What is a LPS mental health conservatorship?

Useful Rulings on LPS Mental Health Conservatorship

Recent Rulings on LPS Mental Health Conservatorship

101-125 of 249 results

JOSEPH S. ET AL VS BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM INC

joseph s., et al. vs. beautiful minds center for autism, inc. ; BC523355, JUNE 8, 2018 [Tentative] Order RE: PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST MARCO SANDOVAL Plaintiffs Joseph S., Jack S., and Daniel S., by and through their Guardian ad Litem Federico Sayre (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) request that the Court enter default...

  • Hearing

    Jun 08, 2018

IN THE MATTER OF CAROL SEELEY

The proposed Conservatee has been the subject of a LPS Conservatorship since 1994 and hospitalized or living in an assisted living facility, skilled nursing facility or board/care since 1/19/2012. For the last 4 years she has only left her residence for physician appointments. Notwithstanding these and other deficits, the proposed Conservatee opposes the conservatorship. Subject to input from the Public Defender, the Court intends to grant the Petition. Discuss.

  • Hearing

    Jun 01, 2018

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF CAROL SEELEY

The proposed Conservatee has been the subject of a LPS Conservatorship since 1994 and hospitalized or living in an assisted living facility, skilled nursing facility or board/care since 1/19/2012. For the last 4 years she has only left her residence for physician appointments. Notwithstanding these and other deficits, the proposed Conservatee opposes the conservatorship. Subject to input from the Public Defender, the Court intends to grant the Petition. Discuss.

  • Hearing

    Jun 01, 2018

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF CAROL SEELEY

The proposed Conservatee has been the subject of a LPS Conservatorship since 1994 and hospitalized or living in an assisted living facility, skilled nursing facility or board/care since 1/19/2012. For the last 4 years she has only left her residence for physician appointments. Notwithstanding these and other deficits, the proposed Conservatee opposes the conservatorship. Subject to input from the Public Defender, the Court intends to grant the Petition. Discuss.

  • Hearing

    Jun 01, 2018

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

CONSERVATORSHIP OF SHANE NEWHOUSE

PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED. The proposed conservatee’s appearance is waived.

  • Hearing

    Jun 01, 2018

JESUSITA CONSUELO CALDERON VS ADVANCE TIRE AND MUFFLER ET AL

Lanterman-Petris-Short Act The Hospital also argues it would be improper for it to produce the records absent Plaintiff’s consent. The parties discuss the ruling in Mavroudis v. Superior Court (1980) 102 Cal.App.3d 594, 602 in this regard. In Mavroudis, the court held that records relating to a plaintiff’s mental health, which are the same type of records at issue here, can only be produced if production is “necessary to the administration of justice.” WIC §5328(f).

  • Hearing

    May 31, 2018

IN THE MATTER OF RACHEL A KEALEY

The court investigator, acknowledging that the proposed conservatee "may lack appropriate care and treatment in the future without conservatorship," suggests consideration of LPS conservatorship. Though not typically done, the conservatorship statutes are flexible enough to essentially "build" general probate conservatorship powers that are consistent with a proposed conservatee's specific needs, and reject those general powers that are deemed inapplicable (see, e.g.

  • Hearing

    May 25, 2018

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF RACHEL A KEALEY

The court investigator, acknowledging that the proposed conservatee "may lack appropriate care and treatment in the future without conservatorship," suggests consideration of LPS conservatorship. Though not typically done, the conservatorship statutes are flexible enough to essentially "build" general probate conservatorship powers that are consistent with a proposed conservatee's specific needs, and reject those general powers that are deemed inapplicable (see, e.g.

  • Hearing

    May 25, 2018

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

CONSERVATORSHIP OF DAVID CRAINE

PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF APPOINTMENT OF LPS CONSERVATOR APPEARANCE REQUIRED

  • Hearing

    May 22, 2018

CALIFORNIA DISABILITY SERVICES ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION VS. NANCY BARGMANN, AS DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES

The Department has promulgated regulations as required by the Lanterman Act. Pursuant to California Code of Regulations, title 17, section 57910, the Department may adjust a permanent rate (such as for an unanticipated program change) pursuant to section 57920, subdivision (b) or (c).

  • Hearing

    May 18, 2018

CALIFORNIA DISABILITY SERVICES ASSOCIATION, A CALIFORNIA NONPROFIT CORPORATION VS. NANCY BARGMANN, AS DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES

The Department has promulgated regulations as required by the Lanterman Act. Pursuant to Califomia Code of Regulations, title 17, section 57910, the Department may adjust a permanent rate (such as for an unanticipated program change) pursuant to section 57920, subdivision (b) or (c).

  • Hearing

    May 18, 2018

CONSERVATORSHIP OF JOHNS

The Court has received and reviewed the Doctor’s Declaration recommending reappointment of the LPS Conservator. Petitioner is to prepare the Order and Letters of Conservatorship.

  • Hearing

    May 14, 2018

BRENNER VS COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEMS ET AL

For general information regarding Judge DeNoce and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.denoce.com _____________________________________________ The court's tentative ruling is as follows: The court intends to grant judicial notice of the authenticated Secretary of State certificates which state that there are no general corporations, partnerships, LLCs, LLP or LPs with the name 'Kaiser Permanente'.

  • Hearing

    May 02, 2018

BRENNER VS COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEMS ET AL

For general information regarding Judge DeNoce and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.denoce.com _____________________________________________ The court's tentative ruling is as follows: The court intends to grant judicial notice of the authenticated Secretary of State certificates which state that there are no general corporations, partnerships, LLCs, LLP or LPs with the name 'Kaiser Permanente'.

  • Hearing

    May 02, 2018

BRENNER VS COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEMS ET AL

For general information regarding Judge DeNoce and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.denoce.com _____________________________________________ The court's tentative ruling is as follows: The court intends to grant judicial notice of the authenticated Secretary of State certificates which state that there are no general corporations, partnerships, LLCs, LLP or LPs with the name 'Kaiser Permanente'.

  • Hearing

    May 02, 2018

JOSEPH S. ET AL VS BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM INC

joseph s., et al. vs. beautiful minds center for autism, inc. ; BC523355, MAY 1, 2018 [Tentative] Order RE: PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST MARCO SANDOVAL Plaintiffs Joseph S., Jack S., and Daniel S., by and through their Guardian ad Litem Federico Sayre (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) request that the Court enter defa...

  • Hearing

    May 01, 2018

CONSERVATORSHIP OF LAWRENCE JEFFREY MOORE

This would likely meet the standard contemplated by the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (Welf. & Ins. Code, §§ 500-5550 [as a result of a mental health disorder or impairment by chronic alcoholism, is unable to provide for his or her basic personal needs for food, clothing, or shelter]), but it appears the requested powers to place Mr. Moore in a secure facility are outside the jurisdiction of the probate court. (Prob. Code, § 2356(a).). The fact that Mr.

  • Hearing

    Apr 11, 2018

CONSERVATORSHIP OF LAWRENCE JEFFREY MOORE

Moore has been held per the LPS act on section 5150 grounds, at least twice without further elevation to holds/evaluations per section 5200 et seq., militates against a probate conservatorship. PLEASE NOTE: The Public Guardian filed a declaration recommending denial of the temporary and that the Court order an LPS investigation to proceed. Objections should be submitted in writing. The proposed temporary conservatee is expected to attend the hearing. (Prob. Code § 2250.4.)

  • Hearing

    Apr 11, 2018

IN THE MATTER OF KASSEEM ZAIMAH

Third, it appears from the face of the pleadings filed herein that there is an existent proceeding, likely an LPS conservatorship which has priority that this Court must defer to. Lastly, the mother of the proposed conservatee states in her confidential supplemental information filed with the instant petition several bases for the Court to have sufficient concern to make further inquiry as to the appropriateness of her appointment as conservator of the person.

  • Hearing

    Apr 06, 2018

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

  • County

    Ventura County, CA

JOSEPH S. ET AL VS BEAUTIFUL MINDS CENTER FOR AUTISM INC

joseph s., et al. vs. beautiful minds center for autism, inc. ; BC523355, APRIL 5, 2018 [Tentative] Order RE: PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST MARCO SANDOVAL Plaintiffs Joseph S., Jack S., and Daniel S., by and through their Guardian ad Litem Federico Sayre (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) request that the Court enter de...

  • Hearing

    Apr 05, 2018

CONSERVATORSHIP OF LAWRENCE JEFFREY MOORE

Moore has been held per the LPS act on section 5150 grounds, at least twice without further elevation to holds/evaluations per section 5200 et seq., militates against a probate conservatorship. The proposed temporary conservatee is expected to attend the hearing. (Prob. Code § 2250.4.)

  • Hearing

    Feb 28, 2018

SAN DIEGO REGIONAL CENTER VS. OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS STATE OF CALIFORNIA

The parties do not dispute that SDRC is governed by the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act ("Lanterman Act"). "'[R]egional centers,' operated by private nonprofit community agencies under contract with DDS, are charged with providing developmentally disabled persons with 'access to the facilities and services best suited to them throughout their lifetime' (§ 4620)." (Association for Retarded Citizens v. Department of Developmental Services (1985) 38 Cal.3d 384, 389.)

  • Hearing

    Feb 08, 2018

  • Type

    Administrative

  • Sub Type

    Writ

REYNALDO CARPIO ET AL VS A-1 GROUP LLC ET AL

On November 3, 2017, a Notice of Rejection of Application and Order for Service on the Secretary of State-Corps; LLCs; LPs was filed by the clerk. However, Plaintiffs argue that they were not served with this notice and only found out after calling a clerk in Room 118 on November 29, 2017. Plaintiffs further argue that they have made efforts to locate A-1 and even hired a private investigator, but that these efforts have been unsuccessful.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2018

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Auto

CONFIDENTIAL

The petition for Reappointment of LPS Conservator of the Person is granted. The clerk is reminded to send notice prior to the termination of the conservatorship on October 22, 2018.

  • Hearing

    Oct 23, 2017

PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO., LP. VS. AMERICAN LOGISTICS INTERN.

Code §§ 15901.16(c)(1) (relating to LPs) and 17061(c)(1) (relating to LLCs) allow service on LPs and LLCs through the California Secretary of State when a plaintiff demonstrates by affidavit that (1) the defendant’s agent for service of process has resigned and has not been replaced, and (2) the defendant cannot otherwise be served with reasonable diligence.

  • Hearing

    Oct 17, 2017

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Collections

  • Judge

    Steven D. Blades or Brian S. Currey

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.