What is loss of consortium?

Useful Resources for Loss of Consortium

Rulings on Loss of Consortium

126-150 of 1699 results

SCHOTZ VS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

Thus, the motion to amend is denied with respect to the dependent abuse, IIED and loss of consortium claims. As noted, the Court did not preclude plaintiffs from seeking leave to allege additional facts to support the medical malpractice claims. Defendants argue the proposed TAC is a sham pleading that attempts to avoid the statute of limitations.

  • Hearing

    Jan 24, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

WENDY A NELSON ET AL VS REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFOR

Plaintiff Steven Nelson’s Loss of Consortium Claim Plaintiff Steven Nelson asserts a loss of consortium claim based on the injuries allegedly sustained by Ms. Nelson. Complaint, ¶ 41. However, Mr. Nelson’s claim depends on whether Ms. Nelson’s has a viable claim against Covidien.

  • Hearing

    Jul 07, 2017

BRENDA DIAZ ET AL VS PAMC LTD ET AL

Plaintiffs bring causes of action for Negligence, Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, and Loss of Consortium against Defendants. Defendants have presented expert medical evidence demonstrating that Defendants complied with the standard of care in their treatment of Plaintiff Brenda Diaz and Minor Plaintiff throughout the course of Plaintiff Brenda Diaz’s prenatal care. (Declaration of Michael Ross, M.D. ¶¶ 8-18.)

  • Hearing

    Dec 07, 2016

ERIC HUBBARD, ET AL. VS AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.

SUMMARY OF COMPLAINT: Action for products liability, negligence, loss of consortium and punitive damages. MOTION: Plaintiff moves to reclassify this action on the grounds that this case was filed as an unlimited civil case and should have been classified as such. OPPOSITION: Defendant filed notice of non-opposition on November 7, 2019. REPLY: None filed as of December 2, 2019.

  • Hearing

    Dec 05, 2019

  • Judge

    James E. Blancarte or Serena R. Murillo

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

STACY VALERO ET AL VS CAMPCLAR CORPORATION ET AL

of consortium.

  • Hearing

    Apr 06, 2017

SHARON DUNN ET AL VS. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. ET AL

1708, 1709 and 1710) causes of action, as well as loss of consortium and survival. This court previously overruled defendant?s special demurrer to the loss of consortium cause of action. Defendant has 10 days to answer. If a hearing is requested, it will be at 9:45am. A court reporter will not be provided by the court. If a court reporter is needed, the parties must meet and confer to agree on only one court reporter for any reported matter in this case.

  • Hearing

    Mar 08, 2012

CHRISTIAN VILLANUEVA VS. BRENT PEARSON ET AL

As for the proposed new Plaintiff and her cause of action for loss of consortium, Defendant represented that Plaintiff has withdrawn this request. The Reply did not confirm this withdrawal nor did it discuss this new party and claim. If the loss of consortium claim is still requested, then a hearing is required. If not, then no hearing required.

  • Hearing

    Mar 25, 2014

KENNETH COWARD ET AL VS JEFFREY WANG MD ET AL

Coward’s claim for loss of consortium depends on the existence of her spouse’s cause of action for tortious injury. As Mr. Howard’s claim for negligence fails, so does the claim for loss of consortium. Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 746. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Aug 01, 2018

RITA M CABEZA ET AL VS HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ET AL

First, Defendants move to strike loss of consortium damages sought under the NIED cause of action, arguing that loss of consortium was already alleged as a separate cause of action. (See Vanhooser v. Superior Court (2012) 206 Cal.App.4th 921, 927 [elements of loss of consortium].) The Court grants the motion to strike the phrase “loss of consortium” from page 14, line 7.

  • Hearing

    Nov 15, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

HARLAN POWERS ET AL VS BEVERLY HILLS MARRIOTT HOTEL ET AL

Plaintiff’s wife, Sonie Powers, asserts a claim for loss of consortium. Defendants move for summary judgment, or, in the alternative, summary adjudication of the causes of action in Plaintiff’s complaint. Defendants argue that they did not own, operate, supervise, or control any aspect of the day-to-day operations at the Beverly Hills Marriott, where the accident occurred.

  • Hearing

    Nov 18, 2019

FERNANDO IBARRA VS. PARADISE CHEVROLET

Discussion RFP 39 - - All documents that evidence claims arising within the last five years, under an insurance policy you issued where the underlying claimant alleged, at least in part, that workers compensation benefits were not applicable to a loss of consortium claim; and RFP 40 - - All documents that evidence any claims arising within the last five years, under an insurance policy you issued where the underlying first party claimed at least in part loss of consortium.

  • Hearing

    Mar 12, 2012

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

LATHAM VS. NATURAL GAS SYSTEMS

Plaintiff's SAC alleges claims for (1) negligence, (2) strict products liability, and (3) loss of consortium. Defendant Burckhardt Compression (US) Inc. was substituted into the action as DOE 34 on on 12/16/11. 2. The SAC states sufficient facts to state a cause of action against Defendant Burkhardt for products liability based on negligence in its allegations in ¶¶ 31-38, which expressly encompass DOE 34.

  • Hearing

    Feb 16, 2012

ANGEL CABRAL VS HASTINGS RANCH INVESTMENT CO

Cabral’s negligent infliction of emotional distress and loss of consortium causes of action fail as well. (Blain v. Doctor's Co. (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1048, 1067.) The demurrers to plaintiffs’ fifth cause of action for negligence and plaintiff Elsy D. Cabral’s eighth cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress and ninth cause of action for loss of consortium are SUSTAINED. II.

  • Hearing

    Dec 04, 2020

FRANCISCO SALAS, ET AL. VS JOE FILETO, ET AL.

On 1/6/21, the plaintiff dismissed his loss of consortium claim. As such, the demurrer on this claim is moot in light of said dismissal. Moving Defendant to answer the third amended complaint within 10 days. Moving Defendant to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jan 07, 2021

OZELIA HARRIS VS PENSKE MERCEDES-BENZ OF WEST COVINA ET AL

Plaintiff seeks leave to file a corrected First Amended Complaint (herein referred to as “SAC”) to add Stephen Harris as a Plaintiff, and add five additional causes of action: res ipsa loquitur, intentional misrepresentation, breach of oral contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and loss of consortium. Plaintiffs had initially filed a pleading as their first amended complaint on April 26, 2019, but erroneously filed the wrong document.

  • Hearing

    Jun 24, 2019

ISABEL MARTINEZ VS OSCAR PEREZ M D INC ET AL

Holsome’s claim for loss of consortium depends on the existence of her spouse’s cause of action for tortious injury. As Mr. Holsome’s claim for negligence fails, so does the claim for loss of consortium. Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 746. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2018

RICHARD LIEBSCHER VS. SIMI VALLEY HOSPITAL

Plaintiff Sylvia Liebscher's second cause of action for loss of consortium is "derivative of and dependent on her husband's negligence action ...." ( See Calatayud v. State of California (1998) 18 Cal.4th 1057, 1060, fn. 4.) Since Defendant Dr. Gupta is entitled to summary adjudication of Plaintiff Mr. Liebscher's medical malpractice claim, Dr. Gupta is also entitled to summary adjudication of Plaintiff Mrs. Liebscher's cause of action for loss of consortium. 5. Given that Defendant Dr.

  • Hearing

    Jun 23, 2010

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

SCHOTZ VS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

Accordingly, the demurrer to the 2nd cause of action is sustained. 7th Cause of Action for Loss of Consortium Defendants argue that Leslie's loss of consortium claim accrued when Gary was discharged on October 10, 2016 and is barred by the one-year statute of limitations. Meighan v. Shore (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 1025, 1034. Defendants also note that the statute is not tolled during the pendency of Gary's personal injury claim. Id.

  • Hearing

    Jul 25, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

MARILYN GONZALES ET AL VS SANSUM CLINIC ET AL

As a result, the statute of limitations demurrer to the loss of consortium claim asserted by plaintiff Bob Gonzales is also overruled. “A cause of action for loss of consortium is, by its nature, dependent on the existence of a cause of action for tortious injury to a spouse.

  • Hearing

    Jan 16, 2013

  • Judge Donna Geck
  • County

    Santa Barbara County, CA

LAWRENCE HOLSOME ET AL VS GARNI BARKHOUDARIAN MD ET AL

Holsome’s claim for loss of consortium depends on the existence of her spouse’s cause of action for tortious injury. As Mr. Holsome’s claim for negligence fails, so does the claim for loss of consortium. Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 746. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Jul 13, 2018

SCHOTZ VS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

Accordingly, the demurrer to the 2nd cause of action is sustained. 7th Cause of Action for Loss of Consortium Defendants argue that Leslie's loss of consortium claim accrued when Gary was discharged on October 10, 2016 and is barred by the one-year statute of limitations. Meighan v. Shore (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 1025, 1034. Defendants also note that the statute is not tolled during the pendency of Gary's personal injury claim. Id.

  • Hearing

    Jul 25, 2019

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

RONALD ZANNINI ET AL VS HENRY MAYO NEWHALL COMMUNITY MEDICAL

In addition, recovery for loss of consortium is not allowed where the spouse’s claim is barred. Meighan v. Shore (1995) 34 Cal. App. 4th 1025, 1034-1035. Here, defendant filed the declaration of Lawrence M. Shuer, M.D. in support of the motion for summary judgment. Dr.

  • Hearing

    Jan 08, 2018

BARBARA WUCHNER ET AL VS FIRESIDE CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL ET A

Plaintiff, Dennis Wuchner seeks damages for loss of consortium. Plaintiffs filed this action on 12/14/15. At this time, Defendant, All Source Recruiting Group, Inc. moves for judgment on the pleadings on Plaintiff, Barbara Wuchner’s complaint, contending she has passed away since the action was filed, and no party has substituted in to prosecute the action. The motion is supported by a request for judicial notice of Decedent’s death certificate, which shows she passed away on 3/26/17.

  • Hearing

    Sep 26, 2017

PABLO HERRERA ET AL VS CLEAN HARBORS ENVIORNMENTAL SERVICES

Hererra’s claim for loss of consortium as her claim depends on the viability of her spouse’s negligence claim, which does not survive summary judgment. Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal. App. 4th 740, 746. Moving party is ordered to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Nov 16, 2017

MARTIN A FELDMAN VS MTD BATH INC ET AL

In Reply, Plaintiff argues that the Court should maintain the trial date of March 2, 2017, for the consolidated action because the matter in BC622279 consists of a single loss of consortium claim. Plaintiff argues that four months of discovery is sufficient for Defendants to conduct discovery for BC622279 since the loss of consortium claim is derivative of the personal injury claims in BC593350.

  • Hearing

    Oct 24, 2016

  « first    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 68     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.