(Based on The State Bar of California Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct Formal Opinion No. 2019-197.)
When a lawyer consults another lawyer about matters involving the first lawyer’s current client, ethical questions arise concerning what disclosures the lawyer must make to the client about that consultation. (Bus. and Prof. Code, § 6068(m). )
It is a duty of a lawyer “[t]o maintain inviolate the confidence, and at every peril to himself or herself to preserve the secrets, of his or her client.” (Bus. and Prof. Code, § 6068(e)(1).) A lawyer’s duty to preserve the confidentiality of client information involves public policies of paramount importance. (In Re Jordan (1974) 12 Cal.3d 575, 580 [116 Cal.Rptr. 371].) As such, “[a] lawyer shall not reveal information protected from disclosure unless the client gives informed consent.” (Rules of Prof. Conduct, Rule 1.6(a); Bus. and Prof. Code, § 6068(e)(1); Commercial Standard Title Co. v. Super. Ct. (1979) 92 Cal.App.3d 934, 945.)
“The scope of an attorney's duty may be determined as a matter of law based on the Rules of Professional Conduct which, together with statutes and general principles relating to other fiduciary relationships, all help define the duty component of the fiduciary duty which an attorney owes to his [or her] client.” (Slovensky v. Friedman (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 1518, 1534-1535.)
“It is… an attorney’s duty to protect his client in every possible way, and it is a violation of that duty for him to assume a position adverse or antagonistic to his client without the latter’s free and intelligent consent.” (Santa Clara County Counsel Attys. Ass'n v. Woodside (1994) 7 Cal.4th 525, 548.) The fiduciary duty that attorneys owe to their clients also includes a duty of communication. (In re O.S. (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 1402, 1411.) “[T]he dealings between practitioner and client frame a fiduciary relationship. The duty of a fiduciary embraces the obligation to render a full and fair disclosure to the beneficiary of all facts which materially affect his rights and interests.” (Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & Gelfand (1971) 6 Cal.3d 176, 188-189.)
“A lawyer shall:
(Rules of Prof. Conduct, Rule 1.4(a).)
“‘Informed consent’ means a person's agreement to a proposed course of conduct after the lawyer has communicated and explained
(Rules of Prof. Conduct, Rule 1.0.1(e).)
“A law firm is not necessarily disloyal to a client ‘by seeking legal advice to determine how best to address [a] potential conflict.’” (Palmer v. Super. Ct. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 1214, 1233.) “The attorney’s and client’s interests are likely to dovetail insofar as the attorney seeks to resolve the dispute to the client’s satisfaction, or determine through consultation with counsel what his or her ethical and professional responsibilities are in order to comply with them.” (Id. at p. 1233-1234.)
The Court has the authority to disqualify attorneys who violate professional ethical rules because every Court has the power to control, “in furtherance of justice,” the conduct of persons connected with its proceedings. (Jackson v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 1163, 1166.) Disqualification is proper to assure fairness in judicial proceedings -- its point is not to punish ethical transgressions, but to prevent continuing, detrimental effects upon the proceedings. (Id.)
A disqualification motion addresses a conflict between a party’s right to choose its counsel and the overall needs of the judicial system to maintain ethical standards of professional responsibility for attorneys. (Comden v. Super. Ct. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 906, 915; SpeeDee Oil Change Systems, Inc. (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1135, 1145.) Disqualification is a drastic remedy that should be used only with caution; it usually imposes a substantial hardship on the disqualified attorney's innocent client. (Gregori v. Bank of America (1989) 207 Cal.App.3d 291, 300, 301.)
Nov 12, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Nov 09, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Sep 11, 2020
Placer County, CA
Sep 11, 2020
Placer County, CA
Aug 14, 2020
Placer County, CA
Apr 13, 2020
Placer County, CA
Mar 25, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Mar 25, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Mar 25, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Mar 25, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Mar 25, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Mar 25, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Mar 04, 2020
Placer County, CA
Mar 04, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Mar 04, 2020
Placer County, CA
Mar 04, 2020
San Francisco County, CA
Feb 21, 2020
Placer County, CA
Feb 06, 2020
Placer County, CA
Jan 08, 2020
Butte County, CA
Dec 24, 2019
San Francisco County, CA
Dec 18, 2019
San Francisco County, CA
Dec 09, 2019
Culver Kapetan, Kristi
Fresno County, CA
Nov 27, 2019
San Francisco County, CA
Nov 27, 2019
San Francisco County, CA
Nov 26, 2019
San Joaquin County, CA
Please wait a moment while we load this page.