What is Wrongful Termination in Violation of Public Policy?

Useful Rulings on Wrongful Termination – Violation of Public Policy

Recent Rulings on Wrongful Termination – Violation of Public Policy

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

Where, as here, the defendants are public agencies and the plaintiff seeks to restrain them in the performance of their duties, public policy considerations also come into play. There is a general rule against enjoining public officers or agencies from performing their duties. This rule would not preclude a court from enjoining unconstitutional or void acts, but to support a request for such relief the plaintiff must make a significant showing of irreparable injury.”

  • Hearing

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

SCE cites a number of cases in support of its view that the fair market value must take into consideration the SCE-SARVS lease. (See, e.g., People ex re. Dep’t of Public Works v. Lynbar (1967) 253 Cal. App. 2d 870, 881.) While SARVS argues that the holding of Lynbar is distinguishable, it cites no legal authorities that suggest that the lease should not play a role in the valuation of the Property.

  • Hearing

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

In addition, Turner was required pursuant to CCP § 437(b)(1) to specify in the Separate Statement – as to each individual Plaintiff subject to the motion-- the material undisputed facts that mandates judgment in its favor; i.e., that Plaintiffs have only suffered economic damages, and further that Plaintiffs will not be able at trial to show they suffered property damage in connection with their business operations. Turner failed to do so.

  • Hearing

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

The peremptory writ further commands that Respondents shall reconsider the Permit in light of the decision of this Court dated April 18, 2019. 3. Nothing in this judgment or the writ shall limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in Respondents. 4. Petitioners shall recover their costs in this proceeding in the amount of $_____.

  • Hearing

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the State of California or (2) regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. CRC, Rule 9.40(a)(2) and (3). The hearings on the applications are continued to 7/19/19 to allow the applicants to provide supplemental information regarding the foregoing factors. The supplemental information should be submitted by 7/12/19. No appearance is required at the hearing set for 6/21/19.

  • Hearing

PERSOLVE LEGAL GROUP, LLP VS LETICIA HERNANDEZ

/wrongful death). (JC Form CIV-050; CCP 425.11.) N/A Punitive Damages are supported. Info re Defendant’s financial status. (CCP 425.115)

  • Hearing

MICHAEL PHAM, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH PHAM, ET AL. VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings will not be heard on this date in Department 28. No further hearings will be heard in Department 28, Spring Street Courthouse, as of 11/13/20.

  • Hearing

CEMEX USA, INC. VS ATILANO, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

/wrongful death). (JC Form CIV-050; CCP 425.11.) N/A Punitive Damages are supported. Info re Defendant’s financial status. (CCP 425.115)

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

717 NOGALES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS NEW DIAMOND TRUCKING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AND, ET AL.

/wrongful death). (JC Form CIV-050; CCP 425.11.) N/A Punitive Damages are supported. Info re Defendant’s financial status. (CCP 425.115)

  • Hearing

MARK LIU VS XUEFAN LIU

/wrongful death). (JC Form CIV-050; CCP 425.11.) N/A Punitive Damages are supported. Info re Defendant’s financial status. (CCP 425.115)

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

MICHAEL PHAM, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH PHAM, ET AL. VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

The Motion for Summary Judgment will not be heard on this date in Department 28. No further hearings will be heard in Department 28, Spring Street Courthouse, as of 11/13/20.

  • Hearing

PRIME STAFF INC VS PARTNERSHIP STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLC

However, the Statement of Damages under CCP 425.115 does not cure the defective prayer because it is only used to preserve the right to seek punitive damages, not actual damages, and, even if it could be used for such purpose, "[s]tatement of damages are used only in personal injury and wrongful death.... [Citation.] In all other cases, when recovering damages in a default judgment, the plaintiff is limited to the damages specified in the complaint. [Citations.]" Levine v.

  • Hearing

AVITUS INC. VS ANDIAMO MANAGEMENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ET AL.

/wrongful death). (JC Form CIV-050; CCP 425.11.) N/A Punitive Damages are supported. Info re Defendant’s financial status. (CCP 425.115)

  • Hearing

HASMIK KANATARYAN, ET AL. VS CHARLENE SARSTEDT, ET AL.

No further hearings are in Dept. 28, Spring StreetAFTER REVIEW OF THE COURT FILE, THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER:Department 28 of the Personal Injury Court has determined that the above entitled action is complicated based upon the number of pretrial hearings and/or the complexity of the issues presented.AT THE DIRECTION OF DEPARTMENT 1:This case is hereby transferred and reassigned to the following Independent Calendar Court in THE NORTH CENTRAL DISTRICT, JUDGE CURTIS A. KIN presiding in DEPT.

  • Hearing

GRDSHP OF SCOTT

Order must contain findings that (1) reunification with ward’s parents is not viable; and, (2) it is not in the ward’s best interest to return to his country of origin or last habitual residence and the reason for not returning. Order must specify which parent abused, neglected or abandoned the ward; the name of the person with whom ward is placed; and, whether ward is married or unmarried.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

HAI YING RUAN, ET AL. VS CUONG THOAI DIEP, ET AL.

“The only issue involved in a demurrer hearing is whether the complaint, as it stands, unconnected with extraneous matters, states a cause of action.” (Hahn, supra, 147 Cal.App.4th at 747.)

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

RE: FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF CO-EXECUTORS ON WAIVER OF ACCOUNT

SMITH PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SHARON L. ANDERSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Moving paper is in Vol. 1 Need appearances to report status, including 9-1-2020 order to meet and confer Note: Objection filed by John Martini, Richard Martini and David Martini 10-15-2019. DAVID MARTINI JOHN MARTINI KEVIN RODRIGUEZ RICHARD MARTINI KEVIN RODRIGUEZ THE MARTINI FAMILY TRUST DTD 9 TIMOTHY MARTINI DANIEL B NEWBOLD

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF TRAVEON C GAINS

Christopher Schweickert at address in petition or waiver of notice. Proof of Service attached to Notice filed 11-23-2020 reflects mailing to him at an address other than that listed in petition. DAVID HANSON LOREN L BARR EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION EUGENE L HAHM JOHN A LARIMORE CHRISTOPHER M MOORE MARIANNE J LARIMORE CHRISTOPHER M MOORE STEPHEN C LARIMORE CHRISTOPHER M MOORE THE LARIMORE FAMILY TRUST THE TRUST FOR STEPHEN C.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N TO COMPEL TIMOTHY MARTINI TO ACCT; RPT ACTS COMPEL

Proof of service in the manner provided in CCP § 415.10 (30 days personal service) or CCP § 415.30 (30 days proof of mailing with Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt) on each person claiming an interest in, or having title to or possession of, the property. PrC § 851(a)(2) KRISTEN GATES CHARLES B WOOD KRISTEN GATES CHARLES B.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST STATUS REPORT OF THE EXECUTOR'S ADMINISTRATION

Declaration in objection filed by Florian Taylor and Elzada Reed 10-7-2020. 2. Stipulation filed 11-2-2020. ELZADA REED FLORIAN TAYLOR PETRINA ARMOUR MATTHEW B TALBOT THE HATTIE M. OWNES REVOCABLE THE HATTIE M OWENS REVOCABLE L WILLIAM SHAW JONATHAN T. THOMPSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Corrected proof of mailing to complete Item # 3 which is incomplete on Proof of Service attached to Notice filed 9-2-2020. 2.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TRUST INSTRUMENT & CONFIRMATION

Verified declaration in support of attorney’s fees paid as reported at paragraph 6. Statement showing services rendered, hours and rates charged so ct. can evaluate attorney fees reported. LR 7.450. 2. Proposed Order Note: Per 7-27-2020 minute order, Atty. Lara Heisler was ordered to appear 9-2-2020. Atty. Heisler failed to appear 9-2-2020.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR COMPENSATION

It appears amounts paid are excessive for periods in which conservatee lived in a care facility. 4. Original financial account statement(s) as required by PrC § 2620(c) (2), (3) 5. Original statements from the residential care facility PrC § 2620(c)(5) 6. Verified declaration by attorney to clarify whether fees were paid to attorney without a court order. PrC §2647 7.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

FALISHA PORTER VS PHARMAVITE, LLC

clothes by co-workers to harassher And other similar complaints result in constructive termination Plaintiff asserts that she suffered from severe emotional distress and psychological abuse.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

/wrongful death). (JC Form CIV-050; CCP 425.11.) N/A Punitive Damages are supported. Info re Defendant’s financial status. (CCP 425.115)

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

CONSERVATORSHIP OF RICHARD MARTIN REIMERS

Note: First and Final Account is set for 12-16-2020 in Dept. 30 MICHELLE KAREN ROTH KONSTANTINE A DEMIRIS RICHARD MARTIN REIMERS WENDY KRESS Need appearances Notes: 1. Respondents Greg Gaskin and Gaskin Wealth Management’s Responses and Objections filed 7-20-2020. 2. Trial is set for 12-28-2020 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept. 30. GASKIN WEALTH MANAGMENT ANDREW P. DANZA GREG GASKIN ANDREW P. DANZA MARY CHRISTINE YOUNG KONSTANTINE A DEMIRIS THE YOUNG REVOCABLE TRUST

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.