What is public disclosure of private facts?

Useful Rulings on Privacy – Public Disclosure of Private Facts

Recent Rulings on Privacy – Public Disclosure of Private Facts

MICHELLE MANNING VS TODD SMITH, ET AL.

Code § 12955); Discrimination (Civil Code § 51); Breach of Contract; Breach of the Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment (Civil Code § 1940.2); Defamation; Invasion of Privacy; Public Disclosure of Private Facts; Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; Retaliatory Eviction (Civil Code § 1942.5(d) and Common Law); and Constructive Eviction. On February 10, 2020 the Court granted Defendant’s motion for summary adjudication of the third cause of action for breach of contract.

  • Hearing

    Jul 06, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Discrimination/Harass

MARO BURUNSUZYAN VS DIMITRI ROGER

The Complaint asserts causes of action for: Invasion of Privacy/Public Disclosure of Private Facts; Appropriation of Personal Information for Use in a False Light; Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; and Negligence.

  • Hearing

    Mar 04, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

BENNETT WAISBREN VS IN FOCUS ADVERTISING, INC., ET AL.

- public disclosure of private facts; (14) wrongful interference with prospective and actual employment; (15) negligent supervision and training of employees; (16) wrongful supervision and training of employees; (17) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage; (18) intentional interference with contractual relations; (19) violation of American with Disabilities Act; Anti-Retaliation Provisions; (20) violation of Civil Code section 56.20.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

BENNETT WAISBREN VS IN FOCUS ADVERTISING, INC., ET AL.

- public disclosure of private facts; (14) wrongful interference with prospective and actual employment; (15) negligent supervision and training of employees; (16) wrongful supervision and training of employees; (17) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage; (18) intentional interference with contractual relations; (19) violation of American with Disabilities Act; Anti-Retaliation Provisions; (20) violation of Civil Code section 56.20.

  • Hearing

    Jan 09, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

BENNETT WAISBREN VS IN FOCUS ADVERTISING, INC., ET AL.

- public disclosure of private facts; (14) wrongful interference with prospective and actual employment; (15) negligent supervision and training of employees; (16) wrongful supervision and training of employees; (17) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage; (18) intentional interference with contractual relations; (19) violation of American with Disabilities Act; Anti-Retaliation Provisions; (20) violation of Civil Code section 56.20.

  • Hearing

    Jan 09, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

MARO BURUNSUZYAN VS DIMITRI ROGER

The Complaint asserts causes of action for: Invasion of Privacy/Public Disclosure of Private Facts; Appropriation of Personal Information for Use in a False Light; Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; and Negligence.

  • Hearing

    Dec 31, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

JANE DOE VS JABARI SHELTON ET AL

.: BC685310 Hearing Date: November 21, 2019 [TENTATIVE] order RE: PLAINTIFF/CROSS-DEFENDANT jane doe’s motion for attorney fees BACKGROUND On November 30, 2017, Plaintiff Jane Doe (“Doe”) filed a complaint against Defendants Jabari Shelton p/k/a A$AP BARI (“Shelton”) and Does 1-10 for (1) sexual assault and battery; (2) invasion of privacy – intrusion on seclusion; and (3) invasion of privacypublic disclosure of private facts.

  • Hearing

    Nov 21, 2019

  • Judge Elaine Lu
  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

MICHELLE MANNING VS TODD SMITH, ET AL.

On December 28, 2018, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) asserting causes of action for: Housing Discrimination (Gov’t Code § 12955); Discrimination (Civil Code § 51); Breach of Contract; [against Smith& the Partnership] Breach of the Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment (Civil Code § 1940.2); [against Smith & the Partnership] Defamation; Invasion of Privacy; Public Disclosure of Private Facts; Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; Retaliatory Eviction (Civil Code § 1942.5(d) and Common

  • Hearing

    Apr 10, 2019

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Discrimination/Harass

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. The court incorporates the minutes for August 8, 2018 (ROA 269) for a more complete recitation of the rather tortured procedural history of the case. On that day, the court denied in part and granted in part defendant's motion for a nonsuit. Evidence continued the following day, Thursday, August 9, with the defense case under way. ROA 286.

  • Hearing

    Mar 25, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. The court incorporates the minutes for August 8, 2018 (ROA 269) for a more complete recitation of the rather tortured procedural history of the case. On that day, the court denied in part and granted in part defendant's motion for a nonsuit. Evidence continued the following day, Thursday, August 9, with the defense case under way. ROA 286.

  • Hearing

    Jan 29, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. The court incorporates the minutes for August 8, 2018 (ROA 269) for a more complete recitation of the rather tortured procedural history of the case. On that day, the court denied in part and granted in part defendant's motion for a nonsuit. Evidence continued the following day, Thursday, August 9, with the defense case under way. ROA 286.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. The court incorporates the minutes for August 8, 2018 (ROA 269) for a more complete recitation of the rather tortured procedural history of the case. On that day, the court denied in part and granted in part defendant's motion for a nonsuit. Evidence continued the following day, Thursday, August 9, with the defense case under way. ROA 286.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. The court incorporates the minutes for August 8, 2018 (ROA 269) for a more complete recitation of the rather tortured procedural history of the case. On that day, the court denied in part and granted in part defendant's motion for a nonsuit. Evidence continued the following day, Thursday, August 9, with the defense case under way. ROA 286.

  • Hearing

    Oct 30, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. Defendant, who is a Texas domiciliary, sought to quash service of the summons and complaint. ROA 11, 12. He asserts that all of plaintiff's claims "have been specifically and fully addressed in annulment proceedings already completed in Texas.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. Defendant, who is a Texas domiciliary, sought to quash service of the summons and complaint. ROA 11, 12. He asserts that all of plaintiff's claims "have been specifically and fully addressed in annulment proceedings already completed in Texas.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. Defendant, who is a Texas domiciliary, sought to quash service of the summons and complaint. ROA 11, 12. He asserts that all of plaintiff's claims "have been specifically and fully addressed in annulment proceedings already completed in Texas.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. Defendant, who is a Texas domiciliary, sought to quash service of the summons and complaint. ROA 11, 12. He asserts that all of plaintiff's claims "have been specifically and fully addressed in annulment proceedings already completed in Texas.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. Defendant, who is a Texas domiciliary, sought to quash service of the summons and complaint. ROA 11, 12. He asserts that all of plaintiff's claims "have been specifically and fully addressed in annulment proceedings already completed in Texas.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. Defendant, who is a Texas domiciliary, sought to quash service of the summons and complaint. ROA 11, 12. He asserts that all of plaintiff's claims "have been specifically and fully addressed in annulment proceedings already completed in Texas.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. Defendant, who is a Texas domiciliary, sought to quash service of the summons and complaint. ROA 11, 12. He asserts that all of plaintiff's claims "have been specifically and fully addressed in annulment proceedings already completed in Texas.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. Defendant, who is a Texas domiciliary, sought to quash service of the summons and complaint. ROA 11, 12. He asserts that all of plaintiff's claims "have been specifically and fully addressed in annulment proceedings already completed in Texas.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. Defendant, who is a Texas domiciliary, sought to quash service of the summons and complaint. ROA 11, 12. He asserts that all of plaintiff's claims "have been specifically and fully addressed in annulment proceedings already completed in Texas.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. Defendant, who is a Texas domiciliary, sought to quash service of the summons and complaint. ROA 11, 12. He asserts that all of plaintiff's claims "have been specifically and fully addressed in annulment proceedings already completed in Texas.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. Defendant, who is a Texas domiciliary, sought to quash service of the summons and complaint. ROA 11, 12. He asserts that all of plaintiff's claims "have been specifically and fully addressed in annulment proceedings already completed in Texas.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ANNA MITSKEVYCH VS. BRIAN NORTHCUTT MD

The complaint for negligence, battery, defamation, invasion of privacy/public disclosure of private facts and fraud was filed April 21, 2017. ROA 1. Defendant, who is a Texas domiciliary, sought to quash service of the summons and complaint. ROA 11, 12. He asserts that all of plaintiff's claims "have been specifically and fully addressed in annulment proceedings already completed in Texas.

  • Hearing

    May 16, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

1 2 3     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.