Application for and Renewal of Judgment?

Useful Rulings on Application for and Renewal of Judgment

Recent Rulings on Application for and Renewal of Judgment

PENTECH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. VS RENE MEDINA

On July 31, 2018, WVJP filed an “Application for and Renewal of Judgment.” (Id., ¶5, Exh. 3.) On June 20, 2011, an abstract of judgment was issued; it was filed and recorded on August 3, 2011, with the Recorder’s Office for Los Angeles County. (Id., ¶6, Exh. 4.) On July 30, 2018, an amended abstract of judgment was issued; it was filed and recorded on August 9, 2018 with the Recorder’s Office for Los Angeles County. (Id., ¶7, Exh. 5.) On December 5, 2018, a writ of execution was issued.

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

HERMAN YEE VS ANN HON

On June 6, 2019, Hon and Lai filed an Application for and Renewal of Judgment, as well as a Memorandum of Costs After Judgment, Acknowledgment of Credit and Declaration of Accrued Interest. On September 23, 2019, Hon and Lai filed a Notice of Renewal of Judgment. On October 21, 2019, this instant case was deemed related to Case No. KC068890.

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

SAFAEI ENTERPRISES INC. VS KOLAHI

Motion for Application for Renewal of Judgment The Motion is Denied. There are two ways to keep a judgment alive under California law, which are governed by different procedures. One is for the judgment creditor to bring an independent action on the judgment, which proceeds as a regular civil action, and leads to a further judgment that is good for another ten years.

  • Hearing

    Jul 10, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Finally, to the extent Judgment Debtor’s opposition seeks affirmative relief, namely, that the Court find the renewal of judgment in 2004 and 2013 to be improper and vacate those renewals, the Court makes no finding without noticed motion, as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 683.170. Conclusion Judgment Creditors, Dawn Lyle and Tom McAllister’s Motion for Charging Order is GRANTED IN PART, AND DENIED IN PART.

  • Hearing

    Jul 09, 2020

LOBEL FINANCIAL VS. JOHNSON

Plaintiff filed a notice for renewal of judgment on December 17, 2015 and served it by mail on December 21, 2015 at the same address used for Defendant throughout the case (5535 Scoville, Oakland). The court file reflects that a Final Return on a Writ of Execution on the judgment was filed by the Sheriff of Alameda County on or about March 16, 2018 showing that at one point before that date $1353.40 had been garnished from the Defendant’s salary at the Oakland Unified School District.

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Based on the foregoing evidence, the Court finds that the renewal of judgment should be amended in the interest of justice. Asignee of Record Credilogical Systems, LLC’s Motion to Amend Renewal of Judgment is GRANTED. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 02, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

TENTATIVE RULING: Judgment Assignee Sarcor Financial, Inc.’s Motion to Correct Error in Rejecting Renewal of Judgment is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Jul 01, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

MICHAEL KHABUSHANI VS NAJILA K. BRENT

J); (3) Notice of Renewal of Judgment entered December 7, 2015 in LASC Case No. PC00379 (Exh. K); (4) Quitclaim Deed transferring TRIUNFO property from Michael Khabushani to his wife, Zohreh Khabushani filed with the Ventura County Clerk and Recorder’s Office (Exh. L); (5) August 2, 2016 Bankruptcy Court Order denying Michael Khabushani’s Motion to Avoid Lien in case 1:09-bk-18679-MB (Exh.

  • Hearing

    Jun 25, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  • Judge

    Paul A. Bacigalupo or Virginia Keeny

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

YONG DENG, ET AL. VS FOOTHILL INDEPENDENT BANK, ET AL.

The preliminary title report generated by Chicago Title disclosed the 2006 Renewal of Judgment but did not reflect any lien on the Property in connection with the judgment. Mauriss became aware of the 2006 Renewal of Judgment upon viewing the preliminary title report. In October 2013, unbeknownst to Plaintiffs, Mauriss filed an ex parte application to vacate the 1996 Judgment based on the erroneous belief that the 2006 Renewal of Judgment constituted a lien on the Property.

  • Hearing

    Jun 22, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

However, the Court notes that Judgment Creditor did not timely its Application for Renewal of Judgment in 2017.

  • Hearing

    Jun 22, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

NUNEZ V. SERVIN

Motion: Defendant Elaine Cantu’s motion to vacate renewal of judgment Tentative Ruling: To grant. The renewal of judgment dated December 11, 2019, shall be vacated as to Defendant Elaine Cantu. The abstract of judgment dated December 12, 2019, shall be vacated as to Defendant Elaine Cantu. Explanation: Renewal of judgment can be vacated on the grounds that service of the underlying complaint was not executed per statute. (See Fidelity Creditor Service, Inc. v.

  • Hearing

    Jun 18, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

A-L FINANCIAL VS. LOVE-WILLIAMS

Based on the above chronology of events, this court grants the motion of Latonya Williams to vacate the renewal of judgment filed by the Plaintiff on July 15, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Jun 15, 2020

  • Judge

    Burch

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY V. KARL-FREDRIC SELIGMAN

The original default judgment entered against defendant on March 9, 2010, is vacated as is the renewal of judgment dated February 25, 2020. A dismissal hearing pursuant to CCP secs. 583.310 and 583.410 is set for Aug. 5, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. 4. Defendant to submit a conforming order on his motion to the court for signature and filing, and to give notice of the dismissal hearing to plaintiff or its successor in interest.

  • Hearing

    Jun 11, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Conclusion & Order For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Lovella Thomas’ Motion to Vacate Renewal of Judgment is DENIED. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Mar 11, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Plaintiff filed an Application for and Renewal of Judgment on September 3, 2009, and again on November 29, 2018. On May 14, 2019, a Writ of Execution was issued. On September 13, 2019, Defendant filed the instant Motion to Vacate Default Judgment (the “Motion”). On September 27, 2019, Plaintiff filed an Opposition. No reply was filed.

  • Hearing

    Mar 11, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Conclusion & Order For the foregoing reasons, Defendant Lovella Thomas’ Motion to Vacate Renewal of Judgment is DENIED. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Mar 11, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Villa’s Motion to Vacate Renewal of Judgment is CONTINUED TO MAY 21, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. in Department 25 at the SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE. At least 16 court days before the next scheduled hearing, Judgment Debtor Villa must file and serve supplemental papers correcting the deficiencies identified herein. Failure to do so may result in the Motion being placed off calendar or denied.

  • Hearing

    Mar 05, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Notice of the renewal of judgment was served on Judgment Debtor on February 9, 2016. Judgment Debtor filed the instant Motion to Vacate the Renewal of Judgment on May 10, 2019. To date, no opposition has been filed. Judgment Debtor filed a notice of non-opposition and reply on January 17, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Mar 04, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Conclusion & Order For the foregoing reasons, Judgment Debtor Karina Saucedo’s Motion to Vacate Renewal of Judgment is DENIED. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Mar 03, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

WILSON, FRANK ET AL VS DELTA HOMES, INC. ET AL

On November 10, 2016, Lonnie Wilson filed an application for and renewal of judgment for $721,519. The judgment was renewed. On March 2017, the court denied a similar motion as the one that was denied on February 25, 2015. On November 16, 2018, the court denied a similar motion as the one filed in March 2017, except as to Acclaim Credit Technologies.

  • Hearing

    Mar 03, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

PENTECH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. VS RENE MEDINA

On July 31, 2018, WVJP filed an “Application for and Renewal of Judgment.” (Id., ¶5, Exh. 3.) On June 20, 2011, an abstract of judgment was issued; it was filed and recorded on August 3, 2011, with the Recorder’s Office for Los Angeles County. (Id., ¶6, Exh. 4.) On July 30, 2018, an amended abstract of judgment was issued; it was filed and recorded on August 9, 2018 with the Recorder’s Office for Los Angeles County. (Id., ¶7, Exh. 5.) On December 5, 2018, a writ of execution was issued.

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Conclusion & Order For the foregoing reasons, Judgment Debtor Karina Saucedo’s Motion to Vacate Renewal of Judgment is DENIED. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2020

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

PENTECH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. VS RENE MEDINA

On July 31, 2018, WVJP filed an “Application for and Renewal of Judgment.” (Id., ¶5, Exh. 3.) On June 20, 2011, an abstract of judgment was issued; it was filed and recorded on August 3, 2011, with the Recorder’s Office for Los Angeles County. (Id., ¶6, Exh. 4.) On July 30, 2018, an amended abstract of judgment was issued; it was filed and recorded on August 9, 2018 with the Recorder’s Office for Los Angeles County. (Id., ¶7, Exh. 5.) On December 5, 2018, a writ of execution was issued.

  • Hearing

    Mar 02, 2020

PACIFIC WESTERN BANK VS INSATIABLE ASSETS LLC.

On June 28, 2018, judgment creditor Pacific Western Bank filed an Application for and Renewal of judgment, seeking a total renewed judgment of $276,861.14. ANALYSIS: Judgment creditor Pacific Western Bank seeks the issuance of an order to appear for examination to Schock & Schock, a law corporation, through John P. Schock, to testify about his knowledge of the assets and liabilities of judgment debtors the DLG Family Limited Partnership and Bradley A. Barnes.

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2020

NATIONAL CREDIT ACCEPTANCE INC. VS KHAN, RONNIE

Ronnie Khan CORRECT ERROR IN REJECTING RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT (CCP § 683.010, et seq.) TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is GRANTED as follows. Under the court’s general authority to correct clerical mistakes, the court directs the clerk to re-process Judgment Assignee’s April 11, 2019 judgment renewal application. The clerk will review that application but will not reject it for failure to meet the 10-year expiration deadline.

  • Hearing

    Feb 24, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.