What is a Motion to Approve PAGA Settlement?

Useful Resources for Motion to Approve PAGA Settlement

Recent Rulings on Motion to Approve PAGA Settlement

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction Provided that the City will stipulate to a preliminary injunction with respect to the provisions of Ordinance No. 6374 relating to immediate warrantless access to the short-term rental (STR) units, the Court DENIES the application for a preliminary injunction in all other respects, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY VS. SANTA ANA RV STORAGE, L.P.

With respect to the first question, the Court concludes that Section 13.2(f) does not preclude SARVS from attempting to obtain compensation for any alleged loss of goodwill. Notably, nowhere in that section is there any reference to goodwill or any statement to the effect that any potential item of compensation not explicitly referenced therein is considered waived.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

The motion is MOOT as to Issue 2, which seeks adjudication of the Third Cause of Action, which Plaintiffs dismissed as to Count 1, under the General Contract. [ROA 2604.] The Court’s analysis with respect to Saddleback’s motion directed to the contract claims applies equally to this motion. 4.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

CAS004001, as amended on June 16, 2015 by State Board Order WQ 2015-0075, which is remanded to you for reconsideration in light of the Decision of this Court dated April 18, 2019. Nothing herein shall limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in you. YOU ARE FURTHER COMMANDED to file with this Court a return to this writ on or before (90 plus 30 days as per Respondents’ request) stating what you have done to comply.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

VELAZQUEZ VS KIA MOTORS AMERICA INC.

Plaintiff Francisco Velazquez’s Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Kim D. Stephens, Gregory F. Coleman, Paul C. Peel, Jason T. Dennett and Adam A. Edwards The pro hac vice applications of Adam A. Edwards, Gregory Coleman, Jason T. Dennett, Kim D. Stephens, and Paul C. Peel do not address whether the applicants are: (1) regularly employed in the State of California or (2) regularly engaged in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California. CRC, Rule 9.40(a)(2) and (3).

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

MALIN VS AMBRY GENETICS CORPORATION

Continued to 7-19-2019

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

LONG-HIM TANG, ET AL. VS PATRICIA PONCE DE LEON

When a defendant has been served and no answer, demurrer, or certain motion has been filed within the time specified in the summons, the clerk shall enter the default of the defendant. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 585, subd. (b).) The court shall then render judgment in the plaintiff’s favor, not exceeding the amount stated in the statement of damages, as appears by the evidence to be just. (Ibid.)

  • Hearing

    Mar 26, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

TRANSPORT FUNDING, LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS ERK LOGISTICS INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.

(“Assignor”), wherein Assignor agreed to sell a 2014 Peterbilt 579 Tractor, VIN 1XPBDP9X6ED226872 to ERK in exchange for ERK’s 47 monthly payments of $1,485.85, commencing on October 15, 2017 until paid in full. On or about May 15, 2020, ERK defaulted in making payments.

  • Hearing

    Mar 24, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

I.L.W.U. CREDIT UNION VS JOHN SUA, ET AL.

The following defects are noted: Plaintiff has failed to provide the court with a summary of the case, as per California Rules of Court (“CRC”) Rule 3.1800(a)(1). It is unclear to the court how Defendants could have defaulted under the terms of the Agreement by allegedly failing to make an installment payment due on or about April 22, 2020 and all subsequent installments when the Agreement specifies that the last payment therein was due on November 23, 2017.

  • Hearing

    Mar 10, 2021

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Failure to do so may result in the Petition being placed off calendar or denied. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2021

STEPHANIE GREENE VS LINDA PENA ET AL

Pena, and Does 1 to 10 arising from a trip-and-fall. Plaintiff alleges she was in Defendants’ residence. Defendants ran an extension cord to her room from another room due to a broken electrical outlet in her room. Plaintiff alleges the extension cord was improperly secured and caused her to trip and fall, sustaining severe injuries and damages requiring medical treatment.

  • Hearing

    Feb 16, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for January 14, 2021. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is GRANTED; however, attorney’s fees are reduced to $877.31 (i.e., $690 + 3% of $6,243.54) pursuant to Local Rule 3.214, based on the $15,567.39 balance amount. ANALYSIS Yes (12/5/19) Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.)

  • Hearing

    Feb 16, 2021

717 NOGALES, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS NEW DIAMOND TRUCKING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AND, ET AL.

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for February 11, 2021. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

EARL BULL ET AL VS SUPERIOR MOBILITY INC ET AL

Hearing on Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses - Compelling Cross-Complainant Pride Mobility Products Corporation's Further Responses to Cross-Complainant/Cross-Defendant Superior Mobility, Inc.'s Special Interrogatories, (Set 3) scheduled for 02/11/2021 are continued to 02/16/2021 at 10:00 AM in Department 29 at Spring Street Courthouse. The Moving Party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Feb 11, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

A Case Management Conference and an Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment are set for January 14, 2021. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is GRANTED; however, attorney’s fees are reduced to $877.31 (i.e., $690 + 3% of $6,243.54) pursuant to Local Rule 3.214, based on the $15,567.39 balance amount. ANALYSIS Yes (12/5/19) Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.)

  • Hearing

    Feb 06, 2021

V. L., ET AL. VS EVAN CARTER, ET AL.

Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

UNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE VS YOUNG ACTORS CAMP, ET AL.

The “Account Statement Commission Calculation” lists only “Inspire Me, dba Young” and the invoice dated 8/1/16 attached thereto is directed to “Inspire Me Inc – DBA Young Actors Camp.” While the latter document is directed to “ATTN: Nichelle Rodriguez,” this reference is insufficient to establish individual liability against N. Rodriguez.

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

V. L., ET AL. VS EVAN CARTER, ET AL.

Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Feb 04, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

DIEGO GARCIA, ET AL. VS U.S. DEPT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL.

Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

DIEGO GARCIA, ET AL. VS U.S. DEPT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL.

(NOTE: All hearings currently set in Department 29 of the Spring Street Courthouse are taken off calendar subject to being reset and notified by the receiving court Re: New hearing dates.) Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

SUNPOWER CAPITAL, LLC VS BEN HE, ET AL.

Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice: The Declaration of Brunilda Cuellar (“Cuellar”) states only that she is Plaintiff’s Custodian of Records, that she has custody and control of the records and files pertaining to the lease, and that Plaintiff filed this lawsuit against He and Wang, that He and Wang were served but failed to file any responsive pleadings. (Cuellar Decl., ¶¶1-4.)

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION VS FRANCISCO PRECIADO PEREZ, ET AL.

Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

PERSOLVE LEGAL GROUP, LLP VS LETICIA HERNANDEZ

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for February 1, 2020.

  • Hearing

    Feb 01, 2021

CYNTHIA ECCLES VS THE ESTATE OF MARK ROBINSON, ET AL.

Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

HAI THANH LUU VS GEORGE KONGAIKA

Luu attests, in his declaration, that “[i]n or about early April 2018 Defendants abandoned the constructions [sic] work, even though it was unfinished,” that “due to the poor quality of work, when it rained, other parts of [his] house started leaking which [he] had to get fixed, and that he “was forced to hire another contractor to finish the job Defendants had left unfinished, and also to fix the leaks which resulted from Defendant’s poor work.” (Id., ¶¶6-7.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.