What is a LPS mental health conservatorship?

Useful Rulings on LPS Mental Health Conservatorship

Recent Rulings on LPS Mental Health Conservatorship

126-150 of 249 results

IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTI RENGER

Court will inquire as to option for LPS conservatorship.

  • Hearing

    Sep 26, 2017

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

YAQUELINE SANTIAGO VS. GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER, ET

Santiago v Glendale Adventist Medical Center MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS Calendar: 8 Case No: EC065060 Date: 9/8/17 MP: Defendant, Estalita Calica RP: Plaintiff, Yaqueline Santiago RELIEF REQUESTED: Order imposing terminating sanctions DISCUSSION: This case arises from the Plaintiff’s claim of illegal detention under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act because the Defendants failed to assess plaintiff’s condition and based the detainment on a false statement of probable cause.

  • Hearing

    Sep 08, 2017

JOSEPH S. ET AL VS BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM INC

joseph s. , et al.; vs. beautiful minds center for autism, inc. , et al.; AND RELATED CROSS-COMPLAINT BROUGHT BY COASTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOUNDATION BC523355, AUGUST 14, 2017 [Tentative] Order RE: CROSS-DEFENDANT BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM, INC.’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO COASTAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOUNDATION’...

  • Hearing

    Aug 14, 2017

IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTI RENGER

Court will discuss option of LPS conservatorship.

  • Hearing

    Aug 01, 2017

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

YAQUELINE SANTIAGO VS. GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER, ET

DISCUSSION: This case arises from the Plaintiff’s claim that he was illegally detained under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act because the Defendants failed to assess the plaintiff’s condition and based the detainment on a false statement of probable cause. Trial is set for September 25, 2017. This hearing concerns the Defendant’s four motions to seek orders regarding its written discovery.

  • Hearing

    Jul 07, 2017

DARIAN ZAFAR ET AL VS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL

Plaintiffs filed suit in Los Angeles County on February 21, 2017, alleging four causes of action: (1) violation of Lanterman Petris Short Act; (2) violation of civil rights under United States Code, Title 42, section 1983, et seq.; (3) false imprisonment; and (4) negligence. Defendant Canyon Ridge Hospital now moves to transfer venue from Los Angeles County to San Bernardino County. Plaintiffs do not oppose the motion.

  • Hearing

    Jun 09, 2017

DAVID SHARABI ET AL VS ELIRAN MOR ET AL

The order granting Armen Shaghzo and Shaghzo & Shaghza Law Firm, LPs’ motions to be relieved as counsel for defendants Elian Mor and Guy Hart shall be effective upon the filing of a proof of service indicating service of the Order Granting Attorney’s Motion To Be Relieved s Counsel upon Elian Mor and Guy Hart. The order has been signed and will be processed. It will be available for pick up from the attorney service out-box on 5/18/2017 after 1:30 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED: Frederick C. Shaller, Judge

  • Hearing

    May 17, 2017

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

SERJ ARAMIAN VS WALTERS RESIDENCE HOMES INC ET AL

Defendant Lanterman Regional Center here seeks to establish that plaintiff will be unable to establish his only cause of action asserted against this defendant, the second cause of action for negligence, because he cannot establish that defendant failed to comply with the applicable standard of care.

  • Hearing

    Apr 28, 2017

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

SERJ ARAMIAN VS WALTERS RESIDENCE HOMES INC ET AL

Defendant Lanterman Regional Center here seeks to establish that plaintiff will be unable to establish his only cause of action asserted against this defendant, the second cause of action for negligence, because he cannot establish that defendant failed to comply with the applicable standard of care.

  • Hearing

    Apr 28, 2017

IN RE MARVIN TENANT

Grant Public Administrator's petition to create a special needs trust for LPS conservatee Marvin Tennant, to receive and administer the applicable distributive proceeds of the beneficiary's father's estate for beneficiary's special needs. Appoint the Ventura County Public Guardian, trustee of the Marvin Tennant Special Needs Trust. Bond is on file.

  • Hearing

    Apr 20, 2017

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN RE MARVIN TENANT

Grant Public Administrator's petition to create a special needs trust for LPS conservatee Marvin Tennant, to receive and administer the applicable distributive proceeds of the beneficiary's father's estate for beneficiary's special needs. Appoint the Ventura County Public Guardian, trustee of the Marvin Tennant Special Needs Trust. Bond is on file.

  • Hearing

    Apr 20, 2017

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

IN RE MARVIN TENANT

Grant Public Administrator's petition to create a special needs trust for LPS conservatee Marvin Tennant, to receive and administer the applicable distributive proceeds of the beneficiary's father's estate for beneficiary's special needs. Appoint the Ventura County Public Guardian, trustee of the Marvin Tennant Special Needs Trust. Bond is on file.

  • Hearing

    Apr 20, 2017

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

JOSEPH S. ET AL VS BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM INC

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT DEPARTMENT 53 JOSEPH S., et al.; Plaintiffs, vs. BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM, INC., et al.; Defendants. Case No.: BC523355 Hearing Date: April 20, 2017 Time: 8:30 a.m. [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: PETITIONS TO APPROVE COMPROMISE OF PENDING ACTIO...

  • Hearing

    Apr 20, 2017

PAGE VS. MISSION HOSPITAL LAGUNA BEACH

For the proposed new claim for violation of Lanterman-Petris Short, it seems to allege in part that Plaintiff never consented to the confinement of her person, and there was a lack of justification for it. Although not identical, it appears that similar issues are being litigated in the existing claims. (See Second Amended Compl. ¶ 55, 68-77 vs. proposed TAC p. 14-17). Defendants argue that the other proposed theory of constitutional-rights violations, would not succeed. See Robbins v.

  • Hearing

    Mar 24, 2017

JOSEPH S. ET AL VS BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM INC

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT DEPARTMENT 53 JOSEPH S., et al.; Plaintiffs, vs. BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No.: BC523355 Hearing Date: March 7, 2017 Time: 8:30 a.m. [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: A. DEFENDANT MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC...

  • Hearing

    Mar 07, 2017

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL EMARD

Assuming the remaining attorney fees and conservator fees have been ordered by the judges pro tem in the LPS matter for services unrelated to this estate, what are co-trustees' standards for determining which fees are requested where ? Are co-trustees even noticed on the LPS matter in which payments for professional services are being ordered ? Can counsel please supply the underlying invoices and orders ? Upon satisfactory clarification, approve first account and report.

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2017

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    other

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL EMARD

Assuming the remaining attorney fees and conservator fees have been ordered by the judges pro tem in the LPS matter for services unrelated to this estate, what are co-trustees' standards for determining which fees are requested where ? Are co-trustees even noticed on the LPS matter in which payments for professional services are being ordered ? Can counsel please supply the underlying invoices and orders ? Upon satisfactory clarification, approve first account and report.

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2017

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    other

IN THE MATTER OF GLADYS PABLO DE RANGEL

It is unclear if there is court-ordered authorization for the restraint pursuant to some form of LPS hold. The confidential supplemental information form states that conservatee "requires a locked long-term facility", which the court to probate conservatorship cannot accomplish absent a §2256.5 diagnosis of dementia. The petition does not include a dementia attachment, and as yet there is no GC-335 capacity declaration on file.

  • Hearing

    Jan 10, 2017

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF GLADYS PABLO DE RANGEL

It is unclear if there is court-ordered authorization for the restraint pursuant to some form of LPS hold. The confidential supplemental information form states that conservatee "requires a locked long-term facility", which the court to probate conservatorship cannot accomplish absent a §2256.5 diagnosis of dementia. The petition does not include a dementia attachment, and as yet there is no GC-335 capacity declaration on file.

  • Hearing

    Jan 10, 2017

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

LAKESIDE PARTNERS HUTTON, LLC VS TOBISHIMA CORP

- SP4 Hutton LLC - does the Delaware Secretary of State have listings for the underlying LPs with CB Richard Ellis affiliations? - All of the Statements of Information seem to be signed by a “Paul J. Hagan”. Has an effort been made to locate this individual for possible addresses for the LLCs? The hearing shall be continued to 2-3-17for the Plaintiff to undertake these additional efforts and report to the Court.

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2017

PAGE VS. MISSION HOSPITAL LAGUNA BEACH

See W&I Code § 5328 (stating that all information and records obtained in the course of providing services under the Lanterman Petris Act shall be kept confidential); see Devereaux v. Latham & Watkins (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 1571, 1585–86 (it was not shown that the records were of providers of services), disapproved of on another grounds by Moran v. Murtaugh Miller Meyer & Nelson, LLP (2007) 40 Cal.4th 780). Plaintiff has not aided the Court in this area.

  • Hearing

    Jan 06, 2017

TA ROE VS SIGNS OF LIFE JOB ASSISTANCE TRAINING AND PLACEMEN

Next, Plaintiff alleges Defendants interfered with Plaintiff’s rights under the Lanterman Bill of Rights by attempting to cover up Harris’ assault. First, Defendants’ argument that “Plaintiff does not point to any interference of any right created, or secured, by… a federal or state statute. . .” (Defendants’ Demurrer at 12) is easily rebutted by Plaintiff’s to the specific rights guaranteed to Plaintiff under California’s Lanterman Bill of Rights.

  • Hearing

    Jan 05, 2017

  • Judge

    Brian S. Currey or John A. Slawson

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., VS. ALLIANTGROUP, L.P., ET AL

Amended Notice Of Motion And Motion Of Inoapps, Usa To Quash Service Of Summons And Dismiss Alliantgroup, Lps Cross-Complaint For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction Set for hearing on Tuesday, January 3, 2017, Line 5, Cross-defendant Innovative Applications, Inc.'s motion to quash service of summons and dismiss cross-complainant alliantgroup, L.P.'s cross-complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted. alliantgroup has not shown that there is either general or specific jurisdiction over Innoapps.

  • Hearing

    Jan 03, 2017

JOSEPH S. ET AL VS BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM INC

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT DEPARTMENT 53 JOSEPH S., et al.; Plaintiffs, vs. BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM, INC., et al.; Defendants. Case No.: BC523355 Hearing Date: December 22, 2016 Time: 8:30 a.m. [TENTATIVE] ORDER RE: PETITIONS TO APPROVE COMPROMISE OF DISPUTED...

  • Hearing

    Dec 22, 2016

MICHAEL MARTIN ET AL VS. BRISTOL-MEYERS SQUIBB COMPANY ET AL

Notice Of Mckesson Corporation, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company And Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals Lps Motion To Sever And Dismiss Based On Forum Non Conveniens Matter on calendar for Monday, December 12, 2016, Line 14, DEFENDANT BRISTOL-MEYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, MCKESSON CORPORATION LP's Motion To Sever And Dismiss Based On Forum Non Conveniens.

  • Hearing

    Dec 12, 2016

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.