What is negligent supervision?

Useful Resources for Negligent Supervision

Recent Rulings on Negligent Supervision

26-50 of 10000 results

SEAN ROSS PAUL VS TISHMAN SPEYER ARCHSTONE-SMITH ET AL

BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the operative Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) alleging causes of action for: (1) breach of express and implied contract; (2) breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing/breach of express/implied warranty of habitability; (3) fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and concealment; (4) negligence—premises liability; (5) negligence, negligent supervision, and negligent management (owner and manager); (6) negligence; (7) violation of Bus. & Prof.

  • Hearing

    Jan 14, 2021

NICOLE BRAZIER VS. ROBERT DOUGLAS FREY MD

This is clearly a minor, clerical amendment which, reading the SAC in its entirety, was an unintended drafting error. Such amendments are permitted in the Court's discretion. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 473, subd. (a)(1).) The Court finds this amendment will not prejudice defendants. Ruling on Demurrer The Court OVERRULES defendants' objections to Brazier's late filing of the opposition.

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

CTRSHP OF HEATHER I EDGAR

Order Appointing Guardian of Minor Form GC-240 (revised 7-1-16) PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances ERIN BRINDLEY STEPHEN M. FLYNN JOANN HOWELL LINDA LEGATE ALAN D WEST MICHELE TIERNAN G KEVIN LACHONA ROBERT O MORRIS ROBERT O MORRIS

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

SWOPE VS LIBERTY UNION HIGH SC

Negligent Hiring / Retention (Cause of Action Three) The negligent hiring and retention claim includes many of the allegations included for the negligent supervision claim. In order for this claim to be different from the negligent supervision claim, however, the theory here appears to be one based on negligent hiring and retention of Souza.

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

CREAMER VS. ATCHISSON

Here, the Wolff law firm obtained an independent guardian ad litem for the minor child and then secured written waivers from each of the plaintiffs before the case was filed. Now that Mr. August has passed, the firm intends to name his estate in his place. The estate will be represented by an heir who has renounced her share to any recovery in the case. The minor’s interest as an heir will be handled by his current guardian ad litem.

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

MAJORIE HOLDSWORTH ET AL VS COMFORT BEDDING MANUFACTURING IN

CASE NO: BC708527 [TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING PETITION TO APPROVE COMPROMISE OF MINOR WITHOUT PREJUDICE Dept. 31 8:30 a.m. January 13, 2021 Plaintiffs, Marjorie Holdsworth (“Petitioner”), Curtis Holdsworth and Abigail Holdsworth (“Claimant”), a minor by and through her guardian ad litem, Petitioner, filed this action against Defendants, Comfort Bedding Manufacturing Inc. (“Comfort Bedding”) and Durham School Services, L.P. (“Durham”) for damages arising from a motor-vehicle accident involving a bus.

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

ROSE VS GUTIERREZ

Plaintiff alleges that the doctors told him that his injuries were minor, however, Plaintiff indicates that the doctors failed to diagnose him with a subdural hematoma, which showed on a CT scan two days later. Plaintiff alleges that the hematoma has caused significant and catastrophic consequences, specifically permanent damage to Plaintiff’s brain resulting in left sided hemiparesis, and other irreversible damage.

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

FRANCO LARA VS JOSEPH TORKAN

The trivial defect doctrine originated to shield public entities from liability where conditions on public property create a risk “of such a minor, trivial or insignificant nature in view of the surrounding circumstances ... no reasonable person would conclude that the condition created a substantial risk of injury when such property or adjacent property was used with due care in a manner in which it was reasonably foreseeable that it would be used.” (Kasparian v.

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

LAUREN B. VS KF COMMUNITY CARE, LLC, ET AL.

of emotional distress against Community Care and Arjona, (8) negligence against Community Care and Arjona, (9) negligent supervision, hiring and retention against Community Care, (10) dependent adult abuse and/or neglect against Community Care, (11) negligence against Community Care, (12) negligent hiring, supervision or retention against Community Care in connection with its hiring of Defendant, Christopher Andaya (“Andaya”) (13) sexual battery against Andaya, (14) denial of civil rights (Civil Code §§ 41.7

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Discrimination/Harass

IRMA MARGARET GARCIA, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL. VS 888 PROPERTY PARTNER, ENTITY TYPE UNKNOWN

On December 9, 2020, the Court granted the petition as to minor Christian Soto with modification. However, minor Rudy Soto because Rudy Soto was not appointed a guardian ad litem at that time. Therefore, the hearing on the petition as to Rudy Soto as continued to January 13, 2021 to allow counsel to file appropriate documents for Rudy Soto. On December 18, 2020, Plaintiff filed an Application and Order For Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem for Rudy Soto to name Adonia Marya Soto as Guardian Ad Litem.

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

ZY'KEIRH SINGLETON, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, RONISHA RUFFIN, ET AL. VS ANTHONY PICKETT, M.D., ET AL.

19STCV23402 ZY'KEIRH SINGLETON vs ANTHONY PICKETT, M.D. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, defendants Nghia C. Truong, M.D. and Nghia Truong, Inc’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The court will sign the proposed order submitted by plaintiffs on 12/17/20....

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

ERICKA HERNANDEZ, ET AL. VS CRYSTAL HUDSON

The Court finds good cause to excuse the appearances of counsel, the guardian ad litem and the minor. No appearances are necessary. The Court has reviewed the Amended Petition to Approve Compromise of Pending Action of a Minor (Tyrin Harris, Age 13), filed on 12/31/2020 as well as the Supplemental Declaration of Jeffrey L. Molchan, filed on 01/06/2021. The Court finds that the settlement is reasonable, and based thereon, approves and GRANTS the petition.

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

SEQUOIA COMPANIES, LLC VS BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEBRASKA

(3) The names, ages, and place or places of residence of the payee's minor children or other dependents, if any. (4) The amounts and sources of the payee's monthly income and financial resources and, if presently married, the amounts and sources of the monthly income and financial resources of the payee's spouse.

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

JOSE LUIS SERRANO VS FOREST LAWN MEMORIAL-PARK ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

The trivial defect doctrine originated to shield public entities from liability where conditions on public property create a risk “of such a minor, trivial or insignificant nature in view of the surrounding circumstances ... no reasonable person would conclude that the condition created a substantial risk of injury when such property or adjacent property was used with due care in a manner in which it was reasonably foreseeable that it would be used.” (Kasparian v.

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

DAISHA SIDA, ET AL. VS CITY OF SAN FERNANDO, A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY

Plaintiff argues that the statute of limitations is tolled because Plaintiff is a minor. Plaintiff is incorrect. Per Code of Civil Procedure section 352, subdivision (b), a plaintiff’s minority does not toll the statute of limitations on a claim against a public entity. (Code Civ. Proc., § 352, subd. (b).) Plaintiff cites City of Huntington Park v. Superior Court (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 1293, but that case is not on-point.

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

DIANE MARY MELBAR, ET AL. VS JOACHIM GEORGE BUSH

PARTY’S REQUESTS Defendant requests for an order compelling Mia, a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem (“GAL”), Melbar to serve verified responses, without objections, to Defendant’s Form Interrogatories, Set One, Special Interrogatories, Set One, and Demand for Production of Documents, Set One. Defendant also requests that the Court order Mia, a minor, by and through her GAL, Melbar and her attorney John Ksajikian to pay monetary sanctions in the amount of $800 per motion for the sum of $2,400.

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

JOHN AA DOE ET AL VS LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ET

On August 6, 2020, Plaintiffs filed the operative Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”).The TAC now alleges only ten causes of action, as follows: (1) negligence by minor Plaintiffs against all defendants, by parent Plaintiffs against LAUSD, Bennett, Vazquez and Gillard, (2) negligent supervision by minor Plaintiffs against all defendants, by parent Plaintiffs against LAUSD, Bennett, Vazquez and Gillard, (3) negligent hiring/retention by minor Plaintiffs against all defendants, by parent Plaintiffs against LAUSD,

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

LAURA COOK V. LAS CANCHAS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL.

In reply, defendants again contend that the nuisance allegations relate only to asbestos exposure, and then for the first time, contend that the environmental report she attached to the complaint only identified minor amounts of asbestos in the bathroom drywall and joint compound, nothing in the balcony wall, and does not reference the living room, supporting the finding that there was no asbestos contamination in the balcony or living room, and that they therefore cannot be liable for having created or maintained

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2021

IN THE MATTER OF KARSON AND KAIDEN CRANE

The guardianship status reports were filed on 11/24/20. The Court has reviewed the reports and they are complete. No appearance required. The next guardianship status reports shall be filed on or before 12/7/21 and set for a filing/sufficiency hearing on 1/18/22, 10:30 AM, J6. The clerk to give notice. __________________ As COVID-19...

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2021

MARYAM GHUKASIAN VS AEGIS SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, A STOCK INSURER, ET AL.

to supervise or negligent supervision.

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2021

  • Type

    Insurance

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

VICTOR AVALOS, ET AL. VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, A PUBLIC ENTITY , ET AL.

19STCV27032 VICTOR AVALOS vs COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Demurrer and Motion to Strike TENTATIVE RULING: The demurrer to the 5th, 6th, and 7th causes of action are SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. The motion to strike punitive damages for the 5th, 6th, and 7th causes of action is GRANTED. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint consistent with thi...

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

DIANE MARY MELBAR, ET AL. VS JOACHIM GEORGE BUSH

PARTIES’ REQUEST Defendant requests for an order compelling Plaintiff Marisa Gish, a minor, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Diane Mary Melbar, to serve verified responses, without objections, to Defendant’s Form Interrogatories, Set One, Special Interrogatories, Set One, and Demand for Production of Documents, Set One.

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2021

JOHN DOE, AN INDIVIDUAL VS DEFENDANT DOE 1, A REGISTERED NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, ET AL.

On August 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed a complaint, asserting causes of action against Defendant Doe 1, Defendant Doe 2 and Does 3-40 for: Negligent Hiring, Supervision, and Retention Breach of Mandatory Duty: Failure to Report Suspected Child Abuse Negligent Failure to Warn, Train or Educate Negligent Supervision of a Minor Sexual Battery Negligence On September 14, 2020, this action was transferred from Department 28 of the Personal Injury Court to this instant department.

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

NANCY SEILER VS STEVEN GORDON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

It had minor damage to the right front side fender. AR 16. The second vehicle (“V2”) was a parked vehicle that was parked adjacent to the east curb of the street. AR 16. It had major damage to the left rear side of the vehicle and was undrivable. AR 16. The officers met Seiler, who was standing on the west curb of the street. AR 16. Romero observed that Seiler had a two-inch contusion on her forehead that was bleeding and appeared to be from her head hitting the steering wheel. AR 16.

  • Hearing

    Jan 12, 2021

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

REBECCA BRAND V. MIMI BRAND, ET AL.

Defendant, then 19 years of age, stated that she could purchase the Property and LLC from plaintiff and pay the monthly mortgage payments and other expenses using the settlement funds she had received as a minor while plaintiff continued to manage the Property and LLC. Plaintiff agreed to the arrangement and on May 14, 2011, plaintiff executed an Assignment of LLC Interest in favor of defendant.

  • Hearing

    Jan 11, 2021

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.