARRY LOGISTICS INC

(Application for Right to Attach Order (Application), ¶8.) Second, the amount of Plaintiff's claim is fixed and readily ascertainable and is more than $500.00. (Application, ¶8.) Third, the claim upon which the attachment is sought is not secured by real property. (Id., at ¶6(a).) Second, the Court must find that a plaintiff has established the probable validity of the claim upon which the attachment is based. (Code Civ. Proc., §484.090(a)(2).)

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

PACIFIC WESTERN BANK VS HARRY LOGISTICS INC

(Application for Right to Attach Order (Application), ¶8.) Second, the amount of Plaintiff's claim is fixed and readily ascertainable and is more than $500.00. (Application, ¶8.) Third, the claim upon which the attachment is sought is not secured by real property. (Id., at ¶6(a).) Second, the Court must find that a plaintiff has established the probable validity of the claim upon which the attachment is based. (Code Civ. Proc., §484.090(a)(2).)

  • Hearing

    Feb 27, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 35     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.