What is a LPS mental health conservatorship?

Useful Rulings on LPS Mental Health Conservatorship

Recent Rulings on LPS Mental Health Conservatorship

151-175 of 249 results

JOHN OKOYE ET AL VS. BRISTO-MEYERS SQUIBB COMPANY ET AL

Notice Of Defendants Bristol Myers Squibb Company And Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals Lps Motion To Sever And Quash Service Of Process For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction As To Non California Plaintiffs Matter on calendar for Monday, December 12, 2016, Line 10, DEFENDANT BRISTO-MEYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP's Motion To Sever And Quash Service Of Process For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction As To Non California Plaintiffs. The matter is taken off calendar.

  • Hearing

    Dec 12, 2016

YAQUELINE SANTIAGO VS. GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER, ET

When these tests are applied to the Plaintiff’s Complaint, there are no grounds to find that the Defendants were state actors when the detained the Plaintiff under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act. Therefore, based on express legal principles in numerous federal authorities, including the holdings of the United State Supreme Court, the Defendants were not state actors when they made the decision to detain the Plaintiff under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act.

  • Hearing

    Dec 02, 2016

SERJ ARAMIAN VS WALTERS RESIDENCE HOMES INC ET AL

TENTATIVE RULING MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES (CCP § 2030.300, et seq.) Calendar: 9 Date: 11/4/16 Case No: EC 064312 Case Name: Serj Aramian v. Walters Residence Homes Inc., et al. Trial Date: May 1, 2017 Moving Party: Plaintiff Serj Aramian, though his GAL Responding Party: Defendant Walters Residen...

  • Hearing

    Nov 04, 2016

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

JOSEPH S. ET AL VS BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM INC

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT DEPARTMENT 53 JOSEPH S., et al.; Plaintiffs, vs. BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM, INC., et al.; Defendants. Case No.: BC523355 Hearing Date: October 31, 2016 Time: 8:30 a.m. [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: DEFENDANT BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM, INC.S MOTIO...

  • Hearing

    Oct 31, 2016

CARLOS MARTIN DOMINGUEZ ET AL VS. PETER D. BRATIS ET AL

Notice Of Motion To Compel Defendant Albera Lps Further Responses To Special Interrogatories Set One, Form Interrogatories Set One, Request For Admissions Set One, Request For Production Set One, And For Monetary Sanctions.

  • Hearing

    Oct 17, 2016

GABRIEL GREEN VS SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE ET AL.

Section 5278 is part of the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act, which is enacted at sections 5000 to 5550. The Act governs the involuntary treatment of the mentally ill in California. Conservatorship of Susan T. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 1005, 1008. Section 5150 states that an individual may be brought to an appropriate facility for an evaluation if there is "probable cause to believe that the person is, as a result of mental disorder, a danger to others, or to himself or herself, or gravely disabled."

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2016

JOSEPH S. ET AL VS BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM INC

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT DEPARTMENT 53 JOSEPH S., et al.; Plaintiffs, vs. BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM, INC., et al.; Defendants. Case No.: BC523355 Hearing Date: October 6, 2016 Time: 8:30 a.m. [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: A. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND ...

  • Hearing

    Oct 06, 2016

WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC. VS AVENGED SEVENFOLD, ET AL

Special Interrogatories Nos. 20, 21 These request the identification of persons with knowledge of facts relating to sales or revenue projections for LPS or any studio album by defendant after LP4, and for the second live album or any live album after the first live album. The responses are a series of boilerplate objections, and the response, “None.” Defendants again argue that this is a complete and accurate response.

  • Hearing

    Sep 30, 2016

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., VS. ALLIANTGROUP, L.P., ET AL

Amended Notice Of Motion And Motion Of Inoapps, Usa To Quash Service Of Summons And Dismiss Alliantgroup, Lps Cross-Complaint For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction Set for hearing on Tuesday, September 13, 2016, Line 16, CROSS-DEFENDANT INOAPPS-INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS, INC.'S Amended Motion To Quash Service Of Summons And Dismiss Alliantgroup, Lps Cross-Complaint For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction. Cross-defendant Innovative Applications, Inc.'

  • Hearing

    Sep 13, 2016

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., VS. ALLIANTGROUP, L.P., ET AL

Amended Notice Of Motion And Motion Of Inoapps, Usa To Quash Service Of Summons And Dismiss Alliantgroup, Lps Cross-Complaint For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction Set for hearing on Tuesday, September 6, 2016, Line 13, CROSS-DEFENDANT INOAPPS-INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS, INC.'S Amended Motion To Quash Service Of Summons And Dismiss Alliantgroup, LP's Cross-Complaint For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction is continued to September 13, 2016 at 9:30 a.m., in Dept. 302 by agreement of the parties. =(302/HK)

  • Hearing

    Sep 06, 2016

IN THE MATTER OF BRENNA NICHOL CLARK

The notice of appeal, filed February 1, 2016, arguably conflates a probate conservatorship with an institutional LPS conservatorship, which categorical designations appellant's counsel may wish to amend. Status on placement, please. gmr

  • Hearing

    Jul 12, 2016

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF BRENNA NICHOL CLARK

The notice of appeal, filed February 1, 2016, arguably conflates a probate conservatorship with an institutional LPS conservatorship, which categorical designations appellant's counsel may wish to amend. Status on placement, please. gmr

  • Hearing

    Jul 12, 2016

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF BRENNA NICHOL CLARK

The notice of appeal, filed February 1, 2016, arguably conflates a probate conservatorship with an institutional LPS conservatorship, which categorical designations appellant's counsel may wish to amend. Status on placement, please. gmr

  • Hearing

    Jul 12, 2016

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

CAROLYN WILLIAMS VS. BRISTOL-MEYERS SQUIBB COMPANY

Notice Of Mckesson Corporation, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, And Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals Lps Motion To Dismiss Based On Forum Non-Conveniens Set for hearing on Tuesday, June 28, 2016, Line 14, DEFENDANTS BRISTOL-MEYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, MCKESSON CORPORATION AND ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP'S Motion To Dismiss Based On Forum Non-Conveniens is off calendar for Department 302.

  • Hearing

    Jun 28, 2016

IN THE MATTER OF INA CLAIRE QUINTANILLA

Without prejudice to being trumped by a contemporaneous LPS proceeding, and subject to the consent of appointed counsel, the petition is granted. The court appoints Rudy Quintanilla and Jason Quintanilla, probate co-conservators of person of Ina Claire Quintanilla, their wife and mother, respectively. Set hearings on 60-day level of care, six-month review and one-year status reports. gmr

  • Hearing

    Jun 14, 2016

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF INA CLAIRE QUINTANILLA

Without prejudice to being trumped by a contemporaneous LPS proceeding, and subject to the consent of appointed counsel, the petition is granted. The court appoints Rudy Quintanilla and Jason Quintanilla, probate co-conservators of person of Ina Claire Quintanilla, their wife and mother, respectively. Set hearings on 60-day level of care, six-month review and one-year status reports. gmr

  • Hearing

    May 24, 2016

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

GIAMPAULO BOSCHETTI ET AL VS. PACIFIC BAY INVESTMENTS, INC., A CALIFORNIA ET AL

Because there is no pending claim for dissolution of any of the LLCs and LPs, the court lacks jurisdiction to order dissolution of the LLCs and LPs and thus there cannot be any buyout proceedings (Panakosta Partners, L.P. v. Hammer Lane Mgmt. LLC (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 612, 634; Kennedy v. Kennedy (2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 1474, 1491.) There is no basis to order a valuation of the alleged general partnership between the parties.

  • Hearing

    May 02, 2016

GIAMPAULO BOSCHETTI ET AL VS. PACIFIC BAY INVESTMENTS, INC., A CALIFORNIA ET AL

Motion For An Order To Stay The Winding Up And Dissolution And To Appoint Three Disinterested Appraisers Pursuant To Corporations Code SET FOR HEARING ON MONDAY, MAY 2, 2016, LINE 1 PLAINTIFFS GIAMPAULO BOSCHETTI and PABO LLC's Motion For An Order To Stay The Winding Up And Dissolution And To Appoint Three Disinterested Appraisers Pursuant To Corporations Code The stay that was put in place by the March 8, 2016 order is now vacated because the court lacks jurisdiction to order dissolution of the LLCs and LPs

  • Hearing

    May 02, 2016

RIVER CANYON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC, A COLOR ET AL VS. KENNETH MILLER ET AL

And Development Finance Lps Violation Of Court Orders Set for hearing on Friday, January 22, 2016, Line 18, PLAINTIFFS RIVER CANYON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC, A COLOR AND LAZARUS INVESTMENTS, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY'S Motion For Terminating Sanctions Or, In The Alternative, Issue And Evidentiary Sanctions, Based On Defendant Guardian Capital Advisors Inc.

  • Hearing

    Jan 22, 2016

RIVER CANYON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC, A COLOR ET AL VS. KENNETH MILLER ET AL

And Development Finance Lps Violation Of Court Orders Matter on calendar for Wednesday, January 13, 2016, Line 3, PLAINTIFFS RIVER CANYON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC, AND LAZARUS INVESTMENTS, LLC'S Motion For Terminating Sanctions Or, In The Alternative, Issue And Evidentiary Sanctions, Based On Defendant Guardian Capital Advisors Inc. And Development Finance LP's Violation Of Court Orders.

  • Hearing

    Jan 13, 2016

  • Judge

    Tom Cohen

  • County

    San Francisco County, CA

IN THE MATTER OF CATHERINE BAILEY

Lenehan advised that the probate conservatee was also the subject of an LPS case. Mr. Lenehan asked to continue to December 1, 2015 to determine if the conservator and/or conservatee wished to perpetuate the probate conservatorship in light of the LPS proceeding. In the event the probate conservatorship is to continue, the next biennial status report shall be filed on or before March 6, 2017, and set for hearing on filing/sufficiency on April 11, 2017, 9:00 AM, J6. The clerk shall give notice. gmr

  • Hearing

    Dec 01, 2015

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL EMARD

The periodic filing of the accounting in this case shall negate the need to further account in the LPS matter. gmr

  • Hearing

    Nov 17, 2015

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    other

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL EMARD

The periodic filing of the accounting in this case shall negate the need to further account in the LPS matter. gmr

  • Hearing

    Nov 17, 2015

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    other

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL EMARD

The periodic filing of the accounting in this case shall negate the need to further account in the LPS matter. gmr

  • Hearing

    Nov 17, 2015

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    other

BEVERLY J. JOINER VS. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED ET AL

DEFENDANT LPS DEFAULT TITLE & CLOSING DEMURRER TO 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT sustained with leave to amend for Plaintiffs to allege/identify the terms of the contract(s) breached and to allege each element of statutory violations causes of action as to this defendant. = (501/RBU)

  • Hearing

    Nov 03, 2015

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.