What is negligent supervision?

Useful Rulings on Negligent Supervision

Recent Rulings on Negligent Supervision

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

Plaintiffs argue that they are at risk of losing their permits or may not be able to extend the amortization period beyond the 18-month minimum, based on minor technicalities or for arbitrary reasons. But at this time, there is no evidence that any permits have been revoked or that extensions have been denied. Indeed, the deadlines for the renewal process and the amortization schedule have not passed. Plaintiffs’ CEQA claim is likewise deficient.

  • Hearing

MICHAEL PHAM, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH PHAM, ET AL. VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings will not be heard on this date in Department 28. No further hearings will be heard in Department 28, Spring Street Courthouse, as of 11/13/20. See below.AFTER REVIEW OF THE COURT FILE, THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER: Department 28 of the Personal Injury Court has determined that the above entitled actio...

  • Hearing

MICHAEL PHAM, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH PHAM, ET AL. VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

The Motion for Summary Judgment will not be heard on this date in Department 28. No further hearings will be heard in Department 28, Spring Street Courthouse, as of 11/13/20. See below.AFTER REVIEW OF THE COURT FILE, THE COURT MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER: Department 28 of the Personal Injury Court has determined that the above entitled action is comp...

  • Hearing

PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE

Verified declaration to include Form ICWA-010(A) to confirm that you have questioned minor’s relatives as to whether minor has any Indian ancestry CRC 5.481 4. Parental Notification of Indian Status Form ICWA-020 filed 5. Proposed Order The Court is waiting for these items: 1. Report of Atty. Summer Selleck 2. Report of Atty. Robert O. Morris Need: 1. UCCJEA Form FL-105 verified. Verification is not dated. 2. Court Investigator’s Report Note: Form ICWA-030 was filed 11-18-2020.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MATTER OF THE YOUNG REVOCABLE TRUST

Order Appointing Guardian of Minor Form GC-240 (revised 7-1-16) The Court is waiting for these items: 1. Report of Atty. Oliver Greenwood Notes: A. Court will set a review hearing to ensure deposit of minors’ funds into a blocked account. B. Opposition filed by mother Terra Murphy 3-29-18. C. Response to Opposition filed 4-19-18. D. Letters of Temporary Guardianship of Estate issued to petitioner 5-24-18 expired 1- 20-19.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ALLSTATE SETTLEMENT CORPORATION VS J. E.

Discussion On or about January 29, 1988, Transferor’s Parent/Guardian (as Transferor was then a minor) entered into a Settlement and Release of All Claims (“Settlement Agreement”) with Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate Insurance”).

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

RE: 1ST & FNL RPT OF ADMNTR, PET’N FOR ITS SETTLEMENT, FNL DIST

Order Appointing Guardian of Minor Form GC-240 (revised 7-1-16) JUAN ANTONIO ESCOBAR CHAMUL JANIE S LEE

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

GDNSHIP OF JUAN ANTONIO ESCOBAR CHAMUL

Order Appointing Guardian of Minor Form GC-240 (revised 7-1-16) PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances ANTHONY F LOFORTE SR KEVIN M RODRIQUEZ ANTHONY FRANCIS LOFORTE SR BART FLOOD EFREN DELGADILLO EFREN DELGADILLO JR KATHERINE LOUISE LOFORTE-DELGA

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

BRADY CROUCH ET AL VS ALEX JOSEF LANE ET AL

BC 715713 Brady Crouch, Carson Crouch, a Minor by and through his Guardian ad litem Candi Crouch, et al. v. Alex Josef Lane, et al. The Court finds good cause to excuse the appearances of the claimant, Carson Crouch, the petitioner and guardian ad litem, Candi Crouch, and counsel. The Court has reviewed the Petition to Approve Compromise of Pending Action of a Minor (Carson Crouch, Age 16). The Court finds that the settlement is reasonable, and based thereon, approves and GRANTS the petition.

  • Hearing

REBECCA TOM V. KURT JAMES TOM

Here, the Court finds that Plaintiff has a strong and clear protected privacy interest in regard to any abuse suffered while she was a minor at the hands of a non-party and the treatment or healthcare sought as a result. The Court finds that the intrusion into her privacy would be serious. Defendants have not established how this information is sufficiently relevant to the case at issue here or established a sufficiently important countervailing interest in obtaining this information.

  • Hearing

C'SHIP OF DARLENE FARR

Report of counsel Kathryn Korn ALVIN ZIEGLER MATTHEW B TALBOT ALVIN ZIEGLER MATTHEW S TOTH ASHLEY ZIEGLER MATTHEW S TOTH BUTLER MINOR ANDREW R VERRIERE BUTLER MINOR DAVID W BAER CHARLES SCHWAB TRUST COMPANY GORDON C YOUNG DAVID B PASTOR DAVID B. PASTOR, ESQ. DEBRA J DOLCH TERENCE M MURPHY DEBRA J. DOLCH TERENCE M MURPHY ISA MARY ZIEGLER KATHRYN KORN ISA MARY ZIEGLER MARIA I LAWLESS KNOX ZIEGLER MATTHEW S TOTH LOREN ACUNA EMMANUEL JONATHAN T.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

GDNSHIP OF RYAN THOMAS HSIAO

Do one or the other, but not both: (1) Have a copy of the Notice of Hearing and Petition Form GC-210 personally served on minor Joshua Foley and file Proof of Service or (2) have minor sign a consent and waiver form (GC-211) The Court is still waiting for: A. Court Investigator’s Report Letters of Temporary Guardianship expire 5/20/2021 BROOKLYN A. FOLEY LITA PETTUS-DOTSON CINDY BERNHARDT LARA J HEISLER GREG BERNHARDT LARA J HEISLER JOSHUA T.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ALAMEDA SQUARE OWNER LLC VS THE LOS ANGELES WHOLESALE PRODUCE MARKET, LLC

The Court declines to further reduce the fee award for LAWPM alleging making only minor changes to the second and third demurrers and for billing more in the latter period in the case. In the Court’s experience, this case involved numerous motions and complex arguments and that nonetheless must be adapted for each stage and development in the case. Accordingly, LAWPM’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees is GRANTED in the amount of $106,720. DATED: November 30, 2020 ________________________________ Hon.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

CORY PERKINS VS RITE AID

FILED: 12-17-19 CASE NUMBER: 19STCP05436 NOTICE: N/A PROCEEDINGS: PETITION TO APPROVE MINOR’S COMPROMISE OF DISPUTED CLAIM MOVING PARTY: Petitioner Cory Perkins on behalf of minor Claimant Kori Perkins RESP. PARTY: None PETITION TO APPROVE MINOR’S COMPROMISE OF A DISPUTED CLAIM (CCP § 372, CRC rule 7.950) TENTATIVE RULING: Petitioner Cory Perkins’ Petition to Approve Minor’s Compromise of Disputed Claim is PLACED OFF CALENDAR.

  • Hearing

DENIM JOHNSON, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ROCHELLE FANTROY, ET AL. VS LAUREN DAY, ET AL.

[Citation.] [¶] Nor is the settlement binding [on the minor] until it is endorsed by the trial court.’” (Pearson v. Superior Court (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1333, 1338.) A minor, like Claimant, “shall appear either by a guardian or conservator of the estate or by a guardian ad litem appointed by the court in which the action or proceeding is pending, or by a judge thereof, in each case.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 372, subd. (a)(1).)

  • Hearing

IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER ARDEN SCOTT BURK

These provisions govern money or property paid or delivered pursuant to a court-approved compromise or judgment for minor or disabled person.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER ARDEN SCOTT BURK

These provisions govern money or property paid or delivered pursuant to a court-approved compromise or judgment for minor or disabled person.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

CHRIS BORKOVEC VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

COVID-19 NOTICE: Pursuant to the administrative orders of the Presiding Judge and the Civil Reopening Plan, until further notice, all attorneys and self-represented parties in law and motion hearings must appear telephonically via Court Call; there shall be no personal appearances in the courtroom without the prior express approval of Judge McKaig....

  • Hearing

ESTATE OF STANISLAW J KIERNIK

Order for Probate Form DE-140 Note: Bond will be fixed at $335,000.00; minor heirs cannot waive bond. CLAY ANTHONY COLEMAN JENNIFER S GOLDSMITH PERTRENA INEZ COLEMAN

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR LETTERS OF SPECIAL ADMINISTRATION

Order for Probate Form DE-140 Note: Bond will be fixed at $335,000.00; minor heirs cannot waive bond. CLAY ANTHONY COLEMAN JENNIFER S GOLDSMITH PERTRENA INEZ COLEMAN

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

CAMABY CARLJULE, LLC VS A. B.

B), and a redacted list identifying Payee’s one dependent minor child (id., Ex. C; A.B. Decl. ¶ 2). The petition does not include a copy of Payee’s prior petitions. However, Payee’s declaration identifies his two prior transfers. (A.B. Decl. ¶ 8.) The petition does not include a copy of the annuity contract, any qualified assignment agreement, or underlying structured settlement agreement.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

DYANN LIMON, ET AL. VS OSKAR RAYMUNDO, ET AL.

Petitioner’s attorney declares the case was “straightforward,” conducted minor work, and acceped the case on contingency as a justification for these fees. (See Draitsler Decl., ¶¶ 4-5.) Petitioner’s attorney does not discuss any other factors listed in California Rules of Court, rule 7.955, subdivision (b). These attorney’s fees are unjustified. CONCLUSION The petition is DENIED. Petitioner is ordered to give notice of this ruling.

  • Hearing

ALAN ALEXANDER IRIGOYEN ET AL VS EXEL INC ET AL

HEARING DATE: November 24, 2020 CASE NUMBER: BC663663 CASE NAME: Alan Alexander Irigoyen, et al. v. Exel Inc., et al. TRIAL DATE: None PROOF OF SERVICE: OK MOTION: Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order as to Requests for Admissions, Sets Three MOVING PARTY: Defendant/Cross-Complainant/Cross-Defendant, Jose Antonio Perfecto...

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

CITY NATIONAL BANK, A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION VS ALINA YALANSKA, IN HER CAPACITY AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF BARRY K. ROTHMAN, ET AL.

A financing statement substantially satisfying the requirements is effective, even if it has minor errors or omissions, unless the errors or omissions make the financing statement seriously misleading. Comm. Code §9506(a).

  • Hearing

JOE RELEFORD VS POSTMATES INC, ET AL.

Demurrer – Negligent Supervision & Training “[A]n employer can be liable to a third person for negligently . . . supervising . . . an unfit employee.” (Doe v. Capital Cities (1996) 50 Cal.App.4th 1038, 1054.) To establish a cause of action for negligent supervision, a plaintiff must show that the employer knew or should have known that hiring the employee created a particular risk or hazard and that particular harm occurred. (See Z.V. v.

  • Hearing

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.