A spousal support order may be modified or terminated at any time as the Court determines to be necessary. Fam. C. §§ 3651(a), 3651(e) (statute applies whether or not support is based on agreement of parties). In addition, the Court has authority to make any modification retroactive to the date of filing the within motion. Fam. C. § 4333.
In determining whether a material change in circumstances had occurred necessary to support a modification of Respondent’s spousal support obligation, the court must give effect to Respondent’s and Petitioner’s intent and reasonable expectations as expressed in the agreement. In re Marriage of Khera & Sameer (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 1467, 1476 (“A material change of circumstances may be in the form of unrealized expectations.” In re Marriage of Beust (1994) 23 Cal.App.4th 24, 29.)
A family law court may not find a change of circumstances, however, in the reconsideration of a circumstance which has not changed since the previous order. In re Marriage Farrell (1985) 171 Cal.App.3d 695, 703. “Circumstances accounted for in the previous order cannot constitute a change of circumstances. Hogoboom & King, Cal. Practice Guide: Family Law, The Rutter Group 1999 ¶ 17:147...” In re Marriage of Lautsbaugh (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 1131, 1133. “There is authority that the parties have the power to decide whether a particular event will or will not be deemed a material change of circumstances for purposes of modification of a support order.” In re Marriage of West (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 240, 247.
An order providing for contingent termination of spousal support on a specific date unless, before that time, the supported spouse brings a motion to modify for good cause is denominated a Richmond order after the decision of In re Marriage of Richmond (1980) 105 Cal.App.3d 352.
The order in Richmond provided that the “obligation for spousal support shall continue through the month of September 1981, at which time spousal support shall forever terminate and the jurisdiction of this Court over the issue of spousal support shall terminate, unless prior to September 30, 1981, [the supported spouse] makes a showing of good cause to extend spousal support beyond that date.” Id. at 354. In upholding the order, the appellate court observed: “Limiting the duration of support so that both parties can develop their own lives, free from obligations to each other, is a commendable [judicial] goal.” In re Marriage of Morrison (1978) 20 Cal.3d 437, 452
"The effect of a ‘Richmond’ order is to tell each spouse that the supported spouse has a specified period of time to become self-supporting, after which the obligation of the supporting spouse will cease.... A ‘Richmond’ order psychologically prepares the supported spouse for the time when he or she must be self-supporting. It also places the burden of showing good cause for a change in the order upon the one who is most able to exercise the control necessary to meet the expectations the trial judge had in making the order." In re Marriage of Prietsch & Calhoun (1987) 190 Cal.App.3d 645, 665-666.
In ordering spousal support under this part, the court shall consider all of the following circumstances:
Fam. C. § 4320
Aug 26, 2015
Kern County, CA
Jan 11, 2021
Yolo County, CA
Oct 19, 2020
Yolo County, CA
Apr 14, 2016
Kern County, CA
Apr 14, 2016
Kern County, CA
Apr 08, 2016
Kern County, CA
Apr 04, 2016
Kern County, CA
Apr 08, 2016
Kern County, CA
Aug 02, 2016
Yolo County, CA
Apr 04, 2016
Kern County, CA
Dec 29, 2017
Merced County, CA
Jun 18, 2018
Merced County, CA
May 01, 2018
Merced County, CA
Mar 27, 2018
Merced County, CA
Jan 02, 2018
Merced County, CA
Apr 17, 2018
Merced County, CA
Apr 16, 2018
Merced County, CA
Nov 03, 2020
Yolo County, CA
Dec 22, 2017
Merced County, CA
Oct 15, 2018
Merced County, CA
Oct 02, 2018
Merced County, CA
Jun 28, 2018
Merced County, CA
Jun 21, 2017
Merced County, CA
Sep 15, 2017
Merced County, CA
Mar 15, 2018
Merced County, CA
Please wait a moment while we load this page.