What is an Application for Preliminary Injunction?

Useful Rulings on Application for Preliminary Injunction

Recent Rulings on Application for Preliminary Injunction

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Provided that the City will stipulate to a preliminary injunction with respect to the provisions of Ordinance No. 6374 relating to immediate warrantless access to the short-term rental (STR) units, the Court DENIES the application for a preliminary injunction in all other respects, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Plaintiffs produced sufficient evidence in opposition to that motion showing the existence of triable issues of fact as to the application of equitable estoppel, and have produced evidence sufficient to show triable issues of material fact as to equitable estoppel in opposition to the current motion as well. (Opp. SSUF ¶422.)

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

RCMI Group (19PSCV00904; R/T 19PSCV00905) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff 2000 Gold Limited Partnership’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff 2000 Gold Limited Partnership’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. Background Case No. 19PSCV00904 This is an unlawful detainer case regarding the premises located at 16010 Phoenix Drive, City of Industry, CA 91745.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

JOSE AGUILERA VS 5 STAR DELIVERY INC

(KC070509) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Jose Aguilera’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Jose Aguilera’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

WEST COVINA CAR STOP, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS ROUND TABLE REMARKETING D.R.S., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

., et al. (20PSCV00025) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff West Covina Car Stop, LLC dba Ford of West Covina’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff West Covina Car Stop, LLC dba Ford of West Covina’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

UPGRADE SECURITIZATION TRUST I VS CHRISTOPHER LOPEZ

Lopez (19PSCV00965) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Upgrade Securitization Trust I’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Upgrade Securitization Trust I’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

JINGXUAN ZHANG VS HUMMINGBIRD NEST ENTERTAINMENT CORP

(KC069738) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Jingxuan Zhang’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Jingxuan Zhang’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. Background Plaintiff Jingxuan Zhang (“Plaintiff”) alleges that Hummingbird Nest Entertainment Corp.

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

YESLENDER, LLC, A PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS FIVE BULLS TRANSPORT, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

., et al. (20PSCV00215) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff YesLender, LLC’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff YesLender, LLC’s Application for Default Judgment is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

CITRUS OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLGY VS CITRUS VALLEY HEALTH

A party requesting that a record be filed under seal must file a motion or application for an order sealing the record. (CRC Rule 2.551(b)(1).) The motion or application must be accompanied by a memorandum and a declaration containing facts sufficient to justify the sealing. (Ibid.) “A request to seal a document. . . must be supported by a factual declaration or affidavit explaining the particular needs of the case.” (In re Marriage of Lechowick (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1416.)

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

HWANSHIK YOON VS ELLEN EUN YOO, ET AL.

Yoo, et al. (19PSCV00116) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Hwanshik Yoon aka Kevin Yoon’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Hwanshik Yoon aka Kevin Yoon’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. Background Plaintiff Hwanshik Yoon aka Kevin Yoon (“Plaintiff”) alleges as follows: sometime around December 2017, Plaintiff and Ellen Eun Yoo (“E.

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

The parties further agreed that Tissuesco and Chen would refund Plaintiff $105,000.00 if the via application was denied; Chen made a personal guarantee in this regard. Plaintiff’s L-1 visa application was submitted on August 20, 2018; Tissuesco and Chen agreed to refund Plaintiff if the application was not approved until August 20, 2019. On August 20, 2019, Plaintiff contacted Tissuesco and Chen about the refund, because his application was still pending.

  • Hearing

    Jul 31, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

CHING FU CHANG, ET AL. VS PAN MING LEI, ET AL.

Lei, et al. (19PSCV00711) _____________________________________________ Plaintiffs Ching Fu Chang’s, Yu Chen Wu’s and Hola Elite Corporation’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Ching Fu Chang’s, Yu Chen Wu’s and Hola Elite Corporation’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

KOUROSH IZADPANAHI VS MARIA ALMA YOLANDA IBARRA DABDOUB, ET AL.

Kim demurs to the complaint on the ground Plaintiff Kourosh Izadpanahi’s claims are time-barred by the applicable statutes of limitations even with application of the delayed discovery rule. Under the delayed discovery rule, “the accrual date of a cause of action is delayed until the plaintiff is aware of his or her injury and its cause.” (Brandon G. v. Gray (2003) 111 Cal.App.4th 29, 35.) Here, Plaintiff alleges he was unaware of his injuries until 2019, despite the sale of the property in June 2016.

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2020

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS CHARLES PETERS

Request for Judicial Notice Plaintiffs request judicial notice of the Court’s Tentative Ruling on the Application for a Preliminary Injunction and three provisions of the Beverly Hills Municipal Code. Plaintiffs’ request is GRANTED, pursuant to Evidence Code section 452, subdivisions (b) and (d). Analysis A motion for judgment on the pleadings has the same function as a general demurrer but is made after the time for demurrer has expired. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438, subd. (f).)

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2020

11TH STREET INVESTMENTS, LLC VS TARYN ROSE

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment must be supplemented and corrected as set forth below. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action. Code of Civil Procedure section 587 states that “[a]n application by a plaintiff for entry of default ... shall include an affidavit stating that a copy of the application has been mailed to the defendant’s attorney of record or, if none, to the defendant at his or her last known address and the date on which the copy was mailed.”

  • Hearing

    Jul 25, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

EDUARD GASPARYAN VS. DANIEL GREEN ET. AL.

At ex parte application hearing on 2/5/20, the court ordered the deposition of Mr. Gasparyan for 2/13/20. It is clear that the motion to compel the deposition (by ex parte application) was necessary for the deposition to take place. Accordingly, sanctions are warranted. The amount of sanctions requested is considered unreasonably high for the amount of work which this motion should have taken.

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2020

JOHNATHAN MOLTONI, ET AL. VS XTREME MOTOR SPORTS, INC., ET AL.

., et al. (19PSCV00425) _____________________________________________ Plaintiffs Johnathan Moltoni’s and Tricia Valentine’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiffs Johnathan Moltoni’s and Tricia Valentine’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 23, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

EAST COAST FOODS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS THELMA WEAVER, ET AL.

Ancill failed to disclose these conflicts of interest at any time, including failing to provide a supplement to his Employment Application to the court, as is required under our bankruptcy code. (Compl. ¶¶ 34-35.) Ultimately, “TNI and Ancill materially harmed the estate by ordering excessive amounts of over-priced merchandise” from Ancill’s own companies at inflated prices. (Compl. ¶¶ 26, 44.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 22, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

SHEFA LMV, INC. VS STEVE MADDEN, LTD.

Discussion Injunctive Relief Under the Consent Judgment, Defendant Steve Madden, LLC agrees that as of the date the Court approves and enters the Consent Judgment (Effective Date), Defendant will only sell its Product in California containing the Listed Chemicals “in concentrations less than or equal to 1000 parts per million (“ppm”) (0.1% by weight) when analyzed pursuant to a scientifically reliable application of U.S.

  • Hearing

    Jul 20, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

CITY OF POMONA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL. VS HIGH SUPPLY, A BUSINESS ORGANIZATION, FORM UNKNOWN, ET AL.

Code §§ 3479, 3480, 3491, 3494) Drug Abatement Act (Health & Safety Code § 11570, et seq,) Nuisance Per Se On March 11, 2020, the court granted Plaintiffs’ “Ex Parte Application for an Order to Show Cause Re Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order;” at that time, an Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction was scheduled for March 30, 2020 (subsequently continued to July 30, 2020). On April 1, 2020, 985 West Holt’s and High Supply’s defaults were entered.

  • Hearing

    Jul 20, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

RIVA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT VS MACROSQL TECHNOLOGY LLC

Plaintiff’s application for default judgment is GRANTED.

  • Hearing

    Jul 20, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Legal Standard “The court shall, on application of any defendant, preclude the admission of evidence of that defendant’s profits or financial condition until after the terrier of fact returns a verdict for plaintiff awarding actual damages and finds that a defendant is guilty of malice, oppression, or fraud in accordance with Section 3294.

  • Hearing

    Jul 20, 2020

KATHY HOLLIE VS EMILIE VICTORIA WILLIAMS ET AL

In particular, “preliminary statements” and “general objections” are almost always without merit. The motions to compel responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and RPDs is granted. Defendant is ordered to serve responses, without objections (unless and until relief from waiver is obtained, within 30 days. The Court declines to deem the RFAs admitted, as such relief is unduly harsh under the circumstances.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

CARRIEN QIAN HE, AN INDIVIDUAL VS JAY MIN CHEN, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

., or traveler’s checks and money orders purchased, copies of documents used to purchase checks or money orders, copy of application, copy of check/money order. D. All account applications, account agreements, plan documents, basic services agreements, account documents identifying users and signers, documents removing any signers.”

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

ESTATE OF JOHN W CONVERSE

Nature of Proceedings: Status of Administration; Allow Partial Payment of Statutory Compensation; Preliminary Distribution; Extension of Time to Administer Estate

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.