What is negligent supervision?

Useful Resources for Negligent Supervision

Recent Rulings on Negligent Supervision

101-125 of 10000 results

MOLL V. JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.

Owens & 18 Minor Distrib., Inc., supra, 2018 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 186729 at *1-2.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

IN RE THE NICOLE BURGETT TRUST

The Court intends to hear from the guardian ad litem appointed for the Trust's minor beneficiaries regarding whether the 4/13/20 settlement agreement was to their disadvantage and detriment. Subject to such a report, the Court will determine whether the matter should proceed to trial. Petitioner states that his petition is brought under CCP § 664.6 and PC § 17200(a).

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN RE THE NICOLE BURGETT TRUST

The Court intends to hear from the guardian ad litem appointed for the Trust's minor beneficiaries regarding whether the 4/13/20 settlement agreement was to their disadvantage and detriment. Subject to such a report, the Court will determine whether the matter should proceed to trial. Petitioner states that his petition is brought under CCP § 664.6 and PC § 17200(a).

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

PREWITT VS FARMERS INSURANCE

None...

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

PREWITT VS FARMERS INSURANCE

These are preliminary thoughts. My workup is a work in progress. A RFA is not a discovery device in the same sense as an interrogatory or a RFP. The remedy by the aggrieved party is ultimately proving the stated matter at trial, and then asking for fees for having to go to the bother of having to prove what should have been admitted. The object...

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

PREWITT VS FARMERS INSURANCE

Requests for Production: Defendant has established good cause for its requests. Plaintiff to provide further response to RFP's 1-6, and 9-48 that complies with CCP 3031.240. Plaintiff to amend her responses to RFP 49 in light of any further responses she provides to form and special interrogatories. These RFP's ask for documents in support of the a...

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

LIMITED CONS OF JONATHAN ANDREW CONTRERAS

Proof of Personal Service on minor and minor’s father or their consent and waiver on GC-211 4. Court Investigator Report 5. Proposed Order Letters of Temporary Guardianship issued to petitioner expire 9-30-21 JOSIAH BATES MAURICE BATES CLINTON KILLIAN

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CRUZ VS BAE SYSTEMS SAN DIEGO SHIP REPAIR INC

In addition, the following reductions are appropriate from the hours billed by attorney Brennan: 8/10/20 entry for drafting the complaint is reduced from 4.7 hours to 3 hours because it is substantially duplicative of the demand letter; 8/27/20 entry for drafting and filing the amended complaint is reduced from 1.2 hours to .5 hours because the amended pleading contained only minor corrections; and 9/10/20 entry for preparing written discovery is reduced from 4.3 hours to 0 because Plaintiff did not serve

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

JANE HC DOE, A MINOR BY AND THROUGH HER GAURDIAN AD LITEM KIM S. VS TORRANCE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, A CALIFORNIA LOCAL PUBLIC ENTITY, ET AL.

On February 7, 2020, plaintiff filed a FAC for (1) negligence, (2) negligent supervision, (3) negligent failure to warn, train, or educate, (4) IIED, (5) gender violence, (6) sexual battery, and (7) sexual assault. On August 17, 2020, plaintiff filed a SAC. The SAC alleges that plaintiff is a minor born in September 2012. As a minor attending Lincoln Elementary School, plaintiff was entrusted to the care, supervision, and control of defendant TUSD.

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

MCGILVREY, ET AL V. FISHER, ET AL

Petition to Approve Compromise of Disputed Claim TENTATIVE RULING Minor, Guardian ad Litem and Counsel to appear via Zoom. _____________________________________________ Join Zoom Meeting https://solano-courts-ca- gov.zoom.us/j/85980973115?

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

BRETT O'BRIEN, ET AL. VS JOHN GOULD

In the FAC, Plaintiffs allege that their son, Nicholas O’Brien (“Nicholas”) has been improperly manipulated by Defendants, and that using their influence over Nicholas, Defendants have been able to defame and extort Plaintiffs, ruin their personal and professional relationships, and inflict emotional distress and embarrassment on Plaintiffs and their other minor son, Christopher O’Brien (“Christopher”). Defendants now demur to the entire FAC. Defendants also move to strike portions of the FAC.

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

KATE AYALA VS CITY OF COMPTON

January 6, 2021 On September 4, 2020, Plaintiff Kate Ayala, a minor by and through her guardian ad litem, Alma Ayala, filed this Motion for an order compelling Defendant City of Compton to pay $75,000 pursuant to a settlement agreement executed on August 2, 2019. Plaintiff refers to an order approving a minor’s compromise application on November 7, 2019 as the authority for granting this Motion.

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

MARGIT RANEY VS DOLIA TERRAZA

CASE NO: 20STCV10258 [TENTATIVE] ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION TO APPROVE COMPROMISE OF MINOR Dept. 31 8:30 a.m. January 6, 2021 Plaintiffs, Margit Raney, Jacob Cervantes (“Jacob”), a minor by and through his guardian ad litem (“GAL”), Elizabeth Nunoz (“Petitioner”), and Audrey Cervantes (“Audrey”), a minor by and through her GAL, Petitioner, filed this action against Defendant, Dolia Terraza, et al. for damages arising from a three vehicle accident.

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

VERENICE VAUGHN VS. SUN VALLY 50TH AVENUE LLC

This action involves claims for personal injuries and the Minor Plaintiffs present evidence they are under the age of 14. (See Strom Decl., Ex. 1.) No party has filed an opposition explaining why the Minor Plaintiffs are not entitled to preference based on these facts. Thus, the Court finds the Minor Plaintiffs are entitled to preference. The hearing on this motion is scheduled for January 8, 2021. Pursuant to Code of Civ. Proc. § 36(f), trial must be set before May 8, 2021.

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

DAVID S CRUZ ABUNDIO VS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Cruz Abundio, a minor by and through his guardian ad litem, Sonia Abundio ("Plaintiff") for preference under Code of Civ. Proc. § 36(b) is GRANTED. A party to a civil action who is under the age of 14 is entitled to preference under Code of Civ. Proc. § 36(b) if the action involves claims for damages for wrongful death or personal injury, unless the Court finds the party does not have a substantial interest in the case as a whole. This is an action for personal injuries.

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

SKY FRASIER VS CENTINELA VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Plaintiff was born on January 3, 2003, and thus was a minor during the time for Plaintiff to submit a timely claim. Accordingly, the Court must grant the petition. (Gov. Code, § 911.6, subd. (b)(2).) Conclusion and Order Plaintiff’s petition is granted. Defendant shall file an answer or responsive pleading within statutory time periods. Plaintiff shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court. DATED: January 6, 2021 ___________________________ Stephen I.

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2021

GUARDIANSHIP OF JUANITA ISABEL MARTINEZ

In order for the Court to determine whether the minor releases the guardian here, with a fairly obtained release, the minor and the guardian must appear at the hearing. A PETITION FOR DISCHARGE MUST BE ON FILE BEFORE THE HEARING. PLEASE USE FORM DE-295.

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

MATTER OF THOMAS TAYLOR

This arguably means ordering a payout past the minor’s 18th birthday would be in excess of the court’s jurisdiction, especially more than five years past the 18th birthday, and also since the minor may, as a matter of practice, obtain the funds through assignment (often for a very reduced rate) at 18, or arguably void the contract (incurring tax penalties).

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

IN THE MATTER OF SADIE & SOPHIA DUBOIS

Second Account and Report & Attorney Fees ***** The Court has reviewed the second account and report and notes the following deficiencies. Notice of hearing not filed. The payments on the Promissory Note in the total amount of $24,312 have not reduced the ending balance of the Note on Schedule F. The terms of the Promissory Note are...

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Guardianship/Protective Services

JORDAN VS CITY OF RIVERSIDE

Board of Education of Glendale (1941) 42 Cal.App.2 415, 421 [claim of minor child was sufficient, even though verification was by father describing himself as “claimant”].).

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

MONTIA SABBAG VS KEVIN HART, ET AL.

As to the negligent supervision claim, Plaintiff's allegation that Defendant Hart failed to supervise a hotel room is insufficient. Generally, liability for negligent supervision is based upon the defendant's failure to supervise an employee. Delfino v. Agilent Technologies, Inc. (2006) 145 Cal.App.4th 790, 815. No such employment relationship is alleged and the negligent supervision cause of action, as pled, is merely duplicative of the negligence claim.

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

AALIYAH K VS WILLIAM S HART UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL

Hart Union High School District (“District”) and Nicole March (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging (1) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (2) negligence under vicarious liability; and (3) breach of mandatory duty – negligent supervision. On February 24, 2020, Petitioner filed a notice of ruling, representing that the Court denied her petition to approve a compromise of pending action filed on November 21, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

CATHY CONTRERAS, ET AL. VS CORVALLIS MIDDLE SCHOOL, ET AL.

., a minor filed a complaint against Defendants Corvallis Middle School, Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District, and Greenfields Outdoor Fitness, Inc. for (1) general negligence, (2) premises liability, and (3) products liability. On November 16, 2020, dismissal was entered as to Corvallis Middle School. On November 25, 2020, Defendant Norwalk-La Mirada Unified School District filed a demurrer to complaint. Trial is set for January 10, 2022.

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

TRESHUNDA JUDDINE VS DOES 1 THROUGH 100

CASE NO: BC600599 [TENTATIVE] ORDER TAKING PETITION TO APPROVE COMPROMISE OF MINOR OFF-CALENDAR Dept. 31 8:30 a.m. January 5, 2021 Plaintiff, Treshunda Juddine, by and through her guardian ad litem, Krishawnna A. Barker, filed this action against Defendants Does 1 through 100 for medical negligence.

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

JASMINE V MEJIA VS CROWN PREPARATORY ACADEMY ET AL

The Court excuses the appearances of the minor, the guardian ad litem and counsel. No appearances are necessary. The Court has reviewed the Petition to Approve Compromise of Pending Action of a Minor (Jasmine M. Age 15). The Court finds that the settlement is reasonable, and based thereon, approves and GRANTS the petition. The Court has considered the Declaration of Afshin Siman in support of the fee request.

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2021

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.