What is a Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel?

Useful Rulings on Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel

Recent Rulings on Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

(Motion p. 19-20.) As an initial matter, the City agrees that it will not enforce AMC § 4.05.100.0115, which requires immediate warrantless access to a STR; will not issue citations for failure to grant immediate access pending a trial in this case, pursuant to AMC § 4.05.140.020.0201(6); and will offer the City Council amendments to remove language providing for the issuance of citations for failure to grant immediate access.

  • Hearing

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

That being said, it is not clear that SARVS necessarily will be eligible for such compensation. SCE argues that SARVS is not entitled to compensation for lost goodwill inasmuch as any such compensation would amount to duplicate recovery under § 1263.510(a)(4) since any alleged goodwill is tied up in the value of the land being taken.

  • Hearing

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

The motion for summary adjudication is GRANTED as to Issues 1, 3 and 4 (contract-based claims), with leave to amend as to Plaintiffs T-12 and HRG only. The motion is MOOT as to Issue 2, which seeks adjudication of the Third Cause of Action, which Plaintiffs dismissed as to Count 1, under the General Contract. [ROA 2604.]

  • Hearing

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

The Court has considered the administrative and the supplemental records, the papers of the parties and the arguments of counsel, and it has admitted the administrative record into evidence but declined to receive the supplemental record in evidence as it was unnecessary to its determination. Accordingly, the Court now: ORDERS, ADJUDGES, AND DECREES that: 1.

  • Hearing

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

The hearings on the applications are continued to 7/19/19 to allow the applicants to provide supplemental information regarding the foregoing factors. The supplemental information should be submitted by 7/12/19. No appearance is required at the hearing set for 6/21/19.

  • Hearing

MALIN VS AMBRY GENETICS CORPORATION

Continued to 7-19-2019

  • Hearing

PERSOLVE LEGAL GROUP, LLP VS LETICIA HERNANDEZ

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for February 1, 2020.

  • Hearing

MICHAEL PHAM, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH PHAM, ET AL. VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

The Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings will not be heard on this date in Department 28. No further hearings will be heard in Department 28, Spring Street Courthouse, as of 11/13/20.

  • Hearing

CEMEX USA, INC. VS ATILANO, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

The following defects are noted: Plaintiff is “Cemex USA, Inc.;” however, the “Credit Application and Agreement” attached as Exhibit A to the complaint and as Exhibit A to the Declaration of Glen Hansen (“Hansen”) references “CEMEX Construction Materials Pacific, LLC” at the top of Page 1 and does not appear to make any reference to Cemex USA, Inc. Hansen’s declaration also refers to “Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC” as Plaintiff. It would appear that a substitution of plaintiff is needed.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

717 NOGALES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS NEW DIAMOND TRUCKING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AND, ET AL.

Background Plaintiff 717 Nogales, LLC (“Plaintiff”) alleges as follows: Plaintiff is the owner of the industrial property known as 719 Nogales Street, City of Industry, California 91749 (“subject property”). On or about February 24, 2012, Plaintiff conveyed to an entity known as “Sunrise Logistics Group” (“SLG”) a leasehold interest in the subject property for a three year term (“Lease”). On or about August 19, 2014, Plaintiff and SLG amended the Lease by a First Amendment to Lease.

  • Hearing

MARK LIU VS XUEFAN LIU

Zhang is not alleged to have been a party to the underlying contract and there are no facts alleged as to S. Zhang’s involvement. Plaintiff does not provide the court with any documentary evidence in support of his claims. Plaintiff’s request for $300,000.00 in lost profit damages is unsupported. ANALYSIS Yes (11/9/19) Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.)

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

MICHAEL PHAM, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JOSEPH PHAM, ET AL. VS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.

The Motion for Summary Judgment will not be heard on this date in Department 28. No further hearings will be heard in Department 28, Spring Street Courthouse, as of 11/13/20.

  • Hearing

PRIME STAFF INC VS PARTNERSHIP STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLC

At that time, this Court informed counsel for the Cross-Complainant that there was insufficient information regarding the defendants’ resources to properly determine punitive damages. When this Court stated that it appeared that all other damages sought appeared to be appropriate, counsel withdrew the punitive damages request.

  • Hearing

AVITUS INC. VS ANDIAMO MANAGEMENT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, ET AL.

Additionally, the promissory note attached as Exhibit 1 to Hutzenbiler’s Declaration reflects that Andiamo agreed to pay the loan in 12 monthly installments, with the first payment due on or before July 31, 2017 in the amount of $5,932.95, and with each subsequent monthly payment due on or before the 31st of each month, in an amount of $5,932.95. The entire remaining outstanding balance of principal was to be due on June 29, 2018.

  • Hearing

HASMIK KANATARYAN, ET AL. VS CHARLENE SARSTEDT, ET AL.

The following order was made on 10-20-20 and sent to Plaintiff's counsel.

  • Hearing

GRDSHP OF SCOTT

Do one or the other, but not both: (1) Have a copy of the Notice of Hearing and Petition Form GC-210 served by mail on maternal grandparents and sibling, and file Proof of Service or have each person sign a consent and waiver form (GC-211); OR (2) If a person cannot be found, submit a declaration (GC-02) explaining what efforts have been made to find that person. CRC 7.52 3. File a verified declaration to include Addendum to UCCJEA Form GC-120, not attached as indicated 4.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

HAI YING RUAN, ET AL. VS CUONG THOAI DIEP, ET AL.

As currently pled, the four causes of action named against fail to state sufficient facts against Moving Defendants. Demurrer to this cause of action is SUSTAINED with leave to amend. Motion to Strike Based upon the recommendation made on the demurrer, Defendants’ motion to strike portions of the complaint is MOOT.

  • Hearing

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

PETITION OF TRAVEON C GAINS

Per 12-10-19 minute order, court ordered a Petition for Final Distribution to be filed and calendared for 2-25-20.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST AND FINAL REPORT OF CO-EXECUTORS ON WAIVER OF ACCOUNT

ANDERSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Moving paper is in Vol. 1 Need appearances to report status, including 9-1-2020 order to meet and confer Note: Objection filed by John Martini, Richard Martini and David Martini 10-15-2019. DAVID MARTINI JOHN MARTINI KEVIN RODRIGUEZ RICHARD MARTINI KEVIN RODRIGUEZ THE MARTINI FAMILY TRUST DTD 9 TIMOTHY MARTINI DANIEL B NEWBOLD

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N TO COMPEL TIMOTHY MARTINI TO ACCT; RPT ACTS COMPEL

Revised, proposed order with copy of Will attached, if lost will is to be admitted Note: Proof of Publication filed 9-29-2020 is missing from court file. Please fax a copy to Probate Examiners as a courtesy to the court. ITALO FERRANDO TINA FERRANDO GRAHAM ELIZABETH E TRUTNER PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved Proposed Order Submitted No Appearance Required AUDREY CELESTINE CAESAR YERDUA CAESAR-KAPTOECH JILL BATES-MOORE

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: FIRST STATUS REPORT OF THE EXECUTOR'S ADMINISTRATION

THOMPSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Corrected proof of mailing to complete Item # 3 which is incomplete on Proof of Service attached to Notice filed 9-2-2020. 2. Proof of mailing to Consular of Mexico. PrC § 8113 3. Verified declaration by petitioner to state whether notice was given, or needed, to Dept. of Health Care Services as to predeceased spouse. PrC § 215, 9202(a); i.e., did predeceased spouse receive Medi-Cal benefits? 4.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

ESTATE OF ETHEL MAE HARTS

RE: PET’N FOR LETTERS OF ADMINISTRATION FILED ON 08/19/20 BY DELPHIA LANCASTER PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Petition verified. Petition verification was not dated by petitioner. (CCP § 2015.5) DELPHIA LANCASTER JASON JM ROSS ETHEL MAE HARTS

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TRUST INSTRUMENT & CONFIRMATION

JOHNSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances Note: Per 10-20-2020 minute order, court ordered responses to be filed by 11-13-2020; replies by 11-30-2020. None has been filed. PAUL A. JOHNSON MATTHEW S TOTH THE ARTHUS E. IRMA S. JOHNSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Unable to review. File is unavailable at this time. Need: 1.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: PET’N FOR COMPENSATION

Verified declaration by petitioner to specify payee of unknown disbursements of $20,738.35. 10. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify payment to Lake County for property tax. Accounting does not include real property located in Lake County. 11. Summary of Account that complies with PrC § 1061(b). Accounting must begin with values as reported in Inventory & Appraisal. ¶7 indicates an Inventory & Appraisal will be filed; however, it is unclear whether this is a Corrected or Supplemental I&A.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PETITION OF CHE ANDREA TRAVERS

by petitioner showing diligent efforts made to locate and serve them.

  • Hearing

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.