What is a Motion to Approve PAGA Settlement?

Useful Resources for Motion to Approve PAGA Settlement

Recent Rulings on Motion to Approve PAGA Settlement

176-200 of 10000 results

IN RE MARQUEZ FAMILY GRANTOR TRUST

OSC re Removal for Failure to File Account & Report 2. OSC re Contempt re Failure to File Accounting by 12/6/19 *********************** At the hearing on 10/7/20, the Court suspended Roger Williams as the trustee but did not yet appoint a successor trustee. A motion to continue by Attorney Thomas Olson has been granted twice. What is the status of the case? __________________ As COVID-19 cases continue to rise, we need to be even more vigilant.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF ERIC OTA

Approve $9,165.82 in statutory fees to Petitioner's counsel. Petitioner waives his fees. The proposed final distribution of the estate to Petitioner is consistent with the laws of intestate succession. Proposed Order to be lodged prior to hearing per Local Rule 10.00.D.1. __________________ As COVID-19 cases continue to rise, we need to be even more vigilant. Please avoid coming into the courthouse in person for any reason for the foreseeable future.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

IN THE MATTER OF MARJORIE JANE HOOPER

Approve report. Approve proposed distribution consistent with decedent's will. __________________ As COVID-19 cases continue to rise, we need to be even more vigilant. Please avoid coming into the courthouse in person for any reason for the foreseeable future. Presently, there is almost no situation that requires a personal appearance in court. The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN RE JAMES Y NAKAMURA 1994 REVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person. The Court may need to eliminate in-person appearances in the near future, so please plan accordingly.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN RE THE CONROY FAMILY TRUST

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person. The Court may need to eliminate in-person appearances in the near future, so please plan accordingly.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

MATTER OF WOODROW AND NORA WILSON TRUST

Nature of Proceedings: Petition to Appoint Successor Trustee Appearances required. Any interested party desirous to object, must file a written objection before the hearing. The court has authority to require all objectors to file a written objection pursuant CRC, Rule 7.801, or else deem the failure to do so a waiver. Due to staffing limitations, processing times may be delayed.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

CONSERVATORSHIP OF RITA LAVERNE MARTINS

Please also note: The request to dispense with notice to Dennis Allen does not appear to contain facts sufficient to justify granting the request. Petitioner is welcome to submit a supplemental declaration discussing why service to Dennis Allen meet the standard required to dispense with notice. The proposed temporary conservatee is not expected to attend the hearing. (Prob. Code § 2250.4, subd. (b).)

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

CONSERVATORSHIP OF JUDITH SIMON

Code, § 2610) 2) Proof of Service – Notice of How to File Objection to I & A (GC-042) (Prob. Code, § 2610). Proof of Service must be mailed to the conservatee, the conservatee’s spouse, and the conservatee’s parents and adult children or mailing excused by court.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

CONSERVATORSHIP OF RITA LAVERNE MARTINS

The request to dispense with notice to Dennis Allen does not appear to contain facts sufficient to justify granting the request. Petitioner is welcome to submit a supplemental declaration discussing why service to Dennis Allen meet the standard required to dispense with notice. The proposed temporary conservatee is not expected to attend the hearing. (Prob. Code § 2250.4, subd. (b).)

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

  • Judge Jed Beebe
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

COLT ROGERS VS. USA BMX

Further, sufficient facts are stated to support the causes of action for express contractual indemnity and declaratory relief. Accordingly, the demurrer is overruled. Cross-Defendant to answer within 20 days. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS CONTINENTAL HERITAGE INS.

Accordingly, the motion is denied. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Enforcement

SANTILLAN VS. SANTILLAN

The Court on its own motion, transfers this matter to Probate Court for further proceedings. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

THOM M ESCOBAR VS. B & B MOTORS INC

The Court intends to rule as follows; To grant Defendant's motion to strike with leave to amend. The allegations of corporate liability for punitive damages are insufficient as are the allegations in support of the fact that B&B Motors was aware of the defect. Plaintiffs have not established that punitive damages should be imposed against the lender. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

LOVEKIN VS. VENTU PARK LIQUOR

The Court intends to rule as follows; To grant Plaintiff's motion for trial setting preference. Plaintiff met her burden of showing that her health is such that a preference is necessary to prevent prejudicing her interest in the litigation. To be set for trial not more than 120 days from the date of this court's ruling. (Code Civ. Proc., § 36, subd. (f)). Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS CONTINENTAL HERITAGE INS.

The case law cited by the County states that the period in which to enter summary judgment under Penal Code section 1306 can be tolled by a timely motion to extend the appearance period. (People v. Granite State Insurance Co. (2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 758, 770 [tolling allowed "where a surety timely files a motion to vacate forfeiture prior to the expiration of the exoneration period"] (emphasis added).)

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

  • Type

    Other

  • Sub Type

    Enforcement

SRVUSD VS SRVEA

HEARING ON DEMURRER TO 1st Amended COMPLAINT of SAN RAMON VALLEY USD, FILED BY SAN RAMON VALLEY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION * TENTATIVE RULING: * See Line 3.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

EDWARD DAVIESS VS. BRIDGESTONE

HEARING ON MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING ARBITRATION FILED BY BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS LLC, et al. * TENTATIVE RULING: * The Court rules as follows on the motion to compel arbitration brought by defendant Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC (“Bridgestone LLC”) and Bridgestone Americas, Inc. (“Bridgestone Corporation”). Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration is granted. Plaintiff is directed to properly tab exhibits in all future filings. (See, Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1110, subd. (f).) A.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

CSAA INSURANCE EXCHANGE VS BSH

HEARING ON MOTION TO/FOR STRIKE PLTF'S COMPLAINT FILED BY BSH HOME APPLIANCES CORPORATION * TENTATIVE RULING: * Continued to 2/24/21 by stipulation of parties.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

SRVUSD VS SRVEA

HEARING ON DEMURRER TO 1st Amended COMPLAINT of SAN RAMON VALLEY USD, FILED BY CALIFORNIA SCHOOL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, * TENTATIVE RULING: * See Line 3.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

SHAPELL VS REGREEN

HEARING ON MOTION TO/FOR STRIKE 1ST AMND CROSS CMPLT OF REGREEN FILED BY SHAPELL NORCAL RENTAL PROPERTIES LLC, SHAPELL DEER * TENTATIVE RULING: * Dropped from calendar at request of moving party.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

EDWARD DAVIESS VS. BRIDGESTONE

HEARING ON MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE STAY FILED BY BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS LLC, et al. * TENTATIVE RULING: * In light of the Court’s granting of defendants’ companion motion to compel arbitration, defendants’ motion for stay is also granted. This entire action is stayed as against all parties pending the outcome of arbitration.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

TULLY VS CHOUINARD

HEARING ON MOTION TO/FOR MANDATORY ATTORNEY FEES FILED BY CAROL CHOUINARD * TENTATIVE RULING: * Defendant Chouinard’s motion for attorney fees is granted in part. Plaintiff Tully sued Chouinard for defamation per se and four other causes of action based on numerous tweets by Chouinard critical of Tully. Chouinard successfully defeated the lawsuit via a special motion to strike. In this motion, Chouinard seeks to recover his fees and costs pursuant to CCP 425.16.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

SRVUSD VS SRVEA

The Institute cites no authority to support its position. The Institute offers to amend the FAC to allege facts to support that the employee unions are agents or acting on behalf of the District. (Opp. p. 21, fn. 11.) The demurrer to this cause of action is sustained, with leave to amend. D.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

JKL CONSTRUCTION VS GIANNI

HEARING ON MOTION TO/FOR COMPEL DEFENDANTS TO SERVE AMENDED RESPONSES, FILED BY JKL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC * TENTATIVE RULING: * Taken off calendar by moving party.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

SOLANO AFFORDABLE HOUSING VS T

HEARING ON MOTION TO/FOR ORDER GRANTING PERMISSION TO SUBMIT PETITION FILED BY SOLANO AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOUNDATION * TENTATIVE RULING: * Plaintiff Solano Affordable Housing Foundation’s Motion for Order Granting Permission to Submit Petition for Coordination and Application for Stay are denied. Plaintiff brings this motion pursuant to CCP § 404 et seq. This section is reserved for coordination of complex cases. Plaintiff has not presented facts demonstrating the cases to be coordinated are complex.

  • Hearing

    Jan 20, 2021

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.