What is wrongful termination – employment contract?

Useful Rulings on Wrongful Termination – Employment Contract

Recent Rulings on Wrongful Termination – Employment Contract

1-25 of 10000 results

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

MaryJane MaryJane operates the hotel’s coffee shop pursuant to a lease with T-12 Three, LLC (“T-12”), the successor-in-interest to the Developer under the Construction Contract (the “Contract”) with Turner. MaryJane was formed in September 2007 and, therefore, was not in existence at the time the Contract was formed and was not a party to the Contract.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

/wrongful death). (JC Form CIV-050; CCP 425.11.) N/A Punitive Damages are supported. Info re Defendant’s financial status. (CCP 425.115)

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

JOSE AGUILERA VS 5 STAR DELIVERY INC

/wrongful death). (JC Form CIV-050; CCP 425.11.) N/A Punitive Damages are supported. Info re Defendant’s financial status. (CCP 425.115)

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

WEST COVINA CAR STOP, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS ROUND TABLE REMARKETING D.R.S., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

/wrongful death). (JC Form CIV-050; CCP 425.11.) N/A Punitive Damages are supported. Info re Defendant’s financial status. (CCP 425.115)

  • Hearing

    Sep 23, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

UPGRADE SECURITIZATION TRUST I VS CHRISTOPHER LOPEZ

/wrongful death). (JC Form CIV-050; CCP 425.11.) N/A Punitive Damages are supported. Info re Defendant’s financial status. (CCP 425.115)

  • Hearing

    Aug 17, 2020

JINGXUAN ZHANG VS HUMMINGBIRD NEST ENTERTAINMENT CORP

/wrongful death). (JC Form CIV-050; CCP 425.11.) N/A Punitive Damages are supported. Info re Defendant’s financial status. (CCP 425.115)

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

YESLENDER, LLC, A PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS FIVE BULLS TRANSPORT, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

/wrongful death). (JC Form CIV-050; CCP 425.11.) N/A Punitive Damages are supported. Info re Defendant’s financial status. (CCP 425.115)

  • Hearing

    Aug 12, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

CITRUS OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLGY VS CITRUS VALLEY HEALTH

Issue No. 27: Plaintiff cannot establish any independently wrongful act that caused the termination of the prospective economic relationship between AltaMed and Plaintiff. (3rd cause of action, first count). Issue No. 28: Plaintiff cannot establish any independently wrongful act that caused the termination of the prospective economic relationship between Central City and Plaintiff. (3rd cause of action, second count).

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

HWANSHIK YOON VS ELLEN EUN YOO, ET AL.

No Attorney fees if supported by contract, statute or law. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(9); Local R. 3.214; open book – CC 1717.5.) Yes Interest computations. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(3); 10% for contracts - Civ. Code 3289.) Yes Memorandum of costs and disbursements. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(4); JC Form CIV-100 item 7.) Yes Declaration of nonmilitary status for each defendant. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(5); JC Form CIV-100 item 8.) No Proposed form of judgment. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(6).) N/A Statement of Damages served (P.I./wrongful death).

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

On September 5, 2019, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Chen, Tissuesco and Does 1-10 for: Breach of Contract Breach of Fiduciary Duty On October 23, 2019, Chen’s default was entered. Discussion The hearing on Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is CONTINUED to September 2, 2020 8:30 a.m. The following defects are noted: Tissuesco’s default has not been entered.

  • Hearing

    Jul 31, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

ANTHONY SAM VS RENEE KWAN ET AL

The causes of action in the FAC include (1) breach of fiduciary duty; (2) breach of contract; (3) quiet title/cancellation of instrument; (4) breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (5) violations of Business and Professions Code sections 12700 et seq.; (6) escrow negligence; (7) fraud; (8) civil conspiracy; and (9) declaratory relief.

  • Hearing

    Jul 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

CHING FU CHANG, ET AL. VS PAN MING LEI, ET AL.

/wrongful death). (JC Form CIV-050; CCP 425.11.) No Punitive Damages are supported. Info re Defendant’s financial status. (CCP 425.115)

  • Hearing

    Jul 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

HAGOP TCHAKERIAN VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Thus, the Court cannot conclude that these facts form the basis for his claims, as they were not properly presented to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH).

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

MED CAFE CORP, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS MOSTAFA KARIMBEIK, ET AL.

Moreover, if Plaintiff did not take possession of the property, it does not have a claim for constructive eviction, as Defendants’ conduct was no more than a breach of contract. Thus, Defendants’ demurrer to the fifth cause of action is SUSTAINED, with twenty (20) days leave to amend. Sixth Cause of Action: Conversion “Conversion is the wrongful exercise of dominion over the property of another.

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

ANNE SHOYKHET, ET AL. VS NATHALIE DUBOIS, ET AL.

First Cause of Action: Breach of Contract To state a cause of action for breach of contract, Plaintiff must be able to establish “(1) the existence of the contract, (2) plaintiff’s performance or excuse for nonperformance, (3) defendant’s breach, and (4) the resulting damages to the plaintiff.” (Oasis West Realty, LLC v. Goldman (2011) 51 Cal.4th 811, 821.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

KOUROSH IZADPANAHI VS MARIA ALMA YOLANDA IBARRA DABDOUB, ET AL.

“The elements of a civil conspiracy are (1) the formation of a group of two or more persons who agreed to a common plan or design to commit a tortious act; (2) a wrongful act committed pursuant to the agreement; and (3) resulting damages.” (Id.at p. 212.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2020

11TH STREET INVESTMENTS, LLC VS TARYN ROSE

Next, attorneys’ fees may only be awarded where they are authorized by statute or contract. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1021.) Here, Plaintiff has failed to identify a basis for an award of attorneys’ fees.

  • Hearing

    Jul 25, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

NINA MARIE JOHNSON VS IAN PATTON, ET AL.

An award of attorney’s fees is proper when authorized by contract, statute, or law. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 1032, subd. (b), 1033.5, subd. (a)(10).) Plaintiff asserts she is entitled to attorney’s fees under her written lease agreement, but Plaintiff fails to provide the contract or the attorney’s fees provision. Where a claim is based on a written contract, “the terms must be set out verbatim in the body of the complaint or a copy of the written agreement must be attached and incorporated by reference.”

  • Hearing

    Jul 24, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

JOHNATHAN MOLTONI, ET AL. VS XTREME MOTOR SPORTS, INC., ET AL.

/wrongful death). (JC Form CIV-050; CCP 425.11.) N/A Punitive Damages are supported. Info re Defendant’s financial status. (CCP 425.115)

  • Hearing

    Jul 23, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

LA LIVE PROPERTIES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS KA WAIKWAN, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

Plaintiff’s claim against Triple 8 Restaurant, LLC for breach of contract alleges that Triple 8 Restaurant, LLC, the tenant, breached the lease agreement with Plaintiff. Plaintiff’s claim against Defendants Kwan and Moy for breach of lease and personal guaranty of lease, alleges that Defendants Kwan and Moy breached their guaranty of lease with Plaintiff. (FAC, ¶¶ 22-37.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 23, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

LOREN NAUTA V. SUSAN MURPHY

The complaint sets forth causes of action for breach of contract and legal malpractice and arises out of Murphy’s representation of Nauta in connection with a pending foreclosure. On October 15, 2019, Murphy responded by filing a Motion for Change of Venue, which the Court granted on December 18, 2019. Nauta did not appear at the hearing. At the Court’s direction, Murphy mailed Nauta a Notice of Ruling that same day. Murphy then forwarded to Nauta a signed Order After Hearing on January 16, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Jul 22, 2020

LUIS ALONSO VS ROUNDTREE N VAN NUYS, LLC DBA NISSAN OF VAN NUYS, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY

There are also no facts to prove up punitive damages against a corporate employer: authorization or ratification of an employee's wrongful acts; or knowledge in advance that an employee was likely to commit such acts, and employed him or her with conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others; or was itself guilty of oppression, fraud or malice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 21, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

RE: PET’N FOR ATTY FEES & COSTS, TERMINATION OF APPT

FILED ON 12/06/19 BY TRACY S REGLI PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Drop. Duplicate entry. File w/ 7-13 calendar Need appearances to report status of filing accounting Note: Letters of Conservatorship issued to William Shaw 7-25-19. CHARLES TONELLI MATTHEW B TALBOT DAVID L TONELLI ROBY...

  • Hearing

    Jul 20, 2020

CITY OF POMONA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ET AL. VS HIGH SUPPLY, A BUSINESS ORGANIZATION, FORM UNKNOWN, ET AL.

/wrongful death). (JC Form CIV-050; CCP 425.11.) N/S Punitive Damages are supported. Info re Defendant’s financial status. (CCP 425.115)

  • Hearing

    Jul 20, 2020

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

“The elements which a plaintiff must plead to state the cause of action for intentional interference with contractual relations are (1) a valid contract between plaintiff and a third party; (2) defendant's knowledge of this contract; (3) defendant's intentional acts designed to induce a breach or disruption of the contractual relationship; (4) actual breach or disruption of the contractual relationship; and (5) resulting damage.” (Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v.

  • Hearing

    Jul 20, 2020

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.