Govt. Code section 831.4 provides as follows:
Gov. Code, § 831.4
The purpose of trail immunity is discussed in Amberger-Warren v. City of Piedmont (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 1074, as follows:
“This immunity is afforded ‘to encourage public entities to open their property for public recreational use, because 'the burden and expense of putting such property in a safe condition and the expense of defending claims for injuries would probably cause many public entities to close such areas to public use.’” (Armenio v. County of San Mateo (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 413, 417.)
“The trail immunity provided in subdivision (b) of the statute extends to trails that are used for the activities listed in subdivision (a), and to trails that are used solely for access to such activities.” (Treweek v. City of Napa (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 221, 224–229.) “The immunity applies whether or not the trail is paved.” (Armenio, supra, 28 Cal.App.4th at 418.)
Immunity under Cal. Gov. Code § 831.4 applies to preclude liability for injury occurring on any unpaved road or trail that is not a street or highway that provides access to recreational or scenic areas.Cal. Gov. Code § 831.4
It precludes liability for injury occurring on any “paved trail, walkway, path, or sidewalk on an easement of way which has been granted to a public entity, which easement provides access to any unimproved property, so long as such public entity shall reasonably attempt to provide adequate warnings of the existence of any condition of the paved trail, walkway, path, or sidewalk . . .”
However, warnings “shall only be required where pathways are paved, and such requirement shall not be construed to be a standard of care for any unpaved pathways or roads.” Cal. Gov. Code § 831.4
Whether the Boardwalk is a recreational trail depends on analysis of three factors:
(Amberger-Warren at 1078-1079.)
Other cases have held that Govt. Code § 831.4 applies to bicycle paths similar to the Boardwalk. (See, e.g. Carroll v. County of Los Angeles (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 606, 609; Farnham v. City of Los Angeles (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 1097, 1099-1100; Armenio v. County of San Mateo (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 413, 418.) Thus, under accepted definitions, the Boardwalk is a trail. Further, it is undisputed that the Boardwalk is used for recreational purposes and to access recreational areas. Trail immunity is promoted by deeming the Boardwalk a trail and promotes important legislative policy of permitting public use of governmental property. (See, e.g. Amberger-Warren at 1085.)
Pursuant to Government Code section 831.4, a public entity is not liable for any injury caused by a condition of trails. The District Court of Appeal has held that the Sepulveda Basin Bikeway is a trail for purposes of trail immunity. (Farnham v. City of Los Angeles (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 1097, 1098-1103.)
In Prokop v. City of Los Angeles (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1332, 1335, the appellate court held that the City had “absolute immunity under Government Code section 831.4 from liability for injuries suffered by a bicyclist who collided with a chain link fence immediately after exiting a class I bikeway located along the Los Angeles River.”
In Amberger-Warren v. City of Piedmont (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 1074, 1085, the immunity was applied in the absence of handrail on a trail. The location of the trail was “an integral feature of a trail.”
The lack of warnings or guardrails constitutes a condition of the trail, which does not avoid the trail immunity. Arvizu v. City of Pasadena (2018) 21 Cal.App.5th 760, 767.
The installation of guardrails that may be dangerous to bicyclist on the public trail is a condition that triggers the application of Gov. Code, § 831.4.
Jul 15, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Jul 01, 2020
Butte County, CA
Jun 25, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Jun 22, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Jun 10, 2020
Sacramento County, CA
Jun 10, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Jun 09, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Jun 03, 2020
Butte County, CA
Jun 03, 2020
Butte County, CA
Jun 03, 2020
Butte County, CA
Jun 03, 2020
Butte County, CA
Jun 03, 2020
Butte County, CA
Jun 02, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
May 29, 2020
Butte County, CA
May 20, 2020
Butte County, CA
May 20, 2020
Butte County, CA
May 11, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Apr 29, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Apr 07, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Apr 06, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Mar 23, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Mar 20, 2020
Butte County, CA
Mar 20, 2020
Butte County, CA
Mar 16, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Mar 13, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Please wait a moment while we load this page.