What is a Motion to Approve PAGA Settlement?

Useful Resources for Motion to Approve PAGA Settlement

Recent Rulings on Motion to Approve PAGA Settlement

101-125 of 10000 results

IN RE THE MATTER OF SARGEANT 1989 FAMILY TRUST

RE: PET’N TO COMPEL TRUSTEE TO ACCOUNT TO PRODUCE TRUST RECORDS FILED ON 10/02/20 BY JAMES ARTHUR SARGEANT PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Proof of mailing to Mary Ramies individually not c/o someone or proof of written instructions to that effect. CRC § 7.51(a) 2. Proposed Order JAMES ARTHUR SARGEANT JENNIFER F.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MARY LIM VS CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.

Defendant therefore seeks an order compelling Plaintiff to respond, without objections, to the outstanding discovery and to pay sanctions. Defendant’s motion is unopposed and granted. Plaintiff is ordered to serve verified responses to form interrogatories, set one, without objections, within ten days. (CCP § 2030.290(a),(b).) Sanctions are mandatory. (CCP § 2030.290(c).) Defendant seeks sanctions in the amount of $2,100 for the motion. Given no opposition was filed, the request is unreasonable.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. VS RICHARD A MILLER, ET AL.

The court shall make this order, unless it finds that the party to whom the requests for admission have been directed has served, before the hearing on the motion, a proposed response to the requests for admission that is in substantial compliance with Section 2033.220. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280, subd. (c).) It is mandatory that the court impose a monetary sanction on the party or attorney, or both, whose failure to serve a timely response to requests for admission necessitated this motion.”

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

MICHELLE RHEE VS MENG KING ET AL

CASE NO: BC715377 [TENTATIVE] ORDER DENYING PETITION TO APPROVE COMPROMISE OF MINOR WITHOUT PREJUDICE Dept. 31 8:30 a.m. January 28, 2021 Plaintiff, Michelle Rhee (“Plaintiff”), a minor by and through her guardian ad litem, Tae Rhee (“Petitioner”), filed this action against Defendants Meng King, et al. (“Defendants”) for damages Plaintiff suffered when she was bitten by Defendants’ dog. Petitioner filed a Petition to Approve Compromise of Pending Action on 1/4/21.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

A.R., A MINOR, AND C.R., A MINOR BY AND THROUGH THEIR GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ALICIA RAMOS ACOSTA VS NORA MONTESDOEOCA, ET AL.

Upon receipt of this notice, counsel for Plaintiff shall give notice to all parties of record. COUNSEL ARE TO NOTE THAT EVEN IF THE CASE SUMMARY STILLS SHOWS DEPARTMENT 31 WITH FUTURE HEARINGS, COUNSEL ARE TO CONSIDER THEM TO BE OFF CALENDAR UNTIL THE NEW COURT SAYS OTHERWISE. DATED: January 28, 2021 ___________________________ Hon. Thomas D. Long Judge of the Superior Court

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

GINA FRAZIER VS RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY DBA RALPHS

CCP § 2025.450 requires the Court to compel the deposition unless it finds Defendant served a valid objection under §2025.410. Here, Defendant has properly noticed and attempted to meet and confer with Plaintiff regarding proceeding with Plaintiff’s deposition. Any opposition to the motion was due on or before 1/14/21. To date, no opposition has been filed. The motion to compel is unopposed and granted. (CCP § 2025.450(a).)

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

DONGHONG DENG, ET AL. VS EAST WEST BANK, ET AL.

., “[e]xcept in a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15 pages . . .”). Defendants’ memorandum of points and authorities is 17 pages. There is no indication on ecourt that Defendants ever filed an application for permission to file a longer memorandum as per subsection (e). Counsel for Defendants is admonished. Request for Judicial Notice Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN”) is denied.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

CYNTHIA ECCLES VS THE ESTATE OF MARK ROBINSON, ET AL.

Judicial Assistant is directed to give notice to Plaintiff, who upon receipt of this notice, is ordered to give notice to all parties of record.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

BIANCA ENRIQUEZ VS PROVIDENCE HOLY CROSS MEDICAL CENTER ET A

Accordingly, there are no new facts or law which would lead this Court to reconsider its 7/17/2020 ruling. Finally, the Court notes that Plaintiff’s counsel is not currently eligible to practice law. Given that counsel will no longer be able to appear for the hearing of this motion, the Court is very concerned by counsel’s failure to alert the Court of his now inactive status. Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s motion is denied. It is so ordered. Dated: January , 2021 Hon. Jon R.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

SUHEIL MUDAWAR VS ANA ARTEAGA

On March 11, 2020, a “Stipulation Re: Settlement” was made between Plaintiffs, Arteaga and Flores. On October 13, 2020, Plaintiffs’ counsel’s oral motion to dismiss pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 664.6 was granted as to Arteaga and Flores. An Order to Show Case Re: Default Judgment as to Defendant Ernesto Castillo is set for January 28, 2021. Discussion Plaintiffs’ Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

BEAD GOLF COURSE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. VS JEAN BAPTISTE AIREY, ET AL.

Defendant states in his response to the motion: “Defendant requests that the court enter its order: Granting summary judgment for the partition of the property by sale.” (Defendant’s Response to Motion for Summary Judgment, p.12.) In his declaration, Defendant states: “I do understand that there will be a partition of the property by sale” and that “I was not given the opportunity to stipulate to summary judgment.” (Defendant’s Declaration, ¶¶ 12-13.) Therefore, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ motion.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

HAI THANH LUU VS GEORGE KONGAIKA

Luu attests, in his declaration, that “[i]n or about early April 2018 Defendants abandoned the constructions [sic] work, even though it was unfinished,” that “due to the poor quality of work, when it rained, other parts of [his] house started leaking which [he] had to get fixed, and that he “was forced to hire another contractor to finish the job Defendants had left unfinished, and also to fix the leaks which resulted from Defendant’s poor work.” (Id., ¶¶6-7.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

CYNTHIA ECCLES VS THE ESTATE OF MARK ROBINSON, ET AL.

At the direction of Department 1, this case is hereby ordered reassigned and transferred to the Central District, Los Angeles, the Honorable STEVEN KLEIFIELD, Judge presiding in Department 57 for all purposes except trial. Department 1 hereby delegates to the Independent Calendar Court the authority to assign the cause for trial to that Independent Calendar Court.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

JANA GRANT, ET AL. VS ISABEL TORRES, ET AL.

Petitioner is ordered to give notice. Parties who intend to submit on this tentative must send an email to the court at [email protected] indicating intention to submit on the tentative as directed by the instructions provided on the court website at www.lacourt.org. If the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar.

  • Hearing

    Jan 28, 2021

IN RE THE HALL TRUST DATED 06.30.15

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person. The Court may need to eliminate in-person appearances in the near future, so please plan accordingly.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF ESTELLE HARPER

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person. The Court may need to eliminate in-person appearances in the near future, so please plan accordingly.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

IN RE THE REVOCABLE INTER VIVOS TRUST OF JOHN D. ELVIDGE

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person. The Court may need to eliminate in-person appearances in the near future, so please plan accordingly.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUNN FAMILY SURVIVOR'S TRUST FBO CHARLOTTE GUNN

The Court intends to approve the fifth account and report of the trustee. (Prob. Code § 17200.) __________________ As COVID-19 cases continue to rise, we need to be even more vigilant. Please avoid coming into the courthouse in person for any reason for the foreseeable future. Presently, there is almost no situation that requires a personal appearance in court. The court discourages in-person appearances in Department J6 during the COVID-19 pandemic period.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN RE THE NANCY J. SCHLEICHER REVOCABLE TRUST

Petitioner requests the court order an accounting but has failed to allege any facts supporting the request – that petitioner requested an accounting which was not provided, that Sandra is using the trust property in breach of her fiduciary duties. The court can order an accounting on its own motion, however, here it should be noted that petitioner alleges Sandra became trustee on 02/17/2020 and has not alleged any actions supporting breach of current trustee duties.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN THE MATTER OF LAWRENCE FISHER NELSON JR.

Attorney fails to discuss how the statutory attorney fee will be split with Mr. Doughtery. (Probate Code §10814) Upon filing of statutorily written acceptance of trust, and a discussion re the splitting of attorney fees, accept waiver and approve report. Approve voluntarily reduced statutory fees of $4,000.00. Approve reimbursement of costs of $95.00 to attorney Hollister.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN RE WATTS FAMILY TRUST

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person. The Court may need to eliminate in-person appearances in the near future, so please plan accordingly.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

ESTATE OF SHELBY LEWIS

Petitioner alleged paragraph 3g(2)(a) as a person entitled to letters. It is required to attach an explanation as to why petitioner has priority as attachment 3g(2)(a), when it is not readily apparent why petitioner has priority.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

ESTATE OF LESLIE LLOYD BURNETT

Therefore, the Court should not approve the accounting for all payments made to attorneys from the estate after the decedent’s date of death, because attorney’s fees are governed by Probate Code sections 10800 – 10850, and require court approval before payment. 3) Petitioner should appear to offer explanation to the Court as to why a $13,325 deck needed to be added onto the estate real property. 4) Why a bank fee of $10 is being charged nearly every month of the accounting period (August 26, 2015 to August

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

PATRICIA BARROSO VS. DIGNITY HEALTH

COVID-19 NOTICE: Until further notice, all attorneys and self-represented parties in law and motion hearings must appear telephonically via Court Call; there shall be no personal appearances without the prior approval of Judge McKaig. You may contact Court Call as follows: www.courtcall.com or call 888-882-6878. Please check in by 8:20 a.m.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

LIMITED CONS. OF BRIAN APORILLO

RE: CTREV SET BY COMPLIANCE RE FILING ACCOUNTING PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need appearances to report status of filing first accounting Note: Letters of Temporary Conservatorship of Estate issued to sister-in-law Jeanette Johnson 6-21-19. Bond is fixed at $87,000.00, per Order filed 6-15-2020. BRIAN APORILLO BRENDON D WOODS JEANETTE JOHNSON Need: 1. Appearances to report status 2. Report of Atty. Joseph M.

  • Hearing

    Jan 27, 2021

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.