What is quiet title?

Useful Resources for Quiet Title

Recent Rulings on Quiet Title

26-50 of 4411 results

EZRA HUBER VS VITALI ELKABETZ, ET AL.

Because Huber owns 50% and Elkabetz owns 50% according to their agreement at purchase, and because Azoulay is not an owner but a lienholder, Azoulay has no standing to intervene in the quiet title action. Moreover, the Court can accord complete relief to the parties without Mr. Azoulay. The “complete relief” prong of Section 389 “ ‘requires joinder when nonjoinder precludes the court from effecting relief not in some overall sense, but between extant parties...

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

WRF INVESTMENTS, INC. VS CITIZENS BUSINESS BANK

Plaintiffs seek to quiet title or cancel the grant deeds, deed of trust, and assignment of rents they did not sign. Plaintiffs allege deeds of trust executed in favor of defendant Citizens Business Bank were not executed by them, but by a fraudulent scheme of defendant Michael Smith (Smith). The first amended complaint states the following causes of action: 1. Quiet Title; 2. Cancellation of Written Instruments Pursuant to Civil Code section 3412; 3. Declaratory Relief; 4. Negligence; 5.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

ARA HUNANYAN VS LUCY MEGUERIAN, ET AL.

On November 5, 2020, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint asserting causes of action for (1) Vacate Judgment – Dissolution Case; (2) Breach of Fiduciary Duty; (3) Fraud; (4) Quiet Title – Gault Street Property; (5) Quiet Title – Long Breach Property; (6) Quiet Title – Sherman Way Property; and (7) Cancellation of Lien Instrument. Defendants now demur to the complaint on the grounds it is barred by res judicata and/or collateral estoppel.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

PACHO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. V. EUREKA ENERGY COMPANY

On March 18, 2019, Plaintiffs Pacho Limited Partnership (Pacho) and San Luis Bay Limited Partnership (San Luis Bay) filed a complaint against Defendant Eureka Energy Company (Eureka), alleging causes of action for (1) declaratory relief, and (2) quiet title. On May 2, 2019, Eureka filed a cross-complaint against both Plaintiffs and HomeFed Corporation (HomeFed), also alleging causes of action for (1) declaratory relief, and (2) quiet title. The Parties.

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

JOSE CABRERA, ET AL. VS LOIS M. EDWARDS, ET AL.

This action for quiet title was filed by Plaintiffs JOSE CABRERA and DENE M. MOLINA (“Plaintiffs”) on October 12, 2018. On July 2, 2020, Plaintiffs FILED a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). The FAC asserts the following causes of action: (1) Fraud; (2) Breach of Contract; (3) Implied in Fact Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; (4) Unjust Enrichment; (5) Injunction; (6) Conspiracy to Defraud; (7) Constructive Trust; (8) Quiet Title; and (9) Partition. Defendant LOIS M.

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

  • Judge

    Lori Ann Fournier or Olivia Rosales

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

BRECKENRIDGE PROPERTY FUND 2016, LLC VS MARIE RIGGINS

BACKGROUND On May 20, 2020, Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC filed a complaint against Marie Riggins and all persons unknown, claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the property adverse to plaintiff’s title, or any cloud upon plaintiff’s title for quiet title. Plaintiff seeks a determination of its fee simple title of the real property located at 8725 Penridge Place, Inglewood, comprised of a condominium.

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

KIRAKOS AYVAZYAN VS STEPAN AYVAZYAN

The complaint alleges four causes of action: (1) Violation of Civil Code § 2923.6; (2) Fraud; (3) Quiet Title; and (4) Setting aside and Cancelling deed of Trustee sale and any recordings thereof. On July 15, 2019, default was entered against Defendant. On August 1, 2019, Defendant filed a motion to set aside the entry of default. On November 7, 2019, the motion was placed off calendar, and the instant action was reclassified as an unlimited action due to the relief sought.

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JEANNE D'ARC KHOUREY VS ROBERT KHOUREY

The complaint alleges eight causes of action for quiet title, elder abuse, breach of fiduciary duty, accounting, money had and received, declaratory relief, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. On November 5, 2020, Plaintiff filed an ex parte application for an order of a writ of attachment. On November 5, 2020, the court denied the ex parte application without prejudice. On November 17, 2020, Plaintiff filed the three instant writs of attachment.

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

JOSE C. MAGALLANES, ET AL. VS UNITED PACIFIC CAPITAL INVESTMENT, LLC., ET AL.

The operative First Amended Complaint alleges the following causes of action: Declaratory relief to quiet title and restraining order, and To cancel deeds. On December 30, 2020, Plaintiff dismissed the case as to Plaintiff Guillermo Magallanes. Defendant United Pacific demurs to both causes of action in the FAC. The demurrer is unopposed. For the reasons set forth below, the Court sustains the demurrer.

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

  • Judge

    Maurice A. Leiter or Salvatore Sirna

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JOSE ENRIQUE CAMACHO VS OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORP ET AL

First Cause of Action – Quiet Title The TAC alleges that Plaintiff is entitled to quiet title as of September 2, 2016, five years after the filing of the Trustee’s Deed Upon Sale because Plaintiff claims ownership of the subject property by adverse possession. (TAC ¶¶ 16, 19.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

MACHADO VS. MYERS

The case was filed in August 2014 and alleged causes of action for private nuisance, nuisance per se, trespass, quiet title, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and monetary damages. The parties consenting to having the trial judge hear a settlement conference in this matter. (ROA 111.) Accordingly, a settlement conference was held on February 2, 2016, and the matter was settled. The terms of the settlement were recited on the record in open court, and the hearing was reported by a court reporter.

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION VS. JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY

., quiet title)].) “As a consequence, confidential communications between either the insurer or the insured and counsel are protected by the attorney-client privilege, and both the insurer and insured are holders of the privilege. In addition, counsel’s work product does not lose its protection when it is transmitted to the insurer.”) (Bank of America, 212 Cal.App.4th at 1083.) Old Republic argues that Evidence Code § 962 and Glacier Gen. Assurance Company v.

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

CLAUDETTE MARIE LESLIE, ET AL. VS NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION, ET AL.

Plaintiffs in opposition note that they have dismissed the third-party purchaser from the complaint, and further offer to voluntarily dismiss claims relating to their alleged title to the property, including the fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth causes of action for quiet title, to set aside trustee’s sale, cancelation of trustee’s deed upon sale, and cancellation of grant deed. (Demurrer at p. 2.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Foreclosure

CARR VS VACA

Third, California law requires a quiet title plaintiff to name as defendants those persons "having adverse claims to the title of the plaintiff against which a determination is sought." (C.C.P., § 762.010; Ranch at the Falls LLC v. O'Neal (2019) 38 Cal.App.5th 155, reh'g denied (Aug. 21, 2019), review denied (Nov. 13, 2019) citing Washington Mutual Bank v.

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

RICHARD C COLYEAR VS ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF

As to count four, the Court did not quiet title in Plaintiff’s favor. As to the fifth count, the Court entered judgment in favor of Defendant RHCA and against Plaintiff. On the sixth count, the Court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant RHCA, and in favor of the Individual Director Defendants against Plaintiff.

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

JOSE ENRIQUE CAMACHO VS OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORP ET AL

First Cause of Action – Quiet Title The TAC alleges that Plaintiff is entitled to quiet title as of September 2, 2016, five years after the filing of the Trustee’s Deed Upon Sale because Plaintiff claims ownership of the subject property by adverse possession. (TAC ¶¶ 16, 19.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

GARVEY V TOMLINSON

However, Defendant now claims 100% ownership of the property since Plaintiff is not on the title, and Defendant is attempting to evict Plaintiff from the property. 1st COA – Quiet Title Under Code of Civil Procedure section 761.020, a complaint to quiet title must be verified and must contain all of the following information: (1) a description of the property that is the subject of the action.

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

CLINTON ANDREW AR VS EDWARD RINER, ET AL.

The complaint seeks cancellation of deed and to quiet title, and is premised on the contention that Plaintiff owns the subject property and Defendants fraudulently executed a deed on the subject property claiming ownership in the property. On 2/06/19, the Court entered Defendants’ defaults on the complaint.

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

IN THE MATTER OF: WESTERN PROGRESSIVE, LLC

BC358936, seeking to quiet title to the property based on forgery and fraud. Cochran asserts that Delonay filed a cross-complaint for ejectment and other remedies to remove Cochran from possession of the property and obtain possession for himself. Cochran contends that by judgment dated December 7, 2011, the trial court ruled against Cochran’s efforts to quiet title and to vacate the deed of trust on the ground that Cochran was barred by the statute of limitations.

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

BOE VS BEAZER HOMES HOLDINGS CORP.

North American Title Guaranty Corp. (1963) 59 Cal.2d 618, 621: “When a paid escrow holder has, as in this case, negligently made it necessary for the vendor of land to file a quiet title action against a third person, attorney’s fees incurred by the vendor in prosecuting such action are recoverable as an item of the vendor’s damages in an action against the escrow holder.”

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

VICHIT TILAKAMONKUL VS VICHAI TILAKAMONKUL ET AL

WEISS AS DEFENSE COUNSEL AND COUNSEL FOR T-TEAM MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Vichit Tilakamonkul RESPONDING PARTY(S): Defendants Siriratn Tilakamonkul, Vichai Tilakamonkul, Virut Tilakamonkul, Narlong Tilakamonkul, Sumeth Tilakamonkul, T-Team Investment, LLC, and Defendant and Plaintiff-in-Intervention Royal Thai Cuisine II STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS AND/OR PROCEEDINGS: This is a dispute involving a partnership, in which Plaintiffs seek to quiet title, dissolve a partnership, and partition and sell the partnership

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

FELICIA JACINTA ANARO VS MASON-MCDUFFIE MORTGAGE CORPORATION AND U.S. BANK, N.A. ET AL.

Sixth Cause of Action for Quiet Title: Plaintiff changed the “Closing Date” on her original loan from October 30, 2008 (as stated in the First Amended Complaint) to September 16, 2008 (Second Amended Complaint), but this change does not cure the defects in this cause of action. Although Plaintiff’s SAC is verified (as required for a cause of action for quiet title), it does not clearly identify the date as of which she seeks a judicial determination of quiet title.

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

  • Judge

    George J. Abdallah

  • County

    San Joaquin County, CA

STEVE BROUSSALIAN VS SUSAN ARZOUMANIAN-BROUSSALIAN, ET AL.

The second amended complaint (“SAC”), filed April 1, 2020, alleges: (1) undue influence; (2) cancellation of deed; (3) quiet title to real property; (4) intentional misrepresentation; and (5) declaratory relief. B. Relevant Background and Motion to Vacate Dismissal On December 6, 2019, the Court sustained with 30 days leave to amend the Arzoumanians’ demurrer to the initial complaint.

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

IN THE MATTER OF: WESTERN PROGRESSIVE, LLC

BC358936, seeking to quiet title to the property based on forgery and fraud. Cochran asserts that Delonay filed a cross-complaint for ejectment and other remedies to remove Cochran from possession of the property and obtain possession for himself. Cochran contends that by judgment dated December 7, 2011, the trial court ruled against Cochran’s efforts to quiet title and to vacate the deed of trust on the ground that Cochran was barred by the statute of limitations.

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

FILIMON BALTAZAR VS GMAC MORTGAGE GROUP, LLC. A DISSOLVED DELAWARE CORPORATION AND THEIR SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST ALLY FINANCIAL, INC. A DELAWARE CO

Quiet Title To obtain quiet title of the Property, Plaintiff must provide: (1) the Property’s legal description and common designation; (2) Plaintiff’s title and the basis of that title; (3) specific adverse claims to Plaintiff’s title; (4) the date as of which determination is sought; and (5) a prayer for determination of Plaintiff’s title against adverse claims. (CCP § 761.020.) Plaintiff is also required to allege tender of the outstanding debt. (Lueras v.

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

  • Judge

    Maurice A. Leiter or Salvatore Sirna

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 177     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.