Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
California Code of Civil Procedure ยงยง 564-570 governs Receivership and provides in relevant part:
Code of Civil Procedure ยง 564.
Code of Civil Procedure ยง 567 provides, with respect to the oath and undertaking of court-appointed receivers:
โBefore entering upon the duties of a receiver:
The receiverโs bond is usually fixed high enough to cover the value of any cash or transferable personal property coming into the receiverโs possession. It is the applicantโs responsibility to propose the amount of the bond, but the opposing party may propose a higher amount. (California Rules of Court 1902.5.) Wherever possible, counsel should submit affidavits stating facts justifying the amount of bond. (Id.)
Code of Civil Procedure ยง 568 sets forth the powers of a receiver:
โThe receiver has, under the control of the Court, power to bring and defend actions in his own name, as receiver; to take and keep possession of the property, to receive rents, collect debts, to compound for and compromise the same, to make transfers, and generally to do such acts respecting the property as the Court may authorize.โ
It is held that a receiver may not be sued without leave of court. Ostrowski v. Miller (1964) 226 Cal.App.2d 79, 84-85.
In the context of a forced sale or winding up of a business entity, โ[t]he receiver's powers included enforcing and collecting debts, instituting lawsuits on behalf of [entity] represented to preserve and protect the [...] assets, discharge obligations of business against the funds in [its] possession, and engaging the services of counsel.โ (O'Flaherty v. Belgum (2004) 115 Cal.App.4th 1044, 1048.)
โA receiver is an officer of the court possessing the property for the court. (Pacific Indem. Co. v. Workers' Comp. App. Bd. (1968) 258 Cal.App.2d 35, 40.) Consequently, a receiver is liable in tort solely in an official capacity, not a personal one. (Sealite, Inc. v. Finster (1957) 149 Cal.App.2d 612, 617-618; Chiesur v. Superior Court (1946) 76 Cal.App.2d 198, 200-201.) โHe is not personally liable for torts committed in the performance of his receivership duties; liability is in his official capacity only, to be satisfied from receivership funds.โ (6 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Provisional Remedies, ยง 364, at 304-305.).โ
A receiver is personally liable if he does not give priority to the tax liens of the United States (31 U.S.C. ss 191, 192, supra; King v. United States, supra, 379 U.S. 329.) Further, the withholding and Federal Insurance Contributions Act taxes accruing during the receivership constitute expenses of administration of high priority and are to be held in trust by the receiver for the United States (Cf., Estate of Dwyer, 168 Ca.App.2d 264, 267.) While California is not armed with such formidable statutes imposing personal liability upon a receiver, it is clear that the state sales taxes and unemployment insurance contributions are entitled to high priority in payment (Cf., Estate of Morris, supra, 37 Cal.App.2d 155, 157โ158.)
(a); see also id., ยง 873.050) and if appropriate, posting of bond (id., ยงยง 567, subd. (b), 873.010, subd. (b)(1)), and the receiver/refereeโs duties are established (id., ยงยง 568, 873.060), then the receiver/referee may seek approval of a course of action based on his or her review of the estate (id., ยงยง 564 et seq., 873.110 et seq.). For the above reasons, the court grants leave to the parties to file supplemental filings for the limited issue of proposing a receiver and partition referee.
CARMELA DESANTIS VS. NICOLA VERNI
22CECG02626
Mar 14, 2023
Fresno County, CA
Discussion CCP ยง 564(b)(4) allows the appointment of a receiver "to dispose of the property according to the judgment." "The superior court has jurisdiction to appoint a receiver as an ancillary remedy in an action for partition of real property..." Blodgett v. Haddock (1949) 95 Cal.App.2d 17, 18. The application does not name any potential receivers nor does it address the receiver's undertaking (CCP ยง 567) or the receiver's powers and duties (CCP ยง 568).
WILKINS VS WILKINS
56-2014-00449631-CU-OR-VTA
Dec 12, 2014
Ventura County, CA
Real Property
other
Granting the Receiver, the authority to manage and oversee the rehabilitation of the Property pursuant to CCP section 568; 6. Authorizing the Receiver to secure funding for the receivership estate through the issuance of receiver's certificates that may be recorded as first priority liens on the Property pursuant to CCP section 568, case law, and equity; 7. Enjoining Defendants from interfering with the Receiver in the operation of the Property pursuant to CCP section 568; 8.
CITY OF LEMON GROVE VS THE GROVE COLLECTIVE
37-2016-00015271-CU-BC-CTL
Apr 11, 2019
San Diego County, CA
Contract
Breach
Plaintiff's motion for appointment of a receiver is granted. Cal. Code of Civil Procedure ยง 564(b)(9). Richard Griswold is appointed as receiver. The receiver shall post a bond in the amount of $10,000 within 5 days of the date of this order. Cal. Code of Civil Procedure ยง 567; Cal. Rules of Court ยง 3.1178.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS SHIRK
37-2017-00014498-CU-MC-NC
Sep 27, 2018
San Diego County, CA
Other
Intellectual Property
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER FOR REAL PROPERTY AND COLLECTION OF RENTS by plaintiff Megan Craver is GRANTED. (CCP ยง 564(b)(1), (3)) Attorney Peter Jensen is appointed as receiver. The court will sign the [Proposed] Order with one change. The Order shall provide that the receiver shall give an undertaking to the State of California in the amount of $10,000. (CCP ยง 567(b)) Plaintiff shall immediately provide the court with an amended Order to reflect the receiver bond.
MEGAN CRAVER VS. RUSSELL CARLSON
37-2017-00032493-CU-OR-CTL
Nov 02, 2017
San Diego County, CA
Real Property
other
Wardakโs request for the appointment of a receiver is granted. The Omarsโ request for the appointment of a provisional director is denied. A receiver may be appointed for California Solar Systems, Inc. because the corporation has been dissolved. CCP ยง564(b)(5). In addition, a receiver is necessary to preserve the property and/or rights of the parties. CCP ยง564(b)(9). Contrary to the Omarsโ assertion, there is much more for a neutral third party to do than sell assets.
CALIFORNIA SOLAR SYSTEMS, INC. VS. OMAR
30-2016-00860168-
Aug 02, 2019
Orange County, CA
The receiver is required to give an oath and post an undertaking as directed by the court. Code Civ. Procยง 567. The receiver is required to give an oath and post an undertaking as directed by the court. Code Civ. Proc ยง 567.
MICHAEL BUCK, ET AL. VS PEACE APOSTOLIC CHURCH, INC., ET AL.
21CMCV00087
Sep 13, 2022
12/14/2022
Los Angeles County, CA
("Plaintiff" or "Motiva") for an order appointing a receiver over Defendant National Small Business Alliance ("Defendant" or "NSBA") and to correct the amount of interest in the Judgment, is GRANTED. Appointment of a receiver is necessary given the risk of insolvency. Code Civ. Proc. 564(b). The Receiver is ordered to file a bond in the amount of $5,000. Code Civ. Proc. 567(b). Also, the judgment will be amended to reflect the correct calculation for prejudgment interest.
THE MOTIVA GROUP INC VS GLOBAL IMPACT GROUP INC
37-2016-00022422-CU-BC-CTL
Nov 20, 2019
San Diego County, CA
Contract
Breach
Plaintiff seeks to appoint a receiver or referee under Code of Civil Procedure sections 564 and 873.010 et seq. regarding the handling of the revenues earned by various real property, and a partition by sale thereof. As to the basis for a receiver, plaintiff argues that a receiver is necessary for the preservation of property rights. (Code Civ. Proc. ยง 564, subd. (b)(9).) Among other claims, plaintiff seeks to preserve the right to rents earned on the various real property.
CARMELA DESANTIS VS. NICOLA VERNI
22CECG02626
Apr 06, 2023
Fresno County, CA
Proc., ยง 564, subds. (b)(1), (b)(9).) The receiver has, under the control of the Court, power to bring and defend actions in his own name, as receiver; to take and keep possession of the property, to receive rents, collect debts, to compound for and compromise the same, to make transfers, and generally to do such acts respecting the property as the Court may authorize. (Code Civ. Proc., ยง 568.)
ANGEL LUIS BARRUETA VS ALEXIS BARRUETA
22STCV31289
May 05, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
(CCP 564(b)(9).)
CITY OF POMONA VS LOLA M. NEWMAN
KS021333
Aug 14, 2018
Los Angeles County, CA
Movant is to also propose a reasonable CCP ยง 567 bond amount at the hearing.
CITY OF POMONA, A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VS MARY ANDREWS, TRUSTEE FOR LIVING TRUST DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 1993, A DECEASED INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.
19PSCP00209
Jun 24, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Other
Intellectual Property
The Court grants Defendant/Cross-Complainant DโErricoโs motion for an assignment of rents under the deed of trust and the appointment of a receiver. The Court has reviewed the accompanying exhibits, declarations and memorandum of points and authorities and finds that DโErrico is entitled to an assignment of rents per Civil Code section 2938 and pursuant to the DOT (RJN Ex b, D, Decl. of DโErrico.) Further, the Court appoints a receiver pursuant to CCP ยงยง 564, 568 and City of Sierra Madre v.
MENALDI VS WETHERELL
RIC1900674
Nov 04, 2020
Riverside County, CA
A receiver may be appointed by the court in which an action or proceeding is pending in any case in which the court is empowered by law to appoint a receiver. (C.C.P., ยง 564(a).) This includes after judgment, to carry the judgment into effect. (C.C.P., ยง 564(b)(3).)
SMET VENTURES LLC VS NUMBERS EVENT WAGERING LLC
37-2021-00049362-CU-BC-CTL
Jan 27, 2023
San Diego County, CA
The Court grants Defendant/Cross-Complainant DโErricoโs motion for an assignment of rents under the deed of trust and the appointment of a receiver. The Court has reviewed the accompanying exhibits, declarations and memorandum of points and authorities and finds that DโErrico is entitled to an assignment of rents per Civil Code section 2938 and pursuant to the DOT (RJN Ex b, D, Decl. of DโErrico.) Further, the Court appoints a receiver pursuant to CCP ยงยง 564, 568 and City of Sierra Madre v.
MENALDI VS WETHERELL
RIC1900674
Nov 10, 2020
Riverside County, CA
The amount of the receiver's bond should be sufficient to cover the value of personal property and cash which the receiver may possess at any time during the expected period of the receivership. See, Rule of Court, rule 3.1178; Local Rule, 2.5.4. The appointment will be effective after the receiver files an oath and the undertakings are provided. Code Civ. Proc., ยง 567. The minute order will be the order of the Court. NNM is directed to serve notice of ruling within 2 court days.
NUCCO LLC VS NON-NEWTONIAN MANAGEMENT LLC
37-2017-00044499-CU-PT-CTL
Feb 08, 2019
San Diego County, CA
Other
Intellectual Property
The receiverโs powers and duties are set forth in Code of Civil Procedure Section 568 and include the power to take and keep possession of the collateral, to manage the collateral, and to collect any monies or proceeds from the collateral. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 567(b), the receiver shall post a bond with the State of California in such amount as the court shall direct at the hearing on this matter. The receiver shall also provide monthly reports to the parties. Cal.
SANTA BARBARA BANK & TRUST COMPANY NA VS MELCHIORI CONSTRUCT
1413639
Oct 16, 2012
Santa Barbara County, CA
Further, the Court appoints proposed receiver Matthew Taylor pursuant to CCP ยงยง 564, 568 and City of Sierra Madre v. Sun Trust Mortgage, Inc. (2019) 32 Cal.App.5th 648. Given the terms of the DOT, the Court finds that the rents should be used to pay the costs of the receiver, but if those rents are not sufficient, any additional fees shall be paid by Menaldi. The Court further notes that this motion was originally scheduled for November 4, 2020.
MENALDI VS WETHERELL
RIC1900674
Dec 11, 2020
Riverside County, CA
Appoint Receiver The court GRANTS the motion of judgment creditor to appoint a receiver to seize and sell the equipment belonging to judgment creditor. (CCP 699.070 (a); 564 (b)(3) and (b)(9); 708.620.) Judgment creditor makes a prima facie showing that it is entitled to the relief sought because debtors refuse to turn over the equipment at issue.
DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. VS. PRIME PERFORMANCE CONTRACTORS, INC.
30-2017-00920131-CU-BC-CJC
Apr 25, 2018
Orange County, CA
The Court is inclined to GRANT Plaintiffโs UNOPPOSED Motion for the Appointment of a Rents, Issues and Profits Receiver pursuant to CCP ยง 564(b) (11) and Civil Code ยง 2938(c). It would appear the partiesโ agreements in the Deed of Trust provide plaintiff with the right to such an appointment under the circumstances. Plaintiff has established that defendant 4 Aces Brand, Inc. is in default of its obligations and that defendant agreed contractually that plaintiff may obtain the appointment of a receiver.
LONE OAK FUND, LLC VS 4 ACES BRAND, INC
20GDCV00016
Feb 14, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
Real Property
Foreclosure
Plaintiff moves for appointment of a receiver pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 564(b)(1) & (9).
22CHCP00400
Mar 21, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Although not specifically addressed by the parties, for these same reasons, a receiver is necessary to preserve the property or rights of Plaintiffs under the "catchall" circumstance of C.C.P. section 564(b)(9). A receiver is a drastic remedy, but based on this record and the arguments provided by the parties, Plaintiffs have met their burden under C.C.P. section 564. A receiver is appropriate.
JANKE VS PHG ENGINEERING SERVICES LLC
37-2021-00024423-CU-FR-CTL
Jul 29, 2021
San Diego County, CA
Personal Injury/ Tort
Fraud
The Court has read and considered the STIPULATION TO DECLARATIONS (1) the Receiver, Mike Essary - ROA # 564; and 2) Motiva's attorney, Mitch Wagner - ROA # 565) IN LIEU OF DIRECT TESTIMONY IN CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS - ROA # 566. The question is whether Defendant willfully did not comply with the provisions of paragraph 13 of the November 22, 2019 order; specifically, "13.
THE MOTIVA GROUP INC VS GLOBAL IMPACT GROUP INC
37-2016-00022422-CU-BC-CTL
Dec 07, 2020
San Diego County, CA
Contract
Breach
The County makes this request pursuant to Health and Safety Code sections 17980.6 and 17980.7(c), and Code of Civil Procedure sections 564(b)(3) and 568 and on the grounds that the appointment of a receiver to take control of the Property is warranted and necessary for the County to (1) enforce the 2010 Amended Default Judgment; (2) abate all nuisances being maintained on the Property; and (3) bring the Property into full compliance with the Sonoma County Code, the California Code of Regulations, and the California
COUNTY OF SONOMA V. GOULART
SCV-245028
Oct 03, 2018
Allan D
Sonoma County, CA
Petitioner City of Pomonaโs Petition for Appointment of Receiver and other relief pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 17980.7 is DENIED without prejudice. Receivership โA receiver may be appointed by the court in which an action or proceeding is pending, or by a judge thereof... [i]n all other cases where necessary to preserve the property or rights of any party.โ (CCP ยง 564(b)(9).)
CITY OF POMONA. A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VS LOLA B. STONE, A DECEASED INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.
20PSCP00061
Jul 07, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
Other
Intellectual Property
Petitioner City of Pomonaโs Petition for Appointment of Receiver and other relief pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 17980.7 is DENIED without prejudice. Receivership โA receiver may be appointed by the court in which an action or proceeding is pending, or by a judge thereof... [i]n all other cases where necessary to preserve the property or rights of any party.โ (CCP ยง 564(b)(9).)
IN THE MATTER OF: BRANDON MORGAN HEINE
19PSCP00061
Jul 07, 2020
Los Angeles County, CA
. ยง 564(b)(11) provides that the court has authority to appoint a receiver โ[i]n an action by a secured lender for specific performance of an assignment of rents provision in a deed of trust, mortgage, or separate assignment document.
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION VS THE CODMAN FAMILY TRUST ET A
BC663357
Jun 23, 2017
Los Angeles County, CA
CCP Section 564(b)(11) CCP section 564(b)(11) provides that a court may appoint a receiver โ[i]n an action by a secured lender for specific performance of an assignment of rents provision in a deed of trust, mortgage, or separate assignment document.โ Here, the Deed of Trust provides for the following remedy, among others, in the event of default: Appoint Receiver.
1320 WEST 97TH STREET CRE LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS LONNIE C. FLOWERS, ET AL.
21STCV04250
Mar 04, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
Proc. ยง564(b)(9). A receiver may be appointed after judgment on a partition action to carry the judgment into effect; and/or to dispose of the property according to the judgment or preserve it during the pendency of an appeal. Code Civ. Proc. ยง564(b)(3)(4). A receiver is an agent and officer of the court, and is under the control and supervision of the court. (... ยง 568; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1179.) ( City of Chula Vista v.
AYAD ALANIZI, ET AL. VS OMAR KHATIB, ET AL.
22AHCV00926
Aug 25, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
.: 23SMCV01956 MOTION: Motion to Appoint Receiver HEARING DATE: 5/29/2023 Legal Standard Code of Civil Procedure section 564 provides that [a] receiver may be appointed, in the manner provided in this chapter, by the court in which an action or proceeding is pending in any case in which the court is empowered by law to appoint a receiver.
CIRCLEUP CREDIT ADVISORS LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS FANJOY CO., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, ET AL.
23SMCV01956
May 30, 2023
Timothy Lee Johnson
Los Angeles County, CA
Proc., ยงยง 564, 567.) All parties, through their respective counsel, shall appear at the hearing.
UNITED SECURITY BANK VS. FGV FRESNO, LP/STAYED
23CECG00035
Jan 31, 2023
Fresno County, CA
Therefore, UL has met its burden of showing its entitlement to an appointment of a receiver pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 564 subdivision (b)(11). The court does not address Code of Civil Procedure section 564, subdivision (b)(9), because it appears that ULโs contention for the appointment of a receiver under Code of Civil Procedure section 564, subdivision (b)(9), is similar to its request for an appointment of a receiver under Code of Civil Procedure section 564, subdivision (b)(11).
NGUYEN V. UNITED LENDER, LLC
30-2020-01124778
Jul 20, 2021
Orange County, CA
Here, Plaintiff has a deed of trust that contains the appointment of a receiver and collect rents as a remedy on default. (Lee Decl., Exhibit 3, p. 6.) Plaintiff provides evidence that Defendant is in default, and there is a resulting balance of $4,042,076.80. (Lee Decl. ยถ17-19.) The court may appoint a receiver to enforce an assignment of rents provision. (CCP ยง 564(b)(11).)
BANK OF HOPE VS SUNNYMEADE CAR WASH CORPORATION
CVRI2303407
Dec 14, 2023
Riverside County, CA
APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVERS UNDER CCP ยง 564 Under CCP ยง 564(b), a court may appoint a receiver in the following cases, among others: Where a corporation is insolvent, or in imminent danger of insolvency, or has forfeited its corporate rights; and In all other cases where necessary to preserve the property or rights of any party. (CCP ยง 564(b) (6), (9).) However, the appointment of a receiver is a drastic remedy to be utilized only in โexceptional cases.โ
ANE HOLDINGS, LLC VS RUBIN.
CVPS2102620
May 03, 2022
Riverside County, CA
Code of Civil Procedure ยง 564 authorizes the court to appoint a receiver in certain circumstances.
WARREN BRAITHWAITE VS NICOLE GUEST
BC719593
Feb 14, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Those papers must include the following: A proposed amount of bond for the receiver to post (CCP ยง567); A proposed list of the specified powers of the receiver (ยง568); Names of one or more persons nominated to act as referee (CRC 3.1177); The Court will, at the 9/30/21 hearing, set an OSC re: status of receivership for approximately thirty days after appointment. At that time, the receiver must file an inventory containing a complete and detailed list of all property in the receiver's possession.
SERENA YOUNG VS PHILIP E HILL M.D ET AL
NC061797
Aug 11, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
Personal Injury/ Tort
Fraud
Petition to Appoint a Receiver Per C.C.P. section 564(b)(3), the court may appoint a receiver in a pending action or proceeding after a judgment has been entered in order to carry that judgment into effect.
COUNTY OF SONOMA VS FREEMAN
SCV-265705
Aug 23, 2023
Sonoma County, CA
The Receiver shall have no powers under this order until both the oath and the undertaking have been filed. (CCP ยง 567.) The Business.
GANTAN VS. GANTAN
MSC19-01709
May 20, 2022
Contra Costa County, CA
DISCUSSION The court can appoint a receiver to generally do such acts respecting real property as authorized by the court. ( Code Civ. Proc., ยง 568 ) . Where the owner fails to comply within a reasonable time with the terms of the Citys notice to abate, the Plaintiffs may seek a court order appointing a receiver for the substandard building. ( Health & Saf. Code, ยง 17980.7 ).
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL. SUNNY K. SOLTANI, CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF CARSON, ET AL. VS DEANA PATRICK
22CMCV00315
Mar 10, 2023
12/14/2022
Los Angeles County, CA
He has been appointed receiver by 162 different California Superior Court judge and one federal court judge and has overseen the rehabilitation of approximately 1,332 properties throughout the state. Id. ยถ 2, Ex. I. The receiver is required to give an oath and post an undertaking as directed by the court. Code Civ. Proc., ยง 567 . City proposes to file a bond in the amount of $10,000. Petition, 2:12-14. The powers of a receiver are governed by Section 17980.7 subd.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL. SUNNY K. SOLTANI, CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF CARSON, ET AL. VS DEANA PATRICK
22CMCV00315
Jan 10, 2023
12/14/2022
Los Angeles County, CA
He has been appointed receiver by 162 different California Superior Court judge and one federal court judge and has overseen the rehabilitation of approximately 1,332 properties throughout the state. Id. ยถ 2, Ex. I. The receiver is required to give an oath and post an undertaking as directed by the court. Code Civ. Proc., ยง 567 . City proposes to file a bond in the amount of $10,000. Petition, 2:12-14. The powers of a receiver are governed by Section 17980.7 subd.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL. SUNNY K. SOLTANI, CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF CARSON, ET AL. VS DEANA PATRICK
22CMCV00315
Feb 02, 2023
12/14/2022
Los Angeles County, CA
CCP ยง 567(b) requires an undertaking. Mirzai has not objected to the suggested $5,000 undertaking and the court will order that amount. In its notice of motion, CWB states that it seeks appointment of a receiver โto preserve, protect, maintain and dispose of the real propertyโฆ.โ [Italics added] The order appointing a receiver is not an adjudication of CWBโs cross-complaint for judicial foreclosure.
NADER MIRZAI VS TD SERVICES COMPANY ETC
1372700
Apr 12, 2011
Santa Barbara County, CA
Under CCP ยง567(b), โThe receiver shall give an undertaking to the State of California, in such sum as the court or judge may direct, to the effect that the receiver will faithfully discharge the duties of receive in the action and obey the orders of the court therein. The receiver shall be allowed the cost of the undertaking.โ
MARIA DODOS VS CHUCK AND JACKIE WEISSMAN, DOES 1-25
YC071897
Nov 15, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Before performing his duties, the Receiver shall execute a Receiver's oath and file the bond required by CCP 567(b) in the sum of $5,000.00. A bond is required upon granting a preliminary injunction. (CCP ยง529.) Plaintiff is ORDERED to post a bond in the amount of $1,000.00 within five court days.
LONE OAK FUND, LLC VS JOSE GONZALEZ
23NWCV02191
Aug 10, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
The receiver is required to give an oath and post an undertaking as directed by the court. ( Code Civ. Proc., ยง 567 ) . City proposes to file a bond in the amount of $10,000. (Prop. Ord. 4:19-20.) The powers of a receiver are governed by Section 17980.7 subd.
CITY OF COMPTON, A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VS MEHDI JAVADIAGHDAM, ET AL.
23CMCV00796
Feb 08, 2024
Los Angeles County, CA
This fee schedule appears reasonable given Stapletonโs substantial experience as court-appointed receiver, including in the garments industry. Receiverโs Bond Code of Civil Procedure ยง 567(b) states that โ[t]he receiver shall give an undertaking to the State of California, in such sum as the court or judge may direct, to the effect that the receiver will faithfully discharge the duties of receiver in the action and obey the orders of the court therein.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. VS MOON COLLECTION, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.
20STCV29150
Mar 16, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
Once appointed, the receiver "has, under the control of the Court, power to bring and defend actions in his own name, as receiver; to take and keep possession of the property, to receive rents, collect debts, to compound for and compromise the same, to make transfers, and generally to do such acts respecting the property as the Court may authorize." Code Civ. Proc. ยง 568.
MUNOZ VS SAN DIEGO BEST WINDOW COMPANY INC
37-2018-00002872-CU-OE-CTL
Nov 18, 2020
San Diego County, CA
Employment
Other Employment
The receiver shall be allowed the cost of the undertaking.โ (Code of Civil Procedure, ยง 567(b).)
SINGH V. HAMID
SC-20140241
Dec 20, 2019
El Dorado County, CA
California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 564(a) says that โ[a] receiver may be appointed . . . by the court in which an action or proceeding is pending in any case in which the court is empowered by law to appoint a receiver.โ
NEXGEN CAPITAL, LLC VS NAMR1726, LLC, ET AL.
18STCV09948
Jul 09, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Real Property
other
Kent is appointed to handle the sale of the Property as well as to preserve the Property pending completion of same including the powers pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 568. It is undisputed the parties are having disputes concerning the use and upkeep of the Property. (See, e.g., Allinger Decl., ยถยถ20-25, Exh. 7; see also Fink Decl., ยถ 2.) The Court ORDERS the receiver post an undertaking in the amount of $10k pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 567(b) as requested by Plaintiff.
PREMIER TRUST, INC VS. MARY CAMPBELL, TRUSTEE
30-2018-00997964
Oct 30, 2020
Orange County, CA
Plaintiffsโ motion for an order appointing a receiver and a provisional director for Defendant Alamo is DENIED. DISCUSSION 1. Plaintiffsโ request for appointment of a receiver pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure ยง564(b)(9): Plaintiffs fail to demonstrate that they are entitled to appointment of a Receiver pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure ยง564(b)(9).
2023CUMC012275 ROGER W. COGER, AS TRUSTEE ... VS ALAMO PLAZA, INC.
2023CUMC012275
Feb 06, 2024
Ventura County, CA
This ruling is without prejudice for Plaintiff to seek appointment of a receiver after a judgment of abatement has been issued either after summary judgment motion or trial: "a receiver may be appointed by the court....[a]fter judgment, to carry the judgment into effect". CCP ยง 564(b)(3).
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS SHIRK
37-2017-00014498-CU-MC-NC
Jan 04, 2018
San Diego County, CA
Other
Intellectual Property
He has been appointed receiver by 134 different California Superior Court judge and has overseen the rehabilitation of approximately 229 properties throughout the state. Id. ยถ 2, Ex. 17. The receiver is required to give an oath and post an undertaking as directed by the court. Code Civ. Proc., ยง 567. City proposes to file a bond in the amount of $10,000. Motion, 2:13-17.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL. SUNNY K. SOLTANI, CITY ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF CARSON, ET AL. VS BENJAMIN ONUBAH, ET AL.
21CMCV00193
Jan 11, 2022
12/14/2022
Los Angeles County, CA
Accordingly, the court may not appoint a receiver under Code of Civil Procedure section 564, subdivision (b)(5) at this time. Code of Civil Procedure Section 564, Subdivision (b)(6) Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 564, subdivision (b)(6), a receiver may be appointed [w]here a corporation is insolvent, or in imminent danger of insolvency . . . .
PAULA BENOM, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL. VS MARK E MYERS, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.
23STCV12687
Nov 03, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Defendant Katto qualifies as "any party" and appointment of a receiver is necessary to preserve the property rights of Defendant Katto given that Defendant Malan has been collecting rents and excluding Defendant Katto from doing so. The Court may appoint a receiver under CCP section 564(b)(9). Defendant Malan argues CCP section 564(b)(11) does not provide grounds for appointment of a receiver because there is no authenticated evidence to support the claim.
HS INDEPENDENCE LLC VS WAFA KATTO
37-2019-00029739-CU-OR-CTL
Nov 07, 2019
San Diego County, CA
Real Property
other
Missing from the motion is any actual authority regarding the basis for the receiver. Notwithstanding, a receiver may be appointed a fter judgment, to carry the judgment into effect. (Code Civ. Proc., ยง 564, subd. (b)(3).) (Plaintiff references CCP section 564(a)(4) in reply (6:7-12).) Plaintiff also disputes the argument in opposition regarding the potential for reversal of the judgment.
608 MATEO, LLC VS JAMES SHAW, ET AL.
21STCV32652
Apr 22, 2024
Los Angeles County, CA
Further, CCP section 564(b)(5) authorizes the appointment of a receiver when a corporation has been dissolved, as provided in CCP section 565.
BANK OF AMERICA, NA VS FORMS HOTLINE, INC.
GC041902
Mar 03, 2017
Los Angeles County, CA
Notice Of Application And Application To Appoint A Receiver Pursuant To Ccp 564 And 1281.8 Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Friday, May 13, 2016, line 2. PETITIONER PAOLO MANCINI's Application To Appoint A Receiver Pursuant To Ccp 564 And 1281.8 Hearing Required to address the status of resolution of the appointment of receiver. = (501/REQ)
IN RE: PAOLO MANCINI
CPF16514937
May 13, 2016
San Francisco County, CA
Notice Of Application And Application To Appoint A Receiver Pursuant To Ccp 564 And 1281.8 Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Friday May 20, 2016, line 2. PETITIONER PAOLO MANCINI Notice Of Application And Application To Appoint A Receiver Pursuant To Ccp 564 And 1281.8 Hearing required. Re: appointment of receiver. = (501/REQ)
IN RE: PAOLO MANCINI
CPF16514937
May 20, 2016
San Francisco County, CA
Appoint of the Receiver is confirmed. The Court has already entertained arguments and evidence from both sides and has found that the appointment of the Receiver was proper, and that there was no merit to Defendantsโ request to vacate that appointment (see 8/17/17 and 9/13/17 Minute Orders). The Receiver has posted a CCP ยง567 Undertaking in the sum of $5,000, and there is no argument or evidence from defendants that the bond should be increased.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE VS CORONA PATIENTS
RIC1610806
Sep 27, 2017
Riverside County, CA
App. 4th 791, 807) A receiver may be appointed where the applicant has a probable interest in property that is in danger of being โlost, removed, or materially injured,โ (Code of Civ. Proc., section 564, subd. (b)(1)) or where necessary to preserve the property or rights of any party (Code of Civ. Proc., section 564, subd. (b)(9)) The moving party must set forth facts showing one of the statutory basses for appointment of a receiver exists.
NANCY L. DOWNS VS NORBY ACEVEDO, ET AL
NC060002
Oct 10, 2017
Los Angeles County, CA
Dumrichob (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1258, 1266) Receivership Code of Civil Procedure section 564 provides that [a] receiver may be appointed, in the manner provided in this chapter, by the court in which an action or proceeding is pending in any case in which the court is empowered by law to appoint a receiver.
YU LESEBERG VS ROLAN FELD
SS026368
Jun 15, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
While Plaintiff may be entitled to a receiver pursuant to CCP 708.630, Plaintiff has not presented the Court with any information or proposed order concerning appointment of a specific receiver, his oath and undertaking. CCP 567. The Court intends to continue this matter for further documentation.
CRUZ VS EL SANCHO LOCO
56-2017-00492006-CL-MC-VTA
Apr 17, 2018
Ventura County, CA
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Plaintiff seeks appointment of a receiver pursuant to CCP ยง564(b)(7), which specifically provides that a court may appoint a receiver in an unlawful detainer action. Plaintiff is not entitled to self-help. Plaintiff therefore asks that this Court appoint a receiver so that the rents and profits from the Property that rightfully belong to Plaintiff are not taken by Defendants. CCP ยง 564(b)(7) expressly authorizes the appointment of a receiver in unlawful detainer actions.
HOLLY HILL INVESTMENTS, LLC VS VINCENT FLAHERTY, ET AL.,
SC128569
Jan 12, 2018
Los Angeles County, CA
Section 17980.7 also empowers the receiver to sell the property or to take any other action respecting the property as the court may authorize. (Code Civ. Proc., ยง 17980.7(c)(4)(H); Code Civ. Proc., ยงยง 568, 568.5.) A receiver has the power, with court authorization, to take possession of property, receive rents, collect debts, borrow money, and sell real or personal property in receivership pursuant to court order. (Code Civ. Proc., ยงยง 568, 568.5.)
CITY OF GARDEN GROVE VS. OBANDO
30-2018-00985627
Jun 19, 2020
Orange County, CA
s unopposed motion to appoint receiver is granted. CCP ยงยง 564(b). The court finds Plaintiff establishes that the property at issue "is in danger of being lost, removed, or materially injured" [CCP ยง 564(b)(1)] and that appointment of a receiver is "necessary to preserve the property or rights" of Plaintiff [CCP ยง 564(b)(9)]. The court will hear from the parties on the modifications to the order sought by Defendant Yee Business Group, Inc.
OTAY MESA PROPERTY LP VS RUIZ
37-2016-00041507-CU-OR-CTL
Apr 13, 2017
San Diego County, CA
Real Property
other
Code of Civil Procedure section 564 (a) (9) provides that a receiver may be appointed where necessary to preserve the property or rights of any party. Appropriate notices have been given. The court finds that the appointment of a receiver is necessary in this case to prevent irreparable harm and imminent loss or damage to lender SAS. The motion of the Plaintiff for Appointment of a Receiver is granted.
SAS STOCKTON, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ET AL. VS PINK OCEAN HOSPITALITY, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ET AL.
STK-CV-URP-2018-0013938
Dec 10, 2018
San Joaquin County, CA
CCP 564 provides for the grounds for appointment of a receiver. P relied on CCP 564 (b)(2) which provides for a receiver in an action by a secured lender for foreclosure of deed of trust where it appears that the property is in danger of being lost, removed or materially injured or that condition of deed of trust has not been performed and that property is probably insufficient to discharge the deed of trust. P has not established any evidentiary basis for CCP 564 (b)(2).
UNION BANK N.A. VS. ANDRE F VAN DER VALK
56-2013-00444700-CU-BC-VTA
Feb 05, 2014
Ventura County, CA
Code of Civil Procedure section 564, subdivision (b)(11) provides the court with authority to appoint a receiver in an action by a secured lender for specific performance of an assignment of rents provision in a deed of trust, mortgage, or separate assignment document.
WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SOLELY IN ITS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF BFLD T VS EYP REALTY, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
23STCV10983
Jun 23, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Section 564 provides twelve instances in which a court may appoint a receiver.
CIRCLEUP CREDIT ADVISORS LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS FANJOY CO., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, ET AL.
23SMCV01956
May 08, 2023
Timothy Lee Johnson
Los Angeles County, CA
Proc., 564(b)(3) and ยง 1209(a)(5). Plaintiff moves for the appointment of a receiver as provided in the judgment to enforce its terms and abate the conditions on the properties in accordance with paragraph 10 of the judgment. Defendant did not file an opposition. This motion was originally heard on 6/1/21. The Court provisionally appointed Mark Adams as Receiver.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,ET AL. VS. NICKOLAS J. TOK
TC029185
Jul 13, 2021
12/14/2022
Los Angeles County, CA
Real Property
other
CCP ยง 567 states provides that โ[b]efore entering upon the duties of a receiver: (a) The receiver must be sworn to perform the duties faithfully. (b) The receiver shall give an undertaking to the State of California, in such sum as the court or judge may direct, to the effect that the receiver will faithfully discharge the duties of receiver in the action and obey the orders of the court therein. The receiver shall be allowed the cost of the undertaking.โ
CATHAY BANK, A CALIFORNIA BANKING CORPORATION VS BAXCO PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.
19PSCV00176
May 09, 2019
Gloria White-Brown
Los Angeles County, CA
Collections
Promisory Note
Plaintiffโs Motion for Appointment of Limited Purpose Receiver and/or Injunction Pendente Lite is denied. CCP ยง564(b)(1) authorizes a receiver only where it is shown that the property or fund is in danger of being lost, removed or materially injured. CCP ยง564(b)(9) authorizes a receiver only where necessary to preserve the property or rights of a party. Plaintiff has failed to show these elements.
CUMMING CONSTRUCTION MGMT, INC. VS. CLARKE PROJECT SOLUTIONS, INC.
30-2016-00875031-CU-BC-CJC
Dec 01, 2016
Orange County, CA
Plaintiffโs Motion for Appointment of Limited Purpose Receiver and/or Injunction Pendente Lite is denied. CCP ยง564(b)(1) authorizes a receiver only where it is shown that the property or fund is in danger of being lost, removed or materially injured. CCP ยง564(b)(9) authorizes a receiver only where necessary to preserve the property or rights of a party. Plaintiff has failed to show these elements.
Cumming Construction Mgmt, Inc. vs. Clarke Project Solutions, Inc. 2016-00875031
Dec 01, 2016
Orange County, CA
In this state a receiver may be appointed only as permitted by Code of Civil Procedure section 564. Barclays Bank of California v. Superior Court (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 593, 597. Section 564 provides twelve instances in which a court may appoint a receiver.
CUTTER MILL CREDIT LA LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS AEON BOTANIKA LOS ANGELES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.
22SMCV01841
Nov 01, 2022
Los Angeles County, CA
In this state a receiver may be appointed only as permitted by Code of Civil Procedure section 564. Barclays Bank of California v. Superior Court (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 593, 597. Section 564 provides twelve instances in which a court may appoint a receiver.
BANK OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, N.A., A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION VS 1007 LINCOLN BOULEVARD, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.
23SMCV04510
Sep 28, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Plaintiff City of Chula Vista's unopposed motion to appoint receiver is granted. CCP ยงยง 564. The court finds Plaintiff establishes that appointment of a receiver is necessary "to carry the judgment into effect." CCP ยง 564(b)(3). The court signs the order submitted.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA VS GREEN LADY
37-2016-00006706-CU-MC-CTL
Sep 15, 2017
San Diego County, CA
Other
Intellectual Property
Explanation: Under Code of Civil Procedure section 564, subdivision (a), โA receiver may be appointed, in the manner provided in this chapter, by the court in which an action or proceeding is pending in any case in which the court is empowered by law to appoint a receiver.โ Also, โA receiver may be appointed by the court in which an action or proceeding is pending, or by a judge thereof, in the following cases: โฆ (3) After judgment, to carry the judgment into effect.โ (Code Civ. Proc., ยง 564, subd.
CITY OF FRESNO V. ANTARAMIAN
17CECG03380
Jul 17, 2018
Rosie McGuire
Fresno County, CA
Other
Intellectual Property
Section 564(b)(3) applies to enforcing judgments; this does not apply as there is no judgment in this case. Section 564(b)(9) applies โ[i]n all other cases where necessary to preserve the property or rights of any party.โ
CITY OF JURUPA VALLEY VS MTHC MEDICAL DISPENSARY
RIC1602964
Jun 13, 2018
Riverside County, CA
Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 564(b)(11), a receiver may be appointed by the court โ[i]n an action by a secured lender for specific performance of an assignment of rents provision in a deed of trust, mortgage, or separate assignment document.โ A receiver may also be appointed โ[i]n all cases where necessary to preserve the property or rights of any party.โ Cal. C. Civ. Proc. ยง 564(b)(9).
2442 S COURT INVENTORS, LLC VS. FLYNN/MMB MORTGAGE FUND, LLC
30-2018-01032039-CU-OR-CJC
Jan 09, 2019
Orange County, CA
Notice Of Application And Application To Appoint A Receiver Pursuant To Ccp 564 And 1281.8 Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Friday, April 29, 2016, line 1. PETITIONER PAOLO MANCINI's Application To Appoint A Receiver Pursuant To Ccp 564 And 1281.8 Hearing Required to address the status of foreclosure. = (501/REQ)
IN RE: PAOLO MANCINI
CPF16514937
Apr 29, 2016
San Francisco County, CA
California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1114 does not list a motion for appointment of a receiver. The failure to file a memorandum of points and authorities in this case is not insignificant. The circumstances under which appointment of a receiver is appropriate under CCP section 564(b) various โ there are twelve subsections of CCP section 564(b). (Code Civ. Proc., ยง 564(b).) Judgment Creditor did not identify any subsections of CCP section 564(b) relied upon until the reply.
NORTH COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION VS. VAYA TELECOM INC
37-2011-00083845-CU-BC-CTL
Mar 24, 2023
San Diego County, CA
Notice Of Motion Of Petitioner'S Petition For Appointment Of A Receiver Ccp 564(1) Set for hearing on Thursday, November 6, 2008, line 13. PETITIONER MUSEUM PARC RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM HOMEOWNERS' Motion For Appointment Of A Receiver CCP 564(1) is off calendar. Amended notice filed on October 6 sets the hearing on November 19, 2008. =(302/PJM)
IN RE: MUSEUM PARC RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM HOMEOWNERS'
CPF08508876
Nov 06, 2008
San Francisco County, CA
Defendants argue correctly that a receiver is an agent and officer of the court. (Gold v. Gold Realty Co. (2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 791, 806.) CCP section 568 empowers a receiver to bring and defend actions as a receiver, but only under the control of the court. Hence it follows from CCP 568 that a party must first obtain court permission to sue a receiver. (Vitug v. Griffin (1989) 214 Cal.App.3d 488, 492-493.) If a party fails to obtain leave, the receiver may object by filing a timely demurrer.
TRAN VS RUSSO
30-2016-00894206-CU-PN-CJC
Feb 10, 2017
Orange County, CA
โCode of Civil Procedure section 564 contains a principal source of authority for trial courts to appoint receivers.โ (Id.) โThe requirements of Code of Civil Procedure section 564 are jurisdictional, and without a showing bringing the receiver within one of the subdivisions of that section the court's order appointing a receiver is void.โ (Id. [citing Rondos v. Superior Court (1957) 151 Cal. App. 2d 190, 195].)
BETTY LOPEZ VS RODRIGO A SINOHUI ET AL
BC715904
Apr 24, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Real Property
other
Legal Standard CCP section 564 provides that โ[a] receiver may be appointed, in the manner provided in this chapter, by the court in which an action or proceeding is pending in any case in which the court is empowered by law to appoint a receiver.โ (Code Civ. Proc., ยง 564(a).) Subdivision (b) of CCP section 564 lists the circumstances under which a receiver may be appointed, including after a judgment to enforce the judgment. ( Id. , ยง 564(b).)
ITRIA VENTURES LLC VS JS APPAREL INC ET AL
BS172835
Jan 14, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
Plaintiff failed to show ยง564(b) applies under the circumstances. ii. ยง564(b)(9) ยง564(b)(9) permits appointment of a receiver (9) In all other cases where necessary to preserve the property or rights of any party. Pursuant to Barclays Bank of Cal. V. Superior Court (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 593, 600, the parties agreement to appointment of a receiver in their contract constitutes prima facie support for imposition of a receiver under this section.
REDWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS VIII, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP VS LONG BEACH SQUARE PARTNERS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ET AL.
22LBCV00327
Dec 06, 2022
Los Angeles County, CA
Mendocino County Board of Supervisors , (2001) 88 Cal.App.4th 564, 568. The controlling test for whether a necessary party is also indispensable is whether โthe plaintiff seeks some type of affirmative relief which, if granted, would injure or affect the interest of a third person not joined.โ Save Our Bay v. San Diego United Port District , (โ Save Our Bay โ) (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 686, 692.
ROBERT J. HABER, ET AL. VS ANTHONY THORNE, ET AL.
20STCV10911
Sep 23, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
CCP ยง 564(a) provides that "a receiver may be appointed ... by the court in which an action or proceeding is pending in any case in which the court is empowered by law to appoint a receiver. "[A] receiver may be appointed ... (9) in all other cases where necessary to preserve the property or rights of any party." (CCP ยง 564(b).)
CITY OF HUNTINGTON PARK, A GENERAL CITY VS ROBERT SECHRIST, ET AL.
23NWCV00516
Mar 22, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Code of Civil Procedure section 564, subdivision (b)(5) allows the appointment of a receiver where a corporation has been dissolved, . . . . Finally, Code of Civil Procedure section 564, subdivision (b)(9) provides for the appointment of a receiver where necessary to preserve the property or rights of any party. The appointment of a receiver is a drastic remedy to be utilized only in exceptional cases.
ANNEX WALNUT AUTOMOTIVE COLORS & SUPPLY, INC. VS MARYAM ROUILLARD, ET AL.
23STCP01071
Jun 30, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Legal Standard โA receiver may be appointed, in the manner provided in this chapter, by the court in which an action or proceeding is pending in any case in which the court is empowered by law to appoint a receiver.โ (Code Civ. Proc., ยง 564, subd. (a).)
PETER PICHARDO VS ROSEMARY PICHARDO, ET AL.
19PSCV00510
Sep 03, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
Appointment of Receiver Plaintiff moves for appointment of receiver pursuant to Cal. Civ. Proc. ยง 564 and requests the Court to appoint Michael Strle as Receiver. Plaintiff argues that a receiver is necessary to preserve his rights and legal interests, and that the property is in danger of being lost, removed, or materially injured by Mr. Kuhnโs mismanagement of PBCI, as follows: - Mr. Kuhn incorporated PBCI under false pretenses by misrepresenting a change in law regarding the Association. - Mr.
OHADY VS OAKPORT ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP...
22CV020726
Dec 12, 2023
Alameda County, CA
Appointment of Receiver Plaintiff moves for appointment of receiver pursuant to Cal. Civ. Proc. ยง 564 and requests the Court to appoint Michael Strle as Receiver. Plaintiff argues that a receiver is necessary to preserve his rights and legal interests, and that the property is in danger of being lost, removed, or materially injured by Mr. Kuhnโs mismanagement of PBCI, as follows: - Mr. Kuhn incorporated PBCI under false pretenses by misrepresenting a change in law regarding the Association. - Mr.
OHADY VS OAKPORT ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP...
22CV020726
Dec 05, 2023
Alameda County, CA
Legal Standard Code of Civil Procedure section 564 provides that [a] receiver may be appointed, in the manner provided in this chapter, by the court in which an action or proceeding is pending in any case in which the court is empowered by law to appoint a receiver. (Code Civ. Proc., ยง 564(a).) Subdivision (b) of section 564 lists the circumstances under which a receiver may be appointed, including after a judgment to enforce the judgment. ( Id. , ยง 564(b).)
MARIA ELPIDIO ET AL VS JOSE VILLALOBOS
BC560590
Jun 28, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Proc., ยง 564, subd. (b)(1)].) [6] The statutory scheme for the appointment of a receiver provides multiple grounds for appointing a receiver, including where necessary to preserve the property or rights of any party. (Code Civ. Proc., ยง 564, subd. (b)(9).) Plaintiff has sufficiently demonstrated the need for a receiver especially given the lack of evidence otherwise from Defendant. The court finds on the evidence, the Property is generating rents. (Ritvo Decl., ยถยถ 17-18, Ex. K.)
RH PROPERTIES, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP VS SANDRA K MCBETH
22STCV34236
Jan 25, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Proc., ยง 564, subd. (b)(1)].) [6] The statutory scheme for the appointment of a receiver provides multiple grounds for appointing a receiver, including where necessary to preserve the property or rights of any party. (Code Civ. Proc., ยง 564, subd. (b)(9).) Plaintiff has sufficiently demonstrated the need for a receiver especially given the lack of evidence otherwise from Defendant. The court finds on the evidence, the Property is generating rents. (Ritvo Decl., ยถยถ 17-18, Ex. K.)
RH PROPERTIES, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP VS SANDRA K MCBETH
22STCV34236
Mar 17, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Defendant argues that, because Lorin is not a party, his interest cannot support appointing a receiver under Code of Civil Procedure section 564. Defendant, however, overlooks what exactly the receivership property would be and whose interests the receiver would protect. As plaintiffs proposed order indicates, they move to appoint a receiver not just to control the real property at 167 S. Normandie Ave, but to control the entirety of Normandie Lofts KTown, LLC.
HAPI FOUNDATION, ET AL. VS KB VISION FOUNDATION, ET AL.
22STCV19089
Jan 10, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Finally, on page 14, for the first time, Plaintiff refers to CCP ยง 564. Plaintiff does not specifically mention the sub-part of CCP ยง 564(b) upon Plaintiff is utilizing as the ground upon which the Court may appoint a receiver. In reviewing CCP ยง 564, the only possible provision that Plaintiff could move under is CCP ยง 564(b)(9): In all other cases where necessary to preserve the property or rights of any party.
CONJUNCTION JUNCTION LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS ASHLEY ELLISON, AS TRUSTEE OF THE PORTER TRUST
21STCV34889
Jul 13, 2022
Los Angeles County, CA
Plaintiff, in reply, notes that CCP ยง564(b)(11) was enacted in 1996, and it specifically permits a receiver under the circumstances of this case.
NANO BANC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION VS GLOBAL PREMIER REGENCY PALMS, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL.
23LBCV02360
Feb 01, 2024
Los Angeles County, CA
her rights, and therefore fails to demonstrate that a receiver should be appointed pursuant to ยง564(b)(9); and (c) Plaintiff fails to demonstrate that any alleged issues with Defendant Nicholas Brooksโ ongoing conduct could not be satisfactorily addressed through less onerous means that the appointment of a receiver.
2023CUOR013667 FIONA FIORINI VS NICHOLAS SEAN BROOKS, ET AL.
2023CUOR013667
Oct 31, 2023
Ventura County, CA
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.