What is quiet title?

Useful Resources for Quiet Title

Recent Rulings on Quiet Title

151-175 of 4418 results

MACKENZIE VS FOSTER

The entry of judgment on Plaintiff’s cause of action to quiet title is, therefore, not appropriate. For the same reason, entry of judgment on the conversion claim is likewise not appropriate. (It does not appear that Plaintiff is seeking judgment on his second cause of action for fraud, which, in any event, is not properly pleaded.)

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

KEN Y. PARK, ET AL. VS KWANG TAE KIM, ET AL.

Code §17200), (2) declaratory relief, and (3) quiet title. The Complaint alleges in pertinent part as follows. The Parks are husband and wife and are the current and rightful holders of title and in possession of the Property. Kim is the sole officer, director, and shareholder of Unimae and Global. On October 16, 2003, a former owner of the Property, Jason Lee (“Lee”), obtained a loan in the amount of $10,000 from Kim.

  • Hearing

    Nov 10, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

LINDA SOFFER VS NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, ET AL.

Nationstar does effectively concede that the complaint contains a real property claim by arguing only that Plaintiff’s quiet title claim lacks probable validity, but in any case, Plaintiff did not meet her burden to show that the complaint contains a real property claim.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

U.S. BANK TRUST VS. MARIAM SHASHIKYAN, ET AL

Marks, 6552 Woodman LLC, Larisa Kirakosian, Lan Tran, Bassam Mustafa, Ahlam Mustafa, and Nabil Abudayeh alleging: (1) Declaratory Relief; (2) Cancellation of Instruments; (3) To Impress an Equitable Lien; and (4) Quiet Title. On June 6, 2019, PCI Defendants filed a Cross-Complaint against Plaintiff alleging Common Law Implied Indemnity and Declaratory Relief. PCI Defendants filed a Request for Dismissal of the Cross-Complaint without prejudice on August 21, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Nov 09, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

TIERNAN VS. DIABLO COMMUNITY S

 Cervantes is correct that the Intervenors lack standing to seek to “quiet title” defeating Cervantes’s easement claim, because they claim no interest in the subject property and cannot seek to “quiet” someone else’s title to the land – especially when the someone else disclaims the title sought to be imposed on them. Accordingly, the Court is sustaining Cervantes's demurrer to the quiet-title claims in the Intervenors’ complaint in intervention (Line 3).

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

TIERNAN VS. DIABLO COMMUNITY S

First Cause of Action for Quiet Title In their quiet title cause of action, Intervenors seek a judgment "quieting title to the Cut- Through". They request a judgment establishing "there is no recorded easement in favor of Mr.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

TIERNAN VS. DIABLO COMMUNITY S

The Cross-Complaint does not use the term "quiet title" in its allegations or prayer for relief, but Cervantes does not dispute the DCSD's characterization of the FACC as asserting quiet title and declaratory relief causes of action.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

CECILIA SIERRA VS ALEJANDRA CUEVAS DE HERNANDEZ

Third Cause of Action (Quiet Title) – One who alleges that he is the owner of certain described real property, that defendants claim an interest therein adversely to him, that such claim is without right, and that the defendants have no estate, title or interest whatever in said premises or any part thereof pleads all that the law requires in an action to quiet title and the complaint need not particularly state the facts in regard to the asserted invalidity nor attack the instrument which is claimed to be a

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

WILLIAM CAMPANA VS CONSUELO SALDANA ET AL

The only cause of action asserted in the Cross-Complaint is one for quiet title. The statute of limitations would not begin to run against cross-complainants seeking to quiet title while they are in possession of the property. (Muktarian v. Barmby (1965) 63 Cal.2d 558, 560-56. Here, Cross-Complainants allegedly continue to live at the property as their primary residence. (1ACC ¶ 19.)

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

ROSA HERRERA VS JOSE ONTIVEROS JR, ET AL.

Therefore, a claim for quiet title reliant on the agreement underpinning a claim for constructive trust is not governed by the statute of frauds. Finally, Defendant argues that the claim for quiet title fails because Plaintiff “elected remedies by choosing damages instead of a “quiet title” from Cynthia and dismissing Cynthia. (Demurrer 15:11-12.)

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

MANNY DEE, ET AL. VS PETER LEE, ET AL.

The complaint states causes of action for (1) negligence, (2) trespass, (3) nuisance, (4) injunctive relief and (5) quiet title. Plaintiffs seek, among other relief, compensatory, consequential and punitive damages. Defendants move to strike the allegations and prayer for punitive damages.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

ESPERANZA D BAGWELL VS JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ET AL.

Moving Party: Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A Responding Party: Plaintiff Esperanza Bagwell Relief Requested: Summary judgment in favor of defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. as to each cause of action alleged against Chase in the First Amended Complaint In the alternative, summary adjudication of the second and/or third causes of action Causes of Action from First Amended Complaint 1) Quiet Title to Real Property—Title by Adverse Possession* 2) Declaratory Relief 3) Breach of Contract 4) Wrongful

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

JOSE PEREZ LARIOS VS HUGO PEREZ LARIOS

Accordingly, the demurrer to the quiet title cause of action is SUSTAINED. Plaintiff has fifteen (15) days leave to amend.

  • Hearing

    Nov 06, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

HA, ET AL. V. PHAM, ET AL.

However, as BONYM argues, another element for a quiet title cause of action is tender. (See Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (2013) 221 Cal.App.4th 49, 86 (stating that “[a] borrower may not, however, quiet title against a secured lender without first paying the outstanding debt on which the mortgage or deed of trust is based”); see also Shimpones v.

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

JUAN MANUEL CERVANTES VS. PILAR ALONSO

- Demurrer for Failure to State a Claim to the Sixth Cause of Action for Quiet Title In this case, Plaintiff is challenging the validity of the underlying debt, alleging that he was not loaned the full sums listed in the loan documents. Since he challenges the validity of the debt, tender is not required. Alonso's demurrer for failure to state a claim to the sixth cause of action for quiet title is overruled. Defendant Pilar Alonso is ordered to file an answer by November 25, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

TRINITY FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC VS U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE FOR GSAMP TRUST 2005-HE6,, ET AL.

In the lead case, Trinity Financial Services, LLC (“Trinity”) seeks quiet title, to avoid trustee’s sale, and declaratory relief. In the consolidated case, Daniel Svegliato (“Svegliato”) sues for declaratory relief, breach of contract, and quiet title. The most basic facts concerning the property are not disputed. Trinity had a junior lien on the subject property, and it conducted a non-judicial foreclosure sale to enforce its lien in October of 2018.

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

NICOLE MAYS VS MORTGAGE MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, INC., ET AL.

On August 13, 2019, Plaintiff in pro per filed a verified complaint for quiet title, negligence and trespass to land. Plaintiff recorded a lis pendens on August 15, 2019. Counsel substituted into the case for Plaintiff on October 15, 2019. On January 2, 2019, plaintiff dismissed the prior lis pendens and filed a new lis pendens. On January 29, 2020, the court granted the motion of Magnum Property Investments, LLC to expunge the lis pendens.

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

GLORIA SAUCEDO VS MIGUEL SAUCEDO

On September 16, 2019, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Miguel, Joanna and Does 1-10 for: Quiet Title Cancellation of Written Instruments Set Aside Transfer Without the Written Consent of Plaintiff Declaratory Relief On November 5, 2019, Joanna’s default was entered. The Final Status Conference is set for August 30, 2021. Trial is set for September 7, 2021. Legal Standard Relief under Code of Civil Procedure section 473 is either discretionary or mandatory.

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, A CORPORATION VS JUAN A. AMAYA, ET AL.

On April 8, 2020, Plaintiff filed a complaint for claim and delivery of possession of personal property, breach of contract, conversion, quiet title, and declaratory relief. On May 18, 2020, Plaintiff and the DMV executed a stipulation regarding no monetary damages against DMV and only an interest for the transfer of title.

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

D'ANDRE HUMES, ET AL. VS MARCILLA HAYSLETT, ET AL.

On July 2, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a verified ten cause of action second amended complaint with the caption identifying the causes of action as Breach of Contract, Fraud, Civil Conspiracy, Promissory Estoppel, Constructive Trust, Breach of the Duty of Reasonable Care and Due Diligence, Quiet Title, Negligent Hire and Supervision, Negligent Interference with Contractual Relationship, and Intentional Interference with Contractual Relationship.

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

MACHADO VS. MYERS

The Machado-Plaintiffs filed this case against defendants Bryan and Jackie Myers (collectively, Defendants or The Myers Family) on August 13, 2014 alleging causes of action for private nuisance, nuisance per se, trespass, quiet title, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and monetary damages. It appears there have been some amendments, as well as a cross-complaint, but the details of that procedural history is not pertinent to the instant motion.

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

MACHADO VS. MYERS

The Machado-Plaintiffs filed this case against defendants Bryan and Jackie Myers (collectively, Defendants or The Myers Family) on August 13, 2014 alleging causes of action for private nuisance, nuisance per se, trespass, quiet title, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and monetary damages. It appears there have been some amendments, as well as a cross-complaint, but the details of that procedural history is not pertinent to the instant motion.

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

MAHVASH MAZGANI VS HOFFMAN LA BREA LLC ET AL

There is a June 25, 2018 order granting summary adjudication on cause of action five for quiet title and cause of action six for declaratory relief, as well as a signed August 17, 2018 order on that grant of summary adjudication. In those orders, the Court ruled Plaintiffs were entitled to quiet title in their favor as to the Massachusetts property.

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

MOHAMMADI VS EFTEKARI

Defendant Eftekari concedes, however, that there is a quiet title action alleged in the operative pleading. Defendant Eftekari thus argues that the land in question – the City Parcel – is commercial property and its involvement in this lawsuit was purely for financial reasons; as such, it is not the kind of unique land that cannot be compensated for by money alone. Defendant Eftekari's position is not entirely persuasive.

  • Hearing

    Nov 05, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

CANYON VIEW LIMITED VS. LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICE, LLC

Defendant in opposition challenges the awarded fees on grounds that the Court of Appeal only awarded fees based on the Mobilehome Residency Law, and that Plaintiff unnecessarily proceeded with the quiet title action. Hence, Defendant contends the request for attorney fees is not integral to any Mobilhole Residency Law attorney fee recovery. Defendant seeks to limit any recovery of fees to only entries between the filing of the complaint and the conveyance of title.

  • Hearing

    Nov 04, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 177     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.