Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and will be able to access it on trellis. You can always see your envelopes by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner.
Your subscription has successfully been upgraded.
The Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (“LPS Act”) permits the appointment of a conservator for up to a period of one year for a person determined to be gravely disabled within the meaning of the Act. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 5350, 5361.) An LPS conservatorship is only for people who are seriously mentally ill and need special care (usually placement in a locked facility and/or very powerful drugs to control behavior). Id.
“An LPS conservatorship automatically expires after one year....” (Conservatorship of George H. (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 157, 165. citing § 5361)
Welf. & Inst. Code § 5352, allows "the professional person in charge of an agency providing comprehensive evaluation or a facility providing intensive treatment" to recommend that a county begin such proceedings when that person "determines that a person in his care is gravely disabled as a result of mental disorder . . . and is unwilling to accept, or incapable of accepting, treatment voluntarily." Under those circumstances, a temporary conservatorship lasting no more than 30 days may be established on the basis of a professional's declaration....” (§ 5352.1(a).)
The Act provides that the person who is the subject of the petition has the right to demand a jury trial on the issue of grave disability. (Conservatorship of Kevin M. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 79, 84.) “Demand for court or jury trial shall be made within five days following the hearing on the conservatorship petition.... (Id.) “[T]rial shall commence within 10 days of the date of the demand, except that the court shall continue the trial date for a period not to exceed 15 days upon the request of counsel for the proposed conservatee.” Id. citing § 5350(d)(1) & (2).
"Grave disability can be based on an inability to provide for food, clothing, or shelter. It does not require a finding that a proposed conservatee cannot provide for her food, clothing, and shelter" (Conservatorship of Carol K. (2010) 188 CA4th 123, 135.)
“‘If a person is found gravely disabled and a conservatorship is established, the conservatee does not forfeit legal rights or suffer legal disabilities merely by virtue of the disability.’” (Conservatorship of George H. (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 157, 165.). “‘The court must separately determine the duties and powers of the conservator, the disabilities imposed on the conservatee, and the level of placement appropriate for the conservatee.’” (Id.) “‘The party seeking conservatorship has the burden of producing evidence to support the disabilities sought, the placement, and the powers of the conservator, and the conservatee may produce evidence in rebuttal.’” (Id.)
“Because [...] it is solely the province of the court to determine the proper placement of the conservatee, the disabilities to impose, and the duties and powers of the conservator, a court may not accept a stipulated judgment on these issues without first consulting the conservatee and obtaining on the record his express consent.” (Conservatorship of Christopher A. 139 Cal.App.4th 604, 610.)
The Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (“LPS”) provides that information and records retained by community mental health centers in the provision of mental health services “shall be confidential.” (Welf. & Inst. Code § 5328, subd. (a).) However, LPS provides an exception for disclosure “[t]o the courts, as necessary to the administration of justice.” (Welf. & Inst. Code § 5328(a)(6).)
Involuntary treatment of the mentally ill in California is governed by the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act. (Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 5150.) Under the LPS Act a designated facility, like a hospital, may detain an individual for up to 72 hours for evaluation and treatment if there is “probable cause to believe that the person is, as a result of a mental disorder, a danger to others, or to himself or herself, or gravely disabled.” (Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 5150.)
It was designed for the prompt evaluation and treatment of persons with serious mental disorders…”[t]o guarantee and protect public safety, (and to) safeguard individual rights through judicial review.” (People v. Triplett (1983) 144 Cal.App.3d 283, 286, citing Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 5001.) The LPS Act also provides for "escalating periods of involuntary confinement for persons described in the Act in approved psychiatric facilities within the county of detention…" (Id.)
The LPS Act is “a comprehensive scheme designed to address a variety of circumstances in which a member of the general population may have to be evaluated or treated for different lengths of time. (Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 5150 (short-term emergency evaluation); § 5250 (intensive 14-day treatment); § 5300 (180-day commitment for the imminently dangerous); §5260 (extended commitment for the suicidal); § 5350 (30-day temporary conservatorship or one-year conservatorship for the gravely disabled).” (Cooley v. Superior Court (2002) 29 Cal.4th 228, 253.)
Lanterman-Petris Short Act The Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (“LPS”) provides that information and records retained by community mental health centers in the provision of mental health services “shall be confidential.” (Welf. & Inst. Code § 5328, subd. (a).) However, LPS provides an exception for disclosure “[t]o the courts, as necessary to the administration of justice.” (Welf. & Inst. Code § 5328, subd. (a)(6).)
TATIANA CARMONA VS PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM-SOUTHERN CA ETAL
BC630731
Nov 01, 2018
Los Angeles County, CA
Moore has been held per the LPS act on section 5150 grounds, at least twice without further elevation to holds/evaluations per section 5200 et seq., militates against a probate conservatorship. PLEASE NOTE: The Public Guardian filed a declaration recommending denial of the temporary and that the Court order an LPS investigation to proceed. Objections should be submitted in writing. The proposed temporary conservatee is expected to attend the hearing. (Prob. Code § 2250.4.)
CONSERVATORSHIP OF LAWRENCE JEFFREY MOORE
18PR00060
Apr 11, 2018
Santa Barbara County, CA
Moore has been held per the LPS act on section 5150 grounds, at least twice without further elevation to holds/evaluations per section 5200 et seq., militates against a probate conservatorship. The proposed temporary conservatee is expected to attend the hearing. (Prob. Code § 2250.4.)
CONSERVATORSHIP OF LAWRENCE JEFFREY MOORE
18PR00060
Feb 28, 2018
Santa Barbara County, CA
Accordingly, the demurrer is SUSTAINED without leave to amend as to the 1st – 4th causes of action. 5th Cause of Action Violation of the Lanterman-Petris-Short (“LPS”) Act: ¶¶ 88-90 allege that Defendants captured and detained “Eleana Meza” [sic] against her will and without legitimate medical evaluation. As such, Defendants violated the LPS Act, and Plaintiff suffered damages of at least $4 million.
MARIA MEZA VS COUNTY OF ORANGE
VC067251
Apr 23, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Personal Injury/ Tort
Fraud
Involuntary treatment of the mentally ill in California is governed by the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (“LPS Act”). Under the LPS Act a designated facility, like HOSPITAL, may detain an individual for up to 72 hours for evaluation and treatment if there is “probable cause to believe that the person is, as a result of a mental disorder, a danger to others, or to himself or herself, or gravely disabled.” (Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5150.)
JASON GARDNER VS CERRITOS COLLEGE HOSPITAL
18NWCV00007
Sep 24, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Employment
Discrimination/Harass
Scripps also relies on Defendant Kemper's right to privacy under the California Constitution, Evidence Code § 994 physician-patient privilege; Evidence Code § 1014 psychotherapist-patient privilege; the LPS Act/Welfare & Institutions Code § 5328. It is undisputed that Defendant Kemper was in custody at Scripps Health on a Welfare & Institutions Code § 5150 hold.
STAPLETON VS SCRIPPS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ENCINITAS
37-2018-00038231-CU-MM-CTL
Jul 23, 2020
San Diego County, CA
Personal Injury/ Tort
Medical Malpractice
A Lanterman-Petris-Short (“LPS”) referral to the Public Guardian may only be initiated by a psychiatrist or certain psychologists in a county-designated facility for a patient who is gravely disabled and who will not or cannot accept mental health treatment on a voluntary basis. A court of law may also refer certain persons, usually a criminal defendant, for conservatorship proceedings. Public Guardian Policy No. 210 re New Case Screening and Assignment (“Policy”) 5.
RAYMOND GEORGE GLASS VS PUBLIC GUARDIAN FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
20STCP00553
Jul 29, 2021
Los Angeles County, CA
Findley first argues that the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (the “LPS” Act) emphasizes the preferences given to family members to act in the best interest of families, and that the appointment of a conservator is subject to a list of priorities set forth in Probate Code section 1812, which favors family members. Findley argues that until family members are found unable, unwilling, or unfit to serve as conservators, the Department does not have standing to petition.
CONSERVATORSHIP OF ANDREW FINDLEY
18PR-0283
Dec 05, 2019
San Luis Obispo County, CA
An LPS conservatorship, which is superior to the probate conservatorship (W & I § 5350(c)), was opened on 6/9/11. Since the LPS powers encompass and exceed the powers of the probate conservator, there is no need for a probate conservatorship absent termination of the LPS through nonrenewal or otherwise. The concurrent maintenance of both types of conservatorships puts added strain on the resources of this Court's investigative staff, which most recently (4/24/12) reported on the probate conservatorship.
IN THE MATTER OF PETER GERARD FAULDERS
56-2010-00385812-PR-CP-OXN
May 01, 2012
Ventura County, CA
Family Law
Conservatorship
DDS is the state agency charged with implementing the Lanterman Act. DDS therefore has a mandatory ministerial duty to ensure that it and its contractors comply with the Lanterman Act. ( Id. ¶¶ 19, 90, 92.) FDLRC is a California nonprofit corporation who contracts with DDS to provide services and support to Lanterman Act consumers. ( Id. ¶ 20.) Regional centers are responsible for working with individual consumers to carry out the provision of services and support under the Lanterman Act.
AARON CHATHAM VS NANCY BARGMANN, ET AL.
21STCP03501
Aug 24, 2022
Los Angeles County, CA
Public defender discharged in this case number, subject to a claim for payment for services rendered, which claim this Court orders may be made in the LPS matter as funds become available. gmr
CONSERVATORSHIP OF CATHERINE D. LENTINI
P079332
Sep 27, 2011
Ventura County, CA
Family Law
Conservatorship
SARC’s reliance on Julian, however, is misplaced as that case was concerned with whether a private right of action exists under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act, Welfare and Institutions Code section 5600 et seq., which is entirely separate from the Lanterman Act that is the subject of the third cause of action.
ANDERSON V. SAN ANDREAS REGIONAL CENTER, ET AL.
17CV317129
Sep 06, 2018
Presiding
Santa Clara County, CA
Nature of Proceedings: Review on Issue of LPS Conservatorship This matter was continued for the parties to consider the propriety of an LPS conservatorship. There have been no new filings. Appearance required.
CONSERVATORSHIP OF OF ERIC E DOUGLAS
20PR00213
Jun 10, 2021
Santa Barbara County, CA
The parties do not dispute that SDRC is governed by the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act ("Lanterman Act"). "'[R]egional centers,' operated by private nonprofit community agencies under contract with DDS, are charged with providing developmentally disabled persons with 'access to the facilities and services best suited to them throughout their lifetime' (§ 4620)." (Association for Retarded Citizens v. Department of Developmental Services (1985) 38 Cal.3d 384, 389.)
SAN DIEGO REGIONAL CENTER VS. OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF CALIFORNIA
37-2017-00028655-CU-WM-CTL
Feb 08, 2018
San Diego County, CA
Administrative
Writ
LPS shall file an answer within thirty (30) days. 4. Counsel for LPS shall provide notice and file proof of such with the Court.
KARI ARMSTRONG VS GLOBAL LENDING SERVICES, LLC, ET AL.
23STCV04832
Nov 09, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Discuss status of LPS matter and need for probate conservatorship in light of outcome of LPS trial on 8/25/21 in Dept. 42. _______________ For general information regarding Judge Lund and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.judgerogerlund.com.
IN THE MATTER OF JEFFERSON W. O' CONNOR
56-2021-00553459-PR-CP-OXN
Aug 27, 2021
Ventura County, CA
Family Law
Conservatorship
This conservatorship of the person (only) is statutorily subordinate to the existing LPS conservatorship for such time as the LPS conservatorship remains open. Clerk to give notice. gmr
IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW MARTIN SHERIDAN
56-2010-00379001-PR-CP-OXN
Sep 15, 2015
Ventura County, CA
Family Law
Conservatorship
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF VENTURA Probate Notes 202100561311PRLE: In the Matter of Jenilee Brill 11/07/2023 in Department J6 Review Hearing LPS Conservatorship Mandatory appearance by Conservator to discuss the Court Investigator report findings and LPS conservatorship. The Court uses Zoom exclusively for remote appearances in Department J6.
202100561311PRLE
Nov 07, 2023
Ventura County, CA
Assuming the remaining attorney fees and conservator fees have been ordered by the judges pro tem in the LPS matter for services unrelated to this estate, what are co-trustees' standards for determining which fees are requested where ? Are co-trustees even noticed on the LPS matter in which payments for professional services are being ordered ? Can counsel please supply the underlying invoices and orders ? Upon satisfactory clarification, approve first account and report.
IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL EMARD
56-2015-00470440-PR-OP-OXN
Feb 28, 2017
Ventura County, CA
Probate
other
The investigator's report indicates co-conservators "inadvertently" sought a probate conservatorship rather than an LPS, but the latter of course requires public agency initiation. No physician's capacity declaration is in the file as yet. The petition itself checks virtually no requested relief. Have there been discussions with the Public Guardian's office relating to an LPS conservatorship ? gmr
IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL CRAIG SOFLEY
56-2014-00449949-PR-CP-OXN
Jun 10, 2014
Ventura County, CA
Family Law
Conservatorship
Defendant objects on grounds that they are barred from producing mental health records for third party by the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (LPS Act). Defendant additionally argues that these records are privileged from production by virtue of the Constitutional guarantee of the right to privacy. The LPS Act, codified at Welfare and Institutions Code §§ 5000-5556, contains various protections for those with mental health disorders.
OLGA ZHAROVSKAYA VS BHC ALHAMBRA HOSPITAL, INC.
21STCV18294
Dec 07, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Notice Of Motion Of Graystone Partners, Lps Motion For Summary Adjudication, Or In The Alternative Summary Judgment Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Monday November 2, 2015, line 4. DEFENDANT GRAYSTONE PARTNERS LP MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Notice Of Motion Of Graystone Partners, Lps Motion For Summary Adjudication, Or In The Alternative Summary Judgment DENIED. Triable issues exist as to Material Fact Nos. 14, 15, 18, 19 and 25.
ANDREW RIBOTTO ET AL VS. GRAYSTONE PARTNERS LP ET AL
CGC14538626
Nov 02, 2015
San Francisco County, CA
Notice Of Motion To Compel Defendant Albera Lps Further Responses To Special Interrogatories Set One, Form Interrogatories Set One, Request For Admissions Set One, Request For Production Set One, And For Monetary Sanctions.
CARLOS MARTIN DOMINGUEZ ET AL VS. PETER D. BRATIS ET AL
CGC16551416
Oct 17, 2016
San Francisco County, CA
Defendant argues that these documents are confidential under the Lanterman Act and that privacy rights should preclude their production.
CARLOS DAVIS, ET AL. VS HOME 2 U 9, LLC, ET AL.
21STCV45625
Nov 27, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
When these tests are applied to the Plaintiff’s Complaint, there are no grounds to find that the Defendants were state actors when the detained the Plaintiff under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act. Therefore, based on express legal principles in numerous federal authorities, including the holdings of the United State Supreme Court, the Defendants were not state actors when they made the decision to detain the Plaintiff under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act.
YAQUELINE SANTIAGO VS. GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER, ET
EC065060
Dec 02, 2016
Los Angeles County, CA
On July 19, 2018, this matter was heard by Judge Sterne in Department 5, and the minute order reflects that the Public Guardian withdrew its petition for an LPS Conservatorship. This leaves the Petition for Appointment of Probate Conservator, filed February 8, 2018, as the only petition at issue. The Public Guardian found that an LPS Conservatorship was not warranted in this case.
CONSERVATORSHIP OF LAWRENCE JEFFREY MOORE
18PR00060
Aug 28, 2018
Santa Barbara County, CA
The investigator's report indicates co-conservators "inadvertently" sought a probate conservatorship rather than an LPS, but the latter of course requires public agency initiation. No physician's capacity declaration is in the file as yet. The petition itself checks virtually no requested relief. Have there been discussions with the Public Guardian's office relating to an LPS conservatorship ? " Temporary letters were issued on 6/10/14, but nothing further appears in the court file.
IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL CRAIG SOFLEY
56-2014-00449949-PR-CP-OXN
Jul 15, 2014
Ventura County, CA
Family Law
Conservatorship
Amended Notice Of Motion And Motion Of Inoapps, Usa To Quash Service Of Summons And Dismiss Alliantgroup, Lps Cross-Complaint For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction Set for hearing on Tuesday, September 13, 2016, Line 16, CROSS-DEFENDANT INOAPPS-INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS, INC.'S Amended Motion To Quash Service Of Summons And Dismiss Alliantgroup, Lps Cross-Complaint For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction. Cross-defendant Innovative Applications, Inc.'
ORACLE AMERICA, INC., VS. ALLIANTGROUP, L.P., ET AL
CGC16552321
Sep 13, 2016
San Francisco County, CA
Lanterman Developmental Center (Pomona) is the conservatee's place of residence and is closing down. The conservator has not been heard from in this Court since his geneal plan was filed 3/4/92. gmr
CNSVSHIP OF STEPHEN SCHULTZ
P067794
Jul 05, 2011
Ventura County, CA
Family Law
Conservatorship
The court's investigator believes that the proposed limited conservatee's schizophrenic disorder dictates an LPS locked facility placement, as to which the Public Guardian and Dr. Valencerina apparently concur, but for the recommendation of Dr. Vlaskovits at Hillmont. While it may be that an LPS conservatorship is a more appropriate arrangement for the proposed conservatee, a probate limited conservatorship under the Public Guardian's management is better than no conservatorship at all. Grant petition.
IN THE MATTER OF ALICIA MORALES
56-2014-00451209-PR-LP-OXN
Jun 10, 2014
Ventura County, CA
Immunity under Lanterman-Petris-Short Act, Welfare and Institutions Code §§ 5000 et seq. (“LPS Act”) “ ‘Under the LPS Act, a person who is dangerous or gravely disabled due to a mental disorder may be detained for involuntary treatment. However, in accordance with the legislative purpose of preventing inappropriate, indefinite commitments of mentally disordered persons, such detentions are implemented incrementally. [Citation.]
JIMI MCDANOUGH FURLANO ET AL VS CANYON RIDGE HOSPITAL INC
BC704785
Sep 03, 2020
Maurice A. Leiter or Salvatore Sirna
Los Angeles County, CA
The conservatee was moved to Granada Hills upon anticipated closure of Lanterman Hospital in Pomona. The move appears permanent. The conservatee is serviced by the San Fernando Regional Center and statutory investigative reports are made through Los Angeles County court investigators. There is no reason to continue venue in Ventura County per Probate Code §2201. Venue is transferred sua sponte to the County of Los Angeles. Transfer fees are waived. gmr
IN THE MATTER OF PATRICIA DIANE KITCHEN
P067775
Jan 17, 2012
Ventura County, CA
Family Law
Conservatorship
Calica basically reargues her motion for summary judgment, relying on the argument that the LPS Act does not create a private cause of action, and the declaration of Dr. Braff with regard to her conduct not violating the LPS or the standard of care. [Ex. D, Braff Decl.] As discussed above, this showing appears sufficient to give rise to a reasonable possibility of defendant obtaining judgment in this matter.
DEBRA LYNN HICKS VS GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL
EC059789
Feb 08, 2019
Los Angeles County, CA
Employment
Discrimination/Harass
The conservatee was transferred from Camarillo State Hospital to Lanterman (Pomona) when the local facility closed. The court's investigator proposed change of venue 4/14/98, but nothing has happened since. We need to determine if conservatee is still living and if so, whether there is any reason the conservatorship needs to continue. gmr
CNSVSHIP OF STEPHEN SCHULTZ
P067794
Jun 07, 2011
Ventura County, CA
Family Law
Conservatorship
Plaintiff alleges the waste of public funds and the illegal expenditure of taxpayer monies in its discriminatory administration of Lanterman Act services. Plaintiff seeks a declaration that Defendants administer Lanterman Act programs and services in a discriminatory manner in violation of state law.
PADRES BUSCANDO EL CAMBIO VS HARBOR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES FOUNDATION, INC., ET AL.
21STCP03671
Jun 09, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Lenehan advised that the probate conservatee was also the subject of an LPS case. Mr. Lenehan asked to continue to December 1, 2015 to determine if the conservator and/or conservatee wished to perpetuate the probate conservatorship in light of the LPS proceeding. In the event the probate conservatorship is to continue, the next biennial status report shall be filed on or before March 6, 2017, and set for hearing on filing/sufficiency on April 11, 2017, 9:00 AM, J6. The clerk shall give notice. gmr
IN THE MATTER OF CATHERINE BAILEY
56-2009-00348297-PR-CP-OXN
Dec 01, 2015
Ventura County, CA
Family Law
Conservatorship
Plaintiff alleges the waste of public funds and the illegal expenditure of taxpayer monies in its discriminatory administration of Lanterman Act services. Plaintiff seeks a declaration that Defendants administer Lanterman Act programs and services in a discriminatory manner in violation of state law.
PADRES BUSCANDO EL CAMBIO VS HARBOR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES FOUNDATION, INC., ET AL.
21STCP03671
Sep 12, 2022
Los Angeles County, CA
Nature of Proceedings: Hearing Setting (LPS)
MATTER OF BEEBEE ALEXANDER STAPLETON
19MH00234
Mar 23, 2023
Santa Barbara County, CA
Paragraph 52 refers to other cases in which LPS has been sued for unlicensed activity. The Motion to Strike is denied as to this paragraph because such a motion is not be used a line item veto.
IHAB YOUSSEF VS LOSS PREVENTION SERVICES, LLC, ET AL.
23STCV14410
Oct 26, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Paragraph 52 refers to other cases in which LPS has been sued for unlicensed activity. The Motion to Strike is denied as to this paragraph because such a motion is not be used a line item veto.
IHAB YOUSSEF VS LOSS PREVENTION SERVICES, LLC, ET AL.
23STCV14410
Nov 20, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF JANICE ANN CHADBOURNE
18MH000041
Jun 19, 2018
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF NISA ZAMORA
18MH000059
Oct 04, 2018
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF MARCUS PARRA
18MH000009
Feb 05, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF NICOLE MARIE KEGGI
19MH000035
Apr 02, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF NISA ZAMORA
18MH000059
Sep 05, 2018
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF AZTLAN RAMOS
18MH000072
Aug 28, 2018
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF JOSE BRAVO CONTRERAS
18MH000112
Dec 27, 2018
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF ALBERT CONRAD VAN DIJK
19MH000029
May 16, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF NISA ZAMORA
18MH000059
Nov 08, 2018
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF MABLE PETTENGILL
18MH000091
Nov 27, 2018
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF RYAN BEEMAN
18MH000042
Jun 19, 2018
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF MERCEDES CATALINA CASTRO
19MH000049
May 14, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF RYAN ROBERT TRUMBLE
19MH000111
Oct 22, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF RYAN ROBERT TRUMBLE
19MH000111
Oct 30, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF JONATHAN BERNARD
19MH000099
Oct 15, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF GEORGE SCHIRAGA
18MH000064
Aug 28, 2018
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF TYLER FUNES
19MH000039
May 07, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR RENEWAL APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF CARMELITA F. CASTRO
17MH000088
Dec 04, 2018
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF JOSE BRAVO CONTRERAS
18MH000112
Dec 17, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF JENNIFER LYNN HILL
26-24657
Mar 26, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF PEGGY WILOTH
26-36906
Mar 19, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF DAVID CRAINE
26-29305
May 22, 2018
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF DENISE D. MILLER
26-66747
Jul 19, 2018
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF STEVEN ALEXANDER EVANOFF
PR17375
Jul 17, 2018
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF ALFREDO ALCANTARA
17MH000076
Oct 16, 2018
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROBATE [LPS] CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CONSERVATORSHIP OF BARBARA DAUB
19MH000009
Feb 19, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED *At 9:00 a.m.*
CONSERVATORSHIP OF ALBERT CONRAD VAN DIJK
19MH000029
Apr 16, 2019
Napa County, CA
Nature of Proceedings: Waiver of Accounting/Report of Conservator/Reconsideration of LPS
CONSERVATORSHIP OF SAMANTHA ELISE HAMMOND
1244534
Oct 02, 2008
Santa Barbara County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED *At 9:00 a.m.*
CONSERVATORSHIP OF SHANA L. COOPER
19MH000031
Apr 16, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED. The proposed conservatee’s appearance is waived.
CONSERVATORSHIP OF SHANE NEWHOUSE
17MH000084
Jun 01, 2018
Napa County, CA
Conservatorship of Victoria Kathleen Blue 21MH000063 PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED
21MH000063
Sep 07, 2021
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Monique Langhorne, Dept. B
CONSERVATORSHIP OF ANDREW HANKINS
19MH000032
Apr 16, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Monique Langhorne, Dept. B
CONSERVATORSHIP OF BRAYDEN LEE PAYNE
19MH000083
Aug 27, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Monique Langhorne, Dept. B
CONSERVATORSHIP OF JAIME CORONA
19MH000136
Dec 31, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Monique Langhorne, Dept. B
CONSERVATORSHIP OF STEVEN ALEXANDER EVANOFF
PR17375
Jul 16, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Monique Langhorne, Dept. B
CONSERVATORSHIP OF CHERYL ABBOTT
26-34211
Jul 30, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Monique Langhorne, Dept. B
CONSERVATORSHIP OF BARTH BROWN
26-29483
Jun 04, 2019
Napa County, CA
Conservatorship of George Schiraga 18MH000064 PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED *At 9:00 a.m.*
CONSERVATORSHIP OF GEORGE SCHIRAGA
18MH000064
Aug 31, 2021
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Monique Langhorne, Dept. B
CONSERVATORSHIP OF CAROLYN DUJARDIN
26-24369
Apr 23, 2019
Napa County, CA
The Court has reviewed the two physician declarations in this LPS conservatorship.
CONFIDENTIAL
PR14-00050
Oct 13, 2021
Plumas County, CA
The Court has reviewed the two physician declarations in this LPS conservatorship.
PR20-00044
Oct 13, 2021
Plumas County, CA
Carrington Home Solutions, LPs Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents and for Sanctions 2. Carrington Home Solutions, LPs Motion to Compel Document Production, Further Deposition Session, and for Sanctions TENTATIVE RULING Carrington Home Solutions, LPs Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents and for Sanctions is moot .
TANYA GERARDI, ET AL. VS SOCAL BETTER HOMES, LLC, ET AL.
21TRCV00017
May 18, 2023
Los Angeles County, CA
Case Number: 22STLC02157 Hearing Date: June 30, 2022 Dept: 26 DEMURRER ( CCP §§ 430.31, et seq., 426.30, 428.50) TENTATIVE RULING: Defendants Calitex LLC and Rosamond Ranch LPs Demurrer to the Complaint and Motion to Strike Portions of the Complaint is CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 AT 10:00 IN DEPARTMENT 26 IN THE SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE.
ASHELY PRINCE, ET AL. VS CALITEX, LLC, ET AL.
22STLC02157
Jun 30, 2022
Los Angeles County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Monique Langhorne, Dept. B Malina Kindt v. Concesionaria Vuela Compania
CONSERVATORSHIP OF EVERETT QUINN
19MH000089
Sep 17, 2019
Napa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Monique Langhorne, Dept. B Accredited Surety and Casualty Company, Inc. v.
CONSERVATORSHIP OF MARY TRUE
19MH000123
Dec 10, 2019
Napa County, CA
Has an LPS been started?
IN THE MATTER OF PETER GERARD FAULDERS
56-2010-00385812-PR-CP-OXN
Feb 08, 2011
Ventura County, CA
Family Law
Conservatorship
Conservatorship of Alfredo Alcantara 21MH000054 PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Victoria Wood, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
21MH000054
Aug 10, 2021
Napa County, CA
Petitioner should come prepared to discuss the necessity of seeking a probate conservatorship over an LPS conservatorship.
CONSERVATORSHIP OF SUZANNE BARTLESON
18PR00162
Jul 23, 2018
Santa Barbara County, CA
The Court has received and reviewed the Doctor’s Declaration recommending reappointment of the LPS Conservator. Petitioner is to prepare the Order and Letters of Conservatorship.
CONSERVATORSHIP OF JOHNS
PR17-00012
May 14, 2018
Plumas County, CA
Conservatorship of Robin Hadley 21MH000057 PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Monique Langhorne, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
21MH000057
Aug 31, 2021
Napa County, CA
This LPS conservatorship was set for an interim six- month Review Hearing. The Court will discuss the status of the conservatorship.
PR21-00014
Nov 08, 2021
Plumas County, CA
With the consent of the Public Guardian, dismiss this probate conservatorship without prejudice in light of establishment of LPS conservatorship 56-2013-00431329-MH-CN-VTA. All future dates vacated. gmr
CNSVSHIP OF SAENG DUAN GOWAN
P072685
Dec 31, 2013
Ventura County, CA
Family Law
Conservatorship
The Court will discuss the status of the Investigator’s Report for this LPS conservatorship.
PR21-00057
Nov 08, 2021
Plumas County, CA
This matter is set for reappointment of the Conservator in this LPS case. The Court has reviewed the Physicians’ Declarations, Investigator’s Report and recommendations therein.
CONSERVATORSHIP OF ZEINER
PR16-00028
Dec 27, 2021
Plumas County, CA
As relevant to the demurrer, Regional Center moved to dismiss the District Court Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) (lack of subject matter jurisdiction) and 12(b)(6) (failure to state a claim) based in part on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust her administrative remedies under the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, Welf, & Inst. Code § 4500 ("Lanterman Act"). (Def. RJN Exh. B.) Other defendants also filed motions to dismiss. (Def. RJN Exhs. C and D.)
NICKOLE BOUSLOG VS CARE OPTIO
MSC20-00973
May 20, 2021
Steve K. Austin
Contra Costa County, CA
PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROBATE [LPS] CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON APPEARANCE REQUIRED: Court’s February 19, 2019 Minute Order granted petition but continued for status regarding service on Kimberly Alvarez. Nothing in the Court’s file addresses this service.
CONSERVATORSHIP OF BARBARA DAUB
19MH000009
Apr 09, 2019
Napa County, CA
Whether the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act created a mandatory duty on the City. 2. Assuming for purposes of argument that there was no mandatory duty, if there were another issue of duty that could be summarily adjudicated. Event ID: 2991064 TENTATIVE RULINGS Calendar No.: 43 Page: 1
PIZARRO VS EXECUTOR ADMINISTRATOR AND/OR TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF TREVOR JAMES HEITMANN
37-2019-00039360-CU-PA-CTL
Sep 08, 2023
San Diego County, CA
Code §§ 15901.16(c)(1) (relating to LPs) and 17061(c)(1) (relating to LLCs) allow service on LPs and LLCs through the California Secretary of State when a plaintiff demonstrates by affidavit that (1) the defendant’s agent for service of process has resigned and has not been replaced, and (2) the defendant cannot otherwise be served with reasonable diligence.
PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., LP. VS. AMERICAN LOGISTICS INTERN.
TC028830
Oct 17, 2017
Steven D. Blades or Brian S. Currey
Los Angeles County, CA
Collections
Collections
Court will inquire as to option for LPS conservatorship.
IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTI RENGER
56-2017-00499432-PR-CP-OXN
Sep 26, 2017
Ventura County, CA
Family Law
Conservatorship
Nature of Proceedings: (1) Accounting 2nd/Report/Settlement/Fees; (2) Review Status of Special Needs Trust; (3) Review: Status of LPS Conservatorship in LA; (4) Instructions to Trustee to Establish Special Needs Trust FBO Edward Hay - #2 on the conservatorship calendar
CONSERVATORSHIP OF EDWARD N HAY
1046558
Nov 01, 2012
Santa Barbara County, CA
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.