What is negligent supervision?

Useful Resources for Negligent Supervision

Recent Rulings on Negligent Supervision

51-75 of 10000 results

C'SHIP OF DARLENE FARR

Do one or the other, but not both: (1) Have a copy of the Notice of Hearing and Petition Form GC-210 personally served on minor and file Proof of Service or (2) have minor sign a consent and waiver form (GC-211) 3. File a verified declaration to include names and current addresses of maternal and paternal grandparents, current addresses of siblings 4.

  • Hearing

    Jan 11, 2021

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

LISA SOLIS, ET AL. VS GEORGE BOUTROS

The Court also noted that Petitioner must provide written proof from the private health insurance plans and Roy Goldstein, M.D. confirming the agreements to accept reduced amounts as reimbursement for the plans payments of Minor Claimant’s medical expenses and to satisfy Minor Claimant’s outstanding medical expenses, respectively. Petitioner filed an amended petition and a supplemental declaration on December 14, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Jan 11, 2021

DIANE MARY MELBAR, ET AL. VS JOACHIM GEORGE BUSH

PARTIES’ REQUEST Defendant requests for an order compelling Plaintiff Ella Girsh, a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Diane Mary Melbar, to serve verified responses, without objections, to Defendant’s Form Interrogatories, Set One, Special Interrogatories, Set One, and Demand for Production of Documents, Set One.

  • Hearing

    Jan 11, 2021

IN RE THE MINORS COMPROMISE OF RICHO RICHARDSON III

The minor, the minor’s mother, and counsel to appear via Zoom, in person, or by CourtCall. 9:00 CALENDAR CAROLINE VILLALTA, et. al. v. STARS RECREATION CENTER, et. al.

  • Hearing

    Jan 11, 2021

MICHAEL PHAM, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH PHAM, ET AL. VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

The Motion for Summary Judgment will not be heard on this date in Department 28. No further hearings will be heard in Department 28, Spring Street Courthouse, as of 11/13/20. See below.AFTER REVIEW OF THE COURT FILE, THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER: Department 28 of the Personal Injury Court has determined that the above entitled action is comp...

  • Hearing

    Jan 11, 2021

SELENA ROBLES, ET AL. VS GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, ET AL.

PARTY’S REQUEST Petitioner asks the Court to grant the petition to approve the compromise with special needs trust for Minor Claimant Selena Robles. (“Claimant”). LEGAL STANDARD If a settlement for a minor or a person with a disability is reached in a pending civil action, the settlement must be approved in the court in which the action is pending. (Prob. Code, § 2505(a).) Proceeds from a settlement may be placed into special needs trust. (Prob. Code, §§ 3602(d), 3611(c).)

  • Hearing

    Jan 11, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

AALIYAH K VS WILLIAM S HART UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL

Hart Union High School District (“District”) and Nicole March (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging (1) intentional infliction of emotional distress; (2) negligence under vicarious liability; and (3) breach of mandatory duty – negligent supervision. On February 24, 2020, Petitioner filed a notice of ruling, representing that the Court denied her petition to approve a compromise of pending action filed on November 21, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Jan 11, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

REBECCA DUCHSHERER VS RESORT VACATIONS, INC.

Plaintiff was discriminated against due to her son’s school schedule, required to work less desirable shifts and disciplined more frequently than similarly situated non-caretakers, denied scheduling and vacation requests which were routinely granted in favor of similarly situated non-caretaker employees and disciplined in retaliation for her complaints of discrimination for her minor son.

  • Hearing

    Jan 11, 2021

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

JUAN ARGUETA VS ITALEE OPTICS, INC., ET AL.

On November 30, 2018, Plaintiff Juan Argueta (Plaintiff) filed suit against Italee Optics, Inc. and Bob Lee, alleging: (1) discrimination; (2) harassment; (3) retaliation; (4) failure to prevent discrimination, harassment, and retaliation; (5) wrongful termination; (6) violation of the Ralph Civil Right Act; (7) violation of the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act; (8) sexual battery; (9) gender violence; (10) declaratory judgment; (11) intentional infliction of emotional distress; and (12) negligent supervision and retention

  • Hearing

    Jan 11, 2021

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

ANDREA PASILLAS, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOEL PASILLAS VS CITY OF GLENDALE, A PUBLIC ENTITY, ET AL.

BACKGROUND On July 3, 2019, Plaintiff Andrea Pasillas, a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Joel Pasillas filed a complaint against Defendants City of Glendale and County of Los Angeles for dangerous condition of public property. The complaint alleges that Plaintiff was sitting under a tree at Glenoaks Park on September 16, 2018 when she was struck by a sizeable tree branch that fell from the tree.

  • Hearing

    Jan 11, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

JAMES LECHUGA ET AL VS ESTATE OF MARTHA RAMOS QUINTANA ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: (2) Minor Compromises Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

JAMES LECHUGA ET AL VS ESTATE OF MARTHA RAMOS QUINTANA ET AL

The total attorneys’ fees for which court approval is requested, is $2,500 for each minor. Petitioner, Jennifer Lechuga, approved the 25% fee for each minor. The petition seeks reimbursement of expenses for medical records for each minor, which totaled $8.55 for Jeffrey, and $27.50 for Joey. Total reimbursements to be paid for each minor, consisting of $500 in medical expenses, $2,500 in attorneys’ fees, and the costs for medical records for each minor, are $3,008.55 for Jeffrey, and $3027.50 for Joey.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

KM VS VENTURA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

. ____________________ TENTATIVE RULING The Court intends to GRANT Plaintiffs' motion to compel a complete response to Form Interrogatory 12.1, including the parent names and contact information for the minor individuals identified in Defendant's supplemental response to Form Interrogatory 12.1.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

CONS. OF PAUL LAVONNE KROUT

Verified declaration by petitioner to include a separate Inventory and Appraisal and Accounting for each minor. LR 7.425(b) 5. Notice of Filing Inventory & Appraisal Form GC-042 filed and Proof of Service re: same PrC § 2610 6. Evidence of court orders authorizing payment of all attorney fees PrC § 2647; CRC 7.755; LR 7.61 Note: The guardian and the attorney each have a duty to increase bond ex parte upon the realization that the bond is inadequate.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

JESSICA KRAMER VS WARREN PROPERTIES 2021 OLIVE

It is held, “there can be no liability for negligent supervision in the absence of knowledge by the principal that the agent or servant was a person who could not be trusted to act properly without being supervised.” Juarez v. Boy Scouts of America, Inc. (2000) 81 Cal.App.4th 377, 395. As noted above, it is alleged here that plaintiff did not discover the knowledge by defendant until recently.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

LUCILLIA GOMEZ,'BY AND THROUGH GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ET AL. VS SUKYONG LEE

Petition to Approve Compromise of Pending Action on Behalf of Minor Lucillia Gomez Having considered the moving papers, the Court rules as follows. No opposition papers have been filed. BACKGROUND On July 21, 2020, Plaintiff Lucillia Gomez filed a complaint against Defendant Sukyong Lee. On August 31, 2020, Petitioner Marisa Sanchez filed a petition to approve a compromise of pending action on behalf of Claimant Lucillia Gomez.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

JANE DOE ET AL VS MOUNTAIN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL

It is also alleged that defendant District and defendant School knew of defendant Baldenebro’s propensity and disposition to engage in sexual misconduct before he sexually abused and harassed the minor plaintiffs, but failed to implement reasonable safeguards to avoid acts of unlawful sexual conduct by Baldenebro, and that defendants failed to report and concealed from minor plaintiffs’ parents, students, other parents, teachers, law enforcement authorities, and others, the true facts and relevant information

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

RACHEL KROPP ET AL VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY

The Superior Court is open under “Here for You | Safer for You” Conditions and Orders Counsel are urged to use remote appearance technology LACourtConnect If it is indispensable for counsel to be present in court, face masks (without a valve) are mandated (unless a court orders otherwise) and social distancing rules are in force. Dept. ...

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

ANTONIO CUEVAS VS MONTEREY PARK HOSPITAL, ET AL.

(c) A minor, whether or not qualified under subdivision (a) or (b), if, at the time of the decedent's death, the minor resided for the previous 180 days in the decedent's household and was dependent on the decedent for one-half or more of the minor's support. (CCP § 377.60(a)-(c).) Probate Code, § 6402 provides for the intestate estate succession where the estate is not passing to a surviving spouse. Dr.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ILCIA N. MARTINEZ, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL. VS SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC., ET AL.

The Court finds good cause to excuse the appearances of counsel, the guardian ad litem and the minor. The Court has reviewed the Petition to Approve Compromise of Pending Action of a Minor (Abby Martinez, Age 15). The Court finds that the settlement is reasonable, and based thereon, approves and GRANTS the petition. The Court has considered the Declaration of Owili K. Eison of in support of the fee request.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

SOCORRO COBARRUVIAS VS LOS ANGELES COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT ET

As to the student plaintiff’s negligence claims, the plaintiff failed to establish that the allegedly negligent supervision caused his injuries. (Id. at 1372-73.) Although “[a] special duty of care may arise where a person makes a specific threat against a specific person or otherwise presents a foreseeable danger to a readily identifiable potential victim,” the danger to the plaintiff arose suddenly during the lunch period in which the plaintiff’s injuries occurred. (Id. at 1369.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

MARIA SERRATO ET AL VS INMAR D RIVAS

January 8, 2021 Claimant Jonathon Hernandez Serrato (“Claimant”), a minor, by and through his parent, Maria Serrato (“Petitioner”), has agreed to settle his claims against Defendant Inmar Rivas in exchange for $7,500.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

ATHENA RIVERA VS JC PENNEY, ET AL.

Responding Party: Plaintiff Athena Rivera (No Opposition) RELIEF REQUESTED: Sustain demurrer to third, sixth and seventh causes of action Strike Punitive Damages CAUSES OF ACTION: from First Amended Complaint 1) Negligent Supervision and Retention v. JC Penney, Sephora 2) False Imprisonment v. JC Penney, Sephora 3) Defamation/False Light/Slander of Title v. All Defendants 4) Invasion of Privacy/Unreasonable Intrusion v. JC Penney, Sephora 5) Assault and Battery v.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

ARAKSI ABADZHYAN , ET AL. VS CHEYRL LYNN THOMAS

Per CRC 7.952, Petitioners and minor Claimants must appear at the hearing unless the court finds good cause to excuse their appearance. Lucine is four years old and was only two when the incident occurred, Natalie is 10 years old and was only seven when the incident occurred. The court finds Lucine’s and Natalie’s age constitute good cause to excuse their appearance. Petitioner proposes to have the minors’ funds paid directly to him, without bond.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

CITY OF LAWNDALE VS THOMAS A. SHAW

He explains that at first Shaw committed minor acts of interference but that his “behavior escalated into outright hostility and violence, which did not subside until after the sale of the Property was concluded.” Starting in January 2020, when defendant reacted to a dumpster delivery by nearly running over a receivership staff member with a car, he embarked on a campaign of trespass, vandalism, assault, and targeted destruction of abatement materials and work.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.