What is a Motion to Approve PAGA Settlement?

Useful Resources for Motion to Approve PAGA Settlement

Recent Rulings on Motion to Approve PAGA Settlement

51-75 of 10000 results

RE: FIRST AMENDED PET’N FOR APPT OF C'TOR, PERS & EST

FILED ON 08/06/20 BY STEPHANIE L STEVENS PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Petition Approved Proposed Order Submitted No Appearance Required MARY JANE ASHFORD NATHAN PASTOR STEPHANIE L STEVENS MELVIN S HODGES PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Grover Cady to appear or waiver by counsel 2. Petition verified. Petition verification was not dated. (CCP § 2015.5) 3. Citation issued, served and returned. PrC §§ 1823, 1824 4.

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

RE: 2ND & FNL ACCT & RPT OF CTR & PET’N FOR COMPENSATION

COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES DEPT PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Proposed Order C.C. COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES DEPT COUNTY COUNSEL MAE SMITH PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: Verified declaration by petitioner to attach Schedule G C.C. COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES DEPT COUNTY COUNSEL EARLINE COOPER NATHAN D. PASTOR

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR RE: PET’N FOR APPT OF CTR OF PERS/ESTATE

Spencer Michaelsen to appear or waiver by counsel 2. Court Investigator Report 3. Return of Citation PrC§1825 4. Report of Attorney Pierson 5. Proposed Order HANNAH MICHAELSEN OLIVER ALEXANDER GREENWOOD MATTHEW MICHAELSEN OLIVER ALEXANDER GREENWOOD SPENCER MATTHEW MICHAELSEN MICHAEL PIERSON PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Jack Walton to appear, if account is to be waived LR 7.405(b) 2. Proposed Order JACK DOUGLAS WALTON RONALD K MULLIN RONALD K.

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

JOSEPH ZALENSKI VS FLYING DANS INC

A request for punitive damages pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 425.115 must be served on defendant “before a default is taken, if the motion for default judgment includes a request for punitive damages.” [Code Civ. Proc., § 425.115, subd. (f) (emphasis added).] “Evidence of a defendant’s financial condition is a legal precondition to the award of punitive damages.” (Soto v. BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. (2015) 239 Cal.App.4th 165, 195.)

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

N B, ET AL. VS BURBANK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL.

The Motion for Summary Judgment will not be heard in Dept. 28.

  • Hearing

    Jan 25, 2021

LUCA FOSCHINI VS SHALINI ANANDA

Nature of Proceedings: (4) Motions to Compel Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

START INC VS NATIONAL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: Motion for Consolidation Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

JENNY BELFORTE ET AL VS REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ET AL

Nature of Proceedings: (3) Motions for Good Faith Settlement Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

MARGUERITE GAMO VS LYNDA GEMBERLING

“The appropriate procedural device for challenging a portion of a cause of action seeking an improper remedy is a motion to strike.” Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. v. Superior Court, 134 Cal.App.4th 365, 385 (2005). Again, plaintiff can take this opportunity to clean up the complaint regarding facts supporting a finding of malice under CCP § 1174(b) in ¶14 and Attachment 14, or simply delete the prayer for statutory damages F.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

JACK CHAVEZ VS ANACAPA CONCRETE INC

Nature of Proceedings: Motion to Compel; Protective Order Tentative Ruling: 1. The court denies plaintiff Jack Chavez’s motion for a protective order. 2. The court grants, in part, plaintiff Jack Chavez’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Plaintiff’s Request for Production, Set One.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

JACK CHAVEZ VS ANACAPA CONCRETE INC

Nature of Proceedings: Motion to Compel; Protective Order Tentative not yet posted, please check again.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

IN THE MATTER OF IRVING FOGEL

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person. The Court may need to eliminate in-person appearances in the near future, so please plan accordingly.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF BRUCE M. O'HOP

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person. The Court may need to eliminate in-person appearances in the near future, so please plan accordingly.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

IN THE MATTER OF ANN FOGEL

Subject to the above, Grant. Appoint Chrystal O'Connor conservator of the estate of Ann Fogel with bond of $42,548.00. Set due date and hearing dates for I&A and first account. Proposed Order to be lodged prior to hearing per Local Rule 10.00.D.1. __________________ As COVID-19 cases continue to rise, we need to be even more vigilant. Please avoid coming into the courthouse in person for any reason for the foreseeable future.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF ANN FOGEL

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person. The Court may need to eliminate in-person appearances in the near future, so please plan accordingly.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF BRUCE M. O'HOP

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person. The Court may need to eliminate in-person appearances in the near future, so please plan accordingly.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

IN THE MATTER OF IRVING FOGEL

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person. The Court may need to eliminate in-person appearances in the near future, so please plan accordingly.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF JACK THOMAS FRYE

Face coverings (masks, etc.) are required at all times to enter the courthouse and Department J6, and appropriate social distancing in the courtroom and inside the courthouse shall be maintained at all times. You are encouraged to bring your own face covering to Court if you intend to appear in person. The Court may need to eliminate in-person appearances in the near future, so please plan accordingly.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

MORRISON VS CITY OF SAN BUENAVENTURA

The Court intends to rule as follows; To grant Defendants Edison International and Southern California Edison's motion to strike punitive damages allegations and prayer. Plaintiff has not alleged any facts that would support corporate liability for punitive damages. (Civ. Code, § 3294, subd. (a)). To deny motion to strike claim for attorney's fees and costs pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 as there is no requirement that the intent to seek such attorney's fees be plead.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

MORRISON VS CITY OF SAN BUENAVENTURA

The Court intends to rule as follows; To grant Defendant Southern California Edison's request for judicial notice. To sustain with leave to amend California Edison's demurrer to the FAC . Plaintiff has not alleged SCE is a public entity. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

MORRISON VS CITY OF SAN BUENAVENTURA

The Court intends to rule as follows; To grant defendant's request for judicial notice. To sustain Defendant's demurrer to the first cause of action for dangerous condition of public property with leave to amend. Plaintiff has not alleged SCE or EIX is a public entity. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

CONS. OF VICTORIA RAJU

Letters of Guardianship issued to petitioner 6-3-2010 and suspended 11-18-20 2. File sent to Walnut Creek for hearing on 1-13-21 3.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Judge

    Fenstermacher

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

DAVID ROSS, ET AL. VS JUSTIN MONEMPOUR, AN INDIVIDUAL AND AS TRUSTEE MARTEL TRUST,

If all parties to a motion submit, the court will adopt this tentative as the final order. If the department does not receive an email indicating the parties are submitting on the tentative and there are no appearances at the hearing, the motion may be placed off calendar. Due to Covid-19, the court is strongly discouraging in-person appearances.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

ERIC FISHER VS HILTON WORLWIDE HOLDINGS INC ET AL

.: BC719323 Hearing Date: January 22, 2021 [TENTATIVE] order RE: motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, summary adjudication of issues BACKGROUND A. Allegations Plaintiffs Eric Fisher (“Plaintiff”) alleges that he was a Motion Picture Rigging Grip hired to construct a Showtime television show “I’m Dying Up Here” to be filmed in the Penthouse Suite of Hilton Los Angeles/Universal City Hotel.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST CO. VS. JERRY D. EASLEY

Easley only, the Court issued a Notice of Rejection indicating that Plaintiff had to file a motion. (Id., Exs. C-D.) By filing this motion, Plaintiff specifically seeks to modify section 1 of the Proposed Amended Judgment to define Mr. Easley as the only “Debtor” and section 9 to clarify the judgment is in rem as against Mr. Easley. The Court will grant the motion to amend the judgment. Here, there is no prejudice to the parties by Plaintiff clarifying the identity of the debtor as Mr.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2021

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Foreclosure

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.